IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v18y2011i3p169-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the attention-capturing ability of special displays with the combination effect and the design effect

Author

Listed:
  • Nordfält, Jens

Abstract

Prior studies have provided examples of very large sales effects of special displays. In fact we often expect sales increases of several hundred percent for a brand on display. A previously discussed reason for the effectiveness of special display is the customers’ scarce attentive resources. Yet very little academic work has elaborated on aspects improving the displays’ attention-capturing abilities. In the present study more than 13,500 customers were observed approaching special displays. The results show that a retailer can improve a display’s effectiveness by combining the products with different POP-material as well as by improving the display’s design. For instance the design manipulation in the third experiment shows that a retailer can increase the sales with as much as 977 percent by changing from a commonly used display design to the one recommended in this paper. Both the combination effect and the design effect are tested in different settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Nordfält, Jens, 2011. "Improving the attention-capturing ability of special displays with the combination effect and the design effect," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 169-173.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:18:y:2011:i:3:p:169-173
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.09.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698910000974
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.09.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nedungadi, Prakash, 1990. "Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(3), pages 263-276, December.
    2. Kahn, Barbara E & Wansink, Brian, 2004. "The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(4), pages 519-533, March.
    3. Turley, L. W. & Milliman, Ronald E., 2000. "Atmospheric Effects on Shopping Behavior: A Review of the Experimental Evidence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 193-211, August.
    4. Hoyer, Wayne D, 1984. "An Examination of Consumer Decision Making for a Common Repeat Purchase Product," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(3), pages 822-829, December.
    5. Itamar Simonson & Stephen Nowlis & Katherine Lemon, 1993. "The Effect of Local Consideration Sets on Global Choice Between Lower Price and Higher Quality," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 357-377.
    6. Shapiro, Stewart, 1999. "When an Ad's Influence Is Beyond Our Conscious Control: Perceptual and Conceptual Fluency Effects Caused by Incidental Ad Exposure," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(1), pages 16-36, June.
    7. Janiszewski, Chris, 1988. "Preconscious Processing Effects: The Independence of Attitude Formation and Conscious Thought," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 199-209, September.
    8. Stephen J. Hoch & Eric T. Bradlow & Brian Wansink, 1999. "The Variety of an Assortment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 527-546.
    9. Summers, Teresa A. & Hebert, Paulette R., 2001. "Shedding some light on store atmospherics: influence of illumination on consumer behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 145-150, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohan, Geetha & Sivakumaran, Bharadhwaj & Sharma, Piyush, 2012. "Store environment's impact on variety seeking behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 419-428.
    2. Yan, Huan & Chang, En-Chung & Chou, Ting-Jui & Tang, Xiaofei, 2015. "The over-categorization effect: How the number of categorizations influences shoppers' perceptions of variety and satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 631-638.
    3. Lee, Ha Kyung & Choo, Ho Jung, 2019. "Birds of a feather flocked together look abundant: The visual gestalt effect of an assortment presentation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 170-182.
    4. Diehl, Kristin & van Herpen, Erica & Lamberton, Cait, 2015. "Organizing Products with Complements versus Substitutes: Effects on Store Preferences as a Function of Effort and Assortment Perceptions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 1-18.
    5. Kwak, Kyuseop & Duvvuri, Sri Devi & Russell, Gary J., 2015. "An Analysis of Assortment Choice in Grocery Retailing," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 19-33.
    6. Wörfel, Philipp, 2021. "Unravelling the intellectual discourse of implicit consumer cognition: A bibliometric review," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    7. Bauer, Johannes C. & Kotouc, Alexander J. & Rudolph, Thomas, 2012. "What constitutes a “good assortment†? A scale for measuring consumers' perceptions of an assortment offered in a grocery category," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 11-26.
    8. Sangeeta Peter & Victor Anandkumar, 2016. "Deconstructing the shopping experience of tourists to the Dubai Shopping Festival," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1199109-119, December.
    9. Li, Eric A.L., 2014. "Test for the real option in consumer behavior," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 70-83.
    10. Els Breugelmans & Katia Campo & Els Gijsbrechts, 2007. "Shelf sequence and proximity effects on online grocery choices," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 117-133, June.
    11. Lieve Doucé, 2022. "The Effect of High, Partial, and Low Multisensory Congruity between Light and Scent on Consumer Evaluations and Approach Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    12. Sahay, Arvind, 2013. "A Customer Oriented Approach To Identifying Competitive Advantage," IIMA Working Papers WP2013-05-08, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    13. Davies, Antony & Cline, Thomas W., 2005. "A consumer behavior approach to modeling monopolistic competition," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 797-826, December.
    14. Emrich, Oliver & Paul, Michael & Rudolph, Thomas, 2015. "Shopping Benefits of Multichannel Assortment Integration and the Moderating Role of Retailer Type," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 326-342.
    15. Jonah Berger & Michaela Draganska & Itamar Simonson, 2007. "The Influence of Product Variety on Brand Perception and Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 460-472, 07-08.
    16. Kfir Eliaz & Ran Spiegler, 2011. "Consideration Sets and Competitive Marketing," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 78(1), pages 235-262.
    17. Lizhen Xu & Jason A. Duan & Andrew Whinston, 2014. "Path to Purchase: A Mutually Exciting Point Process Model for Online Advertising and Conversion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1392-1412, June.
    18. Doucé, Lieve & Adams, Carmen, 2020. "Sensory overload in a shopping environment: Not every sensory modality leads to too much stimulation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    19. Schoormans, Jan P. L. & Robben, Henry S. J., 1997. "The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 18(2-3), pages 271-287, April.
    20. Olshavsky, Richard W. & Aylesworth, Andrew B. & Kempf, DeAnna S., 1995. "The price-choice relationship: A contingent processing approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 207-218, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:18:y:2011:i:3:p:169-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.