IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v142y2022icp524-539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ad eroticism from a psychological distance perspective: Investigating its effects in light of consumers’ sex, ethical judgments, and moral attentiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Theodorakis, Ioannis G.
  • Painesis, Grigorios

Abstract

Building on construal level theory and psychological distance, this paper considers the impact of erotic appeal ads in terms of consumer reactions; the demographic and ethically related psychographic factors of sex and moral attentiveness are also examined. Two experiments delve into different psychological distance types, evoking variant construal levels while promoting a different product category across different levels of erotic intensity in the ad. Findings indicate that as the psychological distance or construal level decreases, reactions become more unfavorable, regardless of the ad’s level of erotic intensity. Furthermore, reactions vary depending on sex and moral attentiveness; women and individuals with high moral attentiveness levels (MALs) express stronger objections. Finally, across the levels of erotic intensity, ethical judgments systematically mediate the ads’ effects on attitudes and behaviors, and this mediation effect is intensified when viewers act under a low construal or psychological distance level and when erotic intensity level increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodorakis, Ioannis G. & Painesis, Grigorios, 2022. "Ad eroticism from a psychological distance perspective: Investigating its effects in light of consumers’ sex, ethical judgments, and moral attentiveness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 524-539.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:142:y:2022:i:c:p:524-539
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322000017
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Kyuha & Lee, Sungmi & Choi, Yung Kyun, 2019. "Image proximity in advertising appeals: Spatial distance and product types," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 490-497.
    2. Daulatram Lund, 2008. "Gender Differences in Ethics Judgment of Marketing Professionals in the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 501-515, February.
    3. Kurt Wurthmann, 2013. "A Social Cognitive Perspective on the Relationships Between Ethics Education, Moral Attentiveness, and PRESOR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 131-153, April.
    4. Darren W. Dahl & Jaideep Sengupta & Kathleen D. Vohs, 2009. "Sex in Advertising: Gender Differences and the Role of Relationship Commitment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(2), pages 215-231.
    5. Joseph K. Goodman & Gabriele Paolacci, 2017. "Crowdsourcing Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(1), pages 196-210.
    6. Beatty, Sharon E & Talpade, Salil, 1994. "Adolescent Influence in Family Decision Making: A Replication with Extension," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(2), pages 332-341, September.
    7. Edell, Julie E & Staelin, Richard, 1983. "The Information Processing of Pictures in Print Advertisements," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(1), pages 45-61, June.
    8. Hakkyun Kim & Akshay R. Rao & Angela Y. Lee, 2009. "It's Time to Vote: The Effect of Matching Message Orientation and Temporal Frame on Political Persuasion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(6), pages 877-889, April.
    9. Sabri, Ouidade & Obermiller, Carl, 2012. "Consumer perception of taboo in ads," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 869-873.
    10. David Dawson, 2018. "Organisational Virtue, Moral Attentiveness, and the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility in Business: The Case of UK HR Practitioners," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 765-781, April.
    11. Zhu, Linlin & He, Yi & Chen, Qimei & Hu, Miao, 2017. "It's the thought that counts: The effects of construal level priming and donation proximity on consumer response to donation framing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 44-51.
    12. Dahl, Darren W. & Frankenberger, Kristina D. & Manchanda, Rajesh V., 2003. "Does It Pay to Shock? Reactions to Shocking and Nonshocking Advertising Content among University Students," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 268-280, September.
    13. repec:cup:judgdm:v:7:y:2012:i:5:p:628-638 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Nidhi Agrawal & Echo Wen Wan, 2009. "Regulating Risk or Risking Regulation? Construal Levels and Depletion Effects in the Processing of Health Messages," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(3), pages 448-462.
    15. Sharma, Isha & Jain, Kokil & Behl, Abhishek, 2020. "Effect of service transgressions on distant third-party customers: The role of moral identity and moral judgment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 696-712.
    16. Michael Wood & Theodore Noseworthy & Scott Colwell, 2013. "If You Can’t See the Forest for the Trees, You Might Just Cut Down the Forest: The Perils of Forced Choice on “Seemingly” Unethical Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 515-527, December.
    17. Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan, 2016. "An Extended Model of Moral Outrage at Corporate Social Irresponsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 429-444, May.
    18. Brian Whitaker & Lindsey Godwin, 2013. "The Antecedents of Moral Imagination in the Workplace: A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 61-73, April.
    19. Andranik Tumasjan & Maria Strobel & Isabell Welpe, 2011. "Ethical Leadership Evaluations After Moral Transgression: Social Distance Makes the Difference," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(4), pages 609-622, April.
    20. Ernest Baskin & Cheryl J. Wakslak & Yaacov Trope & Nathan Novemsky, 2014. "Why Feasibility Matters More to Gift Receivers than to Givers: A Construal-Level Approach to Gift Giving," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(1), pages 169-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Michael S.W. & Septianto, Felix & Frethey-Bentham, Catherine & Gao, Esther, 2020. "Condoms and bananas: Shock advertising explained through congruence theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    2. David Dawson, 2018. "Measuring Individuals’ Virtues in Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 793-805, February.
    3. Efrat, Kalanit & Souchon, Anne L. & Dickenson, Peter & Nemkova, Ekaterina, 2021. "Chutzpadik advertising and its effectiveness: Four studies of agencies and audiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 601-613.
    4. Castagna, Ana Carina & Pinto, Diego Costa & Mattila, Anna & de Barcellos, Marcia Dutra, 2021. "Beauty-is-good, ugly-is-risky: Food aesthetics bias and construal level," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 633-643.
    5. Selma Kadić-Maglajlić & Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić & Milena Micevski & Nina Michaelidou & Ekaterina Nemkova, 2017. "Controversial Advert Perceptions in SNS Advertising: The Role of Ethical Judgement and Religious Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 249-265, March.
    6. Rachel E. Sturm, 2017. "Decreasing Unethical Decisions: The Role of Morality-Based Individual Differences," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 37-57, April.
    7. Katarzyna Bachnik & Robert Nowacki, 2018. "How to Build Consumer Trust: Socially Responsible or Controversial Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Ouidade Sabri, 2017. "Does Viral Communication Context Increase the Harmfulness of Controversial Taboo Advertising?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 235-247, March.
    9. David Dawson, 2018. "Organisational Virtue, Moral Attentiveness, and the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility in Business: The Case of UK HR Practitioners," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 765-781, April.
    10. Karim BEN YAHIA & Soukeina TOUITI & Mourad TOUZANI, 2016. "Cultural congruency and shocking buzz campaigns: contrasting the opinions of professionals and consumers," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(3), pages 20-33.
    11. Myers, Susan D. & Deitz, George D. & Huhmann, Bruce A. & Jha, Subhash & Tatara, Jennifer H., 2020. "An eye-tracking study of attention to brand-identifying content and recall of taboo advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 176-186.
    12. Gebreselassie, Andinet Worku, 2019. "On communicating about taboo social issues in least developed countries : The case of Ethiopia," Other publications TiSEM bb35ee74-fdd7-4220-af92-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Kuchmaner, Christina A. & Wiggins, Jennifer & Grimm, Pamela E., 2019. "The Role of Network Embeddedness and Psychological Ownership in Consumer Responses to Brand Transgressions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 129-143.
    14. Nitin Walia & Mark Srite & Wendy Huddleston, 2016. "Eyeing the web interface: the influence of price, product, and personal involvement," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 297-333, September.
    15. Akhter Ali & N. Ravichandran & D.K. Batra, 2013. "Children’s Choice of Influence Strategies in Family Purchase Decisions and the Impact of Demographics," Vision, , vol. 17(1), pages 27-40, March.
    16. Ella Ward & Song Yang & Jenni Romaniuk & Virginia Beal, 2020. "Building a unique brand identity: measuring the relative ownership potential of brand identity element types," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(4), pages 393-407, July.
    17. Azer, Jaylan & Anker, Thomas & Taheri, Babak & Tinsley, Ross, 2023. "Consumer-Driven racial stigmatization: The moderating role of race in online consumer-to-consumer reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Dewani, Prem Prakash & Sinha, Piyush Kumar & Mathur, Sameer, 2016. "Role of gratitude and obligation in long term customer relationships," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 143-156.
    19. Labrecque, JoAnne & Ricard, Line, 2001. "Children's influence on family decision-making: a restaurant study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 173-176, November.
    20. John Hulland & Jeff Miller, 2018. "“Keep on Turkin’”?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 789-794, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:142:y:2022:i:c:p:524-539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.