IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v16y2012i7p4890-4900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural biogas plants in Poland: Investment process, economical and environmental aspects, biogas potential

Author

Listed:
  • Igliński, Bartłomiej
  • Buczkowski, Roman
  • Iglińska, Anna
  • Cichosz, Marcin
  • Piechota, Grzegorz
  • Kujawski, Wojciech

Abstract

The formal and legal requirements as well as the support system for building agricultural biogas plants in Poland have been presented. There are currently 24 agricultural biogas plants operating in Poland. The fermentation substrates are slurry, food waste and maize silage. It is most often mesophilic fermentation. Produced biogas is combusted in cogeneration and thus obtained electrical and thermal energy is used for the biogas plant's own needs and sold. The support system for biogas plants' operation in Poland is based on a system of certificates. In this system it is cost-effective to use waste for fermentation whilst it is not cost-effective for a biogas plant to run on maize silage. It has been calculated that in Poland the theoretical annual biogas potential for cattle slurry is 3646millionm3, for pig slurry it is 2581millionm3, for poultry manure it is 717millionm3, from maize after seed harvest it is 1044millionm3, from municipal waste biofraction it is 100millionm3 of biogas.

Suggested Citation

  • Igliński, Bartłomiej & Buczkowski, Roman & Iglińska, Anna & Cichosz, Marcin & Piechota, Grzegorz & Kujawski, Wojciech, 2012. "Agricultural biogas plants in Poland: Investment process, economical and environmental aspects, biogas potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4890-4900.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:16:y:2012:i:7:p:4890-4900
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032112003127
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nilsson, Lars J. & Pisarek, Marcin & Buriak, Jerzy & Oniszk-Poplawska, Anna & Bucko, Pawel & Ericsson, Karin & Jaworski, Lukasz, 2006. "Energy policy and the role of bioenergy in Poland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(15), pages 2263-2278, October.
    2. Abbasi, Tasneem & Abbasi, S.A., 2010. "Production of clean energy by anaerobic digestion of phytomass--New prospects for a global warming amelioration technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 1653-1659, August.
    3. Jiang, Dong & Zhuang, Dafang & Fu, Jinying & Huang, Yaohuan & Wen, Kege, 2012. "Bioenergy potential from crop residues in China: Availability and distribution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1377-1382.
    4. Budzianowski, Wojciech Marcin, 2011. "Can ‘negative net CO2 emissions’ from decarbonised biogas-to-electricity contribute to solving Poland’s carbon capture and sequestration dilemmas?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6318-6325.
    5. Chen, Yu & Yang, Gaihe & Sweeney, Sandra & Feng, Yongzhong, 2010. "Household biogas use in rural China: A study of opportunities and constraints," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 545-549, January.
    6. Golusin, Mirjana & Ostojic, Aleksandar & Latinovic, Smilja & Jandric, Maja & Ivanovic, Olja Munitlak, 2012. "Review of the economic viability of investing and exploiting biogas electricity plant – Case study Vizelj, Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1127-1134.
    7. Abbasi, Tasneem & Tauseef, S.M. & Abbasi, S.A., 2012. "Anaerobic digestion for global warming control and energy generation—An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3228-3242.
    8. Iglinski, Bartlomiej & Iglinska, Anna & Kujawski, Wojciech & Buczkowski, Roman & Cichosz, Marcin, 2011. "Bioenergy in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2999-3007, August.
    9. Nema, Pragya & Nema, Sameer & Roy, Priyanka, 2012. "An overview of global climate changing in current scenario and mitigation action," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2329-2336.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    2. Chen, Lihong & Cong, Rong-Gang & Shu, Bangrong & Mi, Zhi-Fu, 2017. "A sustainable biogas model in China: The case study of Beijing Deqingyuan biogas project," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 773-779.
    3. Suberu, Mohammed Yekini & Bashir, Nouruddeen & Mustafa, Mohd. Wazir, 2013. "Biogenic waste methane emissions and methane optimization for bioelectricity in Nigeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 643-654.
    4. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Iglińska, Anna & Cichosz, Marcin & Kujawski, Wojciech & Buczkowski, Roman, 2016. "Renewable energy production in the Łódzkie Voivodeship. The PEST analysis of the RES in the voivodeship and in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 737-750.
    5. Tiwary, A. & Williams, I.D. & Pant, D.C. & Kishore, V.V.N., 2015. "Emerging perspectives on environmental burden minimisation initiatives from anaerobic digestion technologies for community scale biomass valorisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 883-901.
    6. Liang Meng & Ahmed Alengebawy & Ping Ai & Keda Jin & Mengdi Chen & Yulong Pan, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Three Modes of Large-Scale Crop Residue Utilization Projects in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Ortiz, Willington & Terrapon-Pfaff, Julia & Dienst, Carmen, 2017. "Understanding the diffusion of domestic biogas technologies. Systematic conceptualisation of existing evidence from developing and emerging countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1287-1299.
    8. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Buczkowski, Roman & Cichosz, Marcin, 2015. "Biogas production in Poland—Current state, potential and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 686-695.
    9. Zheng, Y.H. & Wei, J.G. & Li, J. & Feng, S.F. & Li, Z.F. & Jiang, G.M. & Lucas, M. & Wu, G.L. & Ning, T.Y., 2012. "Anaerobic fermentation technology increases biomass energy use efficiency in crop residue utilization and biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 4588-4596.
    10. Luo, Tao & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Huang, Ruyi & Chen, Qiu & Mei, Zili & Pan, Junting & Liu, Hongbin, 2020. "Analysis of revolution in decentralized biogas facilities caused by transition in Chinese rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    12. Mohsen Jamali & Esmaeil Bakhshandeh & Mohammad Yaghoubi Khanghahi & Carmine Crecchio, 2021. "Metadata Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Impacts of Wheat Residues Burning on Soil Quality in Developing and Developed Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    13. Arshad, Muhammad & Bano, Ijaz & Khan, Nasrullah & Shahzad, Mirza Imran & Younus, Muhammad & Abbas, Mazhar & Iqbal, Munawar, 2018. "Electricity generation from biogas of poultry waste: An assessment of potential and feasibility in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1241-1246.
    14. Zhao, Xiqiang & Zhou, Xing & Wang, Guoxiu & Zhou, Ping & Wang, Wenlong & Song, Zhanlong, 2022. "Evaluating the effect of torrefaction on the pyrolysis of biomass and the biochar catalytic performance on dry reforming of methane," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 313-325.
    15. Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Maitriwong, Kiatchai & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2019. "Production of biogas from cassava wastewater using a three-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 191-205.
    16. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    17. Petra Hýsková & Štěpán Hýsek & Vilém Jarský, 2020. "The Utilization of Crop Residues as Forest Protection: Predicting the Production of Wheat and Rapeseed Residues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-10, July.
    18. Yang, Jing & Song, Kaihui & Hou, Jian & Zhang, Peidong & Wu, Jinhu, 2017. "Temporal and spacial dynamics of bioenergy-related CO2 emissions and underlying forces analysis in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1323-1330.
    19. Lohan, Shiv Kumar & Jat, H.S. & Yadav, Arvind Kumar & Sidhu, H.S. & Jat, M.L. & Choudhary, Madhu & Peter, Jyotsna Kiran & Sharma, P.C., 2018. "Burning issues of paddy residue management in north-west states of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 693-706.
    20. Wang, Jun & Xue, Qingwen & Guo, Ting & Mei, Zili & Long, Enshen & Wen, Qian & Huang, Wei & Luo, Tao & Huang, Ruyi, 2018. "A review on CFD simulating method for biogas fermentation material fluid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 64-73.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:16:y:2012:i:7:p:4890-4900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.