IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v70y2014icp47-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Travel time resilience of roadway networks under disaster

Author

Listed:
  • Faturechi, Reza
  • Miller-Hooks, Elise

Abstract

A bi-level, three-stage Stochastic Mathematical Program with Equilibrium Constraints (SMPEC) is proposed for quantifying and optimizing travel time resilience in roadway networks under non-recurring natural or human-induced disaster events. At the upper-level, a sequence of optimal preparedness and response decisions is taken over pre-event mitigation and preparedness and post-event response stages of the disaster management life cycle. Assuming semi-adaptive user behavior exists shortly after the disaster and after the implementation of immediate response actions, the lower-level problem is formulated as a Partial User Equilibrium, where only affected users are likely to rethink their routing decisions. An exact Progressive Hedging Algorithm is presented for solution of a single-level equivalent, linear approximation of the SMPEC. A recently proposed technique from the literature that uses Schur’s decomposition with SOS1 variables in creating a linear equivalent to complementarity constraints is employed. Similarly, recent advances in piecewise linearization are exploited in addressing nonseparable link travel time functions. The formulation and solution methodology are demonstrated on an illustrative example.

Suggested Citation

  • Faturechi, Reza & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2014. "Travel time resilience of roadway networks under disaster," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 47-64.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:70:y:2014:i:c:p:47-64
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.08.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261514001428
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2014.08.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaisak Suwansirikul & Terry L. Friesz & Roger L. Tobin, 1987. "Equilibrium Decomposed Optimization: A Heuristic for the Continuous Equilibrium Network Design Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 254-263, November.
    2. Patriksson, Michael, 2008. "On the applicability and solution of bilevel optimization models in transportation science: A study on the existence, stability and computation of optimal solutions to stochastic mathematical programs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 843-860, December.
    3. André De Palma & Denis Rochat, 1999. "Understanding individual travel decisions: results from a commuters survey in Geneva," Transportation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 263-281, August.
    4. Zhu, Shanjiang & Levinson, David & Liu, Henry X. & Harder, Kathleen, 2010. "The traffic and behavioral effects of the I-35W Mississippi River bridge collapse," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 771-784, December.
    5. Wang, David Z.W. & Lo, Hong K., 2010. "Global optimum of the linearized network design problem with equilibrium flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 482-492, May.
    6. Li, Changmin & Yang, Hai & Zhu, Daoli & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "A global optimization method for continuous network design problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1144-1158.
    7. S. Siddiqui & S. Gabriel, 2013. "An SOS1-Based Approach for Solving MPECs with a Natural Gas Market Application," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 205-227, June.
    8. Anthony Chen & Zhong Zhou & Piya Chootinan & Seungkyu Ryu & Chao Yang & S. Wong, 2011. "Transport Network Design Problem under Uncertainty: A Review and New Developments," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 743-768.
    9. R. T. Rockafellar & Roger J.-B. Wets, 1991. "Scenarios and Policy Aggregation in Optimization Under Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 119-147, February.
    10. Yueyue Fan & Changzheng Liu, 2010. "Solving Stochastic Transportation Network Protection Problems Using the Progressive Hedging-based Method," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 193-208, June.
    11. Lichun Chen & Elise Miller-Hooks, 2012. "Resilience: An Indicator of Recovery Capability in Intermodal Freight Transport," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 109-123, February.
    12. Loukas Dimitriou & Antony Stathopoulos & Theodore Tsekeris, 2008. "Reliable stochastic design of road network systems," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(5), pages 549-574.
    13. Cox, Andrew & Prager, Fynnwin & Rose, Adam, 2011. "Transportation security and the role of resilience: A foundation for operational metrics," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 307-317, March.
    14. Losada, Chaya & Scaparra, M. Paola & O’Hanley, Jesse R., 2012. "Optimizing system resilience: A facility protection model with recovery time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 519-530.
    15. Lo, Hong K. & Tung, Yeou-Koung, 2003. "Network with degradable links: capacity analysis and design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 345-363, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan, Zhijia & Yang, Hai & Tan, Wei & Li, Zhichun, 2016. "Pareto-improving transportation network design and ownership regimes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 292-309.
    2. Zhang, Fang & Lu, Jian & Hu, Xiaojian & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "Integrated deployment of dedicated lane and roadside unit considering uncertain road capacity under the mixed-autonomy traffic environment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Hua Wang & Xiaoning Zhang, 2017. "Game theoretical transportation network design among multiple regions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 97-117, February.
    4. Reza Faturechi & Shabtai Isaac & Elise Miller-Hooks & Lei Feng, 2018. "Risk-based models for emergency shelter and exit design in buildings," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(1), pages 185-212, March.
    5. Wang, Qingyi & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2022. "A stochastic programming model for emergency supply planning considering transportation network mitigation and traffic congestion," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Liu, Haoxiang & Wang, David Z.W., 2015. "Global optimization method for network design problem with stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 20-39.
    7. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Xu, Guangming & Yang, Chao & Lam, William H.K., 2021. "Enhancing network resilience by adding redundancy to road networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Shen, Siqian & Chen, Zhihao, 2013. "Optimization models for differentiating quality of service levels in probabilistic network capacity design problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 71-91.
    9. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang & Yang, Hai, 2013. "Global optimization methods for the discrete network design problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 42-60.
    10. Asadabadi, Ali & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2017. "Optimal transportation and shoreline infrastructure investment planning under a stochastic climate future," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 156-174.
    11. David L. Alderson & Gerald G. Brown & W. Matthew Carlyle & R. Kevin Wood, 2018. "Assessing and Improving the Operational Resilience of a Large Highway Infrastructure System to Worst-Case Losses," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 1012-1034, August.
    12. Karimi Dehnavi, Hadi & Rezvan, Mohammad Taghi & Shirmohammadli, Abdolmatin & Vallée, Dirk, 2013. "A solution for urban road selection and construction problem using simulation and goal programming—Case study of the city of Isfahan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 46-53.
    13. Arash Kaviani & Russell G. Thompson & Abbas Rajabifard & Majid Sarvi, 2020. "A model for multi-class road network recovery scheduling of regional road networks," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 109-143, February.
    14. Bar-Gera, Hillel & Hellman, Fredrik & Patriksson, Michael, 2013. "Computational precision of traffic equilibria sensitivities in automatic network design and road pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 485-500.
    15. Fan, Yingjie & Schwartz, Frank & Voß, Stefan, 2017. "Flexible supply chain planning based on variable transportation modes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 654-666.
    16. Zangui, Mahmood & Aashtiani, Hedayat Z. & Lawphongpanich, Siriphong & Yin, Yafeng, 2015. "Path-differentiated pricing in congestion mitigation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 202-219.
    17. Yongxi (Eric) Huang & Yueyue Fan & Chien-Wei Chen, 2014. "An Integrated Biofuel Supply Chain to Cope with Feedstock Seasonality and Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 540-554, November.
    18. Sun, Yanshuo & Schonfeld, Paul, 2015. "Stochastic capacity expansion models for airport facilities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-18.
    19. Haque, Khademul & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Golias, Mihalis M., 2021. "Multi-period transportation network investment decision making and policy implications using econometric framework," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    20. Nima Haghighi & S. Kiavash Fayyaz & Xiaoyue Cathy Liu & Tony H. Grubesic & Ran Wei, 2018. "A Multi-Scenario Probabilistic Simulation Approach for Critical Transportation Network Risk Assessment," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 181-203, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:70:y:2014:i:c:p:47-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.