IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v100y2019icp186-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Junliang
  • Wu, Lifeng
  • Zhang, Fucang
  • Cai, Huanjie
  • Zeng, Wenzhi
  • Wang, Xiukang
  • Zou, Haiyang

Abstract

Accurate estimation of global solar radiation (Rs) is essential to the design and assessment of solar energy utilization systems. Existing empirical and machine learning models for estimating Rs from sunshine duration were comprehensively reviewed. The performances of 12 empirical model forms and 12 machine learning algorithms for estimating daily Rs were further evaluated in different climatic zones of China as a case study, i.e. the temperate continental zone (TCZ), temperate monsoon zone (TMZ), mountain plateau zone (MPZ) and (sub)tropical monsoon zone (SMZ). The best-performing model at each station and the overall best model for each climatic zone were selected based on six statistical indictors, a global performance index (GPI) and computational costs (computational time and memory usage). The results revealed that the machine learning models (RMSE: 2.055–2.751 MJ m−2 d−1; NRMSE: 12.8–21.3%; R2: 0.839–0.936) generally outperformed the empirical models (RMSE: 2.118–3.540 MJ m−2 d−1; NRMSE: 12.1–27.5%; R2: 0.834–0.935) in terms of prediction accuracy. The cubic model (M3), modified linear-logarithmic model (M5) and power model (M10) attained generally better ranks among empirical models based on GPI. M3 was the top-ranked model in TMZ and MPZ, while general best performance was obtained by M5 and M2 in SMZ and TCZ, respectively. ANFIS, ELM, LSSVM and MARS obtained generally better performance among machine learning models, with the overall best ranking by ANFIS in TCZ and SMZ and by ELM in MPZ and SMZ. XGBoost (8.1 s and 74.2 MB), M5Tree (11.3 s and 29.7 MB), GRNN (12.3 s and 295.3 MB), MARS (14.4 s and 42.6 MB), MLP (22.4 s and 41.3 MB) and ANFIS (29.8 s and 23.1 MB) showed relatively small computational time and memory usage. Comprehensively considering both the prediction accuracy and computational costs, ANFIS is highly recommended, while MARS and XGBoost are also promising models for daily Rs estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Zeng, Wenzhi & Wang, Xiukang & Zou, Haiyang, 2019. "Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 186-212.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:100:y:2019:i:c:p:186-212
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118307226
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khatib, Tamer & Mohamed, Azah & Sopian, K., 2012. "A review of solar energy modeling techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2864-2869.
    2. Ramedani, Zeynab & Omid, Mahmoud & Keyhani, Alireza & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin, 2014. "Potential of radial basis function based support vector regression for global solar radiation prediction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1005-1011.
    3. Jahani, Babak & Dinpashoh, Y. & Raisi Nafchi, Atefeh, 2017. "Evaluation and development of empirical models for estimating daily solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 878-891.
    4. Bakirci, Kadir, 2009. "Correlations for estimation of daily global solar radiation with hours of bright sunshine in Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 485-501.
    5. Bakirci, Kadir, 2009. "Models of solar radiation with hours of bright sunshine: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2580-2588, December.
    6. Fan, Junliang & Chen, Baiquan & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Lu, Xianghui & Xiang, Youzhen, 2018. "Evaluation and development of temperature-based empirical models for estimating daily global solar radiation in humid regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 903-914.
    7. Bahel, V. & Srinivasan, R. & Bakhsh, H., 1987. "Statistical comparison of correlations for estimation of global horizontal solar radiation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 12(12), pages 1309-1316.
    8. Zou, Ling & Wang, Lunche & Xia, Li & Lin, Aiwen & Hu, Bo & Zhu, Hongji, 2017. "Prediction and comparison of solar radiation using improved empirical models and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 343-353.
    9. Khorasanizadeh, H. & Mohammadi, K., 2013. "Introducing the best model for predicting the monthly mean global solar radiation over six major cities of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 257-266.
    10. Olatomiwa, Lanre & Mekhilef, Saad & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Petković, Dalibor, 2015. "Adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach for solar radiation prediction in Nigeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1784-1791.
    11. Besharat, Fariba & Dehghan, Ali A. & Faghih, Ahmad R., 2013. "Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation: A review and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 798-821.
    12. Baser, Furkan & Demirhan, Haydar, 2017. "A fuzzy regression with support vector machine approach to the estimation of horizontal global solar radiation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 229-240.
    13. Mojumder, Juwel Chandra & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chong, Wen Tong & Izadyar, Nima & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin, 2017. "The intelligent forecasting of the performances in PV/T collectors based on soft computing method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1366-1378.
    14. Deo, Ravinesh C. & Şahin, Mehmet, 2017. "Forecasting long-term global solar radiation with an ANN algorithm coupled with satellite-derived (MODIS) land surface temperature (LST) for regional locations in Queensland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 828-848.
    15. Kumar, Rajesh & Aggarwal, R.K. & Sharma, J.D., 2015. "Comparison of regression and artificial neural network models for estimation of global solar radiations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1294-1299.
    16. Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Mohammadi, Kasra & Yee, Por Lip & Petković, Dalibor & Mostafaeipour, Ali, 2015. "A comparative evaluation for identifying the suitability of extreme learning machine to predict horizontal global solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1031-1042.
    17. Friedman, Jerome H., 2002. "Stochastic gradient boosting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 367-378, February.
    18. El-Sebaii, A.A. & Al-Hazmi, F.S. & Al-Ghamdi, A.A. & Yaghmour, S.J., 2010. "Global, direct and diffuse solar radiation on horizontal and tilted surfaces in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 568-576, February.
    19. Yacef, R. & Benghanem, M. & Mellit, A., 2012. "Prediction of daily global solar irradiation data using Bayesian neural network: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 146-154.
    20. Qin, Wenmin & Wang, Lunche & Lin, Aiwen & Zhang, Ming & Xia, Xiangao & Hu, Bo & Niu, Zigeng, 2018. "Comparison of deterministic and data-driven models for solar radiation estimation in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 579-594.
    21. Sharda, V.N. & Patel, R.M. & Prasher, S.O. & Ojasvi, P.R. & Prakash, Chandra, 2006. "Modeling runoff from middle Himalayan watersheds employing artificial intelligence techniques," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 233-242, June.
    22. Toğrul, İnci Türk & Toğrul, Hasan & Evin, Dugyu, 2000. "Estimation of monthly global solar radiation from sunshine duration measurement in Elaziğ," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 587-595.
    23. Despotovic, Milan & Nedic, Vladimir & Despotovic, Danijela & Cvetanovic, Slobodan, 2015. "Review and statistical analysis of different global solar radiation sunshine models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1869-1880.
    24. Bayrakçı, Hilmi Cenk & Demircan, Cihan & Keçebaş, Ali, 2018. "The development of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation on horizontal surface: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2771-2782.
    25. Wang, Lunche & Kisi, Ozgur & Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad & Salazar, Germán Ariel & Zhu, Zhongmin & Gong, Wei, 2016. "Solar radiation prediction using different techniques: model evaluation and comparison," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 384-397.
    26. Samuel Chukwujindu, Nwokolo, 2017. "A comprehensive review of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 955-995.
    27. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Wang, Xiukang & Lu, Xianghui & Xiang, Youzhen, 2018. "Evaluating the effect of air pollution on global and diffuse solar radiation prediction using support vector machine modeling based on sunshine duration and air temperature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 732-747.
    28. Hassan, Gasser E. & Youssef, M. Elsayed & Mohamed, Zahraa E. & Ali, Mohamed A. & Hanafy, Ahmed A., 2016. "New Temperature-based Models for Predicting Global Solar Radiation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 437-450.
    29. Li, Huashan & Ma, Weibin & Lian, Yongwang & Wang, Xianlong & Zhao, Liang, 2011. "Global solar radiation estimation with sunshine duration in Tibet, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 3141-3145.
    30. Ampratwum, David B. & Dorvlo, Atsu S. S., 1999. "Estimation of solar radiation from the number of sunshine hours," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 161-167, July.
    31. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Mert, Cihan & Kisi, Ozgur, 2018. "Comparison of four heuristic regression techniques in solar radiation modeling: Kriging method vs RSM, MARS and M5 model tree," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 330-341.
    32. Zhang, Jianyuan & Zhao, Li & Deng, Shuai & Xu, Weicong & Zhang, Ying, 2017. "A critical review of the models used to estimate solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 314-329.
    33. Rizwan, M. & Jamil, Majid & Kirmani, Sheeraz & Kothari, D.P., 2014. "Fuzzy logic based modeling and estimation of global solar energy using meteorological parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 685-691.
    34. Makade, Rahul G. & Jamil, Basharat, 2018. "Statistical analysis of sunshine based global solar radiation (GSR) models for tropical wet and dry climatic Region in Nagpur, India: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 22-43.
    35. Bahel, V. & Bakhsh, H. & Srinivasan, R., 1987. "A correlation for estimation of global solar radiation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 131-135.
    36. Mohammad Mehdi Lotfinejad & Reza Hafezi & Majid Khanali & Seyed Sina Hosseini & Mehdi Mehrpooya & Shahaboddin Shamshirband, 2018. "A Comparative Assessment of Predicting Daily Solar Radiation Using Bat Neural Network (BNN), Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN), and Neuro-Fuzzy (NF) System: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    37. Feng, Yu & Cui, Ningbo & Gong, Daozhi & Zhang, Qingwen & Zhao, Lu, 2017. "Evaluation of random forests and generalized regression neural networks for daily reference evapotranspiration modelling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 163-173.
    38. Katiyar, A.K. & Pandey, Chanchal Kumar, 2010. "Simple correlation for estimating the global solar radiation on horizontal surfaces in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5043-5048.
    39. Huang, Jing & Troccoli, Alberto & Coppin, Peter, 2014. "An analytical comparison of four approaches to modelling the daily variability of solar irradiance using meteorological records," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 195-202.
    40. Mecibah, Mohamed Salah & Boukelia, Taqiy Eddine & Tahtah, Reda & Gairaa, Kacem, 2014. "Introducing the best model for estimation the monthly mean daily global solar radiation on a horizontal surface (Case study: Algeria)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 194-202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Ji-Long & He, Lei & Yang, Hong & Ma, Maohua & Chen, Qiao & Wu, Sheng-Jun & Xiao, Zuo-lin, 2019. "Empirical models for estimating monthly global solar radiation: A most comprehensive review and comparative case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 91-111.
    2. Zhang, Jianyuan & Zhao, Li & Deng, Shuai & Xu, Weicong & Zhang, Ying, 2017. "A critical review of the models used to estimate solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 314-329.
    3. Bayrakçı, Hilmi Cenk & Demircan, Cihan & Keçebaş, Ali, 2018. "The development of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation on horizontal surface: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2771-2782.
    4. Fan, Junliang & Chen, Baiquan & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Lu, Xianghui & Xiang, Youzhen, 2018. "Evaluation and development of temperature-based empirical models for estimating daily global solar radiation in humid regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 903-914.
    5. Prieto, Jesús-Ignacio & García, David, 2022. "Global solar radiation models: A critical review from the point of view of homogeneity and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Olubayo M. Babatunde & Josiah L. Munda & Yskandar Hamam, 2020. "Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Neural Network Trained with Differential Evolution for Estimating Global Solar Radiation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Despotovic, Milan & Nedic, Vladimir & Despotovic, Danijela & Cvetanovic, Slobodan, 2015. "Review and statistical analysis of different global solar radiation sunshine models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1869-1880.
    8. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Wang, Xiukang & Lu, Xianghui & Xiang, Youzhen, 2018. "Evaluating the effect of air pollution on global and diffuse solar radiation prediction using support vector machine modeling based on sunshine duration and air temperature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 732-747.
    9. Feng, Yu & Hao, Weiping & Li, Haoru & Cui, Ningbo & Gong, Daozhi & Gao, Lili, 2020. "Machine learning models to quantify and map daily global solar radiation and photovoltaic power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Jahani, Babak & Dinpashoh, Y. & Raisi Nafchi, Atefeh, 2017. "Evaluation and development of empirical models for estimating daily solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 878-891.
    11. Qin, Wenmin & Wang, Lunche & Lin, Aiwen & Zhang, Ming & Xia, Xiangao & Hu, Bo & Niu, Zigeng, 2018. "Comparison of deterministic and data-driven models for solar radiation estimation in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 579-594.
    12. Qiu, Rangjian & Li, Longan & Wu, Lifeng & Agathokleous, Evgenios & Liu, Chunwei & Zhang, Baozhong & Luo, Yufeng & Sun, Shanlei, 2022. "Modeling daily global solar radiation using only temperature data: Past, development, and future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Achour, Lazhar & Bouharkat, Malek & Assas, Ouarda & Behar, Omar, 2017. "Hybrid model for estimating monthly global solar radiation for the Southern of Algeria: (Case study: Tamanrasset, Algeria)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 526-539.
    14. Kambezidis, H.D. & Psiloglou, B.E. & Karagiannis, D. & Dumka, U.C. & Kaskaoutis, D.G., 2017. "Meteorological Radiation Model (MRM v6.1): Improvements in diffuse radiation estimates and a new approach for implementation of cloud products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 616-637.
    15. Wang, Lunche & Kisi, Ozgur & Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad & Salazar, Germán Ariel & Zhu, Zhongmin & Gong, Wei, 2016. "Solar radiation prediction using different techniques: model evaluation and comparison," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 384-397.
    16. Paulescu, M. & Stefu, N. & Calinoiu, D. & Paulescu, E. & Pop, N. & Boata, R. & Mares, O., 2016. "Ångström–Prescott equation: Physical basis, empirical models and sensitivity analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 495-506.
    17. Mecibah, Mohamed Salah & Boukelia, Taqiy Eddine & Tahtah, Reda & Gairaa, Kacem, 2014. "Introducing the best model for estimation the monthly mean daily global solar radiation on a horizontal surface (Case study: Algeria)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 194-202.
    18. Rohani, Abbas & Taki, Morteza & Abdollahpour, Masoumeh, 2018. "A novel soft computing model (Gaussian process regression with K-fold cross validation) for daily and monthly solar radiation forecasting (Part: I)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 411-422.
    19. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Mert, Cihan & Kisi, Ozgur, 2018. "Comparison of four heuristic regression techniques in solar radiation modeling: Kriging method vs RSM, MARS and M5 model tree," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 330-341.
    20. Rodrigues, Eugénio & Gomes, Álvaro & Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues & Henggeler Antunes, Carlos, 2018. "Estimation of renewable energy and built environment-related variables using neural networks – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 959-988.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:100:y:2019:i:c:p:186-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.