IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v66y2013i7p864-870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research note: E-store image, perceived value and perceived risk

Author

Listed:
  • Chang, En-Chi
  • Tseng, Ya-Fen

Abstract

E-store image influences purchase intention through perceived value. Though past studies fervently discuss the influence of store image and perceived value on purchase intention, few studies discuss the relationships among these three constructs. This study also argues that perceived risk influences a consumer's intention to purchase and thus mitigates perceived value's role as a motivator, which prompts the consumer to purchase online. The result of an online survey among consumers of two most popular shopping websites in Taiwan shows that e-store image influences purchase intention through perceived value and utilitarian value exerts a larger influence than hedonic value; however, perceived risk does not moderate the relationships between two types of perceived value and purchase intention. Meantime, the survey result shows that style, usefulness, and ease of use are the most important e-store image attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, En-Chi & Tseng, Ya-Fen, 2013. "Research note: E-store image, perceived value and perceived risk," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 864-870.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:66:y:2013:i:7:p:864-870
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296311001998
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    2. Van den Poel, Dirk & Leunis, Joseph, 1999. "Consumer Acceptance of the Internet as a Channel of Distribution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 249-256, July.
    3. Bhatnagar, Amit & Ghose, Sanjoy, 2004. "Segmenting consumers based on the benefits and risks of Internet shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1352-1360, December.
    4. Davis, Lenita & Wang, Sijun & Lindridge, Andrew, 2008. "Culture influences on emotional responses to on-line store atmospheric cues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(8), pages 806-812, August.
    5. Á. Herrero Crespo & I. Rodríguez del Bosque & M. M. García de los Salmones Sánchez, 2009. "The influence of perceived risk on Internet shopping behavior: a multidimensional perspective," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 259-277, March.
    6. Overby, Jeffrey W. & Lee, Eun-Ju, 2006. "The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(10-11), pages 1160-1166, October.
    7. Bhatnagar, Amit & Ghose, Sanjoy, 2004. "A latent class segmentation analysis of e-shoppers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(7), pages 758-767, July.
    8. Dowling, Grahame R & Staelin, Richard, 1994. "A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 119-134, June.
    9. Close, Angeline G. & Kukar-Kinney, Monika, 2010. "Beyond buying: Motivations behind consumers' online shopping cart use," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 986-992, September.
    10. Forsythe, Sandra M. & Shi, Bo, 2003. "Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 867-875, November.
    11. Grewal, Dhruv & Gotlieb, Jerry & Marmorstein, Howard, 1994. "The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 145-153, June.
    12. Babin, Barry J. & Attaway, Jill S., 2000. "Atmospheric Affect as a Tool for Creating Value and Gaining Share of Customer," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 91-99, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aobo Jiang & Erin & Yu-Ching Lin, 2018. "Research On The Development Of Science And Technology Network Industry Based On Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research & Developments (JMERD), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 41(3), pages 82-90, September.
    2. Echchakoui, Saïd, 2015. "Drivers of sales force equity in the service industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 140-153.
    3. repec:zib:zjmerd:3jmerd2018-82-90 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Jackson, Vanessa & Stoel, Leslie & Brantley, Aquia, 2011. "Mall attributes and shopping value: Differences by gender and generational cohort," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 1-9.
    5. Yi-Man Teng & Kun-Shan Wu, 2019. "Sustainability Development in Hospitality: The Effect of Perceived Value on Customers’ Green Restaurant Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Nahid Malazizi & Habib Alipour & Hossein Olya, 2018. "Risk Perceptions of Airbnb Hosts: Evidence from a Mediterranean Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Scarpi, Daniele, 2012. "Work and Fun on the Internet: The Effects of Utilitarianism and Hedonism Online," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 53-67.
    8. Grant, Robert & Clarke, Rodney J. & Kyriazis, Elias, 2010. "Research needs for assessing online value creation in complex consumer purchase process behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 53-60.
    9. Noort, Guda Van & Kerkhof, Peter & Fennis, Bob M., 2008. "The persuasiveness of online safety cues: The impact of prevention focus compatibility of Web content on consumers’ risk perceptions, attitudes, and intentions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 58-72.
    10. Pramono Hari Adi & Faizal Wihuda & Wiwiek Rabiatul Adawiyah, 2017. "The Role of Social Media Browsing Intention for Behavioral Outcomes of Young Consumers," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(1), pages 39-57.
    11. Broekhuizen, Thijs L.J. & Jager, Wander, 2004. "A conceptual model of channel choice: measuring online and offline shopping value perceptions," Research Report 04F04, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    12. El Hedhli, Kamel & Zourrig, Haithem & Chebat, Jean-Charles, 2016. "Shopping well-being: Is it just a matter of pleasure or doing the task? The role of shopper's gender and self-congruity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-13.
    13. Demoulin, Nathalie & Willems, Kim, 2019. "Servicescape irritants and customer satisfaction: The moderating role of shopping motives and involvement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 295-306.
    14. Chen, Ching-Fu & Lee, Chia-Han, 2023. "Investigating shared e-scooter users’ customer value co-creation behaviors and their antecedents: Perceived service quality and perceived value," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 147-154.
    15. Rémi Mencarelli & Carole Lombart, 2017. "Influences of the perceived value on actual repurchasing behavior: Empirical exploration in a retailing context," Post-Print hal-01592035, HAL.
    16. Zührem Yaman & Onur Köksal, 2023. "Validity and reliability of consumer attitude toward online shopping scale," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 41(1), pages 91-112.
    17. Bonnin, Gaël & Goudey, Alain, 2012. "The kinetic quality of store design: An Exploration of its influence on shopping experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 637-643.
    18. Cao, XinYu & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2005. "The Intended and Actual Adoption of Online Purchasing: A Brief Review of Recent Literature," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt45q5p1vb, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    19. repec:dgr:rugsom:04f04 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Patricea Elena BERTEA, 2015. "From Fearful To Trustful – How Perceived Risk Dimensions In E-Commerce Differentiate Between Consumers," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 15, pages 45-54, June.
    21. Pappas, Nikolaos, 2016. "Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-103.
    22. Han-Shen Chen & Chia-Hsing Liang & Shu-Yi Liao & Hung-Yu Kuo, 2020. "Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions toward Food Delivery Platform Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:66:y:2013:i:7:p:864-870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.