IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i4p21-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Sector of Public Vocational Universities in Poland from the Point of View of their Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Mariusz Pyra
  • Mieczyslaw Adamowicz

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the article is to present the results of efficiency studies using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method, as well as the Tobit model using examples of 29 public vocational universities operating in Poland. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research methodology is the DEA model in variants CCR-0, CCR-I, BCC-0, BCC-I. These are models based on the radial reduction of inputs in an input-oriented model. Taking into account the degree of differentiation of ineffective DMUs, it was decided to use the SE CCR-I model. Continuing the analysis and drawing conclusions from the above-mentioned DEA methods, the Tobit model was used in the next stage. Findings: From the point of view of the aim of the research, the SE DEA CCR-I model turned out to be the most useful. First, thanks to the removal of the limitation related to the maximum value of the evaluation of the efficiency of the studied DMU, a broader and more precise characterization of the efficient facilities was obtained. It became possible to distinguish among facilities classified as efficient, going beyond the mere statement that in their case there is efficiency at level 1. Second, the model was not so much focused on differentiating inefficient facilities, showing a picture of facilities with efficiency scores above 1, without compromising the quality of evaluating facilities with efficiency below 1. Practical Implications: The DEA method basically allows one to determine whether the object studied converts its expenditures into results in an optimal way, i.e., it allows for determining the effectiveness of the object under study. Determining the effectiveness of the functioning of public vocational universities is important for the future of this sector. Originality/value: The application of the DEA method to research the effectiveness of universities is not as often used as in the case of entities operating for profit. This is due to the complexity of the selection of inputs and outputs. The most common analyses using DEA methods relate to academic universities. Hence the need to extend such research to public vocational universities, that matter in the transfer of human resources to the labor market, is very important.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariusz Pyra & Mieczyslaw Adamowicz, 2021. "Assessment of the Sector of Public Vocational Universities in Poland from the Point of View of their Efficiency," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 21-43.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:21-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/2560/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Per Andersen & Niels Christian Petersen, 1993. "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1261-1264, October.
    2. Kalyan Chakraborty & Basudeb Biswas & W. Cris Lewis, 2001. "Measurement of Technical Efficiency in Public Education: A Stochastic and Nonstochastic Production Function Approach," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(4), pages 889-905, April.
    3. Finn Førsund & Nikias Sarafoglou, 2002. "On the Origins of Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 23-40, January.
    4. Allen N. Berger & David B. Humphrey, 1992. "Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking," NBER Chapters, in: Output Measurement in the Service Sectors, pages 245-300, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Piyu Yue, 1992. "Data envelopment analysis and commercial bank performance: a primer with applications to Missouri banks," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Jan, pages 31-45.
    6. Johnes, Jill, 2006. "Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 273-288, June.
    7. Kalyan Chakraborty & Basudeb Biswas & W. Cris Lewis, 2001. "Measurement of Technical Efficiency in Public Education: A Stochastic and Nonstochastic Production Function Approach," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(4), pages 889-905, April.
    8. Wagenvoort, Rien & Schure, Paul, 1999. "The Recursive Thick Frontier Approach to Estimating Efficiency," Economic and Financial Reports 1999/2, European Investment Bank, Economics Department.
    9. Emmanuel Thanassoulis, 1999. "Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Use in Banking," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Alene, Arega D. & Manyong, Victor M. & Gockowski, James, 2006. "The production efficiency of intercropping annual and perennial crops in southern Ethiopia: A comparison of distance functions and production frontiers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 51-70, November.
    11. Bogusław Guzik, 2009. "Basic analytical capabilities of the CCR-DEA model," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 19(1), pages 55-75.
    12. Johnes, Jill, 2006. "Measuring teaching efficiency in higher education: An application of data envelopment analysis to economics graduates from UK Universities 1993," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 443-456, October.
    13. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Kaoru Tone, 2007. "Data Envelopment Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-45283-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariusz Pyra & Joanna Zurakowska-Sawa, 2022. "Cooperation and Merger: Forecasting the Results of the Amalgamation of Selected Higher Education Institutions in the Context of a Change in their Effectiveness Rating," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 369-389.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Domagała, 2007. "Data Envelopment Analysis – a method for measuring the relative technical efficiency," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 17(3-4), pages 21-34.
    2. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min & Lin, Bruce J.Y., 2013. "A survey of DEA applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 893-902.
    3. Kristof De Witte & Laura López-Torres, 2017. "Efficiency in education: a review of literature and a way forward," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(4), pages 339-363, April.
    4. Atici, Kazim Baris & Podinovski, Victor V., 2015. "Using data envelopment analysis for the assessment of technical efficiency of units with different specialisations: An application to agriculture," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 72-83.
    5. Marcel Clermont, 2016. "Effectiveness and efficiency of research in Germany over time: an analysis of German business schools between 2001 and 2009," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1347-1381, September.
    6. Daghbashyan, Zara, 2009. "Do university units differ in the efficiency of resource utilization?," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 176, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, revised 17 Dec 2012.
    7. repec:mje:mjejnl:v:12:y:2017:i:3:p:63-73 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Luis R. Murillo‐Zamorano, 2004. "Economic Efficiency and Frontier Techniques," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 33-77, February.
    9. Halkos, George E. & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2013. "Estimating the degree of operating efficiency gains from a potential bank merger and acquisition: A DEA bootstrapped approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1658-1668.
    10. Marcel Clermont & Alexander Dirksen & Harald Dyckhoff, 2015. "Returns to scale of Business Administration research in Germany," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 583-614, May.
    11. Herrero, Inés & Algarrada, Inmaculada, 2010. "Is the new ECTS system better than the traditional one? An application to the ECTS pilot-project at the University Pablo de Olavide," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 164-172, July.
    12. Sanjeet Singh & Prabhat Ranjan, 2018. "Efficiency analysis of non-homogeneous parallel sub-unit systems for the performance measurement of higher education," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 641-666, October.
    13. Lau, Kwok Hung, 2013. "Measuring distribution efficiency of a retail network through data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 598-611.
    14. Barros, C.P. & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2016. "Assessing productive efficiency of banks using integrated Fuzzy-DEA and bootstrapping: A case of Mozambican banksAuthor-Name: Wanke, Peter," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 378-389.
    15. Victor V. Podinovski & Wan Rohaida Wan Husain, 2017. "The hybrid returns-to-scale model and its extension by production trade-offs: an application to the efficiency assessment of public universities in Malaysia," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(1), pages 65-84, March.
    16. Wanke, Peter & Maredza, Andrew & Gupta, Rangan, 2017. "Merger and acquisitions in South African banking: A network DEA model," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 362-376.
    17. Ibrahim Huseyni & Mirac Eren & Ali Kemal Celik, 2017. "Examining the Relationship Among Economic Growth, Exports and Total Productivity for OECD Countries Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Panel Data Analyses," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 13(3), pages 63-73.
    18. Navas, Lina P. & Montes, Felipe & Abolghasem, Sepideh & Salas, Ricardo J. & Toloo, Mehdi & Zarama, Roberto, 2020. "Colombian higher education institutions evaluation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    19. Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Revisited: Impact of Information Technology Disruptions on Empirical Retail Logistics Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Simar, Leopold & Wilson, Paul W., 2007. "Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 31-64, January.
    21. Alexandr Gedranovich & Mykhaylo Salnykov, 2012. "Productivity analysis of Belarusian higher education system," BEROC Working Paper Series 16, Belarusian Economic Research and Outreach Center (BEROC).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Efficiency assessment; education sector; model DEA.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:21-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.