IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v266y2023ics0360544222034223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated assessment of water footprint and energy production efficiency in different rice-rape rotation systems

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Zhaoqiang
  • Liao, Wanjie
  • Mu, Yixue
  • Li, Yusheng
  • Nie, Lixiao

Abstract

Rice-rape rotation is one of the most important agricultural production systems in China. Studies were conducted to assess the water footprint (WF) and energy production efficiency (EPE) of six rice-rape rotation systems. Results showed that the annual equivalent yield in the wet directly seeded rice-rape rotation system was higher than that in the dry directly seeded rice-rape and transplanted rice-rape rotation system. However, the total energy input, and WF in the dry directly seeded rice-directly seeded rape (DDR-DR) rotation system were lower than those in other rice-rape rotation systems, while the energy production efficiency (EPE) was higher than that in other rice-rape rotation systems. The key to reducing the total energy input in the rice-rape rotation system is to reduce water and nitrogen inputs and tillage intensity during rice season and the nitrogen fertilizer rate in rape season. In summary, the wet directly seeded rice-directly seeded rape (WDR-DR) rotation system is suitable for promotion in rice-rape rotation production areas with good irrigation conditions and labor shortages, while the DDR-DR rotation might be the preferred planting mode for rice-rape rotation production areas with poor irrigation conditions and labor shortages.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Zhaoqiang & Liao, Wanjie & Mu, Yixue & Li, Yusheng & Nie, Lixiao, 2023. "Integrated assessment of water footprint and energy production efficiency in different rice-rape rotation systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:266:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222034223
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222034223
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126535?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rabiee, Mohammad & Majidian, Majid & Alizadeh, Mohammad Reza & Kavoosi, Masoud, 2021. "Evaluation of energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emission in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) production in paddy fields of Guilan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Unakitan, G. & Hurma, H. & Yilmaz, F., 2010. "An analysis of energy use efficiency of canola production in Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 3623-3627.
    3. Sayin, Cengiz & Nisa Mencet, M. & Ozkan, Burhan, 2005. "Assessing of energy policies based on Turkish agriculture:: current status and some implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(18), pages 2361-2373, December.
    4. Singh, Pritpal & Singh, Gurdeep & Sodhi, G.P.S., 2019. "Energy auditing and optimization approach for improving energy efficiency of rice cultivation in south-western Punjab, India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 269-279.
    5. Kar, Gouranga & Singh, Ravender & Verma, H. N., 2004. "Alternative cropping strategies for assured and efficient crop production in upland rainfed rice areas of eastern India based on rainfall analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 47-62, June.
    6. Eskandari, Hamdollah & Attar, Sajjad, 2015. "Energy comparison of two rice cultivation systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 666-671.
    7. Castellanos, M.T. & Cartagena, M.C. & Requejo, M.I. & Arce, A. & Cabello, M.J. & Ribas, F. & Tarquis, A.M., 2016. "Agronomic concepts in water footprint assessment: A case of study in a fertirrigated melon crop under semiarid conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 81-90.
    8. Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem & Rafiee, Shahin & Sharifi, Mohammad & Hosseinpour, Soleiman & Shah, Ajay, 2017. "Combined application of Life Cycle Assessment and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System for modeling energy and environmental emissions of oilseed production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 807-820.
    9. Yuan, Shen & Peng, Shaobing, 2017. "Input-output energy analysis of rice production in different crop management practices in central China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1124-1132.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan, Shen & Peng, Shaobing & Wang, Dong & Man, Jianguo, 2018. "Evaluation of the energy budget and energy use efficiency in wheat production under various crop management practices in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 184-191.
    2. Yang, Zhiyuan & Zhu, Yuemei & Zhang, Xiaoli & Liao, Qin & Fu, Hao & Cheng, Qingyue & Chen, Zongkui & Sun, Yongjian & Ma, Jun & Zhang, Jinyue & Li, Liangyu & Li, Na, 2023. "Unmanned aerial vehicle direct seeding or integrated mechanical transplanting, which will be the next step for mechanized rice production in China? —A comparison based on energy use efficiency and eco," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    3. Yang, Zhiyuan & Zhu, Yuemei & Zhang, Jinyue & Li, Xuyi & Ma, Peng & Sun, Jiawei & Sun, Yongjian & Ma, Jun & Li, Na, 2022. "Comparison of energy use between fully mechanized and semi-mechanized rice production in Southwest China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    4. Elen Presotto & Gabrielli Martinelli & Gabriela Allegretti & Edson Talamini, 2021. "Energy Efficiency, Monetary Costs, and Sustainability of Brazilian Rainfed and Irrigated Rice Cropping Systems," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Yuan, Shen & Peng, Shaobing, 2017. "Input-output energy analysis of rice production in different crop management practices in central China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1124-1132.
    6. Htwe, Than & Sinutok, Sutinee & Chotikarn, Ponlachart & Amin, Nowshad & Akhtaruzzaman, Md & Techato, Kuaanan & Hossain, Tareq, 2021. "Energy use efficiency and cost-benefits analysis of rice cultivation: A study on conventional and alternative methods in Myanmar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Yan, Jie & Kong, Zhaoyang & Liu, Yize & Li, Ning & Yang, Xiaolin & Zhuang, Minghao, 2023. "A high-resolution energy use efficiency assessment of China’s staple food crop production and associated improvement potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Kaur, Navneet & Vashist, Krishan Kumar & Brar, A.S., 2021. "Energy and productivity analysis of maize based crop sequences compared to rice-wheat system under different moisture regimes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Yongqiang Zhang & Hao Sun & Maosheng Ge & Hang Zhao & Yifan Hu & Changyue Cui & Zhibin Wu, 2023. "Difference in Energy Input and Output in Agricultural Production under Surface Irrigation and Water-Saving Irrigation: A Case Study of Kiwi Fruit in Shaanxi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Singh, Pritpal & Singh, Gurdeep & Sodhi, G.P.S., 2019. "Energy auditing and optimization approach for improving energy efficiency of rice cultivation in south-western Punjab, India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 269-279.
    11. Rabiee, Mohammad & Majidian, Majid & Alizadeh, Mohammad Reza & Kavoosi, Masoud, 2021. "Evaluation of energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emission in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) production in paddy fields of Guilan province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    12. Ghasemi-Mobtaker, Hassan & Kaab, Ali & Rafiee, Shahin, 2020. "Application of life cycle analysis to assess environmental sustainability of wheat cultivation in the west of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    13. Bhunia, Snehasish & Karmakar, Subrata & Bhattacharjee, Suvendu & Roy, Kingshuk & Kanthal, Sahely & Pramanick, Mahadev & Baishya, Aniket & Mandal, Biswapati, 2021. "Optimization of energy consumption using data envelopment analysis (DEA) in rice-wheat-green gram cropping system under conservation tillage practices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    14. Elsoragaby, Suha & Yahya, Azmi & Mahadi, Muhammad Razif & Nawi, Nazmi Mat & Mairghany, Modather, 2019. "Analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) of transplanting and broadcast seeding wetland rice cultivation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    15. Du, Xiangbei & He, Wenchang & Gao, Shangqin & Liu, Dong & Wu, Wenge & Tu, Debao & Kong, Lingcong & Xi, Min, 2022. "Raised bed planting increases economic efficiency and energy use efficiency while reducing the environmental footprint for wheat after rice production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    16. Poddar, Ratneswar & Acharjee, P.U. & Bhattacharyya, K. & Patra, S.K., 2022. "Effect of irrigation regime and varietal selection on the yield, water productivity, energy indices and economics of rice production in the lower Gangetic Plains of Eastern India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    17. Yuan, Shen & Peng, Shaobing, 2017. "Trends in the economic return on energy use and energy use efficiency in China's crop production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 836-844.
    18. Elhami, Behzad & Nejad Raini, Mahmoud Ghasemi & Taki, Morteza & Marzban, Afshin & Heidarisoltanabadi, Mohsen, 2021. "Analysis and comparison of energy-economic-environmental cycle in two cultivation methods (seeding and transplanting) for onion production (case study: central parts of Iran)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 875-890.
    19. Unakıtan, Gökhan & Kumbar, Nihal, 2019. "Analysis of feed conversion efficiency in dairy cattle farms in Thrace Region, Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 589-595.
    20. Šarauskis, Egidijus & Masilionytė, Laura & Juknevičius, Darius & Buragienė, Sidona & Kriaučiūnienė, Zita, 2019. "Energy use efficiency, GHG emissions, and cost-effectiveness of organic and sustainable fertilisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1151-1160.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:266:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222034223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.