IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i9p1396-d111837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential for Energy Production from Farm Wastes Using Anaerobic Digestion in the UK: An Economic Comparison of Different Size Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel D. Oreggioni

    (RCUK National Centre for Sustainable Energy Use in Food Chains, Institute of Energy Futures, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK)

  • Baboo Lesh Gowreesunker

    (RCUK National Centre for Sustainable Energy Use in Food Chains, Institute of Energy Futures, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK)

  • Savvas A. Tassou

    (RCUK National Centre for Sustainable Energy Use in Food Chains, Institute of Energy Futures, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK)

  • Giuseppe Bianchi

    (RCUK National Centre for Sustainable Energy Use in Food Chains, Institute of Energy Futures, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK)

  • Matthew Reilly

    (Agricultural Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems, Department of Animal Production, Welfare and Veterinarian Sciences, Harper Adams University, New Port TF10 8NB, UK)

  • Marie E. Kirby

    (Agricultural Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems, Department of Animal Production, Welfare and Veterinarian Sciences, Harper Adams University, New Port TF10 8NB, UK)

  • Trisha A. Toop

    (Agricultural Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems, Department of Animal Production, Welfare and Veterinarian Sciences, Harper Adams University, New Port TF10 8NB, UK)

  • Mike K. Theodorou

    (Agricultural Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems, Department of Animal Production, Welfare and Veterinarian Sciences, Harper Adams University, New Port TF10 8NB, UK)

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) plants enable renewable fuel, heat, and electricity production, with their efficiency and capital cost strongly dependent on their installed capacity. In this work, the technical and economic feasibility of different scale AD combined heat and power (CHP) plants was analyzed. Process configurations involving the use of waste produced in different farms as feedstock for a centralized AD plant were assessed too. The results show that the levelized cost of electricity are lower for large-scale plants due to the use of more efficient conversion devices and their lower capital cost per unit of electricity produced. The levelized cost of electricity was estimated to be 4.3 p/kWh e for AD plants processing the waste of 125 dairy cow sized herds compared to 1.9 p/kWh e for AD plants processing waste of 1000 dairy cow sized herds. The techno-economic feasibility of the installation of CO 2 capture units in centralized AD-CHP plants was also undertaken. The conducted research demonstrated that negative CO 2 emission AD power generation plants could be economically viable with currently paid feed-in tariffs in the UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel D. Oreggioni & Baboo Lesh Gowreesunker & Savvas A. Tassou & Giuseppe Bianchi & Matthew Reilly & Marie E. Kirby & Trisha A. Toop & Mike K. Theodorou, 2017. "Potential for Energy Production from Farm Wastes Using Anaerobic Digestion in the UK: An Economic Comparison of Different Size Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:9:p:1396-:d:111837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/9/1396/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/9/1396/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gewald, Daniela & Siokos, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2012. "Waste heat recovery from a landfill gas-fired power plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 1779-1789.
    2. Wang, E.H. & Zhang, H.G. & Fan, B.Y. & Ouyang, M.G. & Zhao, Y. & Mu, Q.H., 2011. "Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3406-3418.
    3. Theofanous, Elisavet & Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Panayiotou, Gregoris & Florides, Georgios & Vyrides, Ioannis, 2014. "Energy production from piggery waste using anaerobic digestion: Current status and potential in Cyprus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 263-270.
    4. Lantz, Mikael, 2012. "The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produced from manure in Sweden – A comparison of different CHP technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 502-511.
    5. Schakel, Wouter & Meerman, Hans & Talaei, Alireza & Ramírez, Andrea & Faaij, André, 2014. "Comparative life cycle assessment of biomass co-firing plants with carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 441-467.
    6. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    7. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Łukasz Warguła & Mateusz Kukla & Piotr Lijewski & Michał Dobrzyński & Filip Markiewicz, 2020. "Impact of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Fuel Systems in Small Engine Wood Chippers on Exhaust Emissions and Fuel Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Oreggioni, G.D. & Luberti, M. & Tassou, S.A., 2019. "Agricultural greenhouse CO2 utilization in anaerobic-digestion-based biomethane production plants: A techno-economic and environmental assessment and comparison with CO2 geological storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1753-1766.
    3. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Massimo Cecchini & Francesco Santoro & Antonio Pantaleo, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Analysis of an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Power Plant Integrated with a Compost Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Aragón-Briceño, C.I. & Ross, A.B. & Camargo-Valero, M.A., 2021. "Mass and energy integration study of hydrothermal carbonization with anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 473-483.
    5. Sean O’Connor & Ehiaze Ehimen & Suresh C. Pillai & Gary Lyons & John Bartlett, 2020. "Economic and Environmental Analysis of Small-Scale Anaerobic Digestion Plants on Irish Dairy Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Reynolds, Jemma & Kennedy, Robert & Ichapka, Mariah & Agarwal, Abhishek & Oke, Adekunle & Cox, Elsa & Edwards, Christine & Njuguna, James, 2022. "An evaluation of feedstocks for sustainable energy and circular economy practices in a small island community," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Spyridon Achinas & Johan Horjus & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    8. George Halkos & Kleoniki Natalia Petrou, 2019. "Analysing the Energy Efficiency of EU Member States: The Potential of Energy Recovery from Waste in the Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-32, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Pili & Hartmut Spliethoff & Christoph Wieland, 2017. "Dynamic Simulation of an Organic Rankine Cycle—Detailed Model of a Kettle Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Cavazzini, G. & Bari, S. & Pavesi, G. & Ardizzon, G., 2017. "A multi-fluid PSO-based algorithm for the search of the best performance of sub-critical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 42-58.
    3. Ni, Jiaxin & Zhao, Li & Zhang, Zhengtao & Zhang, Ying & Zhang, Jianyuan & Deng, Shuai & Ma, Minglu, 2018. "Dynamic performance investigation of organic Rankine cycle driven by solar energy under cloudy condition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 122-141.
    4. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    5. Oko, C.O.C. & Njoku, I.H., 2017. "Performance analysis of an integrated gas-, steam- and organic fluid-cycle thermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 431-443.
    6. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    7. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    8. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    9. Fu, Ben-Ran & Hsu, Sung-Wei & Liu, Chih-Hsi & Liu, Yu-Ching, 2014. "Statistical analysis of patent data relating to the organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 986-994.
    10. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Preißinger, Markus & Brüggemann, Dieter & Karellas, Sotirios & Panopoulos, Kyriakos, 2015. "Low grade waste heat recovery with subcritical and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle based on natural refrigerants and their binary mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 80-92.
    11. Peter Collings & Zhibin Yu, 2017. "Numerical Analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle with Adjustable Working Fluid Composition, a Volumetric Expander and a Recuperator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Zhou, Feng & Joshi, Shailesh N. & Rhote-Vaney, Raphael & Dede, Ercan M., 2017. "A review and future application of Rankine Cycle to passenger vehicles for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1008-1021.
    13. He, Chao & Liu, Chao & Zhou, Mengtong & Xie, Hui & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Wu, Shuangying & Li, Yourong, 2014. "A new selection principle of working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle coupling with different heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 283-291.
    14. Larsen, Ulrik & Pierobon, Leonardo & Haglind, Fredrik & Gabrielii, Cecilia, 2013. "Design and optimisation of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery in marine applications using the principles of natural selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 803-812.
    15. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    16. Sikarwar, Shailesh Singh & Surywanshi, Gajanan Dattarao & Patnaikuni, Venkata Suresh & Kakunuri, Manohar & Vooradi, Ramsagar, 2020. "Chemical looping combustion integrated Organic Rankine Cycled biomass-fired power plant – Energy and exergy analyses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 931-949.
    17. Yamada, Noboru & Tominaga, Yoshihito & Yoshida, Takanori, 2014. "Demonstration of 10-Wp micro organic Rankine cycle generator for low-grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 806-813.
    18. Gábor Györke & Axel Groniewsky & Attila R. Imre, 2019. "A Simple Method of Finding New Dry and Isentropic Working Fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-11, February.
    19. Imran, Muhammad & Haglind, Fredrik & Asim, Muhammad & Zeb Alvi, Jahan, 2018. "Recent research trends in organic Rankine cycle technology: A bibliometric approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 552-562.
    20. Jung-Bo Sim & Se-Jin Yook & Young Won Kim, 2023. "Development of 180 kW Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) with a High-Efficiency Two-Stage Axial Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:9:p:1396-:d:111837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.