IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i4p782-d319115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low-Carbon Impact of Urban Rail Transit Based on Passenger Demand Forecast in Baoji

Author

Listed:
  • Na Zhang

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Zijia Wang

    (Beijing Engineering and Technology Research Center of Rail Transit Line Safety and Disaster Prevention, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Feng Chen

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    Beijing Engineering and Technology Research Center of Rail Transit Line Safety and Disaster Prevention, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Jingni Song

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Jianpo Wang

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Yu Li

    (School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

There are increasing traffic pollution issues in the process of urbanization in many countries; urban rail transit is low-carbon and widely regarded as an effective way to solve such problems. The passenger flow proportion of different transportation types is changing along with the adjustment of the urban traffic structure and a growing demand from passengers. The reduction of carbon emissions brought about by rail transit lacks specific quantitative research. Based on a travel survey of urban residents, this paper constructed a method of estimating carbon emissions from two different scenarios where rail transit is and is not available. This study uses the traditional four-stage model to forecast passenger volume demand at the city level and then obtains the basic target parameters for constructing the carbon emission reduction model, including the trip origin-destination (OD), mode, and corresponding distance range of different modes on the urban road network. This model was applied to Baoji, China, where urban rail transit will be available from 2023. It calculates the changes in carbon emission that rail transit can bring about and its impact on carbon emission reductions in Baoji in 2023.

Suggested Citation

  • Na Zhang & Zijia Wang & Feng Chen & Jingni Song & Jianpo Wang & Yu Li, 2020. "Low-Carbon Impact of Urban Rail Transit Based on Passenger Demand Forecast in Baoji," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:4:p:782-:d:319115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/4/782/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/4/782/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng Chen & Xiaopeng Shen & Zijia Wang & Yang Yang, 2017. "An Evaluation of the Low-Carbon Effects of Urban Rail Based on Mode Shifts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Marlon G. Boarnet & Xize Wang & Douglas Houston, 2017. "Can New Light Rail Reduce Personal Vehicle Carbon Emissions? A Before‐After, Experimental‐Control Evaluation In Los Angeles," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 523-539, June.
    3. Daniel McFadden & Kenneth Train, 2000. "Mixed MNL models for discrete response," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 447-470.
    4. Wenjie Wu & Yutian Liang & Di Wu, 2016. "Evaluating the Impact of China’s Rail Network Expansions on Local Accessibility: A Market Potential Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, May.
    5. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Koppelman, Frank S., 2001. "The generalized nested logit model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 627-641, August.
    6. Qi-Li Gao & Qing-Quan Li & Yan Zhuang & Yang Yue & Zhen-Zhen Liu & Shui-Quan Li & Daniel Sui, 2019. "Urban commuting dynamics in response to public transit upgrades: A big data approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Li, Xi & Yu, Biying, 2019. "Peaking CO2 emissions for China's urban passenger transport sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Jeng-Wen Lin & Pu Fun Shen & Bing-Jean Lee, 2015. "Repetitive Model Refinement for Questionnaire Design Improvement in the Evaluation of Working Characteristics in Construction Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liudan Jiao & Fenglian Luo & Fengyan Wu & Yu Zhang & Xiaosen Huo & Ya Wu, 2022. "Exploring the Interactive Coercing Relationship between Urban Rail Transit and the Ecological Environment," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Zijia Wang & Juanjuan Ding & Lichang Wang & Ziqiang Zhu, 2022. "Ex-ante and ex-post approaches of evaluating carbon emission reduction in urban rail transit," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paleti, Rajesh, 2018. "Generalized multinomial probit Model: Accommodating constrained random parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 248-262.
    2. Dam, Tien Thanh & Ta, Thuy Anh & Mai, Tien, 2022. "Submodularity and local search approaches for maximum capture problems under generalized extreme value models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 953-965.
    3. Peter Davis & Pasquale Schiraldi, 2014. "The flexible coefficient multinomial logit (FC-MNL) model of demand for differentiated products," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(1), pages 32-63, March.
    4. José-Benito Pérez-López & Margarita Novales & Francisco-Alberto Varela-García & Alfonso Orro, 2020. "Residential Location Econometric Choice Modeling with Irregular Zoning: Common Border Spatial Correlation Metric," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 785-802, September.
    5. Bhat, Chandra & Lockwood, Allison, 2004. "On distinguishing between physically active and physically passive episodes and between travel and activity episodes: an analysis of weekend recreational participation in the San Francisco Bay area," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 573-592, October.
    6. Chenfeng Xiong & Lei Zhang, 2017. "Dynamic travel mode searching and switching analysis considering hidden model preference and behavioral decision processes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 511-532, May.
    7. David Müller & Vladimir Shikhman, 2022. "Network manipulation algorithm based on inexact alternating minimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 627-664, October.
    8. Tinessa, Fiore & Marzano, Vittorio & Papola, Andrea, 2020. "Mixing distributions of tastes with a Combination of Nested Logit (CoNL) kernel: Formulation and performance analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1-23.
    9. Joao Macieira & Pedro Pereira & Joao Vareda, 2013. "Bundling Incentives in Markets with Product Complementarities: The Case of Triple-Play," Working Papers 13-15, NET Institute.
    10. Shi, Haolun & Yin, Guosheng, 2018. "Boosting conditional logit model," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 48-63.
    11. Kiran Tomlinson & Johan Ugander & Austin R. Benson, 2021. "Choice Set Confounding in Discrete Choice," Papers 2105.07959, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    12. Lili Zheng & Tian Gao & Lin Meng & Tongqiang Ding & Wenhao Chen, 2024. "Research on the Route Choice Behavior of Urban Freight Vehicles Based on GPS Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Zhang, Junyi & Kuwano, Masashi & Lee, Backjin & Fujiwara, Akimasa, 2009. "Modeling household discrete choice behavior incorporating heterogeneous group decision-making mechanisms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 230-250, February.
    14. Lemp, Jason D. & Kockelman, Kara M., 2012. "Strategic sampling for large choice sets in estimation and application," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 602-613.
    15. Ben-Elia, Eran & Shiftan, Yoram, 2010. "Which road do I take? A learning-based model of route-choice behavior with real-time information," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 249-264, May.
    16. Bhat, Chandra R. & Guo, Jessica, 2004. "A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 147-168, February.
    17. Lu, Jiajun, 2020. "Household residential location choice in retirement: The role of climate amenities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    18. Heiss, Florian & Hetzenecker, Stephan & Osterhaus, Maximilian, 2019. "Nonparametric estimation of the random coefficients model: An elastic net approach," Ruhr Economic Papers 824, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    19. Zhongze Cai & Hanzhao Wang & Kalyan Talluri & Xiaocheng Li, 2022. "Deep Learning for Choice Modeling," Papers 2208.09325, arXiv.org.
    20. Yusuke Hara & Eiji Hato, 2019. "Analysis of dynamic decision-making in a bicycle-sharing auction using a dynamic discrete choice model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 147-173, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:4:p:782-:d:319115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.