IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v121y2022icp46-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Significance of intermodal freight modal choice criteria: MCDM-based decision support models and SP-based modal shift policies

Author

Listed:
  • Gohari, Adel
  • Ahmad, Anuar Bin
  • Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard
  • Gohari, Ali
  • Hasan, Razi
  • Sholagberu, Abdulkadir Taofeeq

Abstract

This paper reviews modal choice decisions associated with intermodal freight transportation through decision support models based on the Multi-Criteria Decision-making (MCDM) techniques and modal shift policy assessments based on the Stated Preferences (SP) experiments. The objectives were to determine the relevant decision criteria and their relative significance, to define methods in use, and to identify respective policies that boost intermodality. Google Scholar database and manual search using identified keywords were conducted and references of the relevant articles were double-checked. Consequently, a total of 27 articles consisting of respective 18 and 9 MCDM-based and SP-based articles were reviewed in this study. The results showed that the most commonly used decision criteria were cost, CO2 emissions, delivery time, safety, reliability, flexibility, and frequency. The cost factor was assigned the highest weight in 22 articles (or 81.4%). Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique was implemented in 12 out of 18 MCDM articles (or 66.6%)). Successful application of MCDM methods (both single and integrated) showed the suitability of these methods for intermodal freight modal choice decision-making. The results of SP experiments revealed that cost reduction policies are more effective than policies addressing other factors to increase the demand for intermodal transportation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gohari, Adel & Ahmad, Anuar Bin & Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard & Gohari, Ali & Hasan, Razi & Sholagberu, Abdulkadir Taofeeq, 2022. "Significance of intermodal freight modal choice criteria: MCDM-based decision support models and SP-based modal shift policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 46-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:121:y:2022:i:c:p:46-60
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.03.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2200083X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.03.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Jankowski, Jarosław & Ziemba, Paweł & Karczmarczyk, Artur & Zioło, Magdalena, 2019. "Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-124.
    2. Bergantino, Angela S. & Bierlaire, Michel & Catalano, Mario & Migliore, Marco & Amoroso, Salvatore, 2013. "Taste heterogeneity and latent preferences in the choice behaviour of freight transport operators," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 77-91.
    3. Cathy Macharis & Dries Meers & Tom Van Lier, 2015. "Modal choice in freight transport: combining multi-criteria decision analysis and geographic information systems," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 355-371.
    4. Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Arellana, Julian & Senna, Luiz Afonso, 2017. "Encouraging intermodality: A stated preference analysis of freight mode choice in Rio Grande do Sul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 202-211.
    5. Ying Wang & Gi-Tae Yeo, 2018. "Intermodal route selection for cargo transportation from Korea to Central Asia by adopting Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy ELECTRE I methods," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 3-18, January.
    6. Seungjin Shin & Hong-Seung Roh & Sung Ho Hur, 2019. "Characteristics Analysis of Freight Mode Choice Model According to the Introduction of a New Freight Transport System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Tomas Ambra & An Caris & Cathy Macharis, 2019. "Towards freight transport system unification: reviewing and combining the advancements in the physical internet and synchromodal transport research," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(6), pages 1606-1623, March.
    8. Danielis, Romeo & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2007. "Attribute cut-offs in freight service selection," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 506-515, September.
    9. Tom Vermeiren & Cathy Macharis, 2016. "Intermodal land transportation systems and port choice, an analysis of stated choices among shippers in the Rhine–Scheldt delta," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 992-1004, November.
    10. Rickard Bergqvist & Sönke Behrends, 2011. "Assessing the Effects of Longer Vehicles: The Case of Pre- and Post-haulage in Intermodal Transport Chains," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 591-602.
    11. Vega, Amaya & Feo-Valero, Maria & Espino-Espino, Raquel, 2018. "The potential impact of Brexit on Ireland's demand for shipping services to continental Europe," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-13.
    12. Feo, María & Espino, Raquel & García, Leandro, 2011. "An stated preference analysis of Spanish freight forwarders modal choice on the south-west Europe Motorway of the Sea," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 60-67, January.
    13. Marie Sawadogo & Didier Anciaux, 2011. "Intermodal transportation within the green supply chain: an approach based on ELECTRE method," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 43-65.
    14. Shinghal, Nalin & Fowkes, Tony, 2002. "Freight mode choice and adaptive stated preferences," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 367-378, September.
    15. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Rosano, Mariangela, 2018. "Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 401-418.
    16. Thi Yen Pham & Gi-Tae Yeo, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis Selecting the Transport Routes of Electronics Components from China to Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Burak Ayar & Hande Yaman, 2012. "An intermodal multicommodity routing problem with scheduled services," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 131-153, September.
    18. Prajogo, Daniel & Olhager, Jan, 2012. "Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 514-522.
    19. Mohamed Ben-Daya & Elkafi Hassini & Zied Bahroun, 2019. "Internet of things and supply chain management: a literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 4719-4742, August.
    20. Irina V. Benedyk & Srinivas Peeta, 2018. "A binary probit model to analyze freight transportation decision-maker perspectives for container shipping on the Northern Sea Route," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 358-374, September.
    21. María Feo-Valero & Leandro García-Menéndez & Salvador del Saz-Salazar, 2016. "Rail freight transport and demand requirements: an analysis of attribute cut-offs through a stated preference experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 101-122, January.
    22. R Ishfaq, 2013. "Intermodal shipments as recourse in logistics disruptions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(2), pages 229-240, February.
    23. Murat Köksalan & Jyrki Wallenius & Stanley Zionts, 2011. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making:From Early History to the 21st Century," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 8042, January.
    24. Bontekoning, Y. M. & Macharis, C. & Trip, J. J., 2004. "Is a new applied transportation research field emerging?--A review of intermodal rail-truck freight transport literature," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-34, January.
    25. Macharis, C. & Bontekoning, Y. M., 2004. "Opportunities for OR in intermodal freight transport research: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 400-416, March.
    26. Dalė Dzemydienė & Aurelija Burinskienė & Arūnas Miliauskas, 2021. "Integration of Multi-Criteria Decision Support with Infrastructure of Smart Services for Sustainable Multi-Modal Transportation of Freights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, April.
    27. Frank Witlox & Els Vandaele, 2005. "Determining the Monetary Value of Quality Attributes in Freight Transportation Using a Stated Preference Approach," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 77-92, April.
    28. SteadieSeifi, M. & Dellaert, N.P. & Nuijten, W. & Van Woensel, T. & Raoufi, R., 2014. "Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 1-15.
    29. M. Beuthe & Ch. Bouffioux, 2008. "Analysing Qualitative Attributes of Freight Transport from Stated Orders of Preference Experiment," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 42(1), pages 105-128, January.
    30. María Feo-Valero & Leandro García-Menéndez & Salvador Saz-Salazar, 2016. "Rail freight transport and demand requirements: an analysis of attribute cut-offs through a stated preference experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 101-122, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhiqiang Zhu & Xuechi Zhang & Mengqing Xue & Yaoyao Song, 2023. "Eco-Efficiency and Its Evolutionary Change under Regulatory Constraints: A Case Study of Chinese Transportation Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Rostislav, Kirill (Ростислав, Кирилл) & Rusakov, Dmitry (Русаков, Дмитрий) & Saprykin, Matvey (Сапрыкин, Матвей), 2023. "A brief overview of theoretical and empirical approaches to solving transport problems and problems on the development of transport networks [Краткий Обзор Теоретических И Эмпирических Подходов К Р," Working Papers w20220269, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jawaher Binsuwadan & Gerard De Jong & Richard Batley & Phill Wheat, 2022. "The value of travel time savings in freight transport: a meta-analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1183-1209, August.
    2. Vega, Amaya & Feo-Valero, Maria & Espino-Espino, Raquel, 2018. "The potential impact of Brexit on Ireland's demand for shipping services to continental Europe," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Zhang, Rong & Zhu, Lichao, 2019. "Threshold incorporating freight choice modeling for hinterland leg transportation chain of export containers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 858-872.
    4. Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Feo-Valero, María & García-Menéndez, Leandro & Román, Concepción, 2015. "Modelling mode choice for freight transport using advanced choice experiments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 252-267.
    5. Tapia, Rodrigo Javier & dos Santos Senna, Luiz Afonso & Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Cybis, Helena Beatriz Bettella, 2019. "Joint mode and port choice for soy production in Buenos Aires province, Argentina," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 100-118.
    6. Román, Concepción & Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Feo-Valero, María, 2017. "A latent class model with attribute cut-offs to analyze modal choice for freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 212-227.
    7. Zhang, M. & Pel, A.J., 2016. "Synchromodal hinterland freight transport: Model study for the port of Rotterdam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Tao, Xuezong & Zhu, Lichao, 2020. "Meta-analysis of value of time in freight transportation: A comprehensive review based on discrete choice models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 213-233.
    9. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    10. Rodrigo J. Tapia & Gerard Jong & Ana M. Larranaga & Helena B. Bettella Cybis, 2021. "Exploring Multiple‐discreteness in Freight Transport. A Multiple Discrete Extreme Value Model Application for Grain Consolidators in Argentina," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 581-608, September.
    11. Thi Yen Pham & Ki Young Kim & Gi-Tae YEO, 2018. "The Panama Canal Expansion and Its Impact on East–West Liner Shipping Route Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Tapia, Rodrigo J. & de Jong, Gerard & Larranaga, Ana M. & Bettella Cybis, Helena B., 2020. "Application of MDCEV to infrastructure planning in regional freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 255-271.
    13. Zhuo Zhang & Dezhi Zhang & Lóránt A. Tavasszy & Qinglin Li, 2020. "Multicriteria Intermodal Freight Network Optimal Problem with Heterogeneous Preferences under Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Arellana, Julian & Senna, Luiz Afonso, 2017. "Encouraging intermodality: A stated preference analysis of freight mode choice in Rio Grande do Sul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 202-211.
    15. Li, Zhaojin & Liu, Ya & Yang, Zhen, 2021. "An effective kernel search and dynamic programming hybrid heuristic for a multimodal transportation planning problem with order consolidation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Truschkin, Eugen & Elbert, Ralf, 2013. "Horizontal transshipment technologies as enablers of combined transport: Impact of transport policies on the modal split," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 91-109.
    17. Li, Qinglin & Rezaei, Jafar & Tavasszy, Lori & Wiegmans, Bart & Guo, Jingwei & Tang, Yinying & Peng, Qiyuan, 2020. "Customers’ preferences for freight service attributes of China Railway Express," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 225-236.
    18. Günay, Gürkan, 2023. "Shipment size and vehicle choice modeling for road freight transport: A geographical perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Sinem Tokcaer & Özgür Özpeynirci, 2018. "A bi-objective multimodal transportation planning problem with an application to a petrochemical ethylene manufacturer," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(1), pages 72-88, March.
    20. Jiang, Xiaodan & Fan, Houming & Luo, Meifeng & Xu, Zhenlin, 2020. "Strategic port competition in multimodal network development considering shippers’ choice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 68-89.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:121:y:2022:i:c:p:46-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.