IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v137y2021icp601-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chutzpadik advertising and its effectiveness: Four studies of agencies and audiences

Author

Listed:
  • Efrat, Kalanit
  • Souchon, Anne L.
  • Dickenson, Peter
  • Nemkova, Ekaterina

Abstract

The creation of advertisements that attract immediate attention and simultaneously provoke thoughts and stimulate ongoing discussions is challenging. Hence, advertisers increasingly use Chutzpadik advertising, which we define as “radical advertising messaging that purposefully transgresses social norms and proscribed topics”. We conduct four studies to identify the dimensions and evaluate the effectiveness of Chutzpadik advertising. The first two studies involve interviews with 12 managers of advertising agencies and 22 members of the Israeli general public (audience members). The interviews reveal Chutzpadik advertising’s dimensions are norm violation, novelty, and audacity. In two subsequent studies, the effectiveness of Chutzpadik advertising is examined through data collected from 108 managers and 209 audience members. Structural equation modeling and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis suggest the three dimensions of Chutzpadik advertising differentially affect adverting effectiveness. Our research provides theoretical and empirical grounding for Chutzpadik advertising and advances our knowledge of its effectiveness within differentiation advertising research.

Suggested Citation

  • Efrat, Kalanit & Souchon, Anne L. & Dickenson, Peter & Nemkova, Ekaterina, 2021. "Chutzpadik advertising and its effectiveness: Four studies of agencies and audiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 601-613.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:137:y:2021:i:c:p:601-613
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296321006111
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Urueña, Alberto & Hidalgo, Antonio, 2016. "Successful loyalty in e-complaints: FsQCA and structural equation modeling analyses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1384-1389.
    2. Katarzyna Bachnik & Robert Nowacki, 2018. "How to Build Consumer Trust: Socially Responsible or Controversial Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Chu, Kyounghee & Lee, Do-Hee & Kim, Ji Yoon, 2019. "The effect of verbal brand personification on consumer evaluation in advertising: Internal and external personification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 472-480.
    4. Weijters, Bert & Cabooter, Elke & Schillewaert, Niels, 2010. "The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 236-247.
    5. Robert A. Giacalone & Carole L. Jurkiewicz & Mark Promislo, 2016. "Ethics and Well-Being: The Paradoxical Implications of Individual Differences in Ethical Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 491-506, September.
    6. Vladimir Melnyk & Erica Herpen & Arnout Fischer & Hans Trijp, 2013. "Regulatory fit effects for injunctive versus descriptive social norms: Evidence from the promotion of sustainable products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 191-203, June.
    7. Maxwell, Sarah & Nye, Pete & Maxwell, Nicholas, 2003. "The wrath of the fairness-primed negotiator when the reciprocity norm is violated," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 399-409, May.
    8. Moldovan, Sarit & Steinhart, Yael & Lehmann, Donald R., 2019. "Propagators, Creativity, and Informativeness: What Helps Ads Go Viral," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 102-114.
    9. Richard C. Morey & John M. McCann, 1983. "Estimating the Confidence Interval for the Optimal Marketing Mix: An Application to Lead Generation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 193-202.
    10. Selma Kadić-Maglajlić & Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić & Milena Micevski & Nina Michaelidou & Ekaterina Nemkova, 2017. "Controversial Advert Perceptions in SNS Advertising: The Role of Ethical Judgement and Religious Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 249-265, March.
    11. Gaustad, Tarje & Samuelsen, Bendik M. & Warlop, Luk & Fitzsimons, Gavan J., 2019. "Too much of a good thing? Consumer response to strategic changes in brand image," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 264-280.
    12. Zinkhan, George M. & Watson, Richard T., 1996. "Advertising trends: Innovation and the process of creative destruction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 163-171, November.
    13. Brenes, Esteban R. & Ciravegna, Luciano & Pichardo, Caleb A., 2019. "Managing institutional voids: A configurational approach to understanding high performance antecedents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 345-358.
    14. Tóth, Zsófia & Thiesbrummel, Christoph & Henneberg, Stephan C. & Naudé, Peter, 2015. "Understanding configurations of relational attractiveness of the customer firm using fuzzy set QCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 723-734.
    15. Franke, George R. & Preacher, Kristopher J. & Rigdon, Edward E., 2008. "Proportional structural effects of formative indicators," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 1229-1237, December.
    16. Kaartemo, Valtteri & Nyström, Anna-Greta, 2021. "Emerging technology as a platform for market shaping and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 458-468.
    17. Myers, Susan D. & Deitz, George D. & Huhmann, Bruce A. & Jha, Subhash & Tatara, Jennifer H., 2020. "An eye-tracking study of attention to brand-identifying content and recall of taboo advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 176-186.
    18. Sabri, Ouidade & Obermiller, Carl, 2012. "Consumer perception of taboo in ads," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 869-873.
    19. Dahl, Darren W. & Frankenberger, Kristina D. & Manchanda, Rajesh V., 2003. "Does It Pay to Shock? Reactions to Shocking and Nonshocking Advertising Content among University Students," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 268-280, September.
    20. Azemi, Yllka & Ozuem, Wilson & Howell, Kerry E. & Lancaster, Geoff, 2019. "An exploration into the practice of online service failure and recovery strategies in the Balkans," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 420-431.
    21. Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit & Oghazi, Pejvak & Gebauer, Heiko & Baines, Tim, 2019. "Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 380-392.
    22. Benjamin Saunders & Julius Sim & Tom Kingstone & Shula Baker & Jackie Waterfield & Bernadette Bartlam & Heather Burroughs & Clare Jinks, 2018. "Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1893-1907, July.
    23. Ouidade Sabri, 2017. "Does Viral Communication Context Increase the Harmfulness of Controversial Taboo Advertising?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 235-247, March.
    24. Glozer, Sarah & Morsing, Mette, 2020. "Helpful hypocrisy? Investigating ‘double-talk’ and irony in CSR marketing communications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 363-375.
    25. Wagemann, Claudius & Buche, Jonas & Siewert, Markus B., 2016. "QCA and business research: Work in progress or a consolidated agenda?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2531-2540.
    26. Merendino, Alessandro & Dibb, Sally & Meadows, Maureen & Quinn, Lee & Wilson, David & Simkin, Lyndon & Canhoto, Ana, 2018. "Big data, big decisions: The impact of big data on board level decision-making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 67-78.
    27. Jennings, Jennifer E. & Edwards, Tim & Devereaux Jennings, P. & Delbridge, Rick, 2015. "Emotional arousal and entrepreneurial outcomes: Combining qualitative methods to elaborate theory," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 113-130.
    28. Leenders, Mark A.A.M. & Eliashberg, Jehoshua, 2011. "The antecedents and consequences of restrictive age-based ratings in the global motion picture industry," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 367-377.
    29. Giebelhausen, Michael & Novak, Thomas P., 2012. "Web advertising: Sexual content on eBay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 840-842.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viktorija Grigaliūnait&# & Lina Pilelien&#, 2023. "Effective Domestic Tourism Advertising Layout: Lithuanian Perspective," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(5), pages 93-116.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vassiliki Grougiou & George Balabanis & Danae Manika, 2020. "Does Humour Influence Perceptions of the Ethicality of Female-Disparaging Advertising?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Myers, Susan D. & Deitz, George D. & Huhmann, Bruce A. & Jha, Subhash & Tatara, Jennifer H., 2020. "An eye-tracking study of attention to brand-identifying content and recall of taboo advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 176-186.
    3. Gebreselassie, Andinet Worku, 2019. "On communicating about taboo social issues in least developed countries : The case of Ethiopia," Other publications TiSEM bb35ee74-fdd7-4220-af92-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Selma Kadić-Maglajlić & Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić & Milena Micevski & Nina Michaelidou & Ekaterina Nemkova, 2017. "Controversial Advert Perceptions in SNS Advertising: The Role of Ethical Judgement and Religious Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 249-265, March.
    5. Abed Mahmoudian & Saeed Sadeghi Boroujerdi & Yong Jae Ko & Vahid Delshab, 2024. "The Impact of Perceived Team Reputation on Team Identification in the Context of European Football League Teams," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 70-85, February.
    6. Caroline Moraes & Finola Kerrigan & Roisin McCann, 2020. "Positive Shock: A Consumer Ethical Judgement Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 735-751, September.
    7. Lee, Michael S.W. & Septianto, Felix & Frethey-Bentham, Catherine & Gao, Esther, 2020. "Condoms and bananas: Shock advertising explained through congruence theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    8. Brenes, Esteban R. & Ciravegna, Luciano & Acuña, Joseph, 2020. "Differentiation strategies in agribusiness – A configurational approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 522-539.
    9. Karim BEN YAHIA & Soukeina TOUITI & Mourad TOUZANI, 2016. "Cultural congruency and shocking buzz campaigns: contrasting the opinions of professionals and consumers," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(3), pages 20-33.
    10. Snelson-Powell, Annie C. & Grosvold, Johanne & Millington, Andrew I., 2020. "Organizational hypocrisy in business schools with sustainability commitments: The drivers of talk-action inconsistency," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 408-420.
    11. Muhammad Naeem & Wilson Ozuem & Kerry Howell & Silvia Ranfagni, 2022. "Understanding the process of meanings, materials, and competencies in adoption of mobile banking," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2445-2469, December.
    12. Theodorakis, Ioannis G. & Painesis, Grigorios, 2022. "Ad eroticism from a psychological distance perspective: Investigating its effects in light of consumers’ sex, ethical judgments, and moral attentiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 524-539.
    13. Abou-Foul, Mohamad & Ruiz-Alba, Jose L. & López-Tenorio, Pablo J., 2023. "The impact of artificial intelligence capabilities on servitization: The moderating role of absorptive capacity-A dynamic capabilities perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    14. Katarzyna Bachnik & Robert Nowacki, 2018. "How to Build Consumer Trust: Socially Responsible or Controversial Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Palmié, Maximilian & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "How AI capabilities enable business model innovation: Scaling AI through co-evolutionary processes and feedback loops," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 574-587.
    16. Ouidade Sabri, 2017. "Does Viral Communication Context Increase the Harmfulness of Controversial Taboo Advertising?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 235-247, March.
    17. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    18. Jennifer Tartaglia & Michelle McIntosh & Jonine Jancey & Jane Scott & Andrea Begley, 2021. "Exploring Feeding Practices and Food Literacy in Parents with Young Children from Disadvantaged Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Markus Mayer & Markus Voeth, 2022. "Improving negotiation success in B2B sales organizations: is structured negotiation management a success factor?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 163-196, February.
    20. Adrian MICU & Marius GERU & Angela-Eliza MICU, 2017. "Developing Customer Trust in E-Commerce Using Inbound Marketing Strategies," Proceedings RCE 2017, Editura Lumen, vol. 0, pages 522-531, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:137:y:2021:i:c:p:601-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.