IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i7p1030-d105129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Catalytic Formulation and Operative Conditions on Coke Deposition over CeO 2 -SiO 2 Based Catalysts for Ethanol Reforming

Author

Listed:
  • Vincenzo Palma

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 83040 Fisciano (SA), Italy)

  • Concetta Ruocco

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 83040 Fisciano (SA), Italy)

  • Eugenio Meloni

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 83040 Fisciano (SA), Italy)

  • Antonio Ricca

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II 132, 83040 Fisciano (SA), Italy)

Abstract

In this work, a series of CeO 2 -SiO 2 (30 wt % of ceria)-based catalysts was prepared by the wetness impregnation method and tested for ESR (ethanol steam reforming) at 450–500 °C, atmospheric pressure and a water/ethanol ratio increasing from 4 to 6 (the ethanol concentration being fixed to 10 vol %); after every test, coke gasification measurements were performed at the same water partial pressure, and the temperature of the test and the gasified carbon was measured from the areas under the CO and CO 2 profiles. Finally, oxidation measurements under a 5% O 2 /N 2 stream made it possible to calculate the total carbon deposited. In an attempt to improve the coke resistance of a Pt-Ni/CeO 2 -SiO 2 catalyst, the effect of support basification by alkali addition (K and Cs), as well as Pt substitution by Rh was investigated. The novel catalysts, especially those containing Rh, displayed a lowering in the carbon formation rate; however, a faster reduction of ethanol conversion with time-on-stream and lessened hydrogen selectivities were recorded. In addition, no significant gain in terms of coke gasification rates was observed. The most active catalyst (Pt-Ni/CeO 2 -SiO 2 ) was also tested under different operative conditions, in order to study the effect of temperature and water/ethanol ratio on carbon formation and gasification. The increase in the water content resulted in an enhanced reactor-plugging time due to reduced carbonaceous deposits formation; however, no effect of steam concentration on the carbon gasification rate were recorded. On the other hand, the increase in temperature from 450–500 °C lowered the coke selectivity by almost one order of magnitude improving, at the same time, the contribution of the gasification reactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincenzo Palma & Concetta Ruocco & Eugenio Meloni & Antonio Ricca, 2017. "Influence of Catalytic Formulation and Operative Conditions on Coke Deposition over CeO 2 -SiO 2 Based Catalysts for Ethanol Reforming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:7:p:1030-:d:105129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/1030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/1030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamed F. Aly Aboud & Zeid A. ALOthman & Mohamed A. Habila & Claudia Zlotea & Michel Latroche & Fermin Cuevas, 2015. "Hydrogen Storage in Pristine and d10-Block Metal-Anchored Activated Carbon Made from Local Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Mario Conte & Francesco Di Mario & Agostino Iacobazzi & Antonio Mattucci & Angelo Moreno & Marina Ronchetti, 2009. "Hydrogen as Future Energy Carrier: The ENEA Point of View on Technology and Application Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-30, March.
    3. Yongqi Sun & Zuotai Zhang & Lili Liu & Xidong Wang, 2015. "Heat Recovery from High Temperature Slags: A Review of Chemical Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Mohamed Magdeldin & Thomas Kohl & Cataldo De Blasio & Mika Järvinen & Song Won Park & Reinaldo Giudici, 2016. "The BioSCWG Project: Understanding the Trade-Offs in the Process and Thermal Design of Hydrogen and Synthetic Natural Gas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-27, October.
    5. Sharma, Yogesh Chandra & Kumar, Ashutosh & Prasad, Ram & Upadhyay, Siddh Nath, 2017. "Ethanol steam reforming for hydrogen production: Latest and effective catalyst modification strategies to minimize carbonaceous deactivation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 89-103.
    6. Masahide Yasuda & Ryo Kurogi & Hikaru Tsumagari & Tsutomu Shiragami & Tomoko Matsumoto, 2014. "New Approach to Fuelization of Herbaceous Lignocelluloses through Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation Followed by Photocatalytic Reforming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-11, June.
    7. Mario Sisinni & Andrea Di Carlo & Enrico Bocci & Andrea Micangeli & Vincenzo Naso, 2013. "Hydrogen-Rich Gas Production by Sorption Enhanced Steam Reforming of Woodgas Containing TAR over a Commercial Ni Catalyst and Calcined Dolomite as CO 2 Sorbent," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Jun Tao & Leiqiang Zhao & Changqing Dong & Qiang Lu & Xiaoze Du & Erik Dahlquist, 2013. "Catalytic Steam Reforming of Toluene as a Model Compound of Biomass Gasification Tar Using Ni-CeO 2 /SBA-15 Catalysts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Abrar Inayat & Murni M. Ahmad & Suzana Yusup & Mohamed Ibrahim Abdul Mutalib, 2010. "Biomass Steam Gasification with In-Situ CO2 Capture for Enriched Hydrogen Gas Production: A Reaction Kinetics Modelling Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(8), pages 1-13, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deng, Yimin & Li, Shuo & Appels, Lise & Zhang, Huili & Sweygers, Nick & Baeyens, Jan & Dewil, Raf, 2023. "Steam reforming of ethanol by non-noble metal catalysts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Bogdan Ulejczyk & Łukasz Nogal & Michał Młotek & Krzysztof Krawczyk, 2022. "Efficient Plasma Technology for the Production of Green Hydrogen from Ethanol and Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Ruocco, Concetta & Palma, Vincenzo & Cortese, Marta & Martino, Marco, 2022. "Stability of bimetallic Ni/CeO2–SiO2 catalysts during fuel grade bioethanol reforming in a fluidized bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 913-922.
    4. Eugenio Meloni & Marco Martino & Giuseppina Iervolino & Concetta Ruocco & Simona Renda & Giovanni Festa & Vincenzo Palma, 2022. "The Route from Green H 2 Production through Bioethanol Reforming to CO 2 Catalytic Conversion: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-36, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beatrice Castellani & Alberto Maria Gambelli & Elena Morini & Benedetto Nastasi & Andrea Presciutti & Mirko Filipponi & Andrea Nicolini & Federico Rossi, 2017. "Experimental Investigation on CO 2 Methanation Process for Solar Energy Storage Compared to CO 2 -Based Methanol Synthesis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Zhang, Zhikun & Liu, Lina & Shen, Boxiong & Wu, Chunfei, 2018. "Preparation, modification and development of Ni-based catalysts for catalytic reforming of tar produced from biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1086-1109.
    3. Vera Marcantonio & Marcello De Falco & Enrico Bocci, 2022. "Non-Thermal Plasma Technology for CO 2 Conversion—An Overview of the Most Relevant Experimental Results and Kinetic Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Orlando Corigliano & Leonardo Pagnotta & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2022. "On the Technology of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) Energy Systems for Stationary Power Generation: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-73, November.
    5. Yasuda, Masahide & Matsumoto, Tomoko & Yamashita, Toshiaki, 2018. "Sacrificial hydrogen production over TiO2-based photocatalysts: Polyols, carboxylic acids, and saccharides," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1627-1635.
    6. Duan, Wenjun & Yu, Qingbo & Liu, Junxiang & Wu, Tianwei & Yang, Fan & Qin, Qin, 2016. "Experimental and kinetic study of steam gasification of low-rank coal in molten blast furnace slag," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 859-868.
    7. Satinover, Scott J. & Schell, Dan & Borole, Abhijeet P., 2020. "Achieving high hydrogen productivities of 20 L/L-day via microbial electrolysis of corn stover fermentation products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Łukajtis, Rafał & Hołowacz, Iwona & Kucharska, Karolina & Glinka, Marta & Rybarczyk, Piotr & Przyjazny, Andrzej & Kamiński, Marian, 2018. "Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 665-694.
    9. Magdeldin, Mohamed & Kohl, Thomas & Järvinen, Mika, 2017. "Techno-economic assessment of the by-products contribution from non-catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of lignocellulose residues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 679-695.
    10. Asma Sattar & Chaudhry Arslan & Changying Ji & Sumiyya Sattar & Irshad Ali Mari & Haroon Rashid & Fariha Ilyas, 2016. "Comparing the Bio-Hydrogen Production Potential of Pretreated Rice Straw Co-Digested with Seeded Sludge Using an Anaerobic Bioreactor under Mesophilic Thermophilic Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Huang, Jintao & Lyu, Sha & Han, He & Wang, Yanjiang & Sun, Haoyang & Su, Jingtao & Liu, Yidong & Min, Yonggang & Sun, Dazhi, 2022. "Enhanced looping biomass/vapour gasification utilizing waste heat from molten copper slags," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    12. Zhang, Huining & Dong, Jianping & Wei, Chao & Cao, Caifang & Zhang, Zuotai, 2022. "Future trend of terminal energy conservation in steelmaking plant: Integration of molten slag heat recovery-combustible gas preparation from waste plastics and CO2 emission reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    13. Craig M. Jensen & Etsuo Akiba & Hai-Wen Li, 2016. "Hydrides: Fundamentals and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-2, April.
    14. Eugenio Meloni & Marco Martino & Giuseppina Iervolino & Concetta Ruocco & Simona Renda & Giovanni Festa & Vincenzo Palma, 2022. "The Route from Green H 2 Production through Bioethanol Reforming to CO 2 Catalytic Conversion: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-36, March.
    15. Sreejith, C.C. & Haridasan, Navaneeth & Muraleedharan, C. & Arun, P., 2014. "Allothermal air–steam gasification of biomass with CO2 (carbon dioxide) sorption: Performance prediction based on a chemical kinetic model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 399-408.
    16. Granacher, Julia & Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Castro-Amoedo, Rafael & Maréchal, François, 2022. "Overcoming decision paralysis—A digital twin for decision making in energy system design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    17. De Blasio, Cataldo & De Gisi, Sabino & Molino, Antonio & Simonetti, Marco & Santarelli, Massimo & Björklund-Sänkiaho, Margareta, 2019. "Concerning operational aspects in supercritical water gasification of kraft black liquor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 891-901.
    18. Charisiou, N.D. & Italiano, C. & Pino, L. & Sebastian, V. & Vita, A. & Goula, M.A., 2020. "Hydrogen production via steam reforming of glycerol over Rh/γ-Al2O3 catalysts modified with CeO2, MgO or La2O3," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 908-925.
    19. Pala, Laxmi Prasad Rao & Wang, Qi & Kolb, Gunther & Hessel, Volker, 2017. "Steam gasification of biomass with subsequent syngas adjustment using shift reaction for syngas production: An Aspen Plus model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 484-492.
    20. Chia-Nan Wang & Min-Tsong Chou & Hsien-Pin Hsu & Jing-Wein Wang & Sridhar Selvaraj, 2017. "The Efficiency Improvement by Combining HHO Gas, Coal and Oil in Boiler for Electricity Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:7:p:1030-:d:105129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.