IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v128y2019icp735-743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social embeddedness of policy actors. The failure of consumer-owned wind energy in Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Ratinen, Mari

Abstract

This article investigates democratic performance of policy networks. To shed new light on this topic, the social embeddedness, i.e. social and economic ties of actors in and around policy networks are analysed. A qualitative case study of energy policy networks in Finland is presented. Energy-intensive industries, incumbent utilities and the government are the main actors in policy networks. There are also extensive ties between them. Wind energy developers are formally linked to the networks. However, they have few possibilities to participate in the policy processes or to make an impact on policies. Similarly, representation of the people is poor. Also, the policy debates are not open-ended. Hence, it appears that the policy actors' social embeddedness casts a shadow on the democratic anchorage of the policy networks. Based on these tentative findings, it is concluded that the democratic performance of policy networks should be investigated, not assumed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ratinen, Mari, 2019. "Social embeddedness of policy actors. The failure of consumer-owned wind energy in Finland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 735-743.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:128:y:2019:i:c:p:735-743
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421519300047
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Midttun, Alte & Piccini, Proadpran Boonprasurd, 2017. "Facing the climate and digital challenge: European energy industry from boom to crisis and transformation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 330-343.
    2. Lund, P.D., 2007. "The link between political decision-making and energy options: Assessing future role of renewable energy and energy efficiency in Finland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 2271-2281.
    3. Stenzel, Till & Frenzel, Alexander, 2008. "Regulating technological change--The strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2645-2657, July.
    4. Haridimos Tsoukas & Robert Chia, 2002. "On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(5), pages 567-582, October.
    5. Coleman, William D. & Skogstad, Grace D. & Atkinson, Michael M., 1996. "Paradigm Shifts and Policy Networks: Cumulative Change in Agriculture," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 273-301, September.
    6. Jesse D. Lecy & Ines A. Mergel & Hans Peter Schmitz, 2014. "Networks in Public Administration: Current scholarship in review," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 643-665, June.
    7. Martina Dal Molin & Cristina Masella, 2016. "Networks in policy, management and governance: a comparative literature review to stimulate future research avenues," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 20(4), pages 823-849, December.
    8. Mark Granovetter, 2005. "The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(1), pages 33-50, Winter.
    9. Ericsson, Karin & Huttunen, Suvi & Nilsson, L.J.Lars J. & Svenningsson, Per, 2004. "Bioenergy policy and market development in Finland and Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(15), pages 1707-1721, October.
    10. Martin Gargiulo & Mario Benassi, 2000. "Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 183-196, April.
    11. Harris Hyun-soo Kim, 2016. "Exploring the Downside of Social Embeddedness: Evidence from a Cross-National Study," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 97(2), pages 232-251, June.
    12. Jan Fuhse & Sophie Mützel, 2011. "Tackling connections, structure, and meaning in networks: quantitative and qualitative methods in sociological network research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1067-1089, August.
    13. Ilkka Ruostetsaari, 2010. "Changing Regulation and Governance of Finnish Energy Policy Making: New Rules but Old Elites?," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 27(3), pages 273-297, May.
    14. Ratinen, Mari & Lund, Peter D., 2014. "Growth strategies of incumbent utilities as contextually embedded: Examples from Denmark, Germany, Finland and Spain," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 81-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grunenberg, Michael & Henning, Christian H. C. A., 2019. "Social embeddedness in stakeholder networks and legislators' policy preferences: The case of German livestock policy," Working Papers of Agricultural Policy WP2019-06, University of Kiel, Department of Agricultural Economics, Chair of Agricultural Policy.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leif Brandes & Marc Brechot & Egon Franck, 2011. "The Temptation of Social Ties: When Interpersonal Network Transactions Hurt Firm Performance," Working Papers 00159, University of Zurich, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics (ISU), revised 2012.
    2. Birgit Leick & Susanne Gretzinger, 2018. "Brokerage and governance for business networks: a metasynthesis-based discussion," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(4), pages 773-804, December.
    3. Löhr, Meike & Mattes, Jannika, 2022. "Facing transition phase two: Analysing actor strategies in a stagnating acceleration phase," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Linda D. Hollebeek & Moira K. Clark & Wafa Hammedi & René Arvola, 2021. "Cocreated brand value: theoretical model and propositions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(4), pages 413-428, July.
    5. Löhr, Meike & Mattes, Jannika, 2020. "Facing transition phase two: Analysing actor strategies in a stagnating acceleration phase," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/12, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    6. Wendong Deng & George Hendrikse & Qiao Liang, 2021. "Internal social capital and the life cycle of agricultural cooperatives," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 301-323, January.
    7. José A. Belso-Martinez & Francesc Xavier Molina-Morales, 2013. "Non-Linear Relationships of Internal and External Resources on a Firm's Innovation: The Case of the Spanish Vinalopó Footwear Cluster," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 494-521, September.
    8. Czernek-Marszałek, Katarzyna, 2020. "The overembeddedness impact on tourism cooperation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    9. Zhiwei Wang & Hui Sun & Chenxin Ding & Long Xin & Xuechao Xia & Yuanyuan Gong, 2023. "Do Technology Alliance Network Characteristics Promote Ambidextrous Green Innovation? A Perspective from Internal and External Pressures of Firms in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    10. Lorenzo Cassi & Lorenzo Zirulia, 2008. "The opportunity cost of social relations: On the effectiveness of small worlds," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 77-101, February.
    11. Ratinen, Mari & Lund, Peter D., 2014. "Growth strategies of incumbent utilities as contextually embedded: Examples from Denmark, Germany, Finland and Spain," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 81-92.
    12. Gavin Smith & Olivia Vila, 2020. "A National Evaluation of State and Territory Roles in Hazard Mitigation: Building Local Capacity to Implement FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Annukka Berg & Jani Lukkarinen & Kimmo Ollikka, 2020. "‘Sticky’ Policies—Three Country Cases on Long-Term Commitment and Rooting of RE Policy Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Julián Cárdenas, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Business Elite Networks and Redistributive Social Policies in Latin American Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Christian Lechner & Christophe Leyronas, 2009. "Small–Business Group Formation as an Entrepreneurial Development Model," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(3), pages 645-667, May.
    16. Brown, Philip & Roper, Simon, 2017. "Innovation and networks in New Zealand farming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(3), July.
    17. Jae Wook Yoo & Richard Reed & Shung Jae Shin & David J. Lemak, 2009. "Strategic Choice and Performance in Late Movers: Influence of the Top Management Team's External Ties," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 308-335, March.
    18. Kong, Dongmin & Pan, Yue & Tian, Gary Gang & Zhang, Pengdong, 2020. "CEOs' hometown connections and access to trade credit: Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    19. Burt, George & Mackay, David J. & van der Heijden, Kees & Verheijdt, Charlotte, 2017. "Openness disposition: Readiness characteristics that influence participant benefits from scenario planning as strategic conversation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 16-25.
    20. Shahzad Khurram & Sandra Charreire Petit, 2017. "Investigating the Dynamics of Stakeholder Salience: What Happens When the Institutional Change Process Unfolds?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 485-515, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:128:y:2019:i:c:p:735-743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.