IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v58y2013icp86-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) and CFB (circulating fluidized bed) cogeneration plants equipped with CO2 removal

Author

Listed:
  • Liszka, Marcin
  • Malik, Tomasz
  • Budnik, Michał
  • Ziębik, Andrzej

Abstract

The introduction of CO2 removal processes causes usually generation of waste heat. As the temperature of waste heat carriers is usually moderately high (ca. 100 °C), there is a potential possibility for using them in district heating systems. The main goal of present paper is thus the energy and CO2 emission analysis of CHP (combined heat and power production) plants equipped with CO2 removal and utilizing waste heat generated within the plant. First case is dealing with the CFB (circulating fluidized bed) plant equipped with post-combustion chemical CO2 absorption. The second case is dealing with an IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) equipped with the pre-combustion CO2 removal by physical absorption. Both plants have been modeled on the Thermoflex software. The reference, CFB-based CHP plant without CO2 removal has also been modeled. The obtained results indicate that IGCC plant has better thermodynamic indicators than CFB-based unit. Moreover, the CO2 emission considering system interconnections within the electricity production network is negative for both plants equipped with CCS (carbon capture and storage). The highest exergy efficiency is achieved for the reference CFB plant. The decrease of exergy efficiency caused by CO2 capture and compression is ca. 8 percentage points, but in case of IGCC CHP plant the exergy efficiency is only 3 percentage points lower than for the reference system.

Suggested Citation

  • Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Budnik, Michał & Ziębik, Andrzej, 2013. "Comparison of IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) and CFB (circulating fluidized bed) cogeneration plants equipped with CO2 removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 86-96.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:58:y:2013:i:c:p:86-96
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544213003897
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2012. "Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen-oriented coal gasification with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 142-150.
    2. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2012. "Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-445.
    3. Pérez-Fortes, M. & Bojarski, A.D. & Velo, E. & Nougués, J.M. & Puigjaner, L., 2009. "Conceptual model and evaluation of generated power and emissions in an IGCC plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1721-1732.
    4. Westner, Günther & Madlener, Reinhard, 2011. "Development of cogeneration in Germany: A mean-variance portfolio analysis of individual technology’s prospects in view of the new regulatory framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5301-5313.
    5. Pfaff, I. & Oexmann, J. & Kather, A., 2010. "Optimised integration of post-combustion CO2 capture process in greenfield power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4030-4041.
    6. Kapil, Ankur & Bulatov, Igor & Smith, Robin & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2012. "Process integration of low grade heat in process industry with district heating networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 11-19.
    7. Erlach, B. & Schmidt, M. & Tsatsaronis, G., 2011. "Comparison of carbon capture IGCC with pre-combustion decarbonisation and with chemical-looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3804-3815.
    8. Martelli, Emanuele & Kreutz, Thomas & Carbo, Michiel & Consonni, Stefano & Jansen, Daniel, 2011. "Shell coal IGCCS with carbon capture: Conventional gas quench vs. innovative configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3978-3989.
    9. Davison, John, 2007. "Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1163-1176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kobayashi, Makoto & Akiho, Hiroyuki & Nakao, Yoshinobu, 2015. "Performance evaluation of porous sodium aluminate sorbent for halide removal process in oxy-fuel IGCC power generation plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 320-327.
    2. Wang, Hairong & Yan, Jianbo & Dong, Liang, 2016. "Simulation and economic evaluation of biomass gasification with sets for heating, cooling and power production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 360-368.
    3. Ziębik, Andrzej & Malik, Tomasz & Liszka, Marcin, 2015. "Thermodynamic evaluation of CHP (combined heat and power) plants integrated with installations of coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P2), pages 179-188.
    4. Barelli, L. & Ottaviano, A., 2014. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology coupled with methane dry reforming: A viable option for high efficiency plant with reduced CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    5. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Naraharisetti, Pavan Kumar & Lakshminarayanan, S. & Karimi, I.A., 2014. "Design of biomass and natural gas based IGFC using multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 635-652.
    7. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    8. Peltola, Petteri & Saari, Jussi & Tynjälä, Tero & Hyppänen, Timo, 2020. "Process integration of chemical looping combustion with oxygen uncoupling in a biomass-fired combined heat and power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Tang, Bao-Jun & Li, Ru & Li, Xiao-Yi & Chen, Hao, 2017. "An optimal production planning model of coal-fired power industry in China: Considering the process of closing down inefficient units and developing CCS technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 519-530.
    10. Jānis Krūmiņš & Māris Kļaviņš, 2023. "Integrated Circulating Fluidized Bed Gasification System for Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management: Energy Production and Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Mertzis, Dimitrios & Mitsakis, Panagiotis & Tsiakmakis, Stefanos & Manara, Panagiota & Zabaniotou, Anastasia & Samaras, Zissis, 2014. "Performance analysis of a small-scale combined heat and power system using agricultural biomass residues: The SMARt-CHP demonstration project," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 367-374.
    12. Chutichai, Bhawasut & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn & Assabumrungrat, Suttichai & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2015. "Parametric analysis of a circulating fluidized bed biomass gasifier for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 406-413.
    13. Wang, Jinman & Wang, Ruogu & Zhu, Yucheng & Li, Jiayan, 2018. "Life cycle assessment and environmental cost accounting of coal-fired power generation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 374-384.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Amorino, Carlo, 2013. "Combustion vs. gasification for a demonstration CCS (carbon capture and storage) project in Italy: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 160-169.
    2. Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Woo-Sung & Ju, Youngsan & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    4. Khalilpour, Rajab, 2014. "Multi-level investment planning and scheduling under electricity and carbon market dynamics: Retrofit of a power plant with PCC (post-combustion carbon capture) processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 172-186.
    5. Nemet, Gregory F. & Baker, Erin & Jenni, Karen E., 2013. "Modeling the future costs of carbon capture using experts' elicited probabilities under policy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 218-228.
    6. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2012. "Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen-oriented coal gasification with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 142-150.
    8. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    9. Kim, Young Sik & Park, Sung Ku & Lee, Jong Jun & Kang, Do Won & Kim, Tong Seop, 2013. "Analysis of the impact of gas turbine modifications in integrated gasification combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 977-986.
    10. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    11. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2012. "Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-445.
    12. Lee, Woo-Sung & Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Oh, Min & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance analysis and carbon reduction assessment of an integrated syngas purification process for the co-production of hydrogen and power in an integrated gasification combined cycle plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 910-927.
    13. Nicholas S. Siefert & Sarah Narburgh & Yang Chen, 2016. "Comprehensive Exergy Analysis of Three IGCC Power Plant Configurations with CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Wang, Lu & Wei, Yi-Ming & Brown, Marilyn A., 2017. "Global transition to low-carbon electricity: A bibliometric analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 57-68.
    15. Valiani, Saba & Tahouni, Nassim & Panjeshahi, M. Hassan, 2017. "Optimization of pre-combustion capture for thermal power plants using Pinch Analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 950-960.
    16. Chen, Shiyi & Xiang, Wenguo & Wang, Dong & Xue, Zhipeng, 2012. "Incorporating IGCC and CaO sorption-enhanced process for power generation with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 285-294.
    17. Dinca, Cristian & Slavu, Nela & Cormoş, Călin-Cristian & Badea, Adrian, 2018. "CO2 capture from syngas generated by a biomass gasification power plant with chemical absorption process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 925-936.
    18. Lee, Jae Chul & Lee, Hyeon Hui & Joo, Yong Jin & Lee, Chang Ha & Oh, Min, 2014. "Process simulation and thermodynamic analysis of an IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) plant with an entrained coal gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 58-68.
    19. Tola, Vittorio & Pettinau, Alberto, 2014. "Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1461-1474.
    20. Jin, He & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng, 2018. "Energy-efficient process intensification for post-combustion CO2 capture: A modeling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 471-483.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    IGCC; CFB; CHP; CCS; Waste heat;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:58:y:2013:i:c:p:86-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.