IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v148y2016icp96-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The generalization of Latin hypercube sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Shields, Michael D.
  • Zhang, Jiaxin

Abstract

Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) is generalized in terms of a spectrum of stratified sampling (SS) designs referred to as partially stratified sample (PSS) designs. True SS and LHS are shown to represent the extremes of the PSS spectrum. The variance of PSS estimates is derived along with some asymptotic properties. PSS designs are shown to reduce variance associated with variable interactions, whereas LHS reduces variance associated with main effects. Challenges associated with the use of PSS designs and their limitations are discussed. To overcome these challenges, the PSS method is coupled with a new method called Latinized stratified sampling (LSS) that produces sample sets that are simultaneously SS and LHS. The LSS method is equivalent to an Orthogonal Array based LHS under certain conditions but is easier to obtain. Utilizing an LSS on the subspaces of a PSS provides a sampling strategy that reduces variance associated with both main effects and variable interactions and can be designed specially to minimize variance for a given problem. Several high-dimensional numerical examples highlight the strengths and limitations of the method. The Latinized partially stratified sampling method is then applied to identify the best sample strategy for uncertainty quantification on a plate buckling problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Shields, Michael D. & Zhang, Jiaxin, 2016. "The generalization of Latin hypercube sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 96-108.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:148:y:2016:i:c:p:96-108
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015003543
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alger Ingela & Ma Ching-to Albert & Renault Regis, 2012. "Experience Benefits and Firm Organization," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, September.
    2. Shields, Michael D. & Teferra, Kirubel & Hapij, Adam & Daddazio, Raymond P., 2015. "Refined Stratified Sampling for efficient Monte Carlo based uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 310-325.
    3. Marco Ratto, 2008. "Analysing DSGE Models with Global Sensitivity Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 115-139, March.
    4. Michael D. Shields & V.S. Sundar, 2015. "Targeted random sampling: a new approach for efficient reliability estimation for complex systems," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2/3), pages 174-190.
    5. Helton, J.C. & Johnson, J.D. & Sallaberry, C.J. & Storlie, C.B., 2006. "Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1175-1209.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Javaid, M. Tariq & Sajjad, Umar & Saddam ul Hassan, Syed & Nasir, Sheharyar & Shahid, M. Usman & Ali, Awais & Salamat, Shuaib, 2023. "Power enhancement of vertical axis wind turbine using optimum trapped vortex cavity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PA).
    2. Jiacheng Liu & Haiyun Liu & Cong Zhang & Jiyin Cao & Aibo Xu & Jiwei Hu, 2024. "Derivative-Variance Hybrid Global Sensitivity Measure with Optimal Sampling Method Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Yinquan Yu & Yue Pan & Qiping Chen & Yiming Hu & Jian Gao & Zhao Zhao & Shuangxia Niu & Shaowei Zhou, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization Strategy for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Based on Combined Surrogate Model and Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Shi, Yan & Lu, Zhenzhou & He, Ruyang & Zhou, Yicheng & Chen, Siyu, 2020. "A novel learning function based on Kriging for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. García, Antonio & Monsalve-Serrano, Javier & Martínez-Boggio, Santiago & Wittek, Karsten, 2020. "Potential of hybrid powertrains in a variable compression ratio downsized turbocharged VVA Spark Ignition engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    6. Hau T. Mai & Jaewook Lee & Joowon Kang & H. Nguyen-Xuan & Jaehong Lee, 2022. "An Improved Blind Kriging Surrogate Model for Design Optimization Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Himakar Ganti & Manu Kamin & Prashant Khare, 2020. "Design Space Exploration of Turbulent Multiphase Flows Using Machine Learning-Based Surrogate Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Xie, Bin & Wang, Yanzhong & Zhu, Yunyi & Liu, Peng & Wu, Yu & Lu, Fengxia, 2024. "Time-variant reliability analysis of angular contact ball bearing considering the coupled effect of rolling contact fatigue damage and wear," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Morzaria-Luna, Hem Nalini & Ainsworth, Cameron H. & Tarnecki, Joseph H. & Grüss, Arnaud, 2018. "Diet composition uncertainty determines impacts on fisheries following an oil spill," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(PB), pages 187-198.
    10. Li, Jian & Dueñas-Osorio, Leonardo & Chen, Changkun & Shi, Congling, 2016. "Connectivity reliability and topological controllability of infrastructure networks: A comparative assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 24-33.
    11. Xu, Jintao & Gui, Maolei & Ding, Rui & Dai, Tao & Zheng, Mengyan & Men, Xinhong & Meng, Fanpeng & Yu, Tao & Sui, Yang, 2023. "A new approach for dynamic reliability analysis of reactor protection system for HPR1000," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    12. Wang, Run-Zi & Gu, Hang-Hang & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Li, Kai-Shang & Wang, Ji & Wang, Xiao-Wei & Hideo, Miura & Zhang, Xian-Cheng & Tu, Shan-Tung, 2022. "A data-driven roadmap for creep-fatigue reliability assessment and its implementation in low-pressure turbine disk at elevated temperatures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    13. Zhou, Tong & Peng, Yongbo, 2022. "Reliability analysis using adaptive Polynomial-Chaos Kriging and probability density evolution method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    14. Qihong Feng & Kuankuan Wu & Jiyuan Zhang & Sen Wang & Xianmin Zhang & Daiyu Zhou & An Zhao, 2022. "Optimization of Well Control during Gas Flooding Using the Deep-LSTM-Based Proxy Model: A Case Study in the Baoshaceng Reservoir, Tarim, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Dang, Chao & Xu, Jun, 2020. "Unified reliability assessment for problems with low- to high-dimensional random inputs using the Laplace transform and a mixture distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    16. Sierra, Gina & Robinson, Elinirina I. & Goebel, Kai, 2021. "Improving tail accuracy of the predicted cumulative distribution function of time of failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    17. Wang, Tianzhe & Chen, Zequan & Li, Guofa & He, Jialong & Liu, Chao & Du, Xuejiao, 2024. "A novel method for high-dimensional reliability analysis based on activity score and adaptive Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    18. Quan Li & Xin Wang & Shuaiang Rong, 2018. "Probabilistic Load Flow Method Based on Modified Latin Hypercube-Important Sampling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Goda, Takashi, 2021. "A simple algorithm for global sensitivity analysis with Shapley effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    20. Okpokparoro, Salem & Sriramula, Srinivas, 2021. "Uncertainty modeling in reliability analysis of floating wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 88-108.
    21. Shields, Michael D., 2018. "Adaptive Monte Carlo analysis for strongly nonlinear stochastic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 207-224.
    22. Yue, Wencong & Li, Yangqing & Su, Meirong & Chen, Qionghong & Rong, Qiangqiang, 2023. "Carbon emissions accounting and prediction in urban agglomerations from multiple perspectives of production, consumption and income," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Qiong-Li & Cournède, Paul-Henry & Mathieu, Amélie, 2012. "An efficient computational method for global sensitivity analysis and its application to tree growth modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 35-43.
    2. Shields, Michael D., 2018. "Adaptive Monte Carlo analysis for strongly nonlinear stochastic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 207-224.
    3. Saltelli, Andrea & Campolongo, Francesca & Cariboni, Jessica, 2009. "Screening important inputs in models with strong interaction properties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1149-1155.
    4. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & De Stasio, Claudio & Mauro, Gerardo Maria & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2016. "Multi-stage and multi-objective optimization for energy retrofitting a developed hospital reference building: A new approach to assess cost-optimality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 37-68.
    5. Medeiros, C.P. & Alencar, M.H. & de Almeida, A.T., 2017. "Multidimensional risk evaluation of natural gas pipelines based on a multicriteria decision model using visualization tools and statistical tests for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 268-276.
    6. Chiron, Marie & Genest, Christian & Morio, Jérôme & Dubreuil, Sylvain, 2023. "Failure probability estimation through high-dimensional elliptical distribution modeling with multiple importance sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Albonico, Alice & Paccagnini, Alessia & Tirelli, Patrizio, 2017. "Great recession, slow recovery and muted fiscal policies in the US," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 140-161.
    8. Zhou, Yuekuan & Zheng, Siqian, 2020. "Uncertainty study on thermal and energy performances of a deterministic parameters based optimal aerogel glazing system using machine-learning method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Helton, Jon C. & Johnson, Jay D. & Sallaberry, Cédric J., 2011. "Quantification of margins and uncertainties: Example analyses from reactor safety and radioactive waste disposal involving the separation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1014-1033.
    10. Plischke, Elmar & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2019. "Copula theory and probabilistic sensitivity analysis: Is there a connection?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1046-1059.
    11. Acurio Vásconez, Verónica & Giraud, Gaël & Mc Isaac, Florent & Pham, Ngoc-Sang, 2015. "The effects of oil price shocks in a new-Keynesian framework with capital accumulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 844-854.
    12. Pye, Steve & Sabio, Nagore & Strachan, Neil, 2015. "An integrated systematic analysis of uncertainties in UK energy transition pathways," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 673-684.
    13. Cristiano Cantore & Filippo Ferroni & Miguel León-Ledesma, 2021. "The Missing Link: Monetary Policy and The Labor Share," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 1592-1620.
    14. Bletzinger, Tilman & Lalik, Magdalena, 2017. "The impact of constrained monetary policy on fiscal multipliers on output and inflation," Working Paper Series 2019, European Central Bank.
    15. Sommer, Wijbrand & Valstar, Johan & Leusbrock, Ingo & Grotenhuis, Tim & Rijnaarts, Huub, 2015. "Optimization and spatial pattern of large-scale aquifer thermal energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 322-337.
    16. Saurbayeva, Assemgul & Memon, Shazim Ali & Kim, Jong, 2023. "Integrated multi-stage sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization approach for PCM integrated residential buildings in different climate zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    17. Donghyeon Yoo & Jinhwan Park & Jaemin Moon & Changwan Kim, 2021. "Reliability-Based Design Optimization for Reducing the Performance Failure and Maximizing the Specific Energy of Lithium-Ion Batteries Considering Manufacturing Uncertainty of Porous Electrodes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    18. Daniel Harenberg & Stefano Marelli & Bruno Sudret & Viktor Winschel, 2019. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-41, January.
    19. Tian, Wei & Song, Jitian & Li, Zhanyong & de Wilde, Pieter, 2014. "Bootstrap techniques for sensitivity analysis and model selection in building thermal performance analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 320-328.
    20. Javier Urquizo & Carlos Calderón & Philip James, 2017. "Using a Local Framework Combining Principal Component Regression and Monte Carlo Simulation for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of a Domestic Energy Model in Sub-City Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:148:y:2016:i:c:p:96-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.