IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i16p4165-d397797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Series of Combined Pretreatment Can Affect the Solubilization of Waste-Activated Sludge

Author

Listed:
  • Alsayed Mostafa

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Nam-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Min-Gyun Kim

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Nam-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea
    Tomorrow Water team, Bukang Tech. Co., Ltd., 1184 Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu 34057, Daejeon, Korea)

  • Seongwon Im

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Nam-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea)

  • Mo-Kwon Lee

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Nam-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea
    Department of Environmental Health, Daejeon Health Institute of Technology, 21 Chungjeong-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon 34504, Korea)

  • Seoktae Kang

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, KAIST, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Korea)

  • Dong-Hoon Kim

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Nam-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea)

Abstract

Various pretreatment methods have been combined and employed for maximizing the solubilization of waste-activated sludge (WAS). However, the question “by changing the series of applied combined pretreatments (CPs), can the solubilization efficiency of WAS be affected?” has never been addressed. In this study, firstly, thermal (T), alkaline (A), and ultrasonic (U) pretreatments were individually applied at broad strengths (T = 80–120 °C for 30 min, A = pH 9–12, and U = 5–60 min at 300 W). Then, pretreatment conditions that caused similar solubilization (13.0%) (120 °C, pH 11, and 30 min for T, A, and U, respectively), were adopted for CP with reverse sequences of T&A, U&A, and T&U. A similar disintegration degree was observed in U→A and A→U, while a meaningful difference was found in T&A and T&U: T→A (28.3%), A→T (42.9%), T→U (22.9%), and U→T (27.1%). The difference in pretreatment series also affected the characteristics of soluble matters, which was analyzed by excitation emission matrix and molecular weight distribution. Due to these differences, the highest methane yield of 68.8% (based on (chemical oxygen demand) COD input ) was achieved at A→T, compared to T→A (62.3%). Our results suggested a simple strategy for increasing solubilization, at the same expense of energy, which might be beneficial in the following treatment process, such as dewatering and transportation.

Suggested Citation

  • Alsayed Mostafa & Min-Gyun Kim & Seongwon Im & Mo-Kwon Lee & Seoktae Kang & Dong-Hoon Kim, 2020. "Series of Combined Pretreatment Can Affect the Solubilization of Waste-Activated Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:16:p:4165-:d:397797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/16/4165/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/16/4165/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Li, Yu-You & Zhao, Youcai, 2014. "Combined electrical-alkali pretreatment to increase the anaerobic hydrolysis rate of waste activated sludge during anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 93-102.
    2. Agnieszka Garlicka & Monika Zubrowska-Sudol & Katarzyna Umiejewska & Otton Roubinek & Jacek Palige & Andrzej Chmielewski, 2020. "Effects of Thickened Excess Sludge Pre-Treatment Using Hydrodynamic Cavitation for Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgia-Christina Mitraka & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Maria Batsioula & George F. Banias & Anastasios I. Zouboulis & Panagiotis G. Kougias, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Pretreatment Methods for Enhanced Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-56, September.
    2. Hongyan Mu & Min Zhang & Shanshan Sun & Zhaozheng Song & Yijing Luo & Zhongzhi Zhang & Qingzhe Jiang, 2021. "Pilot-Scale Airlift Bioreactor with Function-Enhanced Microbes for the Reduction of Refinery Excess Sludge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xuezhi & Lei, Zhongfang & Shimizu, Kazuya & Zhang, Zhenya & Lee, Duu-Jong, 2021. "Recent advancements in nanobubble water technology and its application in energy recovery from organic solid wastes towards a greater environmental friendliness of anaerobic digestion system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Lübken, Manfred & Koch, Konrad & Gehring, Tito & Horn, Harald & Wichern, Marc, 2015. "Parameter estimation and long-term process simulation of a biogas reactor operated under trace elements limitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 352-360.
    3. Agnieszka Garlicka & Monika Zubrowska-Sudol & Katarzyna Umiejewska & Otton Roubinek & Jacek Palige & Andrzej Chmielewski, 2020. "Effects of Thickened Excess Sludge Pre-Treatment Using Hydrodynamic Cavitation for Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Hassan, Muhammad & Zhao, Chao & Ding, Weimin, 2020. "Enhanced methane generation and biodegradation efficiencies of goose manure by thermal-sonication pretreatment and organic loading management in CSTR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Zhen, Guangyin & Pan, Yang & Lu, Xueqin & Li, Yu-You & Zhang, Zhongyi & Niu, Chengxin & Kumar, Gopalakrishnan & Kobayashi, Takuro & Zhao, Youcai & Xu, Kaiqin, 2019. "Anaerobic membrane bioreactor towards biowaste biorefinery and chemical energy harvest: Recent progress, membrane fouling and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Koch, Konrad & Helmreich, Brigitte & Drewes, Jörg E., 2015. "Co-digestion of food waste in municipal wastewater treatment plants: Effect of different mixtures on methane yield and hydrolysis rate constant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 250-255.
    7. Ebenezer, A. Vimala & Arulazhagan, P. & Adish Kumar, S. & Yeom, Ick-Tae & Rajesh Banu, J., 2015. "Effect of deflocculation on the efficiency of low-energy microwave pretreatment and anaerobic biodegradation of waste activated sludge," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 104-110.
    8. Elsamadony, M. & Tawfik, A. & Suzuki, M., 2015. "Surfactant-enhanced biohydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) via dry anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 272-282.
    9. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Kato, Hiroyuki & Zhao, Youcai & Li, Yu-You, 2017. "Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: Current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 559-577.
    10. Kong, Fanying & Ren, Hong-Yu & Pavlostathis, Spyros G. & Nan, Jun & Ren, Nan-Qi & Wang, Aijie, 2020. "Overview of value-added products bioelectrosynthesized from waste materials in microbial electrosynthesis systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    11. Tae-Hoon Kim & Dayeong Song & Jung-Sup Lee & Yeo-Myeong Yun, 2023. "Enhanced Methane Production from Pretreatment of Waste Activated Sludge by Economically Feasible Biocatalysts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, January.
    12. Walczak, Justyna & Karolinczak, Beata & Zubrowska-Sudol, Monika, 2023. "Effect of co-digestion and hydrodynamic disintegration on the methane potential of sewage sludge and organic fraction of municipal solid waste with consideration of the carbon footprint," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    13. Li, Wei & Guo, Jianbin & Cheng, Huicai & Wang, Wei & Dong, Renjie, 2017. "Two-phase anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes enhanced by hydrothermal pretreatment: Viability, performance and microbial community evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 613-622.
    14. Hwijin Seo & Anna Joicy & Myoung Eun Lee & Chaeyoung Rhee & Seung Gu Shin & Si-Kyung Cho & Yongtae Ahn, 2023. "Development of a Primary Sewage Sludge Pretreatment Strategy Using a Combined Alkaline–Ultrasound Pretreatment for Enhancing Microbial Electrolysis Cell Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Panigrahi, Sagarika & Sharma, Hari Bhakta & Tiwari, Bikash Ranjan & Krishna, Nakka Vamsi & Ghangrekar, M.M. & Dubey, Brajesh Kumar, 2021. "Insight into understanding the performance of electrochemical pretreatment on improving anaerobic biodegradability of yard waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1166-1178.
    16. Lu Liu & Jun Zhang & Yifan Chen & Ze Guo & Ganzhan Xu & Linlin Yin & Yu Tian & Stevo Lavrnić, 2023. "Anaerobic Fluidized-Bed Membrane Bioreactor for Treatment of Liquid Fraction of Sludge Digestate: Performance and Agricultural Reuse Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Cano, R. & Pérez-Elvira, S.I. & Fdz-Polanco, F., 2015. "Energy feasibility study of sludge pretreatments: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 176-185.
    18. Marcin Zieliński & Marcin Dębowski & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Anna Nowicka & Magda Dudek, 2024. "Application of Hydrodynamic Cavitation in the Disintegration of Aerobic Granular Sludge—Evaluation of Pretreatment Time on Biomass Properties, Anaerobic Digestion Efficiency and Energy Balance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Zhao, Jiamin & Hou, Tingting & Wang, Qian & Zhang, Zhenya & Lei, Zhongfang & Shimizu, Kazuya & Guo, Wenshan & Ngo, Huu Hao, 2021. "Application of biogas recirculation in anaerobic granular sludge system for multifunctional sewage sludge management with high efficacy energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    20. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Kobayashi, Takuro & Li, Yu-You & Xu, Kaiqin & Zhao, Youcai, 2015. "Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and Egeria densa: Performance assessment and kinetic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 78-86.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:16:p:4165-:d:397797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.