IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v228y2020ics0925527320302413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal crowdsourcing contracting for reconfigurable process planning in open manufacturing: A bilevel coordinated optimization approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Yujie
  • Du, Gang
  • Jiao, Roger J.

Abstract

Recent advances in the industrial Internet of Things and smart data analytics have empowered companies to shift towards an open manufacturing paradigm to crowdsource and share manufacturing resources based on demand and capacities across the value chain. Reconfigurable process planning (RPP) reconstructs the optimal process planning for each batch according to different part batches based on commonality. In combination with the optimal crowdsourcing contracting (OCC) strategy, RPP helps release fixed capital and increase the flexibility of the enterprise under the requirement of diversified parts. The coupling of process planning and crowdsourcing contracting decisions is inherent in open manufacturing. This paper focuses on coordinated optimization underlying OCC with RPP. An OCC decision-making mechanism considering RPP based on Stackelberg game theory is established, which provides a solution for trade-offs between the RPP decision-maker and the OCC decision-maker. A coordinated optimization model is proposed to reveal the hierarchical relationships and is solved by a nesting genetic algorithm. A case study of a group of rotating shaft parts is taken to illustrate the effectiveness of the bilevel coordinated optimization (BCO) model. The results present that the commonality has an apparent impact on the OCC and RPP decisions in open manufacturing, and integrating it into process planning activities is advisable for platform enterprises to increase production efficiency and competitive advantages. Our proposed model can deal with the conflict and coordination between OCC and RPP and balances the benefits of platform enterprise with the optimal contractor impacts triggered by planning activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Yujie & Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J., 2020. "Optimal crowdsourcing contracting for reconfigurable process planning in open manufacturing: A bilevel coordinated optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:228:y:2020:i:c:s0925527320302413
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527320302413
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuang Ma & Gang Du & Jianxin (Roger) Jiao & Ruchuan Zhang, 2016. "Hierarchical game joint optimization for product family-driven modular design," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(12), pages 1496-1509, December.
    2. Čapek, R. & Šůcha, P. & Hanzálek, Z., 2012. "Production scheduling with alternative process plans," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 300-311.
    3. Culot, Giovanna & Nassimbeni, Guido & Orzes, Guido & Sartor, Marco, 2020. "Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    4. Xiong, Yixuan & Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J., 2018. "Modular product platforming with supply chain postponement decisions by leader-follower interactive optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 272-286.
    5. Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J. & Chen, Mo, 2014. "Joint optimization of product family configuration and scaling design by Stackelberg game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 330-341.
    6. Xiaojie Liu & Gang Du & Roger J. Jiao, 2017. "Bilevel joint optimisation for product family architecting considering make-or-buy decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(20), pages 5916-5941, October.
    7. Segev, Ella, 2020. "Crowdsourcing contests," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 241-255.
    8. Jerome Bracken & James T. McGill, 1973. "Mathematical Programs with Optimization Problems in the Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 37-44, February.
    9. Martínez, Karim Pérez & Morabito, Reinaldo & Toso, Eli Angela Vitor, 2018. "A coupled process configuration, lot-sizing and scheduling model for production planning in the molded pulp industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 227-243.
    10. Yang, Dong & Jiao, Jianxin (Roger) & Ji, Yangjian & Du, Gang & Helo, Petri & Valente, Anna, 2015. "Joint optimization for coordinated configuration of product families and supply chains by a leader-follower Stackelberg game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 263-280.
    11. Nguyen Hoang Thuan & Pedro Antunes & David Johnstone, 2016. "Factors influencing the decision to crowdsource: A systematic literature review," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 47-68, February.
    12. Ignacio Eguia & Jose Carlos Molina & Sebastian Lozano & Jesus Racero, 2017. "Cell design and multi-period machine loading in cellular reconfigurable manufacturing systems with alternative routing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(10), pages 2775-2790, May.
    13. Oleh Sobeyko & Lars Mönch, 2017. "Integrated process planning and scheduling for large-scale flexible job shops using metaheuristics," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 392-409, January.
    14. Eric Schenk & Claude Guittard, 2011. "Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices," Post-Print halshs-00439256, HAL.
    15. Chenlu Miao & Gang Du & Roger J. Jiao & Tiebin Zhang, 2017. "Coordinated optimisation of platform-driven product line planning by bilevel programming," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(13), pages 3808-3831, July.
    16. Eric Schenk & Claude Guittard, 2011. "Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 93-107.
    17. Li, Xinyu & Shao, Xinyu & Gao, Liang & Qian, Weirong, 2010. "An effective hybrid algorithm for integrated process planning and scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 289-298, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Ameer & Mohammed Dahane, 2023. "Reconfigurability improvement in Industry 4.0: a hybrid genetic algorithm-based heuristic approach for a co-generation of setup and process plans in a reconfigurable environment," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1445-1467, March.
    2. Chen, Xiangpeng & Wang, Rongxi & Gao, Jianmin, 2023. "An optimization framework for enterprise quality infrastructure system under coupling constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Jun & Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J., 2021. "Optimal postponement contracting decisions in crowdsourced manufacturing: A three-level game-theoretic model for product family architecting considering subcontracting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 722-737.
    2. Leandro Gauss & Daniel P. Lacerda & Paulo A. Cauchick Miguel, 2021. "Module-based product family design: systematic literature review and meta-synthesis," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 265-312, January.
    3. Gauss, Leandro & Lacerda, Daniel P. & Cauchick Miguel, Paulo A., 2022. "Market-Driven Modularity: Design method developed under a Design Science paradigm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    4. Xiong, Yixuan & Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J., 2018. "Modular product platforming with supply chain postponement decisions by leader-follower interactive optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 272-286.
    5. Schenk, Eric & Guittard, Claude & Pénin, Julien, 2019. "Open or proprietary? Choosing the right crowdsourcing platform for innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 303-310.
    6. Gang Du & Yi Xia & Roger J. Jiao & Xiaojie Liu, 2019. "Leader-follower joint optimization problems in product family design," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1387-1405, March.
    7. Albors-Garrigos, Jose, 2020. "Barriers and enablers for innovation in the retail sector: Co-innovating with the customer. A case study in grocery retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    8. Herm, Steffen & Callsen-Bracker, Hans-Markus & Kreis, Henning, 2014. "When the crowd evaluates soccer players’ market values: Accuracy and evaluation attributes of an online community," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 484-492.
    9. Van den Broeke, Maud & Boute, Robert & Cardoen, Brecht & Samii, Behzad, 2017. "An efficient solution method to design the cost-minimizing platform portfolio," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 236-250.
    10. Ramón Campos-Blázquez, Juan & Rubio-Andrada, Luis & Soledad Celemín-Pedroche, María, 2023. "Voices from within. To what extent can internal crowdsourcing drive a change in organizational culture?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    11. Heradio, Ruben & Perez-Morago, Hector & Alférez, Mauricio & Fernandez-Amoros, David & Alférez, Germán H., 2016. "Augmenting measure sensitivity to detect essential, dispensable and highly incompatible features in mass customization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 1066-1077.
    12. Barbosu, Sandra & Gans, Joshua S., 2022. "Storm crowds: Evidence from Zooniverse on crowd contribution design," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    13. Brown, Terrence E., 2017. "Sensor-based entrepreneurship: A framework for developing new products and services," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 819-830.
    14. Wang, Jian & He, Shulin, 2022. "Optimal decisions of modularity, prices and return policy in a dual-channel supply chain under mass customization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    15. Palacios, Miguel & Martinez-Corral, Alberto & Nisar, Arsalan & Grijalvo, Mercedes, 2016. "Crowdsourcing and organizational forms: Emerging trends and research implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1834-1839.
    16. Cappa, Francesco & Oriani, Raffaele & Pinelli, Michele & De Massis, Alfredo, 2019. "When does crowdsourcing benefit firm stock market performance?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    17. Pee, L.G. & Koh, E. & Goh, M., 2018. "Trait motivations of crowdsourcing and task choice: A distal-proximal perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 28-41.
    18. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    19. Alkaraan, Fadi & Elmarzouky, Mahmoud & Hussainey, Khaled & Venkatesh, V.G., 2023. "Sustainable strategic investment decision-making practices in UK companies: The influence of governance mechanisms on synergy between industry 4.0 and circular economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    20. Servranckx, Tom & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "Strategies for project scheduling with alternative subgraphs under uncertainty: similar and dissimilar sets of schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 38-53.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:228:y:2020:i:c:s0925527320302413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.