IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v156y2022ics1364032121012545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of hydrogen production processes using bio-waste as renewable energy resource

Author

Listed:
  • Hosseinzadeh, Ahmad
  • Zhou, John L.
  • Li, Xiaowei
  • Afsari, Morteza
  • Altaee, Ali

Abstract

There is a wide spectrum of biological wastes, from which H2 production can generate clean energy while minimizing environmental degradation. This study aims to conduct techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of major hydrogen production processes such as dark, photo and solid-state fermentation, microbial electrolysis cell (MEC), gasification, pyrolysis and plasma. From the technological point of view, the dark fermentation has shown better performance in comparison to the other processes. However, the hybrid dark fermentation with photo-fermentation and MEC has shown higher performances with around 1 L H2/g organic waste. Regarding the economic aspect, the cheapest H2 production belongs to gasification and fermentation with approximately 2 US$/g and 2.3 US$/g followed by plasma (2.4 US$/g), pyrolysis (2.6 US$/g), MEC (2.8 US$/g), and photo-fermentation (3.5 US$/g). Regarding the potential environmental impact, the fermentation process showed the lowest greenhouse gas emission with 15 kg CO2-eq/kg hydrogen followed by gasification, MEC and plasma. Regarding the potential commercial applications, gasification is the most mature with the highest possible technology readiness at level 9.

Suggested Citation

  • Hosseinzadeh, Ahmad & Zhou, John L. & Li, Xiaowei & Afsari, Morteza & Altaee, Ali, 2022. "Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of hydrogen production processes using bio-waste as renewable energy resource," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:156:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121012545
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121012545
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julius Akinbomi & Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, 2015. "Evaluation of Fermentative Hydrogen Production from Single and Mixed Fruit Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Liu, Weiguo & Wang, Jingxin & Bhattacharyya, Debangsu & Jiang, Yuan & DeVallance, David, 2017. "Economic and environmental analyses of coal and biomass to liquid fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 76-86.
    3. Li, Guang & Zhang, Ke & Yang, Bin & Liu, Fan & Weng, Yujing & Liu, Zheyu & Fang, Yitian, 2019. "Life cycle analysis of a coal to hydrogen process based on ash agglomerating fluidized bed gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 638-646.
    4. Fu, Qizi & Wang, Dongbo & Li, Xiaoming & Yang, Qi & Xu, Qiuxiang & Ni, Bing-Jie & Wang, Qilin & Liu, Xuran, 2021. "Towards hydrogen production from waste activated sludge: Principles, challenges and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Lui, Jade & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Tsang, Daniel C.W. & You, Siming, 2020. "A critical review on the principles, applications, and challenges of waste-to-hydrogen technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. World Bank & International Energy Agency, "undated". "Sustainable Energy for All 2013-2014 : Global Tracking Framework [Marco de seguimiento global de la iniciativa Energía sostenible para Todos: Resumen ejecutivo]," World Bank Publications - Reports 16537, The World Bank Group.
    7. Li, Guoxuan & Cui, Peizhe & Wang, Yinglong & Liu, Zhiqiang & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Yang, Sheng, 2020. "Life cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of biomass-to-hydrogen process in comparison with coal-to-hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Gómez-Marín, N. & Bridgwater, A.V., 2021. "Mapping bioenergy stakeholders: A systematic and scientometric review of capabilities and expertise in bioenergy research in the United Kingdom," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Stoutenburg, Eric D. & Jenkins, Nicholas & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2010. "Power output variations of co-located offshore wind turbines and wave energy converters in California," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2781-2791.
    10. Ana Ramos & Carlos Afonso Teixeira & Abel Rouboa, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste by Two-Stage Plasma Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Chisalita, Dora-Andreea & Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2019. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production processes based on various natural gas chemical looping systems with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 331-344.
    12. Ahmad, Anis Atikah & Zawawi, Norfadhila Abdullah & Kasim, Farizul Hafiz & Inayat, Abrar & Khasri, Azduwin, 2016. "Assessing the gasification performance of biomass: A review on biomass gasification process conditions, optimization and economic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1333-1347.
    13. Alassi, Abdulrahman & Bañales, Santiago & Ellabban, Omar & Adam, Grain & MacIver, Callum, 2019. "HVDC Transmission: Technology Review, Market Trends and Future Outlook," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 530-554.
    14. Huang, Yuhan & Surawski, Nic C. & Zhuang, Yuan & Zhou, John L. & Hong, Guang, 2021. "Dual injection: An effective and efficient technology to use renewable fuels in spark ignition engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    15. Hijazi, O. & Munro, S. & Zerhusen, B. & Effenberger, M., 2016. "Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1291-1300.
    16. Margareta, Winny & Nagarajan, Dillirani & Chang, Jo-Shu & Lee, Duu-Jong, 2020. "Dark fermentative hydrogen production using macroalgae (Ulva sp.) as the renewable feedstock," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    17. Peilei Fan, 2009. ". By Yu Zhou," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(3), pages 342-344, July.
    18. Parthasarathy, Prakash & Narayanan, K. Sheeba, 2014. "Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: Influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield – A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 570-579.
    19. Kadier, Abudukeremu & Simayi, Yibadatihan & Kalil, Mohd Sahaid & Abdeshahian, Peyman & Hamid, Aidil Abdul, 2014. "A review of the substrates used in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) for producing sustainable and clean hydrogen gas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 466-472.
    20. Nour Khlaifat & Ali Altaee & John Zhou & Yuhan Huang & Ali Braytee, 2020. "Optimization of a Small Wind Turbine for a Rural Area: A Case Study of Deniliquin, New South Wales, Australia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, May.
    21. Sun, Chihe & Xia, Ao & Liao, Qiang & Fu, Qian & Huang, Yun & Zhu, Xun, 2019. "Life-cycle assessment of biohythane production via two-stage anaerobic fermentation from microalgae and food waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 395-410.
    22. Namioka, Tomoaki & Saito, Atsushi & Inoue, Yukiharu & Park, Yeongsu & Min, Tai-jin & Roh, Seon-ah & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2011. "Hydrogen-rich gas production from waste plastics by pyrolysis and low-temperature steam reforming over a ruthenium catalyst," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2019-2026, June.
    23. Shahbaz, Muhammad & yusup, Suzana & Inayat, Abrar & Patrick, David Onoja & Ammar, Muhammad, 2017. "The influence of catalysts in biomass steam gasification and catalytic potential of coal bottom ash in biomass steam gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 468-476.
    24. Hu, Mian & Guo, Dabin & Ma, Caifeng & Hu, Zhiquan & Zhang, Beiping & Xiao, Bo & Luo, Siyi & Wang, Jingbo, 2015. "Hydrogen-rich gas production by the gasification of wet MSW (municipal solid waste) coupled with carbon dioxide capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 857-863.
    25. Wong, Yee Meng & Wu, Ta Yeong & Juan, Joon Ching, 2014. "A review of sustainable hydrogen production using seed sludge via dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 471-482.
    26. Lv, Pengmei & Wu, Chuangzhi & Ma, Longlong & Yuan, Zhenhong, 2008. "A study on the economic efficiency of hydrogen production from biomass residues in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1874-1879.
    27. George, Adwek & Shen, Boxiong & Craven, Michael & Wang, Yaolin & Kang, Dongrui & Wu, Chunfei & Tu, Xin, 2021. "A Review of Non-Thermal Plasma Technology: A novel solution for CO2 conversion and utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Busch, P. & Kendall, A. & Lipman, T., 2023. "A systematic review of life cycle greenhouse gas intensity values for hydrogen production pathways," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Jesús Rey & Francisca Segura & José Manuel Andújar, 2023. "Green Hydrogen: Resources Consumption, Technological Maturity, and Regulatory Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Andrés Rengel & Alexander Aguila Téllez & Leony Ortiz & Milton Ruiz, 2023. "Optimal Insertion of Energy Storage Systems Considering the Economic Dispatch and the Minimization of Energy Not Supplied," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Ahmed Fathy & Hegazy Rezk & Dalia Yousri & Abdullah G. Alharbi & Sulaiman Alshammari & Yahia B. Hassan, 2023. "Maximizing Bio-Hydrogen Production from an Innovative Microbial Electrolysis Cell Using Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Liu, Xinxin & Zhao, Junhui & He, Chao & Liu, Liang & Li, Gang & Pan, Xiaohui & Xu, Guizhuan & Lu, Chaoyang & Zhang, Quanguo & Jiao, Youzhou, 2023. "A new approach for evaluating photosynthetic bio-hydrogen production: The dissipation rate method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian, Hailin & Li, Jie & Yan, Miao & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Wang, Xiaonan, 2019. "Organic waste to biohydrogen: A critical review from technological development and environmental impact analysis perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    2. Lui, Jade & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Tsang, Daniel C.W. & You, Siming, 2020. "A critical review on the principles, applications, and challenges of waste-to-hydrogen technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    4. Matheus Oliveira & Ana Ramos & Tamer M. Ismail & Eliseu Monteiro & Abel Rouboa, 2022. "A Review on Plasma Gasification of Solid Residues: Recent Advances and Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    6. Łukajtis, Rafał & Hołowacz, Iwona & Kucharska, Karolina & Glinka, Marta & Rybarczyk, Piotr & Przyjazny, Andrzej & Kamiński, Marian, 2018. "Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 665-694.
    7. Abdur Rawoof, Salma Aathika & Kumar, P. Senthil & Vo, Dai-Viet N. & Devaraj, Thiruselvi & Subramanian, Sivanesan, 2021. "Biohythane as a high potential fuel from anaerobic digestion of organic waste: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Kim, Jun Young & Kim, Dongjae & Li, Zezhong John & Dariva, Claudio & Cao, Yankai & Ellis, Naoko, 2023. "Predicting and optimizing syngas production from fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: A machine learning approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    9. Ruivo, Luís & Silva, Tiago & Neves, Daniel & Tarelho, Luís & Frade, Jorge, 2023. "Thermodynamic guidelines for improved operation of iron-based catalysts in gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    10. Wijayasekera, Sachindra Chamode & Hewage, Kasun & Hettiaratchi, Patrick & Razi, Faran & Sadiq, Rehan, 2023. "Planning and development of waste-to-hydrogen conversion facilities: A parametric analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    11. Arnob Das & Susmita Datta Peu, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review on Recent Advancements in Thermochemical Processes for Clean Hydrogen Production to Decarbonize the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-42, September.
    12. Ndayisenga, Fabrice & Yu, Zhisheng & Zheng, Jianzhong & Wang, Bobo & Liang, Hongxia & Phulpoto, Irfan Ali & Habiyakare, Telesphore & Zhou, Dandan, 2021. "Microbial electrohydrogenesis cell and dark fermentation integrated system enhances biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic agricultural wastes: Substrate pretreatment towards optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    13. Liu, Huan & Guo, Wei & Liu, Shuqin, 2022. "Comparative techno-economic performance analysis of underground coal gasification and surface coal gasification based coal-to-hydrogen process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    14. Cortazar, M. & Lopez, G. & Alvarez, J. & Amutio, M. & Bilbao, J. & Olazar, M., 2018. "Advantages of confining the fountain in a conical spouted bed reactor for biomass steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 455-463.
    15. Yahaya, Ahmad Zubair & Somalu, Mahendra Rao & Muchtar, Andanastuti & Sulaiman, Shaharin Anwar & Wan Daud, Wan Ramli, 2019. "Effect of particle size and temperature on gasification performance of coconut and palm kernel shells in downdraft fixed-bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 931-940.
    16. Manuel García & Paula Oulego & Mario Díaz & Sergio Collado, 2021. "Non-Energetic Chemical Products by Fermentation of Hydrolyzed Sewage Sludge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-37, May.
    17. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Parthasarathy, Prakash & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Nassef, Ahmed M. & Sayed, Enas T. & Rezk, Hegazy & Inayat, Abrar & Yousef, Bashria A.A. & Abdelkareem, Mohammad A. & Olabi, A.G., 2020. "Developing a fuzzy-model with particle swarm optimization-based for improving the conversion and gasification rate of palm kernel shell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 125-135.
    19. Tomonori Miyagawa & Mika Goto, 2022. "Hydrogen Production Cost Forecasts since the 1970s and Implications for Technological Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Sedlar, D. Karasalihović & Vulin, D. & Krajačić, G. & Jukić, L., 2019. "Offshore gas production infrastructure reutilisation for blue energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 159-174.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:156:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121012545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.