IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v47y2012i1p70-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power enhancement potential of a mixture transcritical cycle for a low-temperature geothermal power generation

Author

Listed:
  • Baik, Young-Jin
  • Kim, Minsung
  • Chang, Ki-Chang
  • Lee, Young-Soo
  • Yoon, Hyung-Kee

Abstract

The power enhancement potential of a mixture transcritical cycle was investigated by comparison between the power of an R134a subcritical cycle and that of binary HFC (hydrofluorocarbon) mixture transcritical cycles for a low-temperature geothermal heat source of about 100°C. To fairly compare the power of the cycles by using different working fluids, each cycle was optimized from the view point of the power by three (or four for mixture cycles) design parameters. The first two are the turbine inlet temperature and pressure and the third is the ratio of the length of the vapor generator to the combined length of the vapor generator and the condenser. For the mixture cycles, the mixture composition was also optimized. In contrast to previous studies, to achieve a more realistic comparison, the characteristics of the working fluid's heat transfer and pressure drop were considered. Results show that the optimized R125-R245fa mixture transcritical cycle yields 11% more power than does the optimized R134a subcritical cycle under the simulation conditions considered in the present study.

Suggested Citation

  • Baik, Young-Jin & Kim, Minsung & Chang, Ki-Chang & Lee, Young-Soo & Yoon, Hyung-Kee, 2012. "Power enhancement potential of a mixture transcritical cycle for a low-temperature geothermal power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 70-76.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:47:y:2012:i:1:p:70-76
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544212004926
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    2. Cayer, Emmanuel & Galanis, Nicolas & Desilets, Martin & Nesreddine, Hakim & Roy, Philippe, 2009. "Analysis of a carbon dioxide transcritical power cycle using a low temperature source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(7-8), pages 1055-1063, July.
    3. Baik, Young-Jin & Kim, Minsung & Chang, Ki Chang & Kim, Sung Jin, 2011. "Power-based performance comparison between carbon dioxide and R125 transcritical cycles for a low-grade heat source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 892-898, March.
    4. Cayer, Emmanuel & Galanis, Nicolas & Nesreddine, Hakim, 2010. "Parametric study and optimization of a transcritical power cycle using a low temperature source," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1349-1357, April.
    5. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Rahman, Muhammad M. & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2011. "A supercritical Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixture working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat into power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 549-555.
    6. Angelino, Gianfranco & Colonna di Paliano, Piero, 1998. "Multicomponent Working Fluids For Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 449-463.
    7. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sánchez, Carlos J.N. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2018. "Technical and environmental analysis of transcritical Rankine cycles operating with numerous CO2 mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 180-190.
    2. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    3. He, Chao & Liu, Chao & Zhou, Mengtong & Xie, Hui & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Wu, Shuangying & Li, Yourong, 2014. "A new selection principle of working fluids for subcritical organic Rankine cycle coupling with different heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 283-291.
    4. Kazemiani-Najafabadi, Parisa & Amiri Rad, Ehsan, 2022. "Optimization of the boiler pressure and working fluid in a binary organic Rankine cycle for different heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    5. Bamorovat Abadi, Gholamreza & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2017. "Investigation of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixtures as a working fluid: Advantages and issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1000-1013.
    6. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Evaluation of geothermal heating from abandoned oil wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 592-607.
    7. Jesper Graa Andreasen & Martin Ryhl Kærn & Fredrik Haglind, 2019. "Assessment of Methods for Performance Comparison of Pure and Zeotropic Working Fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Su, Wen & Hwang, Yunho & shao, Yawei & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Nie, Xianhua & Zhang, Yue, 2019. "Error analysis of ORC performance calculation based on the Helmholtz equation with different binary interaction parameters of mixture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 414-425.
    9. Daniarta, Sindu & Imre, Attila R. & Kolasiński, Piotr, 2022. "Thermodynamic efficiency of subcritical and transcritical power cycles utilizing selected ACZ working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    10. Habka, Muhsen & Ajib, Salman, 2015. "Evaluation of mixtures performances in Organic Rankine Cycle when utilizing the geothermal water with and without cogeneration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 567-576.
    11. Wang, Enhua & Zhang, Hongguang & Fan, Boyuan & Ouyang, Minggao & Yang, Kai & Yang, Fuyuan & Li, Xiaojuan & Wang, Zhen, 2015. "3D numerical analysis of exhaust flow inside a fin-and-tube evaporator used in engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 800-812.
    12. Costante Invernizzi & Marco Binotti & Paola Bombarda & Gioele Di Marcoberardino & Paolo Iora & Giampaolo Manzolini, 2019. "Water Mixtures as Working Fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Florian Heberle & Dieter Brüggemann, 2015. "Thermo-Economic Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycles for Geothermal Power Generation Using Zeotropic Mixtures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-28, March.
    14. Lee, Ung & Kim, Kyeongsu & Han, Chonghun, 2014. "Design and optimization of multi-component organic rankine cycle using liquefied natural gas cryogenic exergy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 520-532.
    15. Sun, Fengrui & Yao, Yuedong & Li, Guozhen & Li, Xiangfang, 2018. "Geothermal energy extraction in CO2 rich basin using abandoned horizontal wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 760-773.
    16. Choi, In-Hwan & Lee, Sangick & Seo, Yutaek & Chang, Daejun, 2013. "Analysis and optimization of cascade Rankine cycle for liquefied natural gas cold energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 179-195.
    17. Yun, Eunkoo & Kim, Dokyun & Lee, Minseog & Baek, Seungdong & Yoon, Sang Youl & Kim, Kyung Chun, 2016. "Parallel-expander Organic Rankine cycle using dual expanders with different capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 204-214.
    18. Liu, Qiang & Shen, Aijing & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2015. "Parametric optimization and performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles using R600a/R601a mixtures as working fluids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 410-420.
    19. Le, Van Long & Feidt, Michel & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Performance optimization of low-temperature power generation by supercritical ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) using low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 513-526.
    20. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    21. Zheng, Nan & Song, Weidong & Zhao, Li, 2013. "Theoretical and experimental investigations on the changing regularity of the extreme point of the temperature difference between zeotropic mixtures and heat transfer fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 541-552.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Le, Van Long & Feidt, Michel & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Performance optimization of low-temperature power generation by supercritical ORCs (organic Rankine cycles) using low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 513-526.
    2. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    3. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Analyses and optimization of a supercritical N2O Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 344-351.
    4. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    5. Dai, Baomin & Li, Minxia & Ma, Yitai, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide blends with low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 942-952.
    6. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2012. "Exergy analysis and parameter study on a novel auto-cascade Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 539-547.
    7. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    8. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    9. Kermani, Maziar & Wallerand, Anna S. & Kantor, Ivan D. & Maréchal, François, 2018. "Generic superstructure synthesis of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery in industrial processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1203-1225.
    10. Baccioli, A. & Antonelli, M. & Desideri, U., 2017. "Technical and economic analysis of organic flash regenerative cycles (OFRCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 69-87.
    11. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    12. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    13. Shu, Gequn & Shi, Lingfeng & Tian, Hua & Deng, Shuai & Li, Xiaoya & Chang, Liwen, 2017. "Configurations selection maps of CO2-based transcritical Rankine cycle (CTRC) for thermal energy management of engine waste heat," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 423-435.
    14. Kun-Hsien Lu & Hsiao-Wei D. Chiang & Pei-Jen Wang, 2022. "Sensitivity Analysis of Transcritical CO 2 Cycle Performance Regarding Isentropic Efficiencies of Turbomachinery for Low Temperature Heat Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Lee, Ung & Kim, Kyeongsu & Han, Chonghun, 2014. "Design and optimization of multi-component organic rankine cycle using liquefied natural gas cryogenic exergy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 520-532.
    16. Song, Chongzhi & Gu, Mingyan & Miao, Zheng & Liu, Chao & Xu, Jinliang, 2019. "Effect of fluid dryness and critical temperature on trans-critical organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 97-109.
    17. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua & Hung, Tzu-Chen, 2017. "Thermo-economic analysis of the transcritical organic Rankine cycle using R1234yf/R32 mixtures as the working fluids for lower-grade waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 818-836.
    18. Sánchez, Carlos J.N. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2018. "Technical and environmental analysis of transcritical Rankine cycles operating with numerous CO2 mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 180-190.
    19. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    20. Le, Van Long & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Feidt, Michel & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic optimizations of a waste heat to power plant driven by a subcritical ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) using pure or zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 622-638.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:47:y:2012:i:1:p:70-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.