IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2018i1p26-d192610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Biochemical Methane Potential and Kinetics on the Anaerobic Digestion of Vegetable Crop Residues

Author

Listed:
  • Pengfei Li

    (Department of Agriculture Biological Environment and Energy Engineering, School of Engineering, Northeast Agriculture University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Wenzhe Li

    (Department of Agriculture Biological Environment and Energy Engineering, School of Engineering, Northeast Agriculture University, Harbin 150030, China
    Key Laboratory of Renewable Resources Utilization Technology and Equipment for Cold Region Agriculture, Northeast Agriculture University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Mingchao Sun

    (Department of Agriculture Biological Environment and Energy Engineering, School of Engineering, Northeast Agriculture University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Xiang Xu

    (Department of Agriculture Biological Environment and Energy Engineering, School of Engineering, Northeast Agriculture University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Bo Zhang

    (Department of Agriculture Biological Environment and Energy Engineering, School of Engineering, Northeast Agriculture University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Yong Sun

    (Department of Agriculture Biological Environment and Energy Engineering, School of Engineering, Northeast Agriculture University, Harbin 150030, China
    Key Laboratory of Renewable Resources Utilization Technology and Equipment for Cold Region Agriculture, Northeast Agriculture University, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

There is a lack of literature reporting the measurement and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) of vegetable crop residues (VCRs) and similarly, the kinetic assessment on the anaerobic digestion process of VCR is rarely investigated. In this paper, the BMP tests of five different vegetable (snap bean, capsicum, cucumber, eggplant, and tomato) crop residues were conducted at feed to inoculum ratio (F/I) of 2.0 under mesophilic (36 ± 1 °C) conditions. A series of single-variable and multiple-variable regression models were built based on organic components (hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin, total fat, total sugar, and crude protein) for BMP prediction. Three kinetic models, including the first-order kinetic model, the Chen and Hashimoto model, and the modified Gompertz model, were used to simulate the methane yield results of VCR and obtain valuable model parameters simultaneously. As a result, the BMPs and volatile solids (VS) degradation degree of different VCRs were respectively in the range of 94.2–146.8 mL g −1 VS and 40.4–49.9%; the regression prediction models with variables lignin (R 2 = 0.704, p = 0.076), variables crude protein and lignin (R 2 = 0.976, p = 0.048), and variables total fat, hemicellulose, and lignin (R 2 = 0.999, p = 0.027) showed the best performance on BMP prediction among the single-factor, two-factor, and three-factor models, respectively. In addition, compared to the other two kinetic models, the modified Gompertz model could be excellently fitted (R 2 = 0.986–0.998) to the results of BMP experiment, verification deviations within 0.3%.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengfei Li & Wenzhe Li & Mingchao Sun & Xiang Xu & Bo Zhang & Yong Sun, 2018. "Evaluation of Biochemical Methane Potential and Kinetics on the Anaerobic Digestion of Vegetable Crop Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:26-:d:192610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/1/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/1/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, Y. & Heaven, S. & Banks, C.J., 2012. "Strategies for stable anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 206-214.
    2. Kafle, Gopi Krishna & Kim, Sang Hun, 2013. "Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: Batch and continuous operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 61-72.
    3. John J. Milledge & Birthe V. Nielsen & Manar S. Sadek & Patricia J. Harvey, 2018. "Effect of Freshwater Washing Pretreatment on Sargassum muticum as a Feedstock for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Fuli Yang & Wenzhe Li & Mingchao Sun & Qiang Li & Mengyi Wang & Yong Sun, 2018. "Improved Buffering Capacity and Methane Production by Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Corn Stalk and Straw Depolymerization Wastewater," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shruthi Meenakshisundaram & Vincenzo Calcagno & Claire Ceballos & Antoine Fayeulle & Estelle Léonard & Virginie Herledan & Jean-Marc Krafft & Yannick Millot & Xiaojun Liu & Claude Jolivalt & André Pau, 2023. "Chemically and Physically Pretreated Straw in Moderate Conditions: Poor Correlation between Biogas Production and Commonly Used Biomass Characterization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Henrik B. Møller & Peter Sørensen & Jørgen E. Olesen & Søren O. Petersen & Tavs Nyord & Sven G. Sommer, 2022. "Agricultural Biogas Production—Climate and Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Elena Rossi & Isabella Pecorini & Giovanni Ferrara & Renato Iannelli, 2022. "Dry Anaerobic Digestion of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: Biogas Production Optimization by Reducing Ammonia Inhibition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Patrícia V. Almeida & Rafaela P. Rodrigues & Leonor M. Teixeira & Andreia F. Santos & Rui C. Martins & Margarida J. Quina, 2021. "Bioenergy Production through Mono and Co-Digestion of Tomato Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Elena Rossi & Isabella Pecorini & Renato Iannelli, 2022. "Multilinear Regression Model for Biogas Production Prediction from Dry Anaerobic Digestion of OFMSW," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Jacob Rosholm Mortensen & Alastair James Ward & Martin Riis Weisbjerg & Sasha Daniel Hafner & Henrik Bjarne Møller, 2021. "Determination of Nitrogen and Sulphur Mineralization in Batch and Semi-Continuous Anaerobic Digestion Using an Artificial Fiber Bag Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Kun & Liu, Ronghou & Sun, Chen, 2016. "A review of methane production from agricultural residues in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 857-865.
    2. Bateni, Hamed & Karimi, Keikhosro & Zamani, Akram & Benakashani, Fatemeh, 2014. "Castor plant for biodiesel, biogas, and ethanol production with a biorefinery processing perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 14-22.
    3. Sohail Khan & Fuzhi Lu & Muhammad Kashif & Peihong Shen, 2021. "Multiple Effects of Different Nickel Concentrations on the Stability of Anaerobic Digestion of Molasses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Tian, Wenjing & Li, Jianhao & Zhu, Lirong & Li, Wen & He, Linyan & Gu, Li & Deng, Rui & Shi, Dezhi & Chai, Hongxiang & Gao, Meng, 2021. "Insights of enhancing methane production under high-solid anaerobic digestion of wheat straw by calcium peroxide pretreatment and zero valent iron addition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1321-1332.
    5. Sarto, Sarto & Hildayati, Raudati & Syaichurrozi, Iqbal, 2019. "Effect of chemical pretreatment using sulfuric acid on biogas production from water hyacinth and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 335-350.
    6. Sayedin, Farid & Kermanshahi-pour, Azadeh & He, Quan Sophia, 2019. "Evaluating the potential of a novel anaerobic baffled reactor for anaerobic digestion of thin stillage: Effect of organic loading rate, hydraulic retention time and recycle ratio," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 975-983.
    7. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Hailong & Borrion, Aiduan & Yu, Zhixin & Li, Jinhui, 2018. "Kinetic studies on organic degradation and its impacts on improving methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 136-147.
    8. Ali, Ghaffar & Nitivattananon, Vilas & Abbas, Sawaid & Sabir, Muazzam, 2012. "Green waste to biogas: Renewable energy possibilities for Thailand's green markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5423-5429.
    9. Eun-Young Park & Jung-Kyu Park, 2021. "Sequential Hydrothermal HCl Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Saccharina japonica Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Yao, Yiqing & Sheng, Hongmei & Luo, Yang & He, Mulan & Li, Xiangkai & Zhang, Hua & He, Wenliang & An, Lizhe, 2014. "Optimization of anaerobic co-digestion of Solidago canadensis L. biomass and cattle slurry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 122-127.
    11. Grima-Olmedo, C. & Ramírez-Gómez, Á. & Alcalde-Cartagena, R., 2014. "Energetic performance of landfill and digester biogas in a domestic cooker," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 301-308.
    12. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    13. Chen, Miao & Liu, Shujun & Yuan, Xufeng & Li, Qing X. & Wang, Fengzhong & Xin, Fengjiao & Wen, Boting, 2021. "Methane production and characteristics of the microbial community in the co-digestion of potato pulp waste and dairy manure amended with biochar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 357-367.
    14. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Ferreira, Jorge A. & Sirohi, Ranjna & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Baladi, Samin & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Pandey, Ashok & Juneja, Ankita & , 2021. "A critical review on the development stage of biorefinery systems towards the management of apple processing-derived waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    15. Chiu, Su-Fang & Chiu, Juei-Yu & Kuo, Wen-Chien, 2013. "Biological stoichiometric analysis of nutrition and ammonia toxicity in thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of organic substrates under different organic loading rates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 323-329.
    16. Gulhane, Madhuri & Pandit, Prabhakar & Khardenavis, Anshuman & Singh, Dharmesh & Purohit, Hemant, 2017. "Study of microbial community plasticity for anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste in Anaerobic Baffled Reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 59-66.
    17. María Eugenia Beily & Brian Jonathan Young & Patricia Alina Bres & Nicolás Iván Riera & Wenguo Wang & Diana Elvira Crespo & Dimitrios Komilis, 2023. "Relationships among Physicochemical, Microbiological, and Parasitological Parameters, Ecotoxicity, and Biochemical Methane Potential of Pig Slurry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Su, Xing & Shao, Xiaolu & Geng, Yining & Tian, Shaochen & Huang, Yixiang, 2022. "Optimization of feedstock and insulating strategies to enhance biogas production of solar-assisted biodigester system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 59-68.
    19. Tian, Guangliang & Yang, Bin & Dong, Minghua & Zhu, Rui & Yin, Fang & Zhao, Xingling & Wang, Yongxia & Xiao, Wei & Wang, Qiang & Zhang, Wudi & Cui, Xiaolong, 2018. "The effect of temperature on the microbial communities of peak biogas production in batch biogas reactors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 15-25.
    20. John J. Milledge & Birthe V. Nielsen & Supattra Maneein & Patricia J. Harvey, 2019. "A Brief Review of Anaerobic Digestion of Algae for Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:26-:d:192610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.