IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v126y2022icp162-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and modeling of changes in online shopping behavior due to Covid-19 pandemic: A Florida case study

Author

Listed:
  • Adibfar, Alireza
  • Gulhare, Siddhartha
  • Srinivasan, Siva
  • Costin, Aaron

Abstract

The emergence of eCommerce and online shopping commenced a new episode in human life and changed trading patterns. Online shopping provided access to a broader range of products and facilitated their delivery, which increased demand. To respond to the increased demand, more heavy commercial vehicles need to be on the roads to deliver orders. This is while the road infrastructure is not ready for such a swift shift, and most roads and bridges were planned and constructed during the 19s when online shopping was not coined yet. The continued increase of heavy vehicles on roads can intensify the deterioration of roads and structures such as bridges. Therefore, there is a significant need for an update on new shopping trends, especially changes in people's behavior due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, and to assess if the pandemic permanently changed the trends of in-store and online shopping. This study first examines the NHTS 2017 data to find the attributes that are significant to online shoppers' behavior. Then a survey is developed to scrutinize Covid-19 effects on the online shopping behavior of users before, during, and after the Covid-19 pandemic. 206 records of data are interpreted through descriptive analysis and discrete choice modeling of users' responses to find the most significant attributes affecting their online shopping behavior. The findings of discrete choice modeling and descriptive analysis support that people tend to go back to stores after the pandemic. The findings of this study show that online and in-store shopping would be balanced after the pandemic and would pursue their normal trends as they were before the pandemic. Based on the findings of this study, it is hard to state that online shopping can vanish in-store shopping due to Covid-19. People still need to go to stores to fulfill their needs for the joy of shopping, interactions with other people, and touching the products they would like to buy. Therefore, transportation stakeholders need to pay special attention to both in-store and online shopping for their planning and operation management of ground transportation infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Adibfar, Alireza & Gulhare, Siddhartha & Srinivasan, Siva & Costin, Aaron, 2022. "Analysis and modeling of changes in online shopping behavior due to Covid-19 pandemic: A Florida case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 162-176.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:126:y:2022:i:c:p:162-176
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X22001846
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agyemang-Duah, Kwaku & Hall, Fred L., 1997. "Spatial transferability of an ordered response model of trip generation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 389-402, September.
    2. Thaichon, Park, 2017. "Consumer socialization process: The role of age in children's online shopping behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 38-47.
    3. Kim, Yeonsu & Kang, Jisoo & Chun, Hyunbae, 2022. "Is online shopping packaging waste a threat to the environment?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    4. Jasper Grashuis & Theodoros Skevas & Michelle S. Segovia, 2020. "Grocery Shopping Preferences during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Duarte, Paulo & Costa e Silva, Susana & Ferreira, Margarida Bernardo, 2018. "How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 161-169.
    6. Lee, Richard J. & Sener, Ipek N. & Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Handy, Susan L., 2017. "Relationships between the online and in-store shopping frequency of Davis, California residents," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 40-52.
    7. Sun, Xiaoqian & Wandelt, Sebastian & Zheng, Changhong & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "COVID-19 pandemic and air transportation: Successfully navigating the paper hurricane," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    8. Xi, Guangliang & Cao, Xinyu & Zhen, Feng, 2020. "The impacts of same day delivery online shopping on local store shopping in Nanjing, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 35-47.
    9. Schmid, Basil & Axhausen, Kay W., 2019. "In-store or online shopping of search and experience goods: A hybrid choice approach," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 156-180.
    10. Hess, Stephane & Palma, David, 2019. "Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Zhang, Yunchang & Fricker, Jon D., 2021. "Quantifying the impact of COVID-19 on non-motorized transportation: A Bayesian structural time series model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 11-20.
    12. Erjavec, Jure & Manfreda, Anton, 2022. "Online shopping adoption during COVID-19 and social isolation: Extending the UTAUT model with herd behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hashed Mabkhot & Normalisa Md Isa & Ammar Mabkhot, 2022. "The Influence of the Credibility of Social Media Influencers SMIs on the Consumers’ Purchase Intentions: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Weisbrod, Glen & Hensher, David A., 2023. "Improving transportation project evaluation by recognizing the role of spatial scale and context in measuring non-user economic benefits," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 80-89.
    3. Balbontin, Camila & Hensher, David A. & Ho, Chinh, 2023. "Light commercial vehicles destination choice: Understanding preferences relative to the number of stop and tour-based trip type," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Shulin Wang & Shanhua Wu, 2023. "Optimizing the Location of Virtual-Shopping-Experience Stores Based on the Minimum Impact on Urban Traffic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Figliozzi, Miguel & Unnikrishnan, Avinash, 2021. "Exploring the impact of socio-demographic characteristics, health concerns, and product type on home delivery rates and expenditures during a strict COVID-19 lockdown period: A case study from Portlan," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1-19.
    2. Rossetti, Tomás & Yoon, So-Yeon & Daziano, Ricardo A., 2022. "Social distancing and store choice in times of a pandemic," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Kim, Woojung & Holguín-Veras, José & Schmid, Joshua, 2021. "Adoption of delivery services in light of the COVID pandemic: Who and how long?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 270-286.
    4. Shah, Harsh & Carrel, Andre L. & Le, Huyen T.K., 2021. "What is your shopping travel style? Heterogeneity in US households’ online shopping and travel," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 83-98.
    5. Shi, Kunbo & De Vos, Jonas & Cheng, Long & Yang, Yongchun & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "The influence of the built environment on online purchases of intangible services: Examining the mediating role of online purchase attitudes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 116-126.
    6. Maria Cieśla & Sandra Kuśnierz & Oliwia Modrzik & Sonia Niedośpiał & Patrycja Sosna, 2021. "Scenarios for the Development of Polish Passenger Transport Services in Pandemic Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Molloy, Joseph & Becker, Felix & Schmid, Basil & Axhausen, Kay W., 2021. "mixl: An open-source R package for estimating complex choice models on large datasets," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    8. Rotaris, Lucia & Giansoldati, Marco & Scorrano, Mariangela, 2021. "The slow uptake of electric cars in Italy and Slovenia. Evidence from a stated-preference survey and the role of knowledge and environmental awareness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-18.
    9. Scorrano, Mariangela & Rotaris, Lucia, 2022. "The role of environmental awareness and knowledge in the choice of a seated electric scooter," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 333-347.
    10. Li, Shengxiao (Alex), 2023. "Revisiting the relationship between information and communication technologies and travel behavior: An investigation of older Americans," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    11. Colaço, Rui & de Abreu e Silva, João, 2022. "Exploring the e-shopping geography of Lisbon: Assessing online shopping adoption for retail purchases and food deliveries using a 7-day shopping survey," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. Wang, Kaili & Gao, Ya & Liu, Yicong & Nurul Habib, Khandker, 2023. "Exploring the choice between in-store versus online grocery shopping through an application of Semi-Compensatory Independent Availability Logit (SCIAL) model with latent variables," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Jing Chen & Yong Zhang & Shiyao Zhu & Lei Liu, 2021. "Does COVID-19 Affect the Behavior of Buying Fresh Food? Evidence from Wuhan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Alzaidi, Maram Saeed & Agag, Gomaa, 2022. "The role of trust and privacy concerns in using social media for e-retail services: The moderating role of COVID-19," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Shao, Rui & Derudder, Ben & Witlox, Frank, 2022. "The geography of e-shopping in China: On the role of physical and virtual accessibility," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Minh Hieu Nguyen & Jimmy Armoogum & Binh Nguyen Thi, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Growth of E-Shopping over the COVID-19 Era in Hanoi, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Budziński, Wiktor & Daziano, Ricardo, 2023. "Preferences for online grocery shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic — the role of fear-related attitudes," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    18. Perlman, Yael, 2022. "Pricing decisions of online and offline retailers, each offering a competing benefit," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    19. Elif Bozkaya & Levent Eriskin & Mumtaz Karatas, 2023. "Data analytics during pandemics: a transportation and location planning perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 193-244, September.
    20. Frings, Oliver & Abildtrup, Jens & Montagné-Huck, Claire & Gorel, Salomé & Stenger, Anne, 2023. "Do individual PES buyers care about additionality and free-riding? A choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:126:y:2022:i:c:p:162-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.