IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v116y2020icp542-551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecosystem adoption of practices over time (EAPT): Toward an alternative view of contemporary technology adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Nysveen, Herbjørn
  • Pedersen, Per E.
  • Skard, Siv

Abstract

Studies examining technology adoption often investigate the adoption of a particular technological artifact by a specific type of end-user at one point in time. We argue that contemporary technologies are components of an improved practice (object) that is adopted, that these practices materialize through interactions among several end-users in an ecosystem (subject), and that they change over time (have temporality). Hence, contemporary technology adoption may be considered “ecosystem adoption of practices over time” (EAPT). We describe how traditional adoption theories treat the object, subject, and temporality of adoption and use practice theory to propose an alternative, EAPT view. Assistive technology and ambient assistive living adoption are used as illustrative examples. We discuss the boundary conditions for applying the EAPT view and elaborate on the implications of taking this view for the research designs of contemporary technology adoption studies. Finally, theoretical, managerial, and policy implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nysveen, Herbjørn & Pedersen, Per E. & Skard, Siv, 2020. "Ecosystem adoption of practices over time (EAPT): Toward an alternative view of contemporary technology adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 542-551.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:116:y:2020:i:c:p:542-551
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320300205
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José M Peeters & Anke JE de Veer & Lucas van der Hoek & Anneke L Francke, 2012. "Factors influencing the adoption of home telecare by elderly or chronically ill people: a national survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(21-22), pages 3183-3193, November.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Korkman, Oskar & Storbacka, Kaj & Harald, Bo, 2010. "Practices as markets: Value co-creation in e-invoicing," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 236-247.
    4. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
    5. Nambisan, Satish & Wright, Mike & Feldman, Maryann, 2019. "The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    6. Faïz Gallouj, 1997. "Towards a neo-Schumpeterian theory of innovation in services?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(6), pages 405-420, December.
    7. Windrum, Paul & Garci­a-Goñi, Manuel, 2008. "A neo-Schumpeterian model of health services innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, May.
    8. Gallouj, Faiz & Weinstein, Olivier, 1997. "Innovation in services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 537-556, December.
    9. Diane M. Martin & John W. Schouten, 2014. "Consumption-Driven Market Emergence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(5), pages 855-870.
    10. Greenhalgh, Trisha & Wherton, Joe & Sugarhood, Paul & Hinder, Sue & Procter, Rob & Stones, Rob, 2013. "What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 86-94.
    11. McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Hogan, Suellen J. & Witell, Lars & Snyder, Hannah, 2017. "Cocreative customer practices: Effects of health care customer value cocreation practices on well-being," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 55-66.
    12. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    13. Schot, Johan & Steinmueller, W. Edward, 2018. "Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1554-1567.
    14. Verstegen, Luuk & Houkes, Wybo & Reymen, Isabelle, 2019. "Configuring collective digital-technology usage in dynamic and complex design practices," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mele, Cristina & Tuominen, Tiina & Edvardsson, Bo & Reynoso, Javier, 2023. "Smart sensing technology and self-adjustment in service systems through value co-creation routine dynamics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Kapoor, Kawaljeet & Ziaee Bigdeli, Ali & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Schroeder, Andreas & Beltagui, Ahmad & Baines, Tim, 2021. "A socio-technical view of platform ecosystems: Systematic review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 94-108.
    3. Paolo Franco, 2023. "Older consumers and technology: A critical systematic literature review," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 92-121, June.
    4. Martínez-Gautier, Daniel & Garrido-Yserte, Rubén & Gallo-Rivera, María-Teresa, 2021. "Educational performance and ICTs: Availability, use, misuse and context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 173-182.
    5. Muhammad Naeem & Wilson Ozuem & Kerry Howell & Silvia Ranfagni, 2022. "Understanding the process of meanings, materials, and competencies in adoption of mobile banking," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2445-2469, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Witell, Lars & Gebauer, Heiko & Jaakkola, Elina & Hammedi, Wafa & Patricio, Lia & Perks, Helen, 2017. "A bricolage perspective on service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 290-298.
    2. Sarv Devaraj & Ming Fan & Rajiv Kohli, 2002. "Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 316-333, September.
    3. Paul Windrum & Doris Schartinger & Luis Rubalcaba & Faiz F. Gallouj & Marja Toivonen, 2016. "The co-creation of multi-agent social innovations," Post-Print halshs-01322603, HAL.
    4. Faïz Gallouj, 2012. "Service: innovation, performance and public policy," Working Papers hal-01111765, HAL.
    5. Faïz Gallouj & Maria Savona, 2009. "Innovation in services: a review of the debate and a research agenda," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 149-172, April.
    6. Tor Helge Aas & Nina Jentoft & Mikaela Vasstrøm, 2016. "Managing innovation of care services: An exploration of Norwegian municipalities," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1215762-121, December.
    7. Faiz Gallouj & Luis Rubalcaba & Marja Toivonen & Paul Windrum, 2018. "Understanding social innovation in services industries," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 551-569, July.
    8. Giulio Maggiore & Alfonso Morvillo, 2015. "L?innovazione nei servizi pubblici: un caso nel settore sanitario," ECONOMIA E DIRITTO DEL TERZIARIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 127-153.
    9. Kirsi Hyttinen & Sampsa Ruutu & Mika Nieminen & Faiz Gallouj & Marja Toivonen, 2014. "A system dynamic and multi-criteria evaluation of innovations in environmental services," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 29-52.
    10. Djellal, Faridah & Gallouj, Faïz & Miles, Ian, 2013. "Two decades of research on innovation in services: Which place for public services?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 98-117.
    11. Gallouj, Faïz, 2002. "Services innovation: assimilation, differentiation, inversion and integration," MPRA Paper 62174, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Matthijs J. Janssen & Koen Frenken & Elena M. Tur & Alexander S. Alexiev, 2022. "The perils of pleasing: Innovation-stifling effects of customized service provision," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1231-1264, September.
    13. Faïz Gallouj & Marja Toivonen, 2011. "Elaborating the characteristics-based approach to service innovation: making the service process visible," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 33-58.
    14. Risto Rajala & Faïz Gallouj & Marja Toivonen, 2016. "Collaborative Value Creation in Service Innovation," Post-Print hal-01672596, HAL.
    15. Primmer, Eeva & Varumo, Liisa & Krause, Torsten & Orsi, Francesco & Geneletti, Davide & Brogaard, Sara & Aukes, Ewert & Ciolli, Marco & Grossmann, Carol & Hernández-Morcillo, Mónica & Kister, Jutta , 2021. "Mapping Europe’s institutional landscape for forest ecosystem service provision, innovations and governance," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    16. Weber, K. Matthias & Heller-Schuh, Barbara & Godoe, Helge & Roeste, Rannveig, 2014. "ICT-enabled system innovations in public services: Experiences from intelligent transport systems," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 539-557.
    17. Witell, Lars & Snyder, Hannah & Gustafsson, Anders & Fombelle, Paul & Kristensson, Per, 2016. "Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2863-2872.
    18. Snyder, Hannah & Witell, Lars & Gustafsson, Anders & Fombelle, Paul & Kristensson, Per, 2016. "Identifying categories of service innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2401-2408.
    19. Charlotte Fourcroy, 2014. "Innovation logics and energy consumption in the service sector: a characteristics-based approach and its application to food retail services," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 115-138.
    20. Silvia Cruz & Sonia Paulino & Faiz Gallouj, 2014. "Innovation in brazilian landfills: a servppin perspective," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 79-100.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:116:y:2020:i:c:p:542-551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.