IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v83y2018icp151-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Better together? Harnessing the power of brand placement through program sponsorship messages

Author

Listed:
  • Dens, Nathalie
  • De Pelsmacker, Patrick
  • Verhellen, Yann

Abstract

In two field studies, this article investigates the potential benefits of combining brand placement with program sponsorship messages vis-à-vis brand placement or program sponsorship messages only in terms of brand recall and brand attitude. Study 1 presents a quasi-natural experiment in which respondents (n=334) are randomly exposed to a full-length episode of a television program corresponding to one of four conditions (control group, brand placement only, program sponsorship messages only, brand placement plus program sponsorship messages). Study 2 replicates the findings by measuring responses of viewers (n=7629) to 19 real-life campaigns for 15 brands that ran across 8 branded entertainment shows on Belgian commercial television. The results of both studies indicate a positive effect of combining brand placement with program sponsorship messages on brand recall, but not brand attitude.

Suggested Citation

  • Dens, Nathalie & De Pelsmacker, Patrick & Verhellen, Yann, 2018. "Better together? Harnessing the power of brand placement through program sponsorship messages," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 151-159.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:83:y:2018:i:c:p:151-159
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296317304162
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nordhielm, Christie L, 2002. "The Influence of Level of Processing on Advertising Repetition Effects," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(3), pages 371-382, December.
    2. Friestad, Marian & Wright, Peter, 1994. "The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, June.
    3. Brown, Steven P & Stayman, Douglas M, 1992. "Antecedents and Consequences of Attitude toward the Ad: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(1), pages 34-51, June.
    4. Russell, Cristel Antonia, 2002. "Investigating the Effectiveness of Product Placements in Television Shows: The Role of Modality and Plot Connection Congruence on Brand Memory and Attitude," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(3), pages 306-318, December.
    5. Lehu, Jean-Marc & Bressoud, Etienne, 2008. "Effectiveness of brand placement: New insights about viewers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(10), pages 1083-1090, October.
    6. Davtyan, Davit & Cunningham, Isabella, 2017. "An investigation of brand placement effects on brand attitudes and purchase intentions: Brand placements versus TV commercials," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 160-167.
    7. Uribe, Rodrigo, 2016. "Separate and joint effects of advertising and placement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 459-465.
    8. P. De Pelsmacker & M. Geuens & P. Anckaert, 2002. "Media context and advertising effectiveness: The role of context appreciation and context-ad similarity," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 02/162, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    9. Campbell, Margaret C & Keller, Kevin Lane, 2003. "Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 292-304, September.
    10. Sengupta, Jaideep & Johar, Gita Venkataramani, 2002. "Effects of Inconsistent Attribute Information on the Predictive Value of Product Attitudes: Toward a Resolution of Opposing Perspectives," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(1), pages 39-56, June.
    11. Russell, Cristel Antonia & Belch, Michael, 2005. "A Managerial Investigation into the Product Placement Industry," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 73-92, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steven Bellman & Shruthi Arismendez & Duane Varan, 2021. "Can muted video advertising be as effective as video advertising with sound?," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Tessitore, Tina & Geuens, Maggie, 2019. "Arming consumers against product placement: A comparison of factual and evaluative educational interventions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 38-48.
    3. Babin, Barry J. & Herrmann, Jean-Luc & Kacha, Mathieu & Babin, Laurie A., 2021. "The effectiveness of brand placements: A meta-analytic synthesis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1017-1033.
    4. Coker, Kesha K. & Altobello, Suzanne A., 2018. "Product placements in social settings: The impact of coviewing on the recall of placed brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 128-136.
    5. Hofman-Kohlmeyer Magdalena, 2021. "Brand-Related User-Generated Content in Simulation Video Games: Qualitative Research Among Polish Players," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 29(1), pages 61-87, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davtyan, Davit & Cunningham, Isabella, 2017. "An investigation of brand placement effects on brand attitudes and purchase intentions: Brand placements versus TV commercials," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 160-167.
    2. Avramova, Yana R. & Dens, Nathalie & De Pelsmacker, Patrick, 2021. "Brand placement across media: The interaction of placement modality and frequency in film versus text," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 20-30.
    3. Kirk Kristofferson & Lea Dunn, 2023. "The brand that wasn’t there: The impact of brand displacement on viewer engagement and brand attitude," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 716-745, May.
    4. Neale, Michael & Corkindale, David, 2022. "Make product placement work for you: Get less exposure," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 149-157.
    5. Thomas, Sunil & Kohli, Chiranjeev S., 2011. "Can brand image move upwards after Sideways? A strategic approach to brand placements," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 41-49.
    6. Tessitore, Tina & Geuens, Maggie, 2019. "Arming consumers against product placement: A comparison of factual and evaluative educational interventions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 38-48.
    7. Babin, Barry J. & Herrmann, Jean-Luc & Kacha, Mathieu & Babin, Laurie A., 2021. "The effectiveness of brand placements: A meta-analytic synthesis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1017-1033.
    8. Thomas, Sunil & Kohli, Chiranjeev S., 2011. "Can brand image move upwards after Sideways? A strategic approach to brand placements," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 41-49, January.
    9. Coker, Kesha K. & Altobello, Suzanne A., 2018. "Product placements in social settings: The impact of coviewing on the recall of placed brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 128-136.
    10. Yann Verhellen & Caroline Oates & Patrick Pelsmacker & Nathalie Dens, 2014. "Children’s Responses to Traditional Versus Hybrid Advertising Formats: The Moderating Role of Persuasion Knowledge," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 235-255, June.
    11. Johannes Knoll & Jörg Matthes, 2017. "The effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: a meta-analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 55-75, January.
    12. Kronrod, Ann & Huber, Joel, 2019. "Ad wearout wearout: How time can reverse the negative effect of frequent advertising repetition on brand preference," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 306-324.
    13. Mazodier, Marc & Quester, Pascale, 2014. "The role of sponsorship fit for changing brand affect: A latent growth modeling approach," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 16-29.
    14. Beth L. Fossen & David A. Schweidel, 2019. "Measuring the Impact of Product Placement with Brand-Related Social Media Conversations and Website Traffic," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 481-499, May.
    15. Gillespie, Brian & Muehling, Darrel D. & Kareklas, Ioannis, 2018. "Fitting product placements: Affective fit and cognitive fit as determinants of consumer evaluations of placed brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 90-102.
    16. Audrezet, Alice & de Kerviler, Gwarlann & Guidry Moulard, Julie, 2020. "Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 557-569.
    17. David A. Schweidel & Natasha Zhang Foutz & Robin J. Tanner, 2014. "Synergy or Interference: The Effect of Product Placement on Commercial Break Audience Decline," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 763-780, November.
    18. Maggie Geuens & Delphine Vantomme & Bert Weijters, 2003. "Assessing the impact of offline URL advertising," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2003-4, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
    19. Chakravarty, Anindita & Liu, Yong & Mazumdar, Tridib, 2010. "The Differential Effects of Online Word-of-Mouth and Critics' Reviews on Pre-release Movie Evaluation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 185-197.
    20. van Reijmersdal, Eva A. & Rozendaal, Esther & Buijzen, Moniek, 2012. "Effects of Prominence, Involvement, and Persuasion Knowledge on Children's Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advergames," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 33-42.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:83:y:2018:i:c:p:151-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.