IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i17p4565-d408275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design Space Exploration of Turbulent Multiphase Flows Using Machine Learning-Based Surrogate Model

Author

Listed:
  • Himakar Ganti

    (Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0070, USA)

  • Manu Kamin

    (Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0070, USA)

  • Prashant Khare

    (Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0070, USA)

Abstract

This study focuses on establishing a surrogate model based on machine learning techniques to predict the time-averaged spatially distributed behaviors of vaporizing liquid jets in turbulent air crossflow for momentum flux ratios between 5 and 120. This surrogate model extends a previously developed Gaussian-process-based framework applicable to laminar flows to accommodate turbulent flows and demonstrates that in addition to detailed fields of primitive variables, second-order turbulence statistics can also be predicted using machine learning techniques. The framework proceeds in 3 steps—(1) design of experiment studies to identify training points and conducting high-fidelity calculations to build the training dataset; (2) Gaussian process regression (supervised training) for the range of operating conditions under consideration for gaseous and dispersed phase quantities; and (3) error quantification of the surrogate model by comparing the machine learning predictions with the truth model for test conditions (i.e., conditions not used for training). The framework was trained using data generated by high-fidelity large eddy simulation (LES)-based calculations (also referred to as the truth model), which solves the complete set of conservation equations for mass, momentum, energy, and species in an Eulerian reference frame, coupled with a Lagrangian solver that tracks the dispersed phase. Simulations were conducted for the range of momentum flux ratios between 5 and 120 for liquid water injected into crossflowing air at a pressure of 1 atm and temperature of 600 K. Results from the machine-learned surrogate model, also called emulations, were compared with the truth model under testing conditions identified by momentum flux ratios of 7 and 40. L 1 errors for time-averaged field quantities, including velocity magnitudes, pressure, temperature, vapor fraction of the evaporated liquid, and turbulent kinetic energy in the gas phase, and spray penetration and Sauter mean diameters in the dispersed phase are reported. Speedup of 65 was achieved with this emulator when compared against LES simulation of the same test conditions with errors for all quantities below 14%, thus demonstrating the potential benefits of using machine learning techniques for design space exploration of devices that are based on turbulent multiphase fluid flows. This is the first effort of its kind in the literature that demonstrates the application of machine learning techniques on turbulent multiphase flows.

Suggested Citation

  • Himakar Ganti & Manu Kamin & Prashant Khare, 2020. "Design Space Exploration of Turbulent Multiphase Flows Using Machine Learning-Based Surrogate Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:17:p:4565-:d:408275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4565/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4565/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shields, Michael D. & Zhang, Jiaxin, 2016. "The generalization of Latin hypercube sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 96-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Keser & Alberto Ceschin & Michele Battistoni & Hong G. Im & Hrvoje Jasak, 2020. "Development of a Eulerian Multi-Fluid Solver for Dense Spray Applications in OpenFOAM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Tianzhe & Chen, Zequan & Li, Guofa & He, Jialong & Liu, Chao & Du, Xuejiao, 2024. "A novel method for high-dimensional reliability analysis based on activity score and adaptive Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Qihong Feng & Kuankuan Wu & Jiyuan Zhang & Sen Wang & Xianmin Zhang & Daiyu Zhou & An Zhao, 2022. "Optimization of Well Control during Gas Flooding Using the Deep-LSTM-Based Proxy Model: A Case Study in the Baoshaceng Reservoir, Tarim, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Quan Li & Xin Wang & Shuaiang Rong, 2018. "Probabilistic Load Flow Method Based on Modified Latin Hypercube-Important Sampling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Li, Jian & Dueñas-Osorio, Leonardo & Chen, Changkun & Shi, Congling, 2016. "Connectivity reliability and topological controllability of infrastructure networks: A comparative assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 24-33.
    5. Xu, Jintao & Gui, Maolei & Ding, Rui & Dai, Tao & Zheng, Mengyan & Men, Xinhong & Meng, Fanpeng & Yu, Tao & Sui, Yang, 2023. "A new approach for dynamic reliability analysis of reactor protection system for HPR1000," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Shields, Michael D., 2018. "Adaptive Monte Carlo analysis for strongly nonlinear stochastic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 207-224.
    7. Jiacheng Liu & Haiyun Liu & Cong Zhang & Jiyin Cao & Aibo Xu & Jiwei Hu, 2024. "Derivative-Variance Hybrid Global Sensitivity Measure with Optimal Sampling Method Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    8. García, Antonio & Monsalve-Serrano, Javier & Martínez-Boggio, Santiago & Wittek, Karsten, 2020. "Potential of hybrid powertrains in a variable compression ratio downsized turbocharged VVA Spark Ignition engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Goda, Takashi, 2021. "A simple algorithm for global sensitivity analysis with Shapley effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    10. Hau T. Mai & Jaewook Lee & Joowon Kang & H. Nguyen-Xuan & Jaehong Lee, 2022. "An Improved Blind Kriging Surrogate Model for Design Optimization Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Xie, Bin & Wang, Yanzhong & Zhu, Yunyi & Liu, Peng & Wu, Yu & Lu, Fengxia, 2024. "Time-variant reliability analysis of angular contact ball bearing considering the coupled effect of rolling contact fatigue damage and wear," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    12. Hanye Xiong & Zhenzhong Shen & Yongchao Li & Yiqing Sun, 2024. "A Novel Inversion Method for Permeability Coefficients of Concrete Face Rockfill Dam Based on Sobol-IDBO-SVR Fusion Surrogate Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Yinquan Yu & Yue Pan & Qiping Chen & Yiming Hu & Jian Gao & Zhao Zhao & Shuangxia Niu & Shaowei Zhou, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization Strategy for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Based on Combined Surrogate Model and Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Shi, Yan & Lu, Zhenzhou & He, Ruyang & Zhou, Yicheng & Chen, Siyu, 2020. "A novel learning function based on Kriging for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    15. Wang, Run-Zi & Gu, Hang-Hang & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Li, Kai-Shang & Wang, Ji & Wang, Xiao-Wei & Hideo, Miura & Zhang, Xian-Cheng & Tu, Shan-Tung, 2022. "A data-driven roadmap for creep-fatigue reliability assessment and its implementation in low-pressure turbine disk at elevated temperatures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    16. Zhou, Tong & Peng, Yongbo, 2022. "Reliability analysis using adaptive Polynomial-Chaos Kriging and probability density evolution method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    17. Okpokparoro, Salem & Sriramula, Srinivas, 2021. "Uncertainty modeling in reliability analysis of floating wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 88-108.
    18. Dang, Chao & Xu, Jun, 2020. "Unified reliability assessment for problems with low- to high-dimensional random inputs using the Laplace transform and a mixture distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    19. Sierra, Gina & Robinson, Elinirina I. & Goebel, Kai, 2021. "Improving tail accuracy of the predicted cumulative distribution function of time of failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    20. Morzaria-Luna, Hem Nalini & Ainsworth, Cameron H. & Tarnecki, Joseph H. & Grüss, Arnaud, 2018. "Diet composition uncertainty determines impacts on fisheries following an oil spill," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(PB), pages 187-198.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:17:p:4565-:d:408275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.