IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i11p3271-d568335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships between Final Purchasers and Offerors in the Context of Their Perception by Final Purchasers

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Izabela Baruk

    (Department of Management Systems and Innovation, Faculty of Management and Production Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Łódź, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this article was to identify the role of good mutual relationships with offerors for final purchasers, as well as define the meaning of the perception of offerors in the scope of listening to purchasers’ opinions and profiting from purchasers’ readiness to cooperate for the specificities of the prosumeric activity. A deep analysis of the world literature was used to prepare the theoretical part of this paper. The results of this analysis confirm the existing cognitive gap and research gap regarding mentioned aspects, including energy market. Empirical studies were conducted to reduce identified gaps. The survey method was used to collect primary data. The collected data were subjected to quantitative analysis, during which statistical analysis methods and tests were applied (Pearson chi-square independence test, V-Cramer factor analysis, Kruskal–Wallis test (KW), and exploratory factor analysis). The results of the statistical analysis and testing allowed the three research hypotheses formulated to be checked. Between the significance of good relationships with offerors and their perception, a statistically significant dependence was identified for all groups of offerors. The perception of offerors was a feature differentiating respondents’ opinions about the significance of good relationships with offerors for the two following groups: producers and traders. Additionally, the perception of offerors was a feature differentiating forms of prosumeric activity of respondents only for three interpurchase behaviors. The results obtained have a visible cognitive and applicability value. They contribute to the theory of marketing, as well as possibly facilitating the formation of good mutual relationships between offerors (including offerors of energy) and final purchasers as key partners cooperating with offerors in the marketing process. The approach presented in this paper has not been studied and analyzed so far, either in theoretical or in practical terms. This fact confirms its originality and value.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Izabela Baruk, 2021. "Relationships between Final Purchasers and Offerors in the Context of Their Perception by Final Purchasers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3271-:d:568335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/11/3271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thierry Rayna & Ludmila Striukova, 2021. "Involving Consumers: The Role of Digital Technologies in Promoting ‘Prosumption’ and User Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(1), pages 218-237, March.
    2. Junhong Chu & Puneet Manchanda, 2016. "Quantifying Cross and Direct Network Effects in Online Consumer-to-Consumer Platforms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 870-893, November.
    3. Yan Chen & F. Maxwell Harper & Joseph Konstan & Sherry Xin Li, 2010. "Social Comparisons and Contributions to Online Communities: A Field Experiment on MovieLens," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(4), pages 1358-1398, September.
    4. Benedict G. C. Dellaert, 2019. "The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 238-254, March.
    5. Zhi Da & Wei Yang & Hayong Yun, 2016. "Household Production and Asset Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 387-409, February.
    6. Eric Martineau & Zeynep Arsel, 2017. "Managing Communities of Co-creation around Consumer Engagement Styles," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(2), pages 179-195.
    7. Moser, Kilian J. & Tumasjan, Andranik & Welpe, Isabell M., 2017. "Small but attractive: Dimensions of new venture employer attractiveness and the moderating role of applicants' entrepreneurial behaviors," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 588-610.
    8. Atakan, S. Sinem & Bagozzi, Richard P. & Yoon, Carolyn, 2014. "Consumer participation in the design and realization stages of production: How self-production shapes consumer evaluations and relationships to products," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 395-408.
    9. Sundararajan, Arun, 2016. "The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262034573, December.
    10. Rodrigo, Padmali & Khan, Hina & Ekinci, Yuksel, 2019. "The determinants of foreign product preference amongst elite consumers in an emerging market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 139-148.
    11. Marco Schletz & Ana Cardoso & Gabriela Prata Dias & Søren Salomo, 2020. "How Can Blockchain Technology Accelerate Energy Efficiency Interventions? A Use Case Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    12. Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag, 2015. "Organic Food Perception: Fad, or Healthy and Environmentally Friendly? A Case on Romanian Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Brodie, Roderick J. & Ilic, Ana & Juric, Biljana & Hollebeek, Linda, 2013. "Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 105-114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Małgorzata Łatuszyńska & Kesra Nermend, 2022. "Energy Decision Making: Problems, Methods, and Tools—An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-5, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benedict G. C. Dellaert, 2019. "The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 238-254, March.
    2. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk, 2021. "Prosumers’ Needs Satisfied Due to Cooperation with Offerors in the Context of Attitudes toward Such Cooperation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk, 2021. "The Preferences of Active Final Purchasers Regarding the Environment of Cooperation with Offerors and Benefits Achieved Thanks to Such Cooperation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Nardi, Vinicius Antonio Machado & Jardim, William Carvalho & Ladeira, Wagner Júnior & Santini, Fernando, 2020. "A meta-analysis of the relationship between customer participation and brand outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 450-460.
    5. von Richthofen, Georg & von Wangenheim, Florian, 2021. "Managing service providers in the sharing economy: Insights from Airbnb’s host management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 765-777.
    6. Tueanrat, Yanika & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2021. "A conceptual framework of the antecedents of customer journey satisfaction in omnichannel retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    7. Magdalena Maciaszczyk & Maria Kocot, 2021. "Behavior of Online Prosumers in Organic Product Market as Determinant of Sustainable Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Miao Li & Ying Hua & Junxuan Zhu, 2021. "From Interactivity to Brand Preference: The Role of Social Comparison and Perceived Value in a Virtual Brand Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Xiang, Diandian & Jiao, Guanzhe & Sun, Bin & Peng, Chenming & Ran, Yaxuan, 2022. "Prosumer-to-customer exchange in the sharing economy: Evidence from the P2P accommodation context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 426-441.
    10. Jing Lan & Yuge Ma & Dajian Zhu & Diana Mangalagiu & Thomas F. Thornton, 2017. "Enabling Value Co-Creation in the Sharing Economy: The Case of Mobike," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Luri Minami, Adriana & Ramos, Carla & Bruscato Bortoluzzo, Adriana, 2021. "Sharing economy versus collaborative consumption: What drives consumers in the new forms of exchange?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 124-137.
    12. Nadeem, Waqar & Juntunen, Mari & Shirazi, Farid & Hajli, Nick, 2020. "Consumers’ value co-creation in sharing economy: The role of social support, consumers’ ethical perceptions and relationship quality," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Annika Wiecek & Daniel Wentzel & Aras Erkin, 2020. "Just print it! The effects of self-printing a product on consumers’ product evaluations and perceived ownership," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 795-811, July.
    14. de Almeida, Stefânia Ordovás & Scaraboto, Daiane & dos Santos Fleck, João Pedro & Dalmoro, Marlon, 2018. "Seriously Engaged Consumers: Navigating Between Work and Play in Online Brand Communities," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 29-42.
    15. Ge Yao & Jianming Miao, 2021. "Service Value Co-Creation in Digital Platform Business: A Case of Xianyu Idle Trading Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Syed Tariq Anwar, 2023. "The sharing economy and collaborative consumption: Strategic issues and global entrepreneurial opportunities," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 60-88, March.
    17. Mulhuijzen, Max & de Jong, Jeroen P.J., 2023. "The rich or the poor? Personal resources, do-it-yourself, and innovation in the household sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(3).
    18. Sugathan, Praveen & Ranjan, Kumar Rakesh & Mulky, Avinash G., 2017. "Atypical Shifts Post-failure: Influence of Co-creation on Attribution and Future Motivation to Co-create," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 64-81.
    19. Sara Hanson & Lan Jiang & Darren Dahl, 2019. "Enhancing consumer engagement in an online brand community via user reputation signals: a multi-method analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 349-367, March.
    20. Sara Hanson & Lan Jiang, 2016. "The low status advantage: the effect of status structure on participation in an online community," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(3), pages 233-244, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:11:p:3271-:d:568335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.