IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v162y2022ics0301421522000015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local residents' policy preferences in an energy contested region – The Upper Hunter, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Colvin, R.M.
  • Przybyszewski, E.

Abstract

The global momentum toward decarbonisation complicates existing challenges that regional production communities are navigating as they seek prosperous and sustainable futures. In this paper, we explore local residents' priorities for policy processes in the Upper Hunter in New South Wales, Australia. Our research focused on the aim of achieving social wellbeing and economic diversification within this energy-contested region. Using interviews (n = 42), we present several findings that can guide policy processes in the Upper Hunter, and inform processes in other communities. We find that local perspectives on the future of coal are more nuanced than the often binary public debate, indicating a common ground for local policy dialogue. The legacy of conflict between the two dominant sectors – coal mining and thoroughbred breeding – shapes perceptions about new industries for the region. There is an expectation that government will take a leading role in the region's efforts toward economic diversification, though this should be in partnership with industry and community. A plan that provides certainty and diverse, relevant opportunities for the region is desired. From these and other key findings we emphasise the importance of focusing on the social dimensions as a core part of the policy process, and suggest participatory and deliberative processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Colvin, R.M. & Przybyszewski, E., 2022. "Local residents' policy preferences in an energy contested region – The Upper Hunter, Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:162:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522000015
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421522000015
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Connor, Linda H., 2016. "Energy futures, state planning policies and coal mine contests in rural New South Wales," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 233-241.
    2. Paul J. Burke & Rohan Best & Frank Jotzo, 2019. "Closures of coal‐fired power stations in Australia: local unemployment effects," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(1), pages 142-165, January.
    3. Downie, Christian, 2020. "Strategies for Survival: The International Energy Agency's response to a new world," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Evans, Geoff & Phelan, Liam, 2016. "Transition to a post-carbon society: Linking environmental justice and just transition discourses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 329-339.
    5. Roemer, Kelli F. & Haggerty, Julia H., 2021. "Coal communities and the U.S. energy transition: A policy corridors assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Sebastian Rauner & Nico Bauer & Alois Dirnaichner & Rita Van Dingenen & Chris Mutel & Gunnar Luderer, 2020. "Coal-exit health and environmental damage reductions outweigh economic impacts," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(4), pages 308-312, April.
    7. Sally A Weller, 2019. "Just transition? Strategic framing and the challenges facing coal dependent communities," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(2), pages 298-316, March.
    8. Jason Chilvers & Rob Bellamy & Helen Pallett & Tom Hargreaves, 2021. "A systemic approach to mapping participation with low-carbon energy transitions," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(3), pages 250-259, March.
    9. John Dryzek, 2015. "Deliberative engagement: the forum in the system," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(4), pages 750-754, December.
    10. Greg Muttitt & Sivan Kartha, 2020. "Equity, climate justice and fossil fuel extraction: principles for a managed phase out," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 1024-1042, September.
    11. Phil Mcmanus, 2008. "Mines, Wines and Thoroughbreds: Towards Regional Sustainability in the Upper Hunter, Australia," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(9), pages 1275-1290.
    12. Oei, Pao-Yu & Brauers, Hanna & Herpich, Philipp, 2020. "Lessons from Germany’s hard coal mining phase-out: policies and transition from 1950 to 2018," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(8), pages 963-979.
    13. Michael Jakob & Jan Christoph Steckel & Frank Jotzo & Benjamin K. Sovacool & Laura Cornelsen & Rohit Chandra & Ottmar Edenhofer & Chris Holden & Andreas Löschel & Ted Nace & Nick Robins & Jens Suedeku, 2020. "The future of coal in a carbon-constrained climate," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(8), pages 704-707, August.
    14. Colvin, R.M. & Witt, G.Bradd & Lacey, Justine, 2016. "How wind became a four-letter word: Lessons for community engagement from a wind energy conflict in King Island, Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 483-494.
    15. Sanya Carley & David M. Konisky, 2020. "The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 569-577, August.
    16. Pao-Yu Oei & Hanna Brauers & Philipp Herpich, 2020. "Lessons from Germany’s hard coal mining phase-out: policies and transition from 1950 to 2018," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 963-979, September.
    17. Jason Chilvers & Rob Bellamy & Helen Pallett & Tom Hargreaves, 2021. "Publisher Correction: A systemic approach to mapping participation with low-carbon energy transitions," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 764-764, July.
    18. David A. Fleming‐Muñoz & Lavinia Poruschi & Thomas Measham & Jacqui Meyers & Magnus Moglia, 2020. "Economic vulnerability and regional implications of a low carbon emissions future," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 575-604, July.
    19. Della Bosca, Hannah & Gillespie, Josephine, 2018. "The coal story: Generational coal mining communities and strategies of energy transition in Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 734-740.
    20. Healy, Noel & Barry, John, 2017. "Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: Fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 451-459.
    21. Baer, Hans A., 2016. "The nexus of the coal industry and the state in Australia: Historical dimensions and contemporary challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 194-202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan-Philipp Sasse & Evelina Trutnevyte, 2023. "A low-carbon electricity sector in Europe risks sustaining regional inequalities in benefits and vulnerabilities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Kamila Svobodova & John R. Owen & Deanna Kemp & Vítězslav Moudrý & Éléonore Lèbre & Martin Stringer & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2022. "Decarbonization, population disruption and resource inventories in the global energy transition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Zhou, Yuekuan & Lund, Peter D., 2023. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing and trading of renewable energy in smart communities ─ trading pricing models, decision-making and agent-based collaboration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 177-193.
    4. Böhringer, Christoph & Rosendahl, Knut Einar, 2022. "Europe beyond coal – An economic and climate impact assessment," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    5. Lo, Kevin, 2021. "Authoritarian environmentalism, just transition, and the tension between environmental protection and social justice in China's forestry reform," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Harrahill, Kieran & Douglas, Owen, 2019. "Framework development for ‘just transition’ in coal producing jurisdictions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    7. Della Bosca, Hannah & Gillespie, Josephine, 2018. "The coal story: Generational coal mining communities and strategies of energy transition in Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 734-740.
    8. Goddard, George & Farrelly, Megan A., 2018. "Just transition management: Balancing just outcomes with just processes in Australian renewable energy transitions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 110-123.
    9. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2019. "Coal Seam Gas projects: Proposed policy model for compensation and benefits sharing," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Sanz-Hernández, Alexia, 2020. "How to change the sources of meaning of resistance identities in historically coal-reliant mining communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Roxana Voicu-Dorobanțu & Clara Volintiru & Maria-Floriana Popescu & Vlad Nerău & George Ștefan, 2021. "Tackling Complexity of the Just Transition in the EU: Evidence from Romania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Sun, J. & Wen, W. & Wang, M. & Zhou, P., 2022. "Optimizing the provincial target allocation scheme of renewable portfolio standards in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    13. Upham, Dr Paul & Sovacool, Prof Benjamin & Ghosh, Dr Bipashyee, 2022. "Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Vassilis M. Charitopoulos & Mathilde Fajardy & Chi Kong Chyong & David M. Reiner, 2022. "The case of 100% electrification of domestic heat in Great Britain," Working Papers EPRG2206, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    15. Christian Hauenstein & Franziska Holz & Lennart Rathje & Thomas Mitterecker, 2022. "Stranded Assets in the Coal Export Industry? The Case of the Australian Galilee Basin," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2003, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    16. Blankenship, Brian & Aklin, Michaël & Urpelainen, Johannes & Nandan, Vagisha, 2022. "Jobs for a just transition: Evidence on coal job preferences from India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    17. Oei, Pao-Yu & Hermann, Hauke & Herpich, Philipp & Holtemöller, Oliver & Lünenbürger, Benjamin & Schult, Christoph, 2020. "Coal phase-out in Germany – Implications and policies for affected regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    18. David A. Fleming‐Muñoz & Lavinia Poruschi & Thomas Measham & Jacqui Meyers & Magnus Moglia, 2020. "Economic vulnerability and regional implications of a low carbon emissions future," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 575-604, July.
    19. Shidore, Sarang & Busby, Joshua W., 2019. "What explains India's embrace of solar? State-led energy transition in a developmental polity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1179-1189.
    20. Marina Blohm, 2021. "An Enabling Framework to Support the Sustainable Energy Transition at the National Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:162:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522000015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.