IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v56y2015icp99-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When cost–effective design strategies are not enough: Evidence from an experimental study on the role of redundant goals

Author

Listed:
  • Cohen, Izack
  • Iluz, Michal

Abstract

Projects have to meet interrelated time, cost and effectiveness goals. Surveys, such as CHAOS, consistently indicate that over 50% of the projects either significantly deviate from these goals or fail. Therefore, there is room for improvement in terms of project outcomes. This motivated us to explore improvement possibilities for the outcomes of design strategies that account for the interrelations between time, cost and effectiveness. We focus on a cost–effective (CE) design strategy that aspires to maximize the effectiveness-to-cost ratio (ECR) by deciding on: project schedules, resource allocations and a product performance level (i.e. effectiveness). We suggest a mathematical formulation to capture trade-offs between project scope decisions (such as project scheduling and resource allocations) and effectiveness. We conduct experiments, in which participants use a simulator to plan and execute a project according to the CE strategy with and without goals, based on solutions for the mathematical formulation. Contrary to some of the literature on goal-setting theory for complicated tasks, we found that appropriate goals improved the expected ECR while others did not have any impact. A better understanding of appropriate goal-setting in the context of project management may be important for improving projects outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Cohen, Izack & Iluz, Michal, 2015. "When cost–effective design strategies are not enough: Evidence from an experimental study on the role of redundant goals," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 99-111.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:56:y:2015:i:c:p:99-111
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.09.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048314001182
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2014.09.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Izack Cohen, 2008. "Improving Time-Critical Decision Making in Life-Threatening Situations: Observations and Insights," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 100-110, June.
    2. Barry G. Silverman, 1981. "Project Appraisal Methodology: A Multidimensional R&D Benefit/Cost Assessment Tool," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(7), pages 802-821, July.
    3. Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M. & Albacete-Sáez, Carlos A. & Lloréns-Montes, F. Javier, 2004. "The impact of environmental characteristics on TQM principles and organizational performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 425-442, December.
    4. Colin, Jeroen & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2014. "Setting tolerance limits for statistical project control using earned value management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 107-122.
    5. Ragsdale, C, 1989. "The current state of network simulation in project management theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 21-25.
    6. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    7. Earley, P. Christopher & Perry, Brian C., 1987. "Work plan availability and performance: An assessment of task strategy priming on subsequent task completion," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 279-302, June.
    8. Cary Swoveland, 1981. "Benefit-Cost Analysis of a Proposed Runway Extension," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 155-173, February.
    9. Mario Vanhoucke, 2014. "Earned Value Management," Management for Professionals, in: Integrated Project Management and Control, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 17-31, Springer.
    10. Turban, E & Trippi, R, 1989. "The utilization of expert systems in OR/MS: An assessment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 311-322.
    11. Vanhoucke, Mario, 2011. "On the dynamic use of project performance and schedule risk information during projecttracking," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 416-426, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudio Szwarcfiter & Yale T. Herer & Avraham Shtub, 2022. "Project scheduling in a lean environment to maximize value and minimize overruns," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 177-190, April.
    2. Yu, Xinning & Lan, Yanfei & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2021. "Strategic green technology innovation in a two-stage alliance: Vertical collaboration or co-development?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Balouka, Noemie & Cohen, Izack, 2021. "A robust optimization approach for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 457-470.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Plaza, Malgorzata, 2016. "Balancing the costs of human resources on an ERP project," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 171-183.
    2. Vanhoucke, Mario & Colin, Jeroen, 2016. "On the use of multivariate regression methods for longest path calculations from earned value management observations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 127-140.
    3. Martens, Annelies & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2019. "The impact of applying effort to reduce activity variability on the project time and cost performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 442-453.
    4. Song, Jie & Martens, Annelies & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2022. "Using Earned Value Management and Schedule Risk Analysis with resource constraints for project control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 451-466.
    5. Song, Jie & Martens, Annelies & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2020. "The impact of a limited budget on the corrective action taking process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1070-1086.
    6. Martens, Annelies & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2017. "A buffer control method for top-down project control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 274-286.
    7. Womer, K. & Li, H. & Camm, J. & Osterman, C. & Radhakrishnan, R., 2017. "Learning and Bayesian updating in long cycle made-to-order (MTO) production," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 29-42.
    8. Wauters, Mathieu & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2017. "A Nearest Neighbour extension to project duration forecasting with Artificial Intelligence," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1097-1111.
    9. She, Bingling & Chen, Bo & Hall, Nicholas G., 2021. "Buffer sizing in critical chain project management by network decomposition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Mohammadreza Sharifi Ghazvini & Vahidreza Ghezavati & Sadigh Raissi & Ahmad Makui, 2017. "An Integrated Efficiency–Risk Approach in Sustainable Project Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Song, Jie & Martens, Annelies & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2021. "Using Schedule Risk Analysis with resource constraints for project control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 736-752.
    12. Merkourios Papanikolaou & Yiannis Xenidis, 2020. "Risk-Informed Performance Assessment of Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Colin, Jeroen & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2014. "Setting tolerance limits for statistical project control using earned value management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 107-122.
    14. Andrzej Kozik, 2017. "Handling precedence constraints in scheduling problems by the sequence pair representation," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 445-472, February.
    15. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    16. Richard E. Wendell & Timothy J. Lowe & Mike M. Gordon, 2023. "Dangers in using earned duration and other earned value metrics to measure a project’s schedule performance," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 665-680, June.
    17. Nicolas Zufferey & Olivier Labarthe & David Schindl, 2012. "Heuristics for a project management problem with incompatibility and assignment costs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1231-1252, April.
    18. Vega-Velázquez, Miguel Ángel & García-Nájera, Abel & Cervantes, Humberto, 2018. "A survey on the Software Project Scheduling Problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 145-161.
    19. M. T. Hajiali & M. R. Mosavi & K. Shahanaghi, 2014. "Estimation of Project Completion Time-Based on a Mixture of Expert in an Interactive Space," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 229-229, December.
    20. M. Vanhoucke, 2006. "A scatter search procedure for maximizing the net present value of a project under renewable resource constraints," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/417, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:56:y:2015:i:c:p:99-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.