IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v101y2017icp59-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of microbial community plasticity for anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste in Anaerobic Baffled Reactor

Author

Listed:
  • Gulhane, Madhuri
  • Pandit, Prabhakar
  • Khardenavis, Anshuman
  • Singh, Dharmesh
  • Purohit, Hemant

Abstract

Anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) provides a selective environment for the microbial community and their respective metabolic activities, which supports the physiochemical conditions required for an optimal performance of reactor. Hydrolysis and methanogenesis are rate limiting steps of anaerobic digestion which are very sensitive to changes in pH. Effluent recirculation provides buffering environment as well as prevents loss of some methanogenic population. In the present study, we used four chambered (C-1, 2, 3, and 4) anaerobic baffled reactor treating vegetable waste under three operating conditions (OCs); no effluent recirculation (OC I), 25% effluent recirculation (OC II), 100% effluent recirculation (OC III) and studied changes in microbial diversity along with selected parameters. OC I showed dominance of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes in C-1 while remaining chambers were dominated by Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Thermotogae, Spirochaetes and Chloroflexi. This demonstrated that the hydrolytic and fermentative taxa colonized chamber C-1 while syntrophic acetogenic population dominated the remaining chambers. However, a drastic change was observed during OC III, advocated by an increase in diverse population from Firmicutes and Actinobacteria in all chambers. Our results suggest plasticity in microbial population, which could ensure a better reactor performance under different OCs in ABR for methanogenesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Gulhane, Madhuri & Pandit, Prabhakar & Khardenavis, Anshuman & Singh, Dharmesh & Purohit, Hemant, 2017. "Study of microbial community plasticity for anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste in Anaerobic Baffled Reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 59-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:59-66
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148116307224
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Estevez, Maria M. & Sapci, Zehra & Linjordet, Roar & Morken, John, 2014. "Incorporation of fish by-product into the semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of pre-treated lignocellulose and cow manure, with recovery of digestate's nutrients," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 550-558.
    2. Valdez-Vazquez, Idania & Poggi-Varaldo, Héctor M., 2009. "Hydrogen production by fermentative consortia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 1000-1013, June.
    3. Alvarez, René & Lidén, Gunnar, 2008. "Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste, manure, and fruit and vegetable waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 726-734.
    4. Jiang, Y. & Heaven, S. & Banks, C.J., 2012. "Strategies for stable anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 206-214.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, YuQian & Liu, ChunMei & Wachemo, Akiber Chufo & Li, XiuJin, 2018. "Effects of liquid fraction of digestate recirculation on system performance and microbial community structure during serial anaerobic digestion of completely stirred tank reactors for corn stover," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 309-317.
    2. do Carmo Precci Lopes, Alice & Mudadu Silva, Cláudio & Pereira Rosa, André & de Ávila Rodrigues, Fábio, 2018. "Biogas production from thermophilic anaerobic digestion of kraft pulp mill sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 40-49.
    3. Ling Zhao & Yang Gao & Jiaxing Sun & Yanan Wang & Congxin Wang & Shuai Yu & Zhen Wang & Jingyang Li & Ronghou Liu & Wei Kou, 2023. "The Role of Slurry Reflux in a Corn Stalk Continuous Anaerobic Digestion System: Performance and Microbial Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Nsanzumukiza Martin Vincent & Yuansong Wei & Junya Zhang & Dawei Yu & Juan Tong, 2018. "Characterization and Dynamic Shift of Microbial Communities during Start-Up, Overloading and Steady-State in an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Yellezuome, Dominic & Zhu, Xianpu & Wang, Zengzhen & Liu, Ronghou, 2022. "Mitigation of ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion of nitrogen-rich substrates for biogas production by ammonia stripping: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiu, Su-Fang & Chiu, Juei-Yu & Kuo, Wen-Chien, 2013. "Biological stoichiometric analysis of nutrition and ammonia toxicity in thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of organic substrates under different organic loading rates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 323-329.
    2. Sohail Khan & Fuzhi Lu & Muhammad Kashif & Peihong Shen, 2021. "Multiple Effects of Different Nickel Concentrations on the Stability of Anaerobic Digestion of Molasses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Zareei, Samira, 2018. "Project scheduling for constructing biogas plant using critical path method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 756-759.
    4. Khan, Mohd Atiqueuzzaman & Ngo, Huu Hao & Guo, Wenshan & Liu, Yiwen & Zhang, Xinbo & Guo, Jianbo & Chang, Soon Woong & Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Wang, Jie, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 754-768.
    5. Łukajtis, Rafał & Hołowacz, Iwona & Kucharska, Karolina & Glinka, Marta & Rybarczyk, Piotr & Przyjazny, Andrzej & Kamiński, Marian, 2018. "Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 665-694.
    6. Abdur Rawoof, Salma Aathika & Kumar, P. Senthil & Vo, Dai-Viet N. & Devaraj, Thiruselvi & Subramanian, Sivanesan, 2021. "Biohythane as a high potential fuel from anaerobic digestion of organic waste: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Ali, Ghaffar & Nitivattananon, Vilas & Abbas, Sawaid & Sabir, Muazzam, 2012. "Green waste to biogas: Renewable energy possibilities for Thailand's green markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5423-5429.
    8. Yao, Yiqing & Sheng, Hongmei & Luo, Yang & He, Mulan & Li, Xiangkai & Zhang, Hua & He, Wenliang & An, Lizhe, 2014. "Optimization of anaerobic co-digestion of Solidago canadensis L. biomass and cattle slurry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 122-127.
    9. Garfí, Marianna & Martí-Herrero, Jaime & Garwood, Anna & Ferrer, Ivet, 2016. "Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 599-614.
    10. Li, Kun & Liu, Ronghou & Sun, Chen, 2016. "A review of methane production from agricultural residues in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 857-865.
    11. Gottardo, Marco & Micolucci, Federico & Bolzonella, David & Uellendahl, Hinrich & Pavan, Paolo, 2017. "Pilot scale fermentation coupled with anaerobic digestion of food waste - Effect of dynamic digestate recirculation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 455-463.
    12. Xuan, Jin & Leung, Michael K.H. & Leung, Dennis Y.C. & Ni, Meng, 2009. "A review of biomass-derived fuel processors for fuel cell systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(6-7), pages 1301-1313, August.
    13. Liu, Xiao & Gao, Xingbao & Wang, Wei & Zheng, Lei & Zhou, Yingjun & Sun, Yifei, 2012. "Pilot-scale anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass waste: Focusing on biogas production and GHG reduction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 463-468.
    14. O-Thong, Sompong & Boe, Kanokwan & Angelidaki, Irini, 2012. "Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of oil palm empty fruit bunches with palm oil mill effluent for efficient biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 648-654.
    15. Masebinu, S.O. & Akinlabi, E.T. & Muzenda, E. & Aboyade, A.O., 2019. "A review of biochar properties and their roles in mitigating challenges with anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 291-307.
    16. Moktadir, Md. Abdul & Rahman, Mohammed Mizanur, 2022. "Energy production from leather solid wastes by anaerobic digestion: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Sołowski, Gaweł & Shalaby, Marwa.S. & Abdallah, Heba & Shaban, Ahmed.M. & Cenian, Adam, 2018. "Production of hydrogen from biomass and its separation using membrane technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3152-3167.
    18. Hernández, M. & Rodríguez, M., 2013. "Hydrogen production by anaerobic digestion of pig manure: Effect of operating conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 187-192.
    19. Yao, Yiqing & Luo, Yang & Yang, Yingxue & Sheng, Hongmei & Li, Xiangkai & Li, Tian & Song, Yuan & Zhang, Hua & Chen, Shuyan & He, Wenliang & He, Mulan & Ren, Yubing & Gao, Jiangli & Wei, Yali & An, Li, 2014. "Water free anaerobic co-digestion of vegetable processing waste with cattle slurry for methane production at high total solid content," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 309-313.
    20. Latifi, Pooria & Karrabi, Mohsen & Danesh, Shahnaz, 2019. "Anaerobic co-digestion of poultry slaughterhouse wastes with sewage sludge in batch-mode bioreactors (effect of inoculum-substrate ratio and total solids)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 288-296.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:59-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.