IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v21y2014i4p619-629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to reduce perceived risk when buying online: The interactions between intangibility, product knowledge, brand familiarity, privacy and security concerns

Author

Listed:
  • Nepomuceno, Marcelo Vinhal
  • Laroche, Michel
  • Richard, Marie-Odile

Abstract

This paper studies how product intangibility and its moderators affect perceived risk in an online shopping setting. The moderators studied were brand familiarity, product knowledge, privacy concerns and security concerns. Student samples performed online experimental tests, wherein product intangibility was manipulated. The findings indicate that both mental intangibility and physical intangibility increased perceived risk. Mental tangibility had more impact over perceived risk than physical tangibility. This study is the first to show how intangibility, product knowledge, brand familiarity, privacy and security concerns interact and affect perceived risk. Previous studies did not have the opportunity to observe the interactions of these relevant dimensions, thus not identifying which one would have a stronger effect over the perceived risk of buying online. In short, we found that when interacting with intangibility security and privacy concerns increase perceived risk to the same degree. On the other hand, product knowledge reduces the perceived risk more than brand familiarity.

Suggested Citation

  • Nepomuceno, Marcelo Vinhal & Laroche, Michel & Richard, Marie-Odile, 2014. "How to reduce perceived risk when buying online: The interactions between intangibility, product knowledge, brand familiarity, privacy and security concerns," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 619-629.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:21:y:2014:i:4:p:619-629
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.11.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698913001240
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.11.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Obermiller, Carl, 1985. "Varieties of Mere Exposure: The Effects of Processing Style and Repetition on Affective Response," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(1), pages 17-30, June.
    2. Noort, Guda Van & Kerkhof, Peter & Fennis, Bob M., 2008. "The persuasiveness of online safety cues: The impact of prevention focus compatibility of Web content on consumers’ risk perceptions, attitudes, and intentions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 58-72.
    3. Lee, Khai Sheang & Tan, Soo Jiuan, 2003. "E-retailing versus physical retailing: A theoretical model and empirical test of consumer choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 877-885, November.
    4. Gupta, Pranjal & Yadav, Manjit S. & Varadarajan, Rajan, 2009. "How Task-Facilitative Interactive Tools Foster Buyers’ Trust in Online Retailers: A Process View of Trust Development in the Electronic Marketplace," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 159-176.
    5. Eastlick, Mary Ann & Lotz, Sherry L. & Warrington, Patricia, 2006. "Understanding online B-to-C relationships: An integrated model of privacy concerns, trust, and commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(8), pages 877-886, August.
    6. Benedicktus, Ray L. & Brady, Michael K. & Darke, Peter R. & Voorhees, Clay M., 2010. "Conveying Trustworthiness to Online Consumers: Reactions to Consensus, Physical Store Presence, Brand Familiarity, and Generalized Suspicion," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(4), pages 322-335.
    7. Aghekyan-Simonian, Mariné & Forsythe, Sandra & Suk Kwon, Wi & Chattaraman, Veena, 2012. "The role of product brand image and online store image on perceived risks and online purchase intentions for apparel," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 325-331.
    8. Grewal, Dhruv & Gotlieb, Jerry & Marmorstein, Howard, 1994. "The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 145-153, June.
    9. Morgan-Thomas, Anna & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2013. "Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 21-27.
    10. Easley, Richard W. & Madden, Charles S. & Dunn, Mark G., 2000. "Conducting Marketing Science: The Role of Replication in the Research Process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 83-92, April.
    11. Bhatnagar, Amit & Ghose, Sanjoy, 2004. "Segmenting consumers based on the benefits and risks of Internet shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1352-1360, December.
    12. Thakor, Mrugank V. & Borsuk, Wendy & Kalamas, Maria, 2004. "Hotlists and Web browsing behavior--an empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(7), pages 776-786, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pappas, Nikolaos, 2016. "Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-103.
    2. Aghekyan-Simonian, Mariné & Forsythe, Sandra & Suk Kwon, Wi & Chattaraman, Veena, 2012. "The role of product brand image and online store image on perceived risks and online purchase intentions for apparel," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 325-331.
    3. Mukherjee, Amaradri & Smith, Ronn J. & Turri, Anna M., 2018. "The smartness paradox: the moderating effect of brand quality reputation on consumers' reactions to RFID-based smart fitting rooms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 290-299.
    4. Shapiro, Stephen L. & Reams, Lamar & So, Kevin Kam Fung, 2019. "Is it worth the price? The role of perceived financial risk, identification, and perceived value in purchasing pay-per-view broadcasts of combat sports," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 235-246.
    5. Chen, Ying-Hueih & Hsu, I-Chieh & Lin, Chia-Chen, 2010. "Website attributes that increase consumer purchase intention: A conjoint analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1007-1014, September.
    6. Silvina Santana & Sandra Loureiro, 2010. "Assessing Benefits And Risks Of Online Shopping In Spain And Scotland," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 0(2), pages 161-172.
    7. Dimitri Laroutis & Philippe Boistel, 2019. "Comportement d'achat online : facteurs explicatifs du montant des achats Une étude exploratoire," Post-Print hal-02872777, HAL.
    8. Ana Raluca CHIOSA & Bogdan ANASTASIEI, 2018. "What Takes Consumers To Develop Brand Advocacy On Facebook," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 12, pages 131-140, December.
    9. Mondal, Jalaluddin & Chakrabarti, Somnath, 2021. "Insights and anatomy of brand experience in app-based retailing (eRBX): Critical play of physical evidence and enjoyment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    10. Ou, Carol & Zhang, Xiaowei & Angelopoulos, Spyros & Davison, Robert & Janse, Noury, 2022. "Security breaches and organization response strategy : Exploring consumers’ threat and coping appraisals," Other publications TiSEM 9ac0c2eb-87e8-4c1d-a0b0-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Qifan Hu & Qianyun Xu & Bing Xu, 2019. "Introducing of Online Channel and Management Strategy for Green Agri-food Supply Chain based on Pick-Your-Own Operations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, June.
    12. Kao, Karen C. & Rao Hill, Sally & Troshani, Indrit, 2021. "A cross-country comparison of online deal popularity effect," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    13. Chang, En-Chi & Tseng, Ya-Fen, 2013. "Research note: E-store image, perceived value and perceived risk," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 864-870.
    14. Taylor, David G. & Strutton, David, 2010. "Has e-marketing come of age? Modeling historical influences on post-adoption era Internet consumer behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 950-956, September.
    15. Bartikowski, Boris & Singh, Nitish, 2014. "Should all firms adapt websites to international audiences?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 246-252.
    16. Michael D. Clemes & Kathryn Bicknell & Xuedong Li & Nicole Long, 2021. "Clicks or Bricks? Online Shopping Adoption in Australia," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(4), pages 78-103, December.
    17. Molina-Castillo, Francisco-Jose & Lopez-Nicolas, Carolina & Soto-Acosta, Pedro, 2012. "Interaction effects of media and message on perceived complexity, risk and trust of innovative products," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 577-587.
    18. Keeling, Kathleen & McGoldrick, Peter & Beatty, Susan, 2010. "Avatars as salespeople: Communication style, trust, and intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 793-800, August.
    19. Liu, Huan & Lobschat, Lara & Verhoef, Peter C. & Zhao, Hong, 2019. "App Adoption: The Effect on Purchasing of Customers Who Have Used a Mobile Website Previously," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 16-34.
    20. Zührem Yaman & Onur Köksal, 2023. "Validity and reliability of consumer attitude toward online shopping scale," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 41(1), pages 91-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:21:y:2014:i:4:p:619-629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.