IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v38y2017icp118-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of online and offline gender and goal directed shopping online

Author

Listed:
  • Davis, Robert
  • Smith, Sandra D.
  • Lang, Bodo U.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to model the effect of the consumers’ perceptions of their offline and online gendered behaviour on online utilitarian shopping motivation and purchase intentions. We hypothesise that when consumers shop online, their behaviour is mediated by two gendered behaviours, namely offline and online. To test this hypothesis, 515 usable responses were collected in face-to-face interviews. The conceptual model was tested with confirmatory factors analysis (CFA) and structural equation modelling (SEM) across five product categories. Our findings show that the effect of a consumer's perception of their gendered behaviour offline vs. online on online utilitarian shopping motivation and purchase intentions is significantly different. In particular we found that utilitarian shopping motivation online has a significant effect on purchase intentions online mediated by gender (online) overall: strongly for females but not for males. Conversely, utilitarian shopping motivation online has a significant effect on purchase intentions online mediated by gender (offline) for males but not overall and for females.

Suggested Citation

  • Davis, Robert & Smith, Sandra D. & Lang, Bodo U., 2017. "A comparison of online and offline gender and goal directed shopping online," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 118-125.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:38:y:2017:i:c:p:118-125
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.02.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096969891730108X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.02.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thompson, Craig J, 1996. "Caring Consumers: Gendered Consumption Meanings and the Juggling Lifestyle," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(4), pages 388-407, March.
    2. Peter J. Danaher & Isaac W. Wilson & Robert A. Davis, 2003. "A Comparison of Online and Offline Consumer Brand Loyalty," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 461-476, February.
    3. Jennifer J. Argo & Katherine White & Darren W. Dahl, 2006. "Social Comparison Theory and Deception in the Interpersonal Exchange of Consumption Information," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 99-108, June.
    4. Robert J. Fisher & Laurette Dub, 2005. "Gender Differences in Responses to Emotional Advertising: A Social Desirability Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 31(4), pages 850-858, March.
    5. Brunel, Frã‰Dã‰Ric F. & Nelson, Michelle R., 2003. "Message Order Effects and Gender Differences in Advertising Persuasion," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 330-341, September.
    6. J.J. Brakus & B.H. Schmitt & L. Zarantonello, 2009. "Brand Experience: What Is It? How Do We Measure It? And Does It Affect Loyalty?," Post-Print hal-00799102, HAL.
    7. Arnold, Mark J. & Reynolds, Kristy E., 2012. "Approach and Avoidance Motivation: Investigating Hedonic Consumption in a Retail Setting," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 399-411.
    8. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    9. Avery, Jill, 2012. "Defending the markers of masculinity: Consumer resistance to brand gender-bending," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 322-336.
    10. Randall L. Rose & Stacy L. Wood, 2005. "Paradox and the Consumption of Authenticity through Reality Television," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 284-296, September.
    11. Garbarino, Ellen & Strahilevitz, Michal, 2004. "Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(7), pages 768-775, July.
    12. Ira M. Wasserman & Marie Richmond‐Abbott, 2005. "Gender and the Internet: Causes of Variation in Access, Level, and Scope of Use," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 86(1), pages 252-270, March.
    13. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Maheswaran, Durairaj, 1991. "Exploring Differences in Males' and Females' Processing Strategies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 63-70, June.
    14. Rodgers, Shelly & Harris, Mary Ann, 2003. "Gender and E-Commerce: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 322-329, September.
    15. Holbrook, Morris B & Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1982. "The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 132-140, September.
    16. Kim, Jiyeon & Forsythe, Sandra, 2008. "Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 45-59.
    17. Holbrook, Morris B. & Gardner, Meryl P., 1998. "How Motivation Moderates the Effects of Emotions on the Duration of Consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 241-252, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ayushi Sharma & O. P. Wali & Rakesh Mohan Joshi, 2020. "A Critical Investigation of Consumer Response for Monetary and Non-monetary Promotions Across E-services," Paradigm, , vol. 24(2), pages 195-207, December.
    2. Li, Xiong & Zhao, Xiaodong & Xu, Wangtu (Ato) & Pu, Wei, 2020. "Measuring ease of use of mobile applications in e-commerce retailing from the perspective of consumer online shopping behaviour patterns," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    3. Yahia, Imene Ben & Al-Neama, Nasser & Kerbache, Laoucine, 2018. "Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: Importance of trust, social support and the platform perceived usage," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 11-19.
    4. Song, Jiawen & Cai, Lanhui & Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin, 2023. "Exploring consumers’ usage intention of reusable express packaging: An extended norm activation model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Karpinska-Krakowiak, Malgorzata, 2021. "Women are more likely to buy unknown brands than men: The effects of gender and known versus unknown brands on purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    6. Richard Fedorko, 2022. "Consumer Behavior in the Process of Buying Fashion Products: a Study of Generational Differences in Terms of Shopping Channel Preferences," GATR Journals jmmr288, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    7. Norlaile Salleh Hudin & Nur Shafiqa Azrin Khairil Annuar & Ahmad Zainal Abidin Abd Razak, 2019. "The Influence of Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value Towards Consumer Behavioral Intention Among Youth Mall Shoppers," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(5), pages 1-8, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre Volle & Ahmed Anis Charfi, 2011. "Valeur perçue et comportements en ligne en état d'immersion : le rôle modérateur de l'implication et de l'expertise," Post-Print halshs-00638649, HAL.
    2. Tyrväinen, Olli & Karjaluoto, Heikki & Saarijärvi, Hannu, 2020. "Personalization and hedonic motivation in creating customer experiences and loyalty in omnichannel retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    3. Imran Khan & Zillur Rahman, 2017. "Brand Experience and Emotional Attachment in Services: The Moderating Role of Gender," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 50-61, March.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6813 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Park, Hyejune & Joyner Armstrong, Cosette M., 2019. "Is money the biggest driver? Uncovering motives for engaging in online collaborative consumption retail models for apparel," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 42-50.
    6. Slaton, Kelcie & Testa, Danielle & Bakhshian, Sonia & Fiore, Ann Marie, 2020. "The small, inventory free retail format: The impact on consumer-based brand equity and purchase behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    7. Lewin, Jeffrey & Rajamma, Rajasree K. & Paswan, Audhesh K., 2015. "Customer loyalty in entertainment venues: The reality TV genre," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 616-622.
    8. Davis, Robert & Sheriff, Kevin & Owen, Kim, 2019. "Conceptualising and measuring consumer authenticity online," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 17-31.
    9. Shahzad Khalil & Mirza Ameen ul Haq, 2022. "Enhancing Retail Brand Equity through Consumption Value: The Mediating Effect of Brand Experience," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 4(1), pages 114-126, March.
    10. Arijit Bhattacharya & Manjari Srivastava, 2020. "A Framework of Online Customer Experience: An Indian Perspective," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(3), pages 800-817, June.
    11. Carolyn A. Lin & Xihui Wang & Yukyung Yang, 2023. "Sustainable Apparel Consumption: Personal Norms, CSR Expectations, and Hedonic vs. Utilitarian Shopping Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Ather Akhlaq & Ejaz Ahmed, 2016. "Gender Differences Among Online Shopping Factors In Pakistan," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 7(1).
    13. Barari, Mojtaba & Ross, Mitchell & Surachartkumtonkun, Jiraporn, 2020. "Negative and positive customer shopping experience in an online context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    14. Michaud Trevinal, Aurélia & Stenger, Thomas, 2014. "Toward a conceptualization of the online shopping experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 314-326.
    15. Klein, Jan F. & Falk, Tomas & Esch, Franz-Rudolf & Gloukhovtsev, Alexei, 2016. "Linking pop-up brand stores to brand experience and word of mouth: The case of luxury retail," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5761-5767.
    16. Flacandji, Michaël & Krey, Nina, 2020. "Remembering shopping experiences: The Shopping Experience Memory Scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 279-289.
    17. Yeo, Vincent Cheow Sern & Goh, See-Kwong & Rezaei, Sajad, 2017. "Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 150-162.
    18. Dennis, Charles & Joško Brakus, J. & Gupta, Suraksha & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2014. "The effect of digital signage on shoppers' behavior: The role of the evoked experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2250-2257.
    19. Zogaj, Adnan & Olk, Stephan & Tscheulin, Dieter K., 2019. "Go pop-up: Effects of temporary retail on product- and brand-related consumer reactions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 111-121.
    20. Jun-Ho Bae & Hyeon-Mo Jeon, 2022. "Exploring the Relationships among Brand Experience, Perceived Product Quality, Hedonic Value, Utilitarian Value, and Brand Loyalty in Unmanned Coffee Shops during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    21. El Hedhli, Kamel & Zourrig, Haithem & Chebat, Jean-Charles, 2016. "Shopping well-being: Is it just a matter of pleasure or doing the task? The role of shopper's gender and self-congruity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-13.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:38:y:2017:i:c:p:118-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.