IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v291y2021i2p722-737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal postponement contracting decisions in crowdsourced manufacturing: A three-level game-theoretic model for product family architecting considering subcontracting

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Jun
  • Du, Gang
  • Jiao, Roger J.

Abstract

Crowdsourced manufacturing enables companies to outsource and share manufacturing resources based on demand and capacity across the value chain. A postponement strategy is well recognized as an effective means to deal with supply chain risks and uncertainties of producing customized products. However, coordinated decision-making among product design, postponement contracting and subcontracting is a challenging problem area that requires innovative modeling and decision support. This study develops a model that emphasizes interactive decisions within a three-level non-cooperative game that determines the optimal solutions for a single manufacturer, multiple distributors, and multiple subcontractors by maximizing their net profits. This study formulates a postponement contracting with subcontracting (PCS) problem for product family architecting to interact with postponement contracting and subcontracting decisions based on optimal planning of crowdsourced manufacturing activities. The PCS problem differs from traditional postponement design models that assume a (fixed) product architecture is given at the outset. In this study, interaction among different stakeholders is modeled as a non-linear, mixed-integer, three-level game-theoretic model based on the Stackelberg game theory. A novel virtual postponement structure is introduced to concretize optimization of the PCS problem and to justify which product module(s) should be postponed. Analytical solutions are developed incorporating a nested genetic algorithm. A practical case study of postponement contracting decisions in an electric vehicle company is reported to verify the feasibility and potential of the proposed approach for product family architecting. The optimal product family design, the types of postponed product modules, some parts in the postponed product modules that need to be further subcontracted, and other decision results are determined simultaneously in the case study. The sensitivity analyses on the proposed postponement cost and demand parameters indicate that the changes of their values greatly influence the decision makers’ net profit, and the net profit situation of each decision maker in different regions is obtained by the sensitivity analysis of the union of the two parameters. Thus, the PCS problem for product family architecting in crowdsourced manufacturing provides a more complete solution for the current implementation of the postponement strategy, and our proposed three-level game-theoretic model can handle well the coordination among the PCS problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Jun & Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J., 2021. "Optimal postponement contracting decisions in crowdsourced manufacturing: A three-level game-theoretic model for product family architecting considering subcontracting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 722-737.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:291:y:2021:i:2:p:722-737
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221720308535
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esmaeili, M. & Shamsi Gamchi, N. & Asgharizadeh, E., 2014. "Three-level warranty service contract among manufacturer, agent and customer: A game-theoretical approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 177-186.
    2. Thorsten Blecker & Nizar Abdelkafi, 2006. "Mass Customization: State-of-the-Art and Challenges," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Thorsten Blecker & Gerhard Friedrich (ed.), Mass Customization: Challenges and Solutions, chapter 0, pages 1-25, Springer.
    3. Daniel Granot & Shuya Yin, 2008. "Price and Order Postponement in a Decentralized Newsvendor Model with Multiplicative and Price-Dependent Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 121-139, February.
    4. Li, Jian & Wang, Shouyang & Cheng, T.C. Edwin, 2008. "Analysis of postponement strategy by EPQ-based models with planned backorders," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 777-788, October.
    5. Xiong, Yixuan & Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J., 2018. "Modular product platforming with supply chain postponement decisions by leader-follower interactive optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 272-286.
    6. Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J. & Chen, Mo, 2014. "Joint optimization of product family configuration and scaling design by Stackelberg game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 330-341.
    7. Xiaojie Liu & Gang Du & Roger J. Jiao, 2017. "Bilevel joint optimisation for product family architecting considering make-or-buy decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(20), pages 5916-5941, October.
    8. Cvsa, Viswanath & Gilbert, Stephen M., 2002. "Strategic commitment versus postponement in a two-tier supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 526-543, September.
    9. Hubert Pun & H. Sebastian Heese, 2015. "Controlling a supplier’s subcontracting decisions through contractual enforcement or economic incentives," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 127-140, January.
    10. Graman, Gregory A., 2010. "A partial-postponement decision cost model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 34-44, February.
    11. Tang, Dong, 2011. "Managing finished-goods inventory under capacitated delayed differentiation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 481-492, October.
    12. Jun Wu & Gang Du & Roger J. Jiao, 2020. "Dynamic postponement design for crowdsourcing in open manufacturing: A hierarchical joint optimization approach," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 255-275, March.
    13. Bish, Ebru K. & Lin, Kyle Y. & Hong, Seong-Jong, 2008. "Allocation of flexible and indivisible resources with decision postponement and demand learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 429-441, June.
    14. Yang, Dong & Jiao, Jianxin (Roger) & Ji, Yangjian & Du, Gang & Helo, Petri & Valente, Anna, 2015. "Joint optimization for coordinated configuration of product families and supply chains by a leader-follower Stackelberg game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 263-280.
    15. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Haughton, Michael & Pourmehdi, Fahime, 2019. "A robust optimization model for efficient and green supply chain planning with postponement strategy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 266-283.
    16. Chen, Shuo-Pei & Wu, Wann-Yih, 2010. "A systematic procedure to evaluate an automobile manufacturer-distributor partnership," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 687-698, September.
    17. Hua, Zhongsheng & Zhang, Xuemei & Xu, Xiaoyan, 2011. "Product design strategies in a manufacturer-retailer distribution channel," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 23-32, January.
    18. Ernst, Ricardo & Kamrad, Bardia, 2000. "Evaluation of supply chain structures through modularization and postponement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 495-510, August.
    19. Jiang, Li, 2012. "The implications of postponement on contract design and channel performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 356-366.
    20. Ngniatedema, Thomas & Fono, Louis Aimé & Mbondo, Georges Dieudonné, 2015. "A delayed product customization cost model with supplier delivery performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 109-119.
    21. Jewkes, Elizabeth M. & Alfa, Attahiru S., 2009. "A queueing model of delayed product differentiation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 734-743, December.
    22. Chenlu Miao & Gang Du & Roger J. Jiao & Tiebin Zhang, 2017. "Coordinated optimisation of platform-driven product line planning by bilevel programming," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(13), pages 3808-3831, July.
    23. Yossi Aviv & Awi Federgruen, 2001. "Capacitated Multi-Item Inventory Systems with Random and Seasonally Fluctuating Demands: Implications for Postponement Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 512-531, April.
    24. Saghiri, Soroosh S. & Barnes, Stuart J., 2016. "Supplier flexibility and postponement implementation: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 170-183.
    25. Bin Shen & Tsan-Ming Choi & Stefan Minner, 2019. "A review on supply chain contracting with information considerations: information updating and information asymmetry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 4898-4936, August.
    26. Adkins, Roger & Paxson, Dean, 2013. "Deterministic models for premature and postponed replacement," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1008-1019.
    27. Hau L. Lee & Christopher S. Tang, 1997. "Modelling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 40-53, January.
    28. Weskamp, Christoph & Koberstein, Achim & Schwartz, Frank & Suhl, Leena & Voß, Stefan, 2019. "A two-stage stochastic programming approach for identifying optimal postponement strategies in supply chains with uncertain demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 123-138.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaojie Liu & Xuejian Gong & Roger J. Jiao, 2022. "Low-Carbon Product Family Planning for Manufacturing as a Service (MaaS): Bilevel Optimization with Linear Physical Programming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiong, Yixuan & Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J., 2018. "Modular product platforming with supply chain postponement decisions by leader-follower interactive optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 272-286.
    2. Ma, Yujie & Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J., 2020. "Optimal crowdsourcing contracting for reconfigurable process planning in open manufacturing: A bilevel coordinated optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Caliskan Demirag, Ozgun & Xue, Weili & Wang, Jie, 2021. "Retailers’ Order Timing Strategies under Competition and Demand Uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Weskamp, Christoph & Koberstein, Achim & Schwartz, Frank & Suhl, Leena & Voß, Stefan, 2019. "A two-stage stochastic programming approach for identifying optimal postponement strategies in supply chains with uncertain demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 123-138.
    5. Ngniatedema, Thomas & Fono, Louis Aimé & Mbondo, Georges Dieudonné, 2015. "A delayed product customization cost model with supplier delivery performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 109-119.
    6. Singa Wang Chiu & Liang-Wei You & Tsu-Ming Yeh & Tiffany Chiu, 2020. "The Collective Influence of Component Commonality, Adjustable-Rate, Postponement, and Rework on Multi-Item Manufacturing Decision," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Gauss, Leandro & Lacerda, Daniel P. & Cauchick Miguel, Paulo A., 2022. "Market-Driven Modularity: Design method developed under a Design Science paradigm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    8. Heradio, Ruben & Perez-Morago, Hector & Alférez, Mauricio & Fernandez-Amoros, David & Alférez, Germán H., 2016. "Augmenting measure sensitivity to detect essential, dispensable and highly incompatible features in mass customization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 1066-1077.
    9. Fu, Qi & Lee, Chung-Yee & Teo, Chung-Piaw, 2012. "Modified critical fractile approach for a class of partial postponement problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 185-193.
    10. Fernando Bernstein & Gregory A. DeCroix & Yulan Wang, 2011. "The Impact of Demand Aggregation Through Delayed Component Allocation in an Assemble-to-Order System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1154-1171, June.
    11. S Kumar & D A Nottestad & E E Murphy, 2009. "Effects of product postponement on the distribution network: a case study," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(4), pages 471-480, April.
    12. Mustafa Doğru & A. Kok & G. Houtum, 2013. "Newsvendor characterizations for one-warehouse multi-retailer inventory systems with discrete demand under the balance assumption," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 21(3), pages 541-559, September.
    13. Van den Broeke, Maud & Boute, Robert & Cardoen, Brecht & Samii, Behzad, 2017. "An efficient solution method to design the cost-minimizing platform portfolio," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 236-250.
    14. Wong, Hartanto & Potter, Andrew & Naim, Mohamed, 2011. "Evaluation of postponement in the soluble coffee supply chain: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 355-364, May.
    15. Li, Jian & Edwin Cheng, T.C. & Wang, Shouyang, 2007. "Analysis of postponement strategy for perishable items by EOQ-based models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 31-38, May.
    16. Jewkes, Elizabeth M. & Alfa, Attahiru S., 2009. "A queueing model of delayed product differentiation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 734-743, December.
    17. Leandro Gauss & Daniel P. Lacerda & Paulo A. Cauchick Miguel, 2021. "Module-based product family design: systematic literature review and meta-synthesis," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 265-312, January.
    18. Ngniatedema, Thomas & Shanker, Murali & Hu, Michael Y. & Guiffrida, Alfred L. & Eddy Patuwo, B., 2015. "Late customization strategy with service levels requirements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 72-84.
    19. Graman, Gregory A., 2010. "A partial-postponement decision cost model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 34-44, February.
    20. repec:thr:techub:10028:y:2022:i:1:p:389-407 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:291:y:2021:i:2:p:722-737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.