IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v45y2012i1p92-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and analysis of selected carbon dioxide capture methods in IGCC systems

Author

Listed:
  • Skorek-Osikowska, Anna
  • Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna
  • Kotowicz, Janusz

Abstract

Carbon dioxide capture from energy systems will likely become a necessity as the European Union regulations are becoming increasingly more stringent. The greatest disadvantage of the existing methods of CO2 separation is the high energy intensity. In the Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) system, the carbon dioxide capture process is conducted before combustion, which facilitates the separation. In this paper, two methods of CO2 capture are compared. The first is the most frequently considered, known as chemical absorption. The second is membrane CO2 separation, which is not as commonly deployed but has the potential to be an even more efficient process.

Suggested Citation

  • Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna & Kotowicz, Janusz, 2012. "Modeling and analysis of selected carbon dioxide capture methods in IGCC systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 92-100.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:45:y:2012:i:1:p:92-100
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544212000953
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pfaff, I. & Oexmann, J. & Kather, A., 2010. "Optimised integration of post-combustion CO2 capture process in greenfield power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4030-4041.
    2. Corti, Andrea & Fiaschi, Daniele & Lombardi, Lidia, 2004. "Carbon dioxide removal in power generation using membrane technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2025-2043.
    3. Duan, Liqiang & Zhao, Mingde & Yang, Yongping, 2012. "Integration and optimization study on the coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using MEA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 107-116.
    4. Kotowicz, Janusz & Chmielniak, Tadeusz & Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna, 2010. "The influence of membrane CO2 separation on the efficiency of a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 841-850.
    5. Strube, R. & Pellegrini, G. & Manfrida, G., 2011. "The environmental impact of post-combustion CO2 capture with MEA, with aqueous ammonia, and with an aqueous ammonia-ethanol mixture for a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3763-3770.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nakaten, Natalie & Schlüter, Ralph & Azzam, Rafig & Kempka, Thomas, 2014. "Development of a techno-economic model for dynamic calculation of cost of electricity, energy demand and CO2 emissions of an integrated UCG–CCS process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 779-790.
    2. Kotowicz, Janusz & Michalski, Sebastian, 2016. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a supercritical and an ultracritical oxy-type power plant without and with waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 806-820.
    3. Ziębik, Andrzej & Malik, Tomasz & Liszka, Marcin, 2015. "Thermodynamic evaluation of CHP (combined heat and power) plants integrated with installations of coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P2), pages 179-188.
    4. Hossein Asgharian & Florin Iov & Samuel Simon Araya & Thomas Helmer Pedersen & Mads Pagh Nielsen & Ehsan Baniasadi & Vincenzo Liso, 2023. "A Review on Process Modeling and Simulation of Cryogenic Carbon Capture for Post-Combustion Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-35, February.
    5. Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2013. "Modelling the investment in carbon capture retrofits of pulverized coal-fired plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 66-75.
    6. Lee, Woo-Sung & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Oh, Hyun-Taek & Baek, Seung-Won & Oh, Min & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2017. "Performance, economic and exergy analyses of carbon capture processes for a 300 MW class integrated gasification combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 731-742.
    7. Yi, Qun & Feng, Jie & Wu, Yanli & Li, Wenying, 2014. "3E (energy, environmental, and economy) evaluation and assessment to an innovative dual-gas polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 285-294.
    8. Xiping Wang & Hongdou Zhang, 2018. "Optimal design of carbon tax to stimulate CCS investment in China's coal‐fired power plants: A real options analysis," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 863-875, October.
    9. Dinca, Cristian & Slavu, Nela & Cormoş, Călin-Cristian & Badea, Adrian, 2018. "CO2 capture from syngas generated by a biomass gasification power plant with chemical absorption process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 925-936.
    10. Urech, Jeremy & Tock, Laurence & Harkin, Trent & Hoadley, Andrew & Maréchal, François, 2014. "An assessment of different solvent-based capture technologies within an IGCC–CCS power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 268-276.
    11. Kotowicz, Janusz & Michalski, Sebastian, 2015. "Influence of four-end HTM (high temperature membrane) parameters on the thermodynamic and economic characteristics of a supercritical power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 662-673.
    12. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    13. Esmaili, Ehsan & Mostafavi, Ehsan & Mahinpey, Nader, 2016. "Economic assessment of integrated coal gasification combined cycle with sorbent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 341-352.
    14. Rohlfs, Wilko & Madlener, Reinhard, 2013. "Assessment of clean-coal strategies: The questionable merits of carbon capture-readiness," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 27-36.
    15. Zeng, Jing & Wang, Zhenjun & Chen, Guobin, 2021. "Biological characteristics of energy conversion in carbon fixation by microalgae," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Bartela, Łukasz & Kotowicz, Janusz & Sobolewski, Aleksander & Iluk, Tomasz & Remiorz, Leszek, 2014. "The influence of the size of the CHP (combined heat and power) system integrated with a biomass fueled gas generator and piston engine on the thermodynamic and economic effectiveness of electricity an," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 328-340.
    17. Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna & Dryjańska, Aleksandra, 2015. "Possibilities for improving the thermodynamic and economic characteristics of an oxy-type power plant with a cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 45-61.
    18. Atsonios, K. & Panopoulos, K.D. & Doukelis, A. & Koumanakos, A. & Kakaras, E., 2013. "Cryogenic method for H2 and CH4 recovery from a rich CO2 stream in pre-combustion carbon capture and storage schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 106-113.
    19. Park, Sung Ho & Lee, Seung Jong & Lee, Jin Wook & Chun, Sung Nam & Lee, Jung Bin, 2015. "The quantitative evaluation of two-stage pre-combustion CO2 capture processes using the physical solvents with various design parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-55.
    20. Kim, Young Sik & Park, Sung Ku & Lee, Jong Jun & Kang, Do Won & Kim, Tong Seop, 2013. "Analysis of the impact of gas turbine modifications in integrated gasification combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 977-986.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janusz-Szymańska, Katarzyna & Dryjańska, Aleksandra, 2015. "Possibilities for improving the thermodynamic and economic characteristics of an oxy-type power plant with a cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 45-61.
    2. Li, Chunxi & Guo, Shiqi & Ye, Xuemin & Fu, Wenfeng, 2019. "Performance and thermoeconomics of solar-aided double-reheat coal-fired power systems with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    4. Zhang, Yongliang & Jin, Bo & Zou, Xixian & Zhao, Haibo, 2016. "A clean coal utilization technology based on coal pyrolysis and chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling: Principle and experimental validation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 181-189.
    5. Valiani, Saba & Tahouni, Nassim & Panjeshahi, M. Hassan, 2017. "Optimization of pre-combustion capture for thermal power plants using Pinch Analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 950-960.
    6. Bartela, Łukasz & Skorek-Osikowska, Anna & Kotowicz, Janusz, 2014. "Economic analysis of a supercritical coal-fired CHP plant integrated with an absorption carbon capture installation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 513-523.
    7. Jin, He & Liu, Pei & Li, Zheng, 2018. "Energy-efficient process intensification for post-combustion CO2 capture: A modeling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 471-483.
    8. Guo, Liheng & Ding, Yudong & Liao, Qiang & Zhu, Xun & Wang, Hong, 2022. "A new heat supply strategy for CO2 capture process based on the heat recovery from turbine exhaust steam in a coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    9. Kotowicz, Janusz & Michalski, Sebastian, 2015. "Influence of four-end HTM (high temperature membrane) parameters on the thermodynamic and economic characteristics of a supercritical power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 662-673.
    10. Kotowicz, Janusz & Michalski, Sebastian, 2016. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a supercritical and an ultracritical oxy-type power plant without and with waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 806-820.
    11. Kotowicz, Janusz & Bartela, Łukasz, 2012. "Optimisation of the connection of membrane CCS installation with a supercritical coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 118-127.
    12. Cormos, Calin-Cristian & Vatopoulos, Konstantinos & Tzimas, Evangelos, 2013. "Assessment of the consumption of water and construction materials in state-of-the-art fossil fuel power generation technologies involving CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 37-49.
    13. Perevertaylenko, Olexander Yu. & Gariev, Andriy O. & Damartzis, Theodoros & Tovazhnyanskyy, Leonid L. & Kapustenko, Petro O. & Arsenyeva, Olga P., 2015. "Searches of cost effective ways for amine absorption unit design in CO2 post-combustion capture process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 105-112.
    14. Yu, Shiwei & Wei, Yi-Ming & Guo, Haixiang & Ding, Liping, 2014. "Carbon emission coefficient measurement of the coal-to-power energy chain in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 290-300.
    15. Budzianowski, Wojciech Marcin, 2011. "Can ‘negative net CO2 emissions’ from decarbonised biogas-to-electricity contribute to solving Poland’s carbon capture and sequestration dilemmas?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6318-6325.
    16. Hanak, Dawid P. & Jenkins, Barrie G. & Kruger, Tim & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "High-efficiency negative-carbon emission power generation from integrated solid-oxide fuel cell and calciner," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1189-1201.
    17. Khalilpour, Rajab, 2014. "Multi-level investment planning and scheduling under electricity and carbon market dynamics: Retrofit of a power plant with PCC (post-combustion carbon capture) processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 172-186.
    18. Liqiang Xu & Qiufang Cui & Te Tu & Shuo Liu & Long Ji & Shuiping Yan, 2020. "Waste heat recovery from the stripped gas in carbon capture process by membrane technology: Hydrophobic and hydrophilic organic membrane cases," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(2), pages 421-435, April.
    19. José Luis Míguez & Jacobo Porteiro & Raquel Pérez-Orozco & Miguel Ángel Gómez, 2018. "Technology Evolution in Membrane-Based CCS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Wang, Dandan & Li, Sheng & Liu, Feng & Gao, Lin & Sui, Jun, 2018. "Post combustion CO2 capture in power plant using low temperature steam upgraded by double absorption heat transformer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 603-612.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:45:y:2012:i:1:p:92-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.