IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v73y2017icp1000-1013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues

Author

Listed:
  • Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza
  • Kim, Kyung Chun

Abstract

Global warming has been a major concern, and the amount of CO2 released to the atmosphere keeps increasing due to overuse of the earth's fossil fuel reserves. Overpopulation and lack of comprehensive energy management add to the problem. New and renewable energy sources are still expensive or in the conceptual phase. The organic Rankine cycle (ORC) seems to be a viable option to address these issues by reusing waste and low-grade heat that would otherwise be released into the environment. Many ORC power plants are already in commercial use. Since the introduction of the basic ORC (BORC), there have been many revolutionary ideas to optimize the performance of power generators, but they have not been experimentally tested extensively. This study focuses on zeotropic refrigerant mixtures made of two or three refrigerants instead of a single working fluid. The main advantages of this system are increased exergy efficiency and decreased irreversibility in the evaporator and condenser, where the isothermal phase change of pure refrigerant would not match the temperature profile of the heat source and heat sink. Published experimental studies on this topic are extremely rare. This study discusses almost all the articles on this subject, the proposed mixtures, and the conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:73:y:2017:i:c:p:1000-1013
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117302253
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaitanya Prasad, G.S. & Suresh Kumar, C. & Srinivasa Murthy, S. & Venkatarathnam, G., 2015. "Performance of an organic Rankine cycle with multicomponent mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 690-696.
    2. Desideri, Adriano & Gusev, Sergei & van den Broek, Martijn & Lemort, Vincent & Quoilin, Sylvain, 2016. "Experimental comparison of organic fluids for low temperature ORC (organic Rankine cycle) systems for waste heat recovery applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 460-469.
    3. Heberle, Florian & Preißinger, Markus & Brüggemann, Dieter, 2012. "Zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles for low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 364-370.
    4. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Yun, Eunkoo & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2015. "Experimental study of a 1 kw organic Rankine cycle with a zeotropic mixture of R245fa/R134a," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2363-2373.
    5. Gao, P. & Wang, L.W. & Wang, R.Z. & Jiang, L. & Zhou, Z.S., 2015. "Experimental investigation on a small pumpless ORC (organic rankine cycle) system driven by the low temperature heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 324-333.
    6. Chys, M. & van den Broek, M. & Vanslambrouck, B. & De Paepe, M., 2012. "Potential of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 623-632.
    7. F. Tchanche, Bertrand & Pétrissans, M. & Papadakis, G., 2014. "Heat resources and organic Rankine cycle machines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1185-1199.
    8. Zhao, Li & Bao, Junjiang, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 748-756.
    9. Jung, Hyung-Chul & Taylor, Leighton & Krumdieck, Susan, 2015. "An experimental and modelling study of a 1 kW organic Rankine cycle unit with mixture working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 601-614.
    10. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    11. Yu, Haoshui & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2015. "A new pinch based method for simultaneous selection of working fluid and operating conditions in an ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) recovering waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 36-46.
    12. Liu, Qiang & Shen, Aijing & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2015. "Parametric optimization and performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles using R600a/R601a mixtures as working fluids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 410-420.
    13. Oyewunmi, Oyeniyi A. & Taleb, Aly I. & Haslam, Andrew J. & Markides, Christos N., 2016. "On the use of SAFT-VR Mie for assessing large-glide fluorocarbon working-fluid mixtures in organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 263-282.
    14. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    15. Wang, J.L. & Zhao, L. & Wang, X.D., 2010. "A comparative study of pure and zeotropic mixtures in low-temperature solar Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3366-3373, November.
    16. Feng, Yongqiang & Hung, TzuChen & Zhang, Yaning & Li, Bingxi & Yang, Jinfu & Shi, Yang, 2015. "Performance comparison of low-grade ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) using R245fa, pentane and their mixtures based on the thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization and decision makings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2018-2029.
    17. Li, Gang, 2016. "Organic Rankine cycle performance evaluation and thermoeconomic assessment with various applications part II: Economic assessment aspect," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 490-505.
    18. Costall, A.W. & Gonzalez Hernandez, A. & Newton, P.J. & Martinez-Botas, R.F., 2015. "Design methodology for radial turbo expanders in mobile organic Rankine cycle applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 729-743.
    19. Angelino, Gianfranco & Colonna di Paliano, Piero, 1998. "Multicomponent Working Fluids For Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 449-463.
    20. Petr, Philipp & Raabe, Gabriele, 2015. "Evaluation of R-1234ze(Z) as drop-in replacement for R-245fa in Organic Rankine Cycles – From thermophysical properties to cycle performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 266-274.
    21. Kang, Seok Hun, 2016. "Design and preliminary tests of ORC (organic Rankine cycle) with two-stage radial turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 142-154.
    22. Liu, Qiang & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2014. "Effect of condensation temperature glide on the performance of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixture working fluids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 394-404.
    23. Baik, Young-Jin & Kim, Minsung & Chang, Ki-Chang & Lee, Young-Soo & Yoon, Hyung-Kee, 2012. "Power enhancement potential of a mixture transcritical cycle for a low-temperature geothermal power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 70-76.
    24. Vélez, Fredy & Segovia, José J. & Martín, M. Carmen & Antolín, Gregorio & Chejne, Farid & Quijano, Ana, 2012. "A technical, economical and market review of organic Rankine cycles for the conversion of low-grade heat for power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4175-4189.
    25. Lee, Duen-Sheng & Hung, Tzu-Chen & Lin, Jaw-Ren & Zhao, Jun, 2015. "Experimental investigations on solar chimney for optimal heat collection to be utilized in organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 651-662.
    26. Xu, Heng & Gao, Naiping & Zhu, Tong, 2016. "Investigation on the fluid selection and evaporation parametric optimization for sub- and supercritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 59-68.
    27. Brignoli, Riccardo & Brown, J. Steven, 2015. "Organic Rankine cycle model for well-described and not-so-well-described working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 93-104.
    28. Tang, Hao & Wu, Huagen & Wang, Xiaolin & Xing, Ziwen, 2015. "Performance study of a twin-screw expander used in a geothermal organic Rankine cycle power generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 631-642.
    29. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    30. Richardson, E.S., 2016. "Thermodynamic performance of new thermofluidic feed pumps for Organic Rankine Cycle applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 75-84.
    31. Li, Gang, 2016. "Organic Rankine cycle performance evaluation and thermoeconomic assessment with various applications part I: Energy and exergy performance evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 477-499.
    32. Shi, Rongqi & He, Tianqi & Peng, Jie & Zhang, Yangjun & Zhuge, Weilin, 2016. "System design and control for waste heat recovery of automotive engines based on Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 276-286.
    33. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Preißinger, Markus & Brüggemann, Dieter & Karellas, Sotirios & Panopoulos, Kyriakos, 2015. "Low grade waste heat recovery with subcritical and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle based on natural refrigerants and their binary mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 80-92.
    34. Cho, Soo-Yong & Cho, Chong-Hyun & Choi, Sang-Kyu, 2015. "Experiment and cycle analysis on a partially admitted axial-type turbine used in the organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 643-651.
    35. Hærvig, J. & Sørensen, K. & Condra, T.J., 2016. "Guidelines for optimal selection of working fluid for an organic Rankine cycle in relation to waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 592-602.
    36. Li, You-Rong & Du, Mei-Tang & Wu, Shuang-Ying & Peng, Lan & Liu, Chao, 2012. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a condenser for a binary mixture of vapors in organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 341-347.
    37. Deethayat, Thoranis & Asanakham, Attakorn & Kiatsiriroat, Tanongkiat, 2016. "Performance analysis of low temperature organic Rankine cycle with zeotropic refrigerant by Figure of Merit (FOM)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 96-102.
    38. Feng, Yongqiang & Zhang, Yaning & Li, Bingxi & Yang, Jinfu & Shi, Yang, 2015. "Sensitivity analysis and thermoeconomic comparison of ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 664-677.
    39. Li, Jing & Li, Pengcheng & Pei, Gang & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Analysis of a novel solar electricity generation system using cascade Rankine cycle and steam screw expander," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 627-638.
    40. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    41. Mokhtari, Hamid & Hadiannasab, Hasti & Mostafavi, Mostafa & Ahmadibeni, Ali & Shahriari, Behrooz, 2016. "Determination of optimum geothermal Rankine cycle parameters utilizing coaxial heat exchanger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 260-275.
    42. Ssebabi, B. & Dobson, R.T. & Sebitosi, A.B., 2015. "Characterising a turbine for application in an organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1617-1632.
    43. Orian, G. & Jelinek, M. & Levy, A., 2010. "Flow boiling of binary solution in horizontal tube," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 35-44.
    44. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    45. Li, You-Rong & Du, Mei-Tang & Wu, Chun-Mei & Wu, Shuang-Ying & Liu, Chao, 2014. "Potential of organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures as working fluids for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 509-519.
    46. Imran, Muhammad & Usman, Muhammad & Park, Byung-Sik & Yang, Youngmin, 2016. "Comparative assessment of Organic Rankine Cycle integration for low temperature geothermal heat source applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 473-490.
    47. Shu, Gequn & Gao, Yuanyuan & Tian, Hua & Wei, Haiqiao & Liang, Xingyu, 2014. "Study of mixtures based on hydrocarbons used in ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 428-438.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    3. Landelle, Arnaud & Tauveron, Nicolas & Haberschill, Philippe & Revellin, Rémi & Colasson, Stéphane, 2017. "Organic Rankine cycle design and performance comparison based on experimental database," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1172-1187.
    4. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    5. Magdalena Santos-Rodriguez, M. & Flores-Tlacuahuac, Antonio & Zavala, Victor M., 2017. "A stochastic optimization approach for the design of organic fluid mixtures for low-temperature heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 145-159.
    6. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin & Collings, Peter, 2017. "Dynamic control strategy of a distillation system for a composition-adjustable organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1038-1051.
    7. Satanphol, K. & Pridasawas, W. & Suphanit, B., 2017. "A study on optimal composition of zeotropic working fluid in an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for low grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 326-339.
    8. Miao, Zheng & Zhang, Kai & Wang, Mengxiao & Xu, Jinliang, 2019. "Thermodynamic selection criteria of zeotropic mixtures for subcritical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 484-497.
    9. Kajurek, Jakub & Rusowicz, Artur & Grzebielec, Andrzej & Bujalski, Wojciech & Futyma, Kamil & Rudowicz, Zbigniew, 2019. "Selection of refrigerants for a modified organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1-8.
    10. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S. & Deng, Shuai, 2020. "Towards novel low temperature thermodynamic cycle: A critical review originated from organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    11. Sánchez, Carlos J.N. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2018. "Technical and environmental analysis of transcritical Rankine cycles operating with numerous CO2 mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 180-190.
    12. Feng, Yongqiang & Hung, TzuChen & Zhang, Yaning & Li, Bingxi & Yang, Jinfu & Shi, Yang, 2015. "Performance comparison of low-grade ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) using R245fa, pentane and their mixtures based on the thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization and decision makings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2018-2029.
    13. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Mikelis, Angelos & Charalampidis, Antonios & Karellas, Sotirios, 2020. "Exergetic performance of CO2 and ultra-low GWP refrigerant mixtures as working fluids in ORC for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    14. Feili, Milad & Rostamzadeh, Hadi & Ghaebi, Hadi, 2022. "Thermo-mechanical energy level approach integrated with exergoeconomic optimization for realistic cost evaluation of a novel micro-CCHP system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 630-657.
    15. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Hærvig, J. & Sørensen, K. & Condra, T.J., 2016. "Guidelines for optimal selection of working fluid for an organic Rankine cycle in relation to waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 592-602.
    17. Li, Jian & Liu, Qiang & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2017. "Performance analysis of organic Rankine cycles using R600/R601a mixtures with liquid-separated condensation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 376-389.
    18. Peter Collings & Zhibin Yu, 2017. "Numerical Analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle with Adjustable Working Fluid Composition, a Volumetric Expander and a Recuperator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Oyeniyi A. Oyewunmi & Christos N. Markides, 2016. "Thermo-Economic and Heat Transfer Optimization of Working-Fluid Mixtures in a Low-Temperature Organic Rankine Cycle System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, June.
    20. White, M.T. & Oyewunmi, O.A. & Chatzopoulou, M.A. & Pantaleo, A.M. & Haslam, A.J. & Markides, C.N., 2018. "Computer-aided working-fluid design, thermodynamic optimisation and thermoeconomic assessment of ORC systems for waste-heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1181-1198.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:73:y:2017:i:c:p:1000-1013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.