Download Info

To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info

Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Ecological Economics.

Volume (Year): 20 (1997)
Issue (Month): 3 (March)
Pages: 199-207
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:20:y:1997:i:3:p:199-207

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Heidi Boesdal).

Related research

Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

1. Ando, Amy W. & Shah, Payal, 2009. "Demand-Side Factors in Optimal Land Conservation Choice," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49209, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. [Downloadable!]
2. Maskey, Vishakha & Brown, Cheryl & Collins, Alan R. & Nassar, Hala F., 2007. "What Is Historic Integrity Worth to the General Public? Evidence from a Proposed Relocation of a West Virginia Agricultural Mill," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 36(1), April. [Downloadable!]
3. Danny Campbell & Riccardo Scarpa & W. Hutchinson, 2008. "Assessing the spatial dependence of welfare estimates obtained from discrete choice experiments," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 117-126, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   Other versions:
   • Danny Campbell & Riccardo Scarpa & W. Hutchinson, 2008. "Assessing the spatial dependence of welfare estimates obtained from discrete choice experiments," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 117-126, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
4. Giovanni B Concu, 2004. "Effects of distance on non-use values," Working Paper CRENoS 200411, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia. [Downloadable!]
5. John Rolfe & Wang Xuehong, 2008. "Exploring Scope and Scale Issues in Choice Modelling Design," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 0807, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School, Australian National University. [Downloadable!]
6. Salvador Del Saz-Salazar & Leandro Garcia-Menendez, 2001. "Willingness to Pay for Environmental Improvements in a Large City Evidence from The Spike Model and From a Non-Parametric Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 20(2), pages 103-112, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
7. Jette Jacobsen & Nick Hanley, 2009. "Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation?," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 43(2), pages 137-160, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   Other versions:
   • Hanley, Nick & Jacobsen, Jette, 2008. "Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation?," Stirling Economics Discussion Papers 2008-03, University of Stirling, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
8. Robert Deacon & Felix Schläpfer, 2007. "The spatial range of public goods revealed through referendum voting," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series 05-07, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara. [Downloadable!]
9. Kasia Mazur & Jeff Bennett, 2009. "Location differences in communities’ preferences for environmental improvements in selected NSW catchments: A Choice Modelling approach," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 0921, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School, Australian National University. [Downloadable!]
10. Giovanni B Concu, 2004. "A choice modelling approach to investigate biases in individual and aggregated benefit estimates due to omission of distance," Working Paper CRENoS 200412, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia. [Downloadable!]
11. Campbell, Danny & Sinclair, Victoria, 2008. "Mapping preferences for the restoration of environmental damage caused by illegal dumping," 82nd Annual Conference, March 31 - April 2, 2008, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, UK 36772, Agricultural Economics Society. [Downloadable!]

Did you know? RePEc also has a blog.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-3.