IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v143y2015icp117-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relative contributions of disease label and disease prognosis to Alzheimer's stigma: A vignette-based experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson, Rebecca
  • Harkins, Kristin
  • Cary, Mark
  • Sankar, Pamela
  • Karlawish, Jason

Abstract

The classification of Alzheimer's disease is undergoing a significant transformation. Researchers have created the category of “preclinical Alzheimer's,” characterized by biomarker pathology rather than observable symptoms. Diagnosis and treatment at this stage could allow preventing Alzheimer's cognitive decline. While many commentators have worried that persons given a preclinical Alzheimer's label will be subject to stigma, little research exists to inform whether the stigma attached to the label of clinical Alzheimer's will extend to a preclinical disorder that has the label of “Alzheimer's” but lacks the symptoms or expected prognosis of the clinical form.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson, Rebecca & Harkins, Kristin & Cary, Mark & Sankar, Pamela & Karlawish, Jason, 2015. "The relative contributions of disease label and disease prognosis to Alzheimer's stigma: A vignette-based experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 117-127.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:143:y:2015:i:c:p:117-127
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953615300836
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Virginia G. Wadley & William E. Haley, 2001. "Diagnostic Attributions Versus Labeling," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 56(4), pages 244-252.
    2. Van Gorp, Baldwin & Vercruysse, Tom, 2012. "Frames and counter-frames giving meaning to dementia: A framing analysis of media content," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1274-1281.
    3. Chaufan, Claudia & Hollister, Brooke & Nazareno, Jennifer & Fox, Patrick, 2012. "Medical ideology as a double-edged sword: The politics of cure and care in the making of Alzheimer’s disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(5), pages 788-795.
    4. Daniel B Wright & Elin M Skagerberg, 2012. "Measuring Empathizing and Systemizing with a Large US Sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-10, February.
    5. Gustav Tinghög & David Andersson & Caroline Bonn & Harald Böttiger & Camilla Josephson & Gustaf Lundgren & Daniel Västfjäll & Michael Kirchler & Magnus Johannesson, 2013. "Intuition and cooperation reconsidered," Nature, Nature, vol. 498(7452), pages 1-2, June.
    6. Beard, Renée L. & Fox, Patrick J., 2008. "Resisting social disenfranchisement: Negotiating collective identities and everyday life with memory loss," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 1509-1520, April.
    7. Langdon, Shani A. & Eagle, Andrew & Warner, James, 2007. "Making sense of dementia in the social world: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 989-1000, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stites, Shana D. & Gill, Jeanine & Largent, Emily A. & Harkins, Kristin & Sankar, Pamela & Krieger, Abba & Karlawish, Jason, 2022. "The relative contributions of biomarkers, disease modifying treatment, and dementia severity to Alzheimer's stigma: A vignette-based experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Hye Won Kwon, 2021. "Are Gritty People Happier than Others?: Evidence from the United States and South Korea," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 2937-2959, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanna‐Mari Pesonen & Anne M. Remes & Arja Isola, 2013. "Diagnosis of dementia as a turning point among Finnish families: A qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 489-496, December.
    2. Smith, Robert Courtney, 2021. "Analytic autoethnography of familial and institutional social identity construction of My Dad with Alzheimer's: In the emergency room with Erving Goffman and Oliver Sacks," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    3. Lohse, Johannes & Goeschl, Timo & Diederich , Johannes, 2014. "Giving is a question of time: Response times and contributions to a real world public good," Working Papers 0566, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    4. Anna Louisa Merkel & Johannes Lohse, 2019. "Is fairness intuitive? An experiment accounting for subjective utility differences under time pressure," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(1), pages 24-50, March.
    5. Bartoš, Vojtěch, 2021. "Seasonal scarcity and sharing norms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 303-316.
    6. Fehr, Dietmar & Sutter, Matthias, 2019. "Gossip and the efficiency of interactions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 448-460.
    7. Myrseth, Kristian Ove R. & Wollbrant, Conny E., 2017. "Cognitive foundations of cooperation revisited: Commentary on Rand et al. (2012, 2014)," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 133-138.
    8. Martin G. Kocher & Peter Martinsson & Kristian Ove R. Myrseth & Conny E. Wollbrant, 2017. "Strong, bold, and kind: self-control and cooperation in social dilemmas," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 20(1), pages 44-69, March.
    9. Maria Plötner & Robert Hepach & Harriet Over & Malinda Carpenter & Michael Tomasello, 2021. "Young children share more under time pressure than after a delay," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-10, March.
    10. Boonmanunt, Suparee & Meier, Stephan, 2023. "The effect of financial constraints on in-group bias: Evidence from rice farmers in Thailand," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 96-109.
    11. Grossman, Zachary & van der Weele, Joël & Andrijevik, Ana, 2014. "A Test of Dual-Process Reasoning in Charitable Giving," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series qt4tm617f7, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
    12. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:277-279 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Martin G. Kocher & David Schindler & Stefan T. Trautmann & Yilong Xu, 2019. "Risk, time pressure, and selection effects," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(1), pages 216-246, March.
    14. Deck, Cary & Jahedi, Salar & Sheremeta, Roman, 2021. "On the consistency of cognitive load," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Alós-Ferrer, Carlos & Garagnani, Michele, 2020. "The cognitive foundations of cooperation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 71-85.
    16. Rebekka Kesberg & Stefan Pfattheicher, 2019. "Democracy matters: a psychological perspective on the beneficial impact of democratic punishment systems in social dilemmas," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Peter P J L Verkoeijen & Samantha Bouwmeester, 2014. "Does Intuition Cause Cooperation?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-8, May.
    18. Eirik Strømland & Sigve Tjøtta & Gaute Torsvik, 2016. "Cooperating, Fast and Slow: Testing the Social Heuristics Hypothesis," CESifo Working Paper Series 5875, CESifo.
    19. Florian Diekert & Kjell Arne Brekke, 2022. "Groups discipline resource use under scarcity," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 75-103, February.
    20. Engel, Christoph & Rand, David G., 2014. "What does “clean” really mean? The implicit framing of decontextualized experiments," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 386-389.
    21. Exley, Christine L. & Petrie, Ragan, 2018. "The impact of a surprise donation ask," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 152-167.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:143:y:2015:i:c:p:117-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.