IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v123y2021ics0190740921000025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fidelity and flexibility of care activities in child-centered youth care for children growing up in families experiencing complex and multiple problems

Author

Listed:
  • van Assen, Arjen
  • Knot-Dickscheit, Jana
  • Grietens, Hans
  • Post, Wendy

Abstract

Researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in the field of child and family welfare have emphasized the need for child-centered services for children growing up in families experiencing complex and multiple problems (FECMP). However, the provision of evidence-based services for these children requires knowledge of the care activities of these services. The aim of this study was to investigate care activities and considerations related to the care provision of child-centered care for children growing up in FECMP. To study these care activities and considerations we investigated the care process of a program called Child and Youth Coaching. Hybrid coding was used to identify and compare care activities from multiple sources. In the first phase of analysis a coding scheme of care activities was derived from the program manual. Secondly, these care activities were identified from practice using daily care reports, intake forms, and interviews with coaches and the developers of the intervention. During this stage additional care activities were identified from practice. All care activities were compared across sources to assess whether care provision in practice adhered to the program manual (fidelity), and to investigate whether care provision varied across cases (flexibility). Furthermore, considerations that played a role in care provision were identified (considerations). The results showed treatment fidelity for most care activities. However, some treatment standards were only broadly defined in the program manual. Flexibility in treatment was mainly observed in the adaptation of problem assessment to the capabilities and interests of the child. Overall, Child and Youth Coaching promoted child participation by focusing on children’s perspectives in problem assessment, setting care goals, and determining care activities. However, several barriers to child participation were identified such as non-disclosure about the family situation, young age, and a lack of motivation. Although children experiencing these barriers to participation need additional attention in future intervention development and research, we conclude Child and Youth Coaching is a promising program in promoting the participation and wellbeing of children growing up in FECMP.

Suggested Citation

  • van Assen, Arjen & Knot-Dickscheit, Jana & Grietens, Hans & Post, Wendy, 2021. "Fidelity and flexibility of care activities in child-centered youth care for children growing up in families experiencing complex and multiple problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:123:y:2021:i:c:s0190740921000025
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.105923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740921000025
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.105923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Visscher, L. & Evenboer, K.E. & Jansen, D.E.M.C. & Scholte, R.H.J. & Knot-Dickscheit, J. & Veerman, J.W. & Reijneveld, S.A. & van Yperen, T.A., 2018. "Identifying practice and program elements of interventions for families with multiple problems: The development of a taxonomy," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 64-70.
    2. Alberth, Lars & Bühler-Niederberger, Doris, 2015. "Invisible children? Professional bricolage in child protection," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 149-158.
    3. Thoburn, June & Cooper, Neil & Brandon, Marian & Connolly, Sara, 2013. "The place of “think family” approaches in child and family social work: Messages from a process evaluation of an English pathfinder service," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 228-236.
    4. Veerman, Jan W. & van Yperen, Tom A., 2007. "Degrees of freedom and degrees of certainty: A developmental model for the establishment of evidence-based youth care," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 212-221, May.
    5. Visscher, L. & Evenboer, K.E. & Scholte, R.H.J. & van Yperen, T.A. & Knot-Dickscheit, J. & Jansen, D.E.M.C. & Reijneveld, S.A., 2020. "Elucidating care for families with multiple problems in routine practice: Self-registered practice and program elements of practitioners," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    6. Laura Michelini, 2012. "Social Innovation and New Business Models," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-32150-4, October.
    7. Laura Michelini & Daniela Fiorentino, 2012. "New business models for creating shared value," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(4), pages 561-577, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Visscher, L. & Jansen, D.E.M.C. & Scholte, R.H.J. & van Yperen, T.A. & Evenboer, K.E. & Reijneveld, S.A., 2022. "Elements of care that matter: Perspectives of families with multiple problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Brunella Arru, 2015. "Indagine sulla comunicazione della responsabilit? sociale delle societ? quotate italiane," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(4), pages 15-46.
    3. Marcineková, Tatiana & Borbélyová, Diana & Tirpáková, Anna, 2020. "Optimization of children’s transition from preschool and family environment to the first grade of primary school in Slovakia by implementation of an adaptation programme," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Richard W. Butler & Adam R. Szromek, 2019. "Incorporating the Value Proposition for Society with Business Models of Health Tourism Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Vikas Kumar, 2020. "Social Innovation for Agricultural Development: A Study of System of Rice Intensification in Bihar, India," Millennial Asia, , vol. 11(1), pages 99-118, April.
    6. Kuklytė Jūratė & Vveinhardt Jolita, 2017. "Maximization of Created Social Value: Social Business Models and Their Application Tendencies in Lithuania," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 77(1), pages 57-79, June.
    7. Shah, Muhammad Umair & Guild, Paul D., 2022. "Stakeholder engagement strategy of technology firms: A review and applied view of stakeholder theory," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    8. Wenyuan Li & Mohammed Abubakari Sadick & Abdul-Aziz Ibn Musah & Salisu Mustapha, 2018. "The Moderating Effect of Social Innovation in Perspectives of Shared Value Creation in the Educational Sector of Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, November.
    9. Parthasarathy, Balaji & Dey, Supriya & Gupta, Pranjali, 2021. "Overcoming wicked problems and institutional voids for social innovation: University-NGO partnerships in the Global South," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Aleksander Pabian & Katarzyna Bilińska-Reformat, 2021. "The Potential and Need to Implement the New Concept of Social Innovation into the Management Practice of Modern Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-12, October.
    11. Alijani, Sharam & Karyotis, Catherine, 2019. "Coping with impact investing antagonistic objectives: A multistakeholder approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 10-17.
    12. Guo, Su & Guan, Shanshan & Yan, Xiaoqian, 2021. "Effects of early learning environment on early childhood development in rural areas in China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    13. Dongmin Lee & Junghoon Moon & Young Chan Choe & Jaeseok Jeong, 2016. "Impacts of Socially Responsible Corporate Activities on Korean Consumers’ Corporate Evaluations in the Agrifood Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Leonieke Boendermaker & Erwin Landman, 2022. "Video Feedback to Enhance Fidelity in Practice-Based Interventions for Young People, a Small-n Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    15. Iris Rickhoff-Fischer & Christoph Schank & Arne Ortland, 2021. "Is Corporate Social Entrepreneurship a (So Far) Missed Opportunity for Higher Education Institutions? Evidence from Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Gabriel, Thomas, 2023. "The child – Object or subject of child care?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Bühler-Niederberger, Doris & Alberth, Lars, 2023. "Struggling for open awareness – Trajectories of violence against children from a sociological perspective," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    18. Nadia Preghenella & Cinzia Battistella, 2021. "Exploring business models for sustainability: A bibliographic investigation of the literature and future research directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2505-2522, July.
    19. Joaquin Sanchez-Planelles & Marival Segarra-Oña & Angel Peiro-Signes, 2020. "Building a Theoretical Framework for Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen & Wencke Gwozdz & Kerli Kant Hvass, 2018. "Exploring the Relationship Between Business Model Innovation, Corporate Sustainability, and Organisational Values within the Fashion Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 267-284, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:123:y:2021:i:c:s0190740921000025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.