IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v41y2007i9p827-841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the joint choice of activity timing and duration

Author

Listed:
  • Ettema, Dick
  • Bastin, Fabian
  • Polak, John
  • Ashiru, Olu

Abstract

This paper develops a model of activity and trip scheduling that combines three elements that have to date mostly been investigated in isolation: the duration of activities, the time-of-day preference for activity participation and the effect of schedule delays on the valuation of activities. The model is an error component discrete choice model, describing individuals' choice between alternative workday activity patterns. The utility function is formulated in a flexible way, applying a bell-shaped component to represent time-of-day preferences for activities. The model was tested using a 2001 data set from the Netherlands. The estimation results suggest that time-of-day preferences and schedule delays associated with the work activity are the most important factors influencing the scheduling of the work tour. Error components included in the model suggest that there is considerable unobserved heterogeneity with respect to mode preferences and schedule delay.

Suggested Citation

  • Ettema, Dick & Bastin, Fabian & Polak, John & Ashiru, Olu, 2007. "Modelling the joint choice of activity timing and duration," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 827-841, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:41:y:2007:i:9:p:827-841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965-8564(07)00032-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhat, Chandra R., 1996. "A hazard-based duration model of shopping activity with nonparametric baseline specification and nonparametric control for unobserved heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 189-207, June.
    2. I. Meloni & L. Guala & A. Loddo, 2004. "Time allocation to discretionary in-home, out-of-home activities and to trips," Transportation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 69-96, February.
    3. Toshiyuki Yamamoto & Ryuichi Kitamura, 1999. "An analysis of time allocation to in-home and out-of-home discretionary activities across working days and non- working days," Transportation, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 231-250, May.
    4. Kitamura, Ryuichi, 1984. "A model of daily time allocation to discretionary out-of-home activities and trips," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 255-266, June.
    5. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387.
    6. David Hensher & William Greene, 2003. "The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 133-176, May.
    7. Chandra Bhat & Rajul Misra, 1999. "Discretionary activity time allocation of individuals between in-home and out-of-home and between weekdays and weekends," Transportation, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 193-229, May.
    8. Stephane Hess & John Polak & Andrew Daly & Geoffrey Hyman, 2007. "Flexible substitution patterns in models of mode and time of day choice: new evidence from the UK and the Netherlands," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 213-238, March.
    9. Small, Kenneth A, 1982. "The Scheduling of Consumer Activities: Work Trips," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(3), pages 467-479, June.
    10. DeSerpa, A C, 1971. "A Theory of the Economics of Time," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 81(324), pages 828-846, December.
    11. de Jong, Gerard & Daly, Andrew & Pieters, Marits & Vellay, Carine & Bradley, Mark & Hofman, Frank, 2003. "A model for time of day and mode choice using error components logit," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 245-268, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Zhi-Chun & Lam, William H.K. & Wong, S.C., 2014. "Bottleneck model revisited: An activity-based perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 262-287.
    2. Sakano, Ryoichi & Benjamin, Julian, 2011. "A structural model of mode-activity choice: The case of commuter rail in a medium-size metropolitan area," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 434-445, March.
    3. Li, Qing & Liao, Feixiong & Timmermans, Harry J.P. & Huang, Haijun & Zhou, Jing, 2018. "Incorporating free-floating car-sharing into an activity-based dynamic user equilibrium model: A demand-side model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 102-123.
    4. Ozonder, Gozde & Miller, Eric J., 2021. "Longitudinal investigation of skeletal activity episode timing decisions – A copula approach," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    5. Xuemei Fu & Zhicai Juan, 2017. "An integrated framework to jointly model decisions of activity time allocation and work-related travel," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 689-705, August.
    6. Cantelmo, Guido & Viti, Francesco, 2019. "Incorporating activity duration and scheduling utility into equilibrium-based Dynamic Traffic Assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 365-390.
    7. Jenelius, Erik & Mattsson, Lars-Göran & Levinson, David, 2011. "Traveler delay costs and value of time with trip chains, flexible activity scheduling and information," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 789-807, June.
    8. Calastri, Chiara & Hess, Stephane & Daly, Andrew & Carrasco, Juan Antonio, 2017. "Does the social context help with understanding and predicting the choice of activity type and duration? An application of the Multiple Discrete-Continuous Nested Extreme Value model to activity diary," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-20.
    9. Pawlak, Jacek & Polak, John W. & Sivakumar, Aruna, 2017. "A framework for joint modelling of activity choice, duration, and productivity while travelling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 153-172.
    10. Vo, Khoa D. & Lam, William H.K. & Chen, Anthony & Shao, Hu, 2020. "A household optimum utility approach for modeling joint activity-travel choices in congested road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 93-125.
    11. Badiola, Nicolás & Raveau, Sebastián & Galilea, Patricia, 2019. "Modelling preferences towards activities and their effect on departure time choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 39-51.
    12. Roorda, Matthew J. & Miller, Eric J. & Habib, Khandker M.N., 2008. "Validation of TASHA: A 24-h activity scheduling microsimulation model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 360-375, February.
    13. Pawlak, Jacek & Polak, John W. & Sivakumar, Aruna, 2015. "Towards a microeconomic framework for modelling the joint choice of activity–travel behaviour and ICT use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 92-112.
    14. Fang, Zhixiang & Tu, Wei & Li, Qingquan & Li, Qiuping, 2011. "A multi-objective approach to scheduling joint participation with variable space and time preferences and opportunities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 623-634.
    15. Bao, Yue & Xiao, Feng & Gao, Zaihan & Gao, Ziyou, 2017. "Investigation of the traffic congestion during public holiday and the impact of the toll-exemption policy," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 58-81.
    16. Lizana, Pedro & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios & Arellana, Julián & Rizzi, Luis I., 2021. "Forecasting with a joint mode/time-of-day choice model based on combined RP and SC data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 302-316.
    17. Cantelmo, Guido & Viti, Francesco & Cipriani, Ernesto & Nigro, Marialisa, 2018. "A utility-based dynamic demand estimation model that explicitly accounts for activity scheduling and duration," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 303-320.
    18. Ren, Xiyuan & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2022. "A random-utility-consistent machine learning method to estimate agents’ joint activity scheduling choice from a ubiquitous data set," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 396-418.
    19. Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof & Bhat, Chandra, 2010. "A multiple discrete-continuous nested extreme value (MDCNEV) model: Formulation and application to non-worker activity time-use and timing behavior on weekdays," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 562-583, May.
    20. Alexa Delbosc & Maarten Kroesen & Bert Wee & Mathijs Haas, 2020. "Linear, non-linear, bi-directional? Testing the nature of the relationship between mobility and satisfaction with life," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2049-2066, August.
    21. Nurul Habib, Khandker M. & Day, Nicholas & Miller, Eric J., 2009. "An investigation of commuting trip timing and mode choice in the Greater Toronto Area: Application of a joint discrete-continuous model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 639-653, August.
    22. Pougala, Janody & Hillel, Tim & Bierlaire, Michel, 2022. "Capturing trade-offs between daily scheduling choices," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    23. Sasic, Ana & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2013. "Modelling departure time choices by a Heteroskedastic Generalized Logit (Het-GenL) model: An investigation on home-based commuting trips in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 15-32.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghader, Sepehr & Carrion, Carlos & Zhang, Lei, 2019. "Autoregressive continuous logit: Formulation and application to time-of-day choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 240-257.
    2. Khan, Mubassira & Machemehl, Randy, 2017. "Commercial vehicles time of day choice behavior in urban areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 68-83.
    3. Moyin Li & Nebiyou Tilahun, 2020. "A comparative analysis of discretionary time allocation for social and non-social activities in the U.S. between 2003 and 2013," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 893-909, April.
    4. Bhat, Chandra R., 2005. "A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 679-707, September.
    5. Dick Ettema & Olu Ashiru & John Polak & Fabian Bastin, 2005. "Taste Heterogeneity and Substitution Patterns in Models of the Simultaneous Choice of Activity Timing and Duration," ERSA conference papers ersa05p439, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Jara-Díaz, Sergio & Rosales-Salas, Jorge, 2017. "Beyond transport time: A review of time use modeling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 209-230.
    7. Marcela Munizaga & Sergio Jara-Díaz & Paulina Greeven & Chandra Bhat, 2008. "Econometric Calibration of the Joint Time Assignment--Mode Choice Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 208-219, May.
    8. Kuriyama, Koichi & Shoji, Yasushi & Tsuge, Takahiro, 2020. "The value of leisure time of weekends and long holidays: The multiple discrete–continuous extreme value (MDCEV) choice model with triple constraints," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    9. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen, 2015. "Tradeoffs between in- and out-of-residential neighborhood locations for discretionary activities and time use: do social contexts matter?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 119-127.
    10. Badiola, Nicolás & Raveau, Sebastián & Galilea, Patricia, 2019. "Modelling preferences towards activities and their effect on departure time choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 39-51.
    11. de Jong, Gerard & Kouwenhoven, Marco & Ruijs, Kim & van Houwe, Pieter & Borremans, Dana, 2016. "A time-period choice model for road freight transport in Flanders based on stated preference data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 20-31.
    12. Drago Bokal & Mitja Steinbacher, 2019. "Phases of psychologically optimal learning experience: task-based time allocation model," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(3), pages 863-885, September.
    13. Italo Meloni & Erika Spissu & Massimiliano Bez, 2007. "A Model of the Dynamic Process of Time Allocation to Discretionary Activities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 15-28, February.
    14. Rosales-Salas, Jorge & Jara-Díaz, Sergio R., 2017. "A time allocation model considering external providers," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 175-195.
    15. Richard Batley & J. Nicolás Ibá-ez, 2013. "Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models: implications of theory for empirical specification," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Choice Modelling, chapter 7, pages 144-171, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Sanjana Hossain & Md. Sami Hasnine & Khandker Nurul Habib, 2021. "A latent class joint mode and departure time choice model for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1217-1239, June.
    17. Marcela Munizaga & Sergio Jara-Díaz & Javiera Olguín & Jorge Rivera, 2011. "Generating twins to build weekly time use data from multiple single day OD surveys," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 511-524, May.
    18. Bwambale, Andrew & Choudhury, Charisma F. & Hess, Stephane, 2019. "Modelling departure time choice using mobile phone data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 424-439.
    19. Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof & Bhat, Chandra R. & Hensher, David A., 2009. "Residential self-selection effects in an activity time-use behavior model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 729-748, August.
    20. Bhat, Chandra R. & Srinivasan, Sivaramakrishnan & Sen, Sudeshna, 2006. "A joint model for the perfect and imperfect substitute goods case: Application to activity time-use decisions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 827-850, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:41:y:2007:i:9:p:827-841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.