IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v80y2015icp40-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compound Gamma representation for modeling travel time variability in a traffic network

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Jiwon
  • Mahmassani, Hani S.

Abstract

This paper proposes a compound probability distribution approach for capturing both vehicle-to-vehicle and day-to-day variability in modeling travel time reliability in a network. Starting from the observation that standard deviation and mean of distance-normalized travel time in a network are highly positively correlated and their relationship is well characterized by a linear function, this study assumes multiplicative error structures to describe data with such characteristics and derives a compound distribution to model travel delay per unit distance as a surrogate for travel time. The proposed Gamma–Gamma model arises when (within-day) vehicle-to-vehicle travel delay per unit distance is distributed according to a Gamma distribution, with mean that itself fluctuates from day to day following another Gamma distribution. The study calibrates the model parameters and validates the underlying assumptions using both simulated and actual vehicle trajectory data. The Gamma–Gamma distribution shows good fits to travel delay observations when compared to the (simple) Gamma and Lognormal distributions. The main advantage of the Gamma–Gamma model is its ability to recognize different variability dimensions reflected in travel time data and clear physical meanings of its parameters in connection with vehicle-to-vehicle and day-to-day variability. Based on the linearity assumption for the relationship between mean and standard deviation, two shape parameters of the Gamma–Gamma model are linked to the coefficient of variation of travel delay in vehicle-to-vehicle and day-to-day distributions, respectively, and can be directly estimated from the slope of the associated mean-standard deviation plots. An extension of the basic model form was also introduced to address potential deviations from this linearity assumption. The extended Gamma–Gamma model can account for time-of-day variations in mean-standard deviation relationships—such as hysteresis patterns observed in mean and day-to-day variation in travel time—and incorporate such dynamics in travel time distribution modeling. In summary, the model provides a systematic way of quantifying, comparing, and assessing different types of variability, which is important in understanding travel time characteristics and evaluating various transportation measures that affect reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Jiwon & Mahmassani, Hani S., 2015. "Compound Gamma representation for modeling travel time variability in a traffic network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 40-63.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:80:y:2015:i:c:p:40-63
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.06.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019126151500140X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2015.06.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brownlees, Christian T. & Gallo, Giampiero M., 2011. "Shrinkage estimation of semiparametric multiplicative error models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 365-378, April.
    2. M. A. P. Taylor, 1982. "Travel Time Variability---The Case of Two Public Modes," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 507-521, November.
    3. Engle, Robert F. & Gallo, Giampiero M., 2006. "A multiple indicators model for volatility using intra-daily data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1-2), pages 3-27.
    4. Christian T. Brownlees & Fabrizio Cipollini & Giampiero M. Gallo, 2011. "Multiplicative Error Models," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2011_03, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti", revised Apr 2011.
    5. Fosgerau, Mogens, 2010. "On the relation between the mean and variance of delay in dynamic queues with random capacity and demand," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 598-603, April.
    6. Robert Engle, 2002. "New frontiers for arch models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(5), pages 425-446.
    7. Stefanie Peer & Carl Koopmans & Erik T. Verhoef, 2010. "Predicting Travel Time Variability for Cost-Benefit Analysis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 10-071/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    8. Robert B. Noland & John W. Polak, 2002. "Travel time variability: A review of theoretical and empirical issues," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 39-54, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhaoqi Zang & Richard Batley & Xiangdong Xu & David Z. W. Wang, 2022. "On the value of distribution tail in the valuation of travel time variability," Papers 2207.06293, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    2. Li, Baibing, 2019. "Measuring travel time reliability and risk: A nonparametric approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 152-171.
    3. Zhaoqi Zang & Xiangdong Xu & Kai Qu & Ruiya Chen & Anthony Chen, 2022. "Travel time reliability in transportation networks: A review of methodological developments," Papers 2206.12696, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    4. Taylor, Michael A.P., 2017. "Fosgerau's travel time reliability ratio and the Burr distribution," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 50-63.
    5. Saif Eddin Jabari & Nikolaos M. Freris & Deepthi Mary Dilip, 2020. "Sparse Travel Time Estimation from Streaming Data," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Cheng, Lin & Yang, Chao, 2017. "A link-based mean-excess traffic equilibrium model under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 53-75.
    7. Kim, Sung Hoo & Chung, Jin-Hyuk, 2018. "Exploration on origin–destination-based travel time variability: Insights from Seoul metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 104-113.
    8. Zhong, R.X. & Xie, X.X. & Luo, J.C. & Pan, T.L. & Lam, W.H.K. & Sumalee, A., 2020. "Modeling double time-scale travel time processes with application to assessing the resilience of transportation systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 228-248.
    9. Zang, Zhaoqi & Xu, Xiangdong & Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony, 2018. "A closed-form estimation of the travel time percentile function for characterizing travel time reliability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 228-247.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimiliano Caporin & Eduardo Rossi & Paolo Santucci de Magistris, 2014. "Chasing volatility - A persistent multiplicative error model with jumps," CREATES Research Papers 2014-29, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    2. Javier Mencía & Enrique Sentana, 2018. "Volatility-Related Exchange Traded Assets: An Econometric Investigation," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 599-614, October.
    3. E. Otranto, 2012. "Spillover Effects in the Volatility of Financial Markets," Working Paper CRENoS 201217, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    4. Cipollini, Fabrizio & Gallo, Giampiero M. & Otranto, Edoardo, 2021. "Realized volatility forecasting: Robustness to measurement errors," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 44-57.
    5. Markus Engler & Vahidin Jeleskovic, 2016. "Intraday volatility, trading volume and trading intensity in the interbank market e-MID," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201648, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    6. Demetrio Lacava & Giampiero M. Gallo & Edoardo Otranto, 2022. "Unconventional policies effects on stock market volatility: The MAP approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1245-1265, November.
    7. G.M. Gallo & D. Lacava & E. Otranto, 2020. "Measuring the Effects of Unconventional Policies on Stock Market Volatility," Working Paper CRENoS 202006, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    8. Driton Kuçi, 2015. "Contemporary Models of Organization of Power and the Macedonian Model of Organization of Power," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, September.
    9. Heejoon Han & Myung D. Park & Shen Zhang, 2015. "A Multiplicative Error Model with Heterogeneous Components for Forecasting Realized Volatility," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 209-219, April.
    10. Giampiero M. Gallo & Edoardo Otranto, 2018. "Combining sharp and smooth transitions in volatility dynamics: a fuzzy regime approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(3), pages 549-573, April.
    11. Paul Koster & Eric Pels & Erik Verhoef, 2016. "The User Costs of Air Travel Delay Variability," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 120-131, February.
    12. Giampiero M. Gallo & Edoardo Otranto, 2012. "Volatility Swings in the US Financial Markets," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2012_03, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti", revised Jul 2012.
    13. Heejoon Han & Myung D. Park, 2013. "Comparison of Realized Measure and Implied Volatility in Forecasting Volatility," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 522-533, September.
    14. Diaa Noureldin & Neil Shephard & Kevin Sheppard, 2012. "Multivariate high‐frequency‐based volatility (HEAVY) models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(6), pages 907-933, September.
    15. Ahoniemi, Katja & Lanne, Markku, 2009. "Joint modeling of call and put implied volatility," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 239-258.
    16. Luca Scaffidi Domianello & Giampiero M. Gallo & Edoardo Otranto, 2024. "Smooth and Abrupt Dynamics in Financial Volatility: The MS‐MEM‐MIDAS," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 86(1), pages 21-43, February.
    17. Nikolaus Hautsch & Vahidin Jeleskovic, 2008. "Modelling High-Frequency Volatility and Liquidity Using Multiplicative Error Models," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2008-047, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    18. Fabrizio Cipollini & Robert F. Engle & Giampiero M. Gallo, 2006. "Vector Multiplicative Error Models: Representation and Inference," NBER Technical Working Papers 0331, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Robert F. Engle & Giampiero M. Gallo & Margherita Velucchi, 2012. "Volatility Spillovers in East Asian Financial Markets: A Mem-Based Approach," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(1), pages 222-223, February.
    20. Chen, Fei & Diebold, Francis X. & Schorfheide, Frank, 2013. "A Markov-switching multifractal inter-trade duration model, with application to US equities," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 320-342.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:80:y:2015:i:c:p:40-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.