IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v25y1997i5p557-566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An assessment of perceptual differences between informants in information systems research

Author

Listed:
  • Teo, T. S. H.
  • King, W. R.

Abstract

Although survey research is the most widely used methodology in organizational and information systems (IS) research, it is often criticized for the perceptual biases involved in using a single key informant per firm. To mitigate this problem, researchers commonly advocate using more than one key informant per firm. However, it is not uncommon for perceptual differences between key informants to arise in such studies. This study examines possible reasons for such perceptual differences by gathering data through a 'matched-pair' mail survey complemented with follow-up telephone interviews with key informants. The results show that perceptual differences between Business Planners and IS Executives with regard to the extent of integration between business planning (BP) and information systems planning (ISP) may be caused by inherent differences in their roles and responsibilities, by the 'education gap', 'communication gap' and/or 'culture gap' between Business Planners and IS Executives, by the dynamic nature of the evolutionary process of BP-ISP integration, and by the natural tendency of IS Executives to perceive IS processes to be more sophisticated than others perceive them to be. These results should be useful both to researchers, who can use them in designing future studies and to practitioners, since they suggest the nature of, and possible reasons for, perceptual differences concerning IS among top-level executives.

Suggested Citation

  • Teo, T. S. H. & King, W. R., 1997. "An assessment of perceptual differences between informants in information systems research," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 557-566, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:25:y:1997:i:5:p:557-566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(97)00031-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellen M. Hufnagel & Christopher Conca, 1994. "User Response Data: The Potential for Errors and Biases," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 48-73, March.
    2. Donald C. Hambrick, 1981. "Strategic awareness within top management teams," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(3), pages 263-279, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vlastelica, Tamara & Kostic, Slavica Cicvaric & Okanovic, Milan & Milosavljevic, Milos, 2018. "How Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Corporate Reputation: Evidence from an Emerging Market," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(1), pages 10-29.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zied Mani & Inès Chouk, 2019. "Impact of privacy concerns on resistance to smart services: does the ‘Big Brother effect’ matter?," Post-Print hal-03217977, HAL.
    2. Zahra, Shaker A. & Covin, Jeffrey G., 1995. "Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 43-58, January.
    3. Covin, Jeffrey G. & Slevin, Dennis P. & Heeley, Michael B., 2000. "Pioneers and followers: Competitive tactics, environment, and firm growth," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 175-210, March.
    4. France Belanger & Rosann Webb Collins & Paul H. Cheney, 2001. "Technology Requirements and Work Group Communication for Telecommuters," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 155-176, June.
    5. J. Ignacio Canales, 2015. "Sources of Selection in Strategy Making," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 1-31, January.
    6. Sophie Bacq & Kimberly A. Eddleston, 2018. "A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 589-611, October.
    7. Fischhoff, Maya E., 2007. "Electricity company managers' views of environmental issues: Implications for environmental groups and government," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 3868-3878, July.
    8. Yu, Jiang & Liu, Rui & Chen, Feng, 2020. "Linking institutional environment with technological change: The rise of China's flat panel display industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    9. Miao Yu & Fangwei Zhu & Xiaotian Yang & Linzhuo Wang & Xiuxia Sun, 2018. "Integrating Sustainability into Construction Engineering Projects: Perspective of Sustainable Project Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Durand, Rodolphe & Coeurderoy, Regis, 2001. "Age, order of entry, strategic orientation, and organizational performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 471-494, September.
    11. Jeffrey G. Covin & William J. Wales, 2019. "Crafting High-Impact Entrepreneurial Orientation Research: Some Suggested Guidelines," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 3-18, January.
    12. Coeurderoy, Regis & Durand, Rodolphe, 2004. "Leveraging the advantage of early entry: proprietary technologies versus cost leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 583-590, June.
    13. Covin, Jeffrey G. & Slevin, Dennis P. & Heeley, Michael B., 2001. "Strategic decision making in an intuitive vs. technocratic mode: structural and environmental considerations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 51-67, April.
    14. Jahyun Goo, 2010. "Structure of service level agreements (SLA) in IT outsourcing: The construct and its measurement," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 185-205, April.
    15. Judge, William Q. & Stahl, Michael J., 1995. "Middle-manager effort in strategy implementation: A multinational perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 91-111, March.
    16. M.K. Nandakumar, 2013. "Strategic Planning And Organisational Performance – The Moderating Effect Of Environment," Working papers 128, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    17. McDougall, Patricia Phillips & Oviatt, Benjamin M., 1996. "New venture internationalization, strategic change, and performance: A follow-up study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 23-40, January.
    18. Andrea Buratti & Giancarlo Ferrero, 2017. "Empirical evidence of Entrepreneurial Marketing Orientation from Italian firms," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(4), pages 151-173.
    19. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    20. Liao, Kun & Deng, Xiaodong & Marsillac, Erika, 2013. "Factors that influence Chinese automotive suppliers’ mass customization capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 25-36.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:25:y:1997:i:5:p:557-566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.