IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v44y2020ics2212041620300942.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capturing the value of ecosystem services from silvopastoral systems: Perceptions from selected Italian farms

Author

Listed:
  • Röhrig, Nina
  • Hassler, Markus
  • Roesler, Tim

Abstract

Combining livestock and trees in silvopastoral agroforestry systems has shown to be valuable in fostering the provision of ecosystem services. For farmers, these systems provide an opportunity for diversifying their product range. This study assessed if farmers can additionally translate the ecological value into economic benefits. Applying the concepts of global value chain (GVC) and global production network (GPN) analysis, the evolution of value was analysed for eight farms in the Italian regions of Umbria and Lazio following qualitative interviews. Production benefits and ecosystem services resulting from the silvopastoral systems were perceived to contribute to product value either by (i) minimising inputs or (ii) adding value through the marketing of quality attributes such as environmentally friendly production or nutritional value. Although ecological benefits of the systems are recognised by most farmers of this study, few advertise it. Due to a lack of possibilities to label products from silvopastoral systems as such, farmers must rely on close connections to consumers for marketing or use organic certification if selling over greater distances. Designing public payments to reward the provision of ecosystem services directly could make silvopastoral farming more attractive and encourage wider application.

Suggested Citation

  • Röhrig, Nina & Hassler, Markus & Roesler, Tim, 2020. "Capturing the value of ecosystem services from silvopastoral systems: Perceptions from selected Italian farms," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:44:y:2020:i:c:s2212041620300942
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041620300942
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wunder, Sven, 2015. "Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 234-243.
    2. James Murphy & P. Allen & Thomas Stevens & Darryl Weatherhead, 2005. "A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 30(3), pages 313-325, March.
    3. Pandeya, B. & Buytaert, W. & Zulkafli, Z. & Karpouzoglou, T. & Mao, F. & Hannah, D.M., 2016. "A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PB), pages 250-259.
    4. Loomis, John B., 2014. "2013 WAEA Keynote Address: Strategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 39(1), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Farber, Stephen C. & Costanza, Robert & Wilson, Matthew A., 2002. "Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 375-392, June.
    6. Henry Wai-chung Yeung & Neil Coe, 2015. "Toward a Dynamic Theory of Global Production Networks," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 91(1), pages 29-58, January.
    7. Engel, Stefanie & Pagiola, Stefano & Wunder, Sven, 2008. "Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 663-674, May.
    8. Gio, Prana Ugiana & , Suyanto, 2018. "Statistika Nonparametrik dengan SPSS, Minitab dan R," INA-Rxiv 74my8, Center for Open Science.
    9. Neil M. Coe & Peter Dicken & Martin Hess, 2008. "Global production networks: realizing the potential," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 271-295, May.
    10. Henry Wai-chung Yeung & Neil M. Coe, 2015. "Toward a Dynamic Theory of Global Production Networks," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 91(1), pages 29-58, January.
    11. , Santosa, 2018. "Statistika Hospitalitas edisi revisi," OSF Preprints 5c4vb, Center for Open Science.
    12. , Santosa, 2018. "Statistika Hospitalitas," OSF Preprints x7uc4, Center for Open Science.
    13. Lau, F. Din-Houn & Adams, Niall M. & Girolami, Mark A. & Butler, Liam J. & Elshafie, Mohammed Z.E.B., 2018. "The role of statistics in data-centric engineering," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 58-62.
    14. Pagiola, Stefano & Ramirez, Elias & Gobbi, Jose & de Haan, Cees & Ibrahim, Muhammad & Murgueitio, Enrique & Ruiz, Juan Pablo, 2007. "Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 374-385, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ilias Karmiris & Thomas G. Papachristou & Dimitrios Fotakis, 2022. "Abandonment of Silvopastoral Practices Affects the Use of Habitats by the European Hare ( Lepus europaeus )," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Bosshardt, Sara & Sabatier, Rodolphe & Dufils, Arnaud & Navarrete, Mireille, 2022. "Changing perspectives on chicken-pastured orchards for action: A review based on a heuristic model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Low, Guy & Dalhaus, Tobias & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M., 2022. "Reviewing the costs, benefits, and resilience impacts of mixed farming and agroforestry systems on value chains," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322300, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Helena Guimarães, M. & Pinto-Correia, Teresa & de Belém Costa Freitas, Maria & Ferraz-de-Oliveira, Isabel & Sales-Baptista, Elvira & da Veiga, José Francisco Ferragolo & Tiago Marques, J. & Pinto-C, 2023. "Farming for nature in the Montado: the application of ecosystem services in a results-based model," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    5. Low, Guy & Dalhaus, Tobias & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M., 2023. "Mixed farming and agroforestry systems: A systematic review on value chain implications," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Gabriel Carmona & Kai Whiting & Helmut Haberl & Tânia Sousa, 2021. "The use of steel in the United Kingdom's transport sector: A stock–flow–service nexus case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 125-143, February.
    2. Negev, Maya & Sagie, Hila & Orenstein, Daniel E. & Zemah Shamir, Shiri & Hassan, Yousef & Amasha, Hani & Raviv, Orna & Fares, Nasrin & Lotan, Alon & Peled, Yoav & Wittenberg, Lea & Izhaki, Ido, 2019. "Using the ecosystem services framework for defining diverse human-nature relationships in a multi-ethnic biosphere reserve," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    3. Hamilton-Hart, Natasha & Stringer, Christina, 2016. "Upgrading and exploitation in the fishing industry: Contributions of value chain analysis," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 166-171.
    4. Moros-Daza, Adriana & Amaya-Mier, René & Paternina-Arboleda, Carlos, 2020. "Port Community Systems: A structured literature review," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 27-46.
    5. McWilliam, Sarah E. & Kim, Jung Kwan & Mudambi, Ram & Nielsen, Bo Bernhard, 2020. "Global value chain governance: Intersections with international business," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    6. Buckley, Peter J. & Craig, Thomas D. & Mudambi, Ram, 2019. "Time to learn? Assignment duration in global value chain organization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 508-518.
    7. Cédric Durand & David Flacher & Vincent Frigant, 2018. "Étudier les chaînes globales de valeur comme une forme d’organisation industrielle," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 13-34.
    8. Maldonado, Jorge H. & Moreno-Sanchez, Rocio & Henao-Henao, Juan P. & Bruner, Aaron, 2019. "Does exclusion matter in conservation agreements? A case of mangrove users in the Ecuadorian coast using participatory choice experiments," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Kreye, Melissa M. & Adams, Damian C. & Ober, Holly K., 2018. "Protecting Imperiled Wildlife Species on Private Lands: Forest Owner Values and Response to Government Interventions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 254-264.
    10. Giorgos Galanis & Ashok Kumar, 2018. "A dynamic spatial model of global governance structures," Working Papers PKWP1804, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    11. Arriagada, Rodrigo & Villaseñor, Adrián & Rubiano, Eliana & Cotacachi, David & Morrison, Judith, 2018. "Analysing the impacts of PES programmes beyond economic rationale: Perceptions of ecosystem services provision associated to the Mexican case," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 116-127.
    12. Fuenfschilling, Lea & Binz, Christian, 2018. "Global socio-technical regimes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 735-749.
    13. Smorodinskaya, Nataliya V. (Смородинская, Наталья В.) & Katukov, Daniel D. (Катуков, Даниил), 2017. "Dispersed Model of Production and Smart Agenda of National Economic Strategies [Распределенное Производство И «Умная» Повестка Национальных Экономических Стратегий]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 72-101, December.
    14. Ron Boschma, 2021. "Global Value Chains from an Evolutionary Economic Geography perspective: a research agenda," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2134, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2021.
    15. John Pickles & Stephanie Barrientos & Peter Knorringa, 2016. "New end markets, supermarket expansion and shifting social standards," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(7), pages 1284-1301, July.
    16. Neilson, Jeffrey & Dwiartama, Angga & Fold, Niels & Permadi, Dikdik, 2020. "Resource-based industrial policy in an era of global production networks: Strategic coupling in the Indonesian cocoa sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Goldstein, Benjamin & Newell, Joshua P., 2020. "How to track corporations across space and time," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Ellalee, Haider & Alali, Walid Y., 2018. "FDI, Industrial Policy and Employment Impacts on Brexit," MPRA Paper 117507, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Oct 2018.
    19. Kim, Jinhee & Lee, Keun, 2022. "Local–global interface as a key factor in the catching up of regional innovation systems: Fast versus slow catching up among Taipei, Shenzhen, and Penang in Asia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Rodríguez-Ortega, T. & Olaizola, A.M. & Bernués, A., 2018. "A novel management-based system of payments for ecosystem services for targeted agri-environmental policy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PA), pages 74-84.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:44:y:2020:i:c:s2212041620300942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.