IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v621y2023ics0378437123003436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical study on the effect of an obstacle on the inflow process

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Yanghui
  • Bi, Yubo
  • Li, Hongliu
  • Gao, Wei
  • Zhang, Jun
  • Song, Weiguo

Abstract

The inflow process of pedestrians is a common phenomenon in daily life, yet it has received little attention in the pedestrian dynamics field. This study aims to investigate the impact of an obstacle on the inflow process and determine if the conclusion that the existence of obstacles at the exit may improve evacuation efficiency also applies to the inflow process. A series of experiments were carried out to investigate the impact of an obstacle on the inflow process by setting a stationary pedestrian as an obstacle and changing the distance between the obstacle and the entrance. The results indicate that the presence of an obstacle has a significant impact on pedestrian trajectory, with a notable increase in the deflection angle of pedestrian trajectories. However, the stationary pedestrian has no statistical impact on the dynamic system of the entry process, such as the specific flow rate and time headway. The presence of the obstacle pedestrian significantly inhibits the movement speed of pedestrians after entering the room. The risk degree of the crowd was evaluated using ‘crowd pressure’, which is the product of density and speed variance. The presence of the obstacle effectively reduces the high ‘crowd pressure’ in front of and behind the entrance, making the entire entry process safer. The distribution of pedestrian destinations in a room is uneven, and the presence of the obstacle can affect pedestrians to stop in areas close to the entrance and on both sides of the obstacle. Therefore, our research results indicate that there is a difference in the impact of pedestrian obstacles at the entrance and exit obstacles on pedestrian dynamics. This difference deserves researchers’ attention and our findings can provide useful references for risk control and crowd management during the inflow process.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Yanghui & Bi, Yubo & Li, Hongliu & Gao, Wei & Zhang, Jun & Song, Weiguo, 2023. "An empirical study on the effect of an obstacle on the inflow process," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 621(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:621:y:2023:i:c:s0378437123003436
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2023.128788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437123003436
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ezaki, Takahiro & Yanagisawa, Daichi & Ohtsuka, Kazumichi & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2012. "Simulation of space acquisition process of pedestrians using Proxemic Floor Field Model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(1), pages 291-299.
    2. Ren, Xiangxia & Zhang, Jun & Song, Weiguo & Cao, Shuchao, 2021. "Mechanisms of passing through short exits for the elderly and young adults," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 195-213.
    3. Liu, Xiaodong & Song, Weiguo & Fu, Libi & Fang, Zhiming, 2016. "Experimental study of pedestrian inflow in a room with a separate entrance and exit," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 442(C), pages 224-238.
    4. Dirk Helbing & Lubos Buzna & Anders Johansson & Torsten Werner, 2005. "Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Lian, Liping & Song, Weiguo & Yuen, Kwok Kit Richard & Telesca, Luciano, 2018. "Investigating the time evolution of some parameters describing inflow processes of pedestrians in a room," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 507(C), pages 77-88.
    6. Li Jiang & Jingyu Li & Chao Shen & Sicong Yang & Zhangang Han, 2014. "Obstacle Optimization for Panic Flow - Reducing the Tangential Momentum Increases the Escape Speed," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Shi, Xiaomeng & Ye, Zhirui & Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Tang, Dounan & Lin, Junkai, 2019. "Examining effect of architectural adjustment on pedestrian crowd flow at bottleneck," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 522(C), pages 350-364.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi, Xiaomeng & Xue, Shuqi & Feliciani, Claudio & Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Lin, Junkai & Li, Dawei & Ye, Zhirui, 2021. "Verifying the applicability of a pedestrian simulation model to reproduce the effect of exit design on egress flow under normal and emergency conditions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    2. Wang, Weili & Zhang, Jingjing & Li, Haicheng & Xie, Qimiao, 2020. "Experimental study on unidirectional pedestrian flows in a corridor with a fixed obstacle and a temporary obstacle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    3. Lian, Liping & Song, Weiguo & Yuen, Kwok Kit Richard & Telesca, Luciano, 2018. "Investigating the time evolution of some parameters describing inflow processes of pedestrians in a room," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 507(C), pages 77-88.
    4. Guo, Ren-Yong, 2014. "Simulation of spatial and temporal separation of pedestrian counter flow through a bottleneck," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 415(C), pages 428-439.
    5. Ziyou Gao & Yunchao Qu & Xingang Li & Jiancheng Long & Hai-Jun Huang, 2014. "Simulating the Dynamic Escape Process in Large Public Places," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1344-1357, December.
    6. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid, 2018. "Crowd behaviour and motion: Empirical methods," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 253-294.
    7. Zhao, Yongxiang & Li, Meifang & Lu, Xin & Tian, Lijun & Yu, Zhiyong & Huang, Kai & Wang, Yana & Li, Ting, 2017. "Optimal layout design of obstacles for panic evacuation using differential evolution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 175-194.
    8. Hu, Yanghui & Bi, Yubo & Ren, Xiangxia & Huang, Shenshi & Gao, Wei, 2023. "Experimental study on the impact of a stationary pedestrian obstacle at the exit on evacuation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 626(C).
    9. Khamis, Nurulaqilla & Selamat, Hazlina & Ismail, Fatimah Sham & Lutfy, Omar Farouq & Haniff, Mohamad Fadzli & Nordin, Ili Najaa Aimi Mohd, 2020. "Optimized exit door locations for a safer emergency evacuation using crowd evacuation model and artificial bee colony optimization," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    10. Shi, Meng & Lee, Eric Wai Ming & Ma, Yi, 2018. "A novel grid-based mesoscopic model for evacuation dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 497(C), pages 198-210.
    11. Shi, Xiaomeng & Ye, Zhirui & Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Tang, Dounan & Lin, Junkai, 2019. "Examining effect of architectural adjustment on pedestrian crowd flow at bottleneck," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 522(C), pages 350-364.
    12. Leng, Biao & Wang, Jianyuan & Zhao, Wenyuan & Xiong, Zhang, 2014. "An extended floor field model based on regular hexagonal cells for pedestrian simulation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 402(C), pages 119-133.
    13. Zhao, Jing & Knoop, Victor L. & Wang, Meng, 2020. "Two-dimensional vehicular movement modelling at intersections based on optimal control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-22.
    14. Huo, Feizhou & Li, Chao & Li, Yufei & Lv, Wei & Ma, Yaping, 2022. "An extended model for describing pedestrian evacuation considering the impact of obstacles on the visual view," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 604(C).
    15. Jie Xu & Yao Ning & Heng Wei & Wei Xie & Jianyuan Guo & Limin Jia & Yong Qin, 2015. "Route Choice in Subway Station during Morning Peak Hours: A Case of Guangzhou Subway," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-8, March.
    16. P. Daniel Wright & Matthew J. Liberatore & Robert L. Nydick, 2006. "A Survey of Operations Research Models and Applications in Homeland Security," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 514-529, December.
    17. Yue, Hao & Zhang, Junyao & Chen, Wenxin & Wu, Xinsen & Zhang, Xu & Shao, Chunfu, 2021. "Simulation of the influence of spatial obstacles on evacuation pedestrian flow in walking facilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    18. Lasse Pedersen, 2009. "When Everyone Runs for the Exit," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 5(4), pages 177-199, December.
    19. Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Sarvi, Majid, 2013. "Understanding pedestrian crowd panic: a review on model organisms approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 12-17.
    20. Sun, Lijun & Tirachini, Alejandro & Axhausen, Kay W. & Erath, Alexander & Lee, Der-Horng, 2014. "Models of bus boarding and alighting dynamics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 447-460.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:621:y:2023:i:c:s0378437123003436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.