IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i1p21582440211069387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Video Feedback to Enhance Fidelity in Practice-Based Interventions for Young People, a Small-n Study

Author

Listed:
  • Leonieke Boendermaker
  • Erwin Landman

Abstract

Competent delivery of interventions in child and youth social care is important, due to the direct effect on client outcomes. This is acknowledged in evidence-based interventions (EBI) when, post-training, continued support is available to ensure competent delivery of the intervention. In addition to EBI, practice-based interventions (PBI) are used in the Netherlands. The current paper discusses to what extent competent delivery of PBI can be influenced by introducing supervision for professionals. This study used a mixed-method design: (1) A small- n study consisting of six participants in a non-concurrent multiple baseline design (MBL). Professionals were asked to record conversations with clients during a baseline period (without supervision) and an intervention period (with supervision). Visual inspection, the non-overlap of all pairs (NAP), and the Combinatorial Inference Technique (CIT) scores were calculated. (2) Qualitative interviews with the six participants, two supervisors, and one lead supervisor focused on the feasibility of the supervision. Four of six professionals showed improvement in treatment fidelity or one of its sub-scales. Had all participants shown progress, this could have been interpreted as an indication that targeted support of professionals contributes to increasing treatment integrity. Interviews have shown that supervision increased the professionals’ enthusiasm, self-confidence, and awareness of working with the core components of the intervention. The study has shown that supervision can be created for PBI and that this stimulates professionals to work with the core components of the intervention. The heterogeneous findings on intervention fidelity can be the result of supervision being newly introduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonieke Boendermaker & Erwin Landman, 2022. "Video Feedback to Enhance Fidelity in Practice-Based Interventions for Young People, a Small-n Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:21582440211069387
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211069387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211069387
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211069387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veerman, Jan W. & van Yperen, Tom A., 2007. "Degrees of freedom and degrees of certainty: A developmental model for the establishment of evidence-based youth care," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 212-221, May.
    2. Akin, Becci A., 2016. "Practitioner views on the core functions of coaching in the implementation of an evidence-based intervention in child welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 159-168.
    3. Visscher, L. & Evenboer, K.E. & Jansen, D.E.M.C. & Scholte, R.H.J. & Knot-Dickscheit, J. & Veerman, J.W. & Reijneveld, S.A. & van Yperen, T.A., 2018. "Identifying practice and program elements of interventions for families with multiple problems: The development of a taxonomy," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 64-70.
    4. Brady, Bernadine & Canavan, John & Redmond, Susan, 2016. "Bridging the gap: Using Veerman and Van Yperen’s (2007) framework to conceptualise and develop evidence informed practice in an Irish youth work organisation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 128-133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Assen, Arjen & Knot-Dickscheit, Jana & Grietens, Hans & Post, Wendy, 2021. "Fidelity and flexibility of care activities in child-centered youth care for children growing up in families experiencing complex and multiple problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Veerman, Jan W. & De Meyer, Ronald E., 2015. "Consistency of outcomes of home-based family treatment in The Netherlands as an indicator of effectiveness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 113-119.
    3. Brady, Bernadine & Canavan, John & Redmond, Susan, 2016. "Bridging the gap: Using Veerman and Van Yperen’s (2007) framework to conceptualise and develop evidence informed practice in an Irish youth work organisation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 128-133.
    4. Brook, Jody & Akin, Becci, 2019. "Using theory of change as a framework for examining community context and philanthropic impact," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Tatiana Casado & Joan Albert Riera & Josefa Cardona, 2020. "Social Work with Families in Special Distress: Collaborative Practices," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Visscher, L. & Evenboer, K.E. & Scholte, R.H.J. & van Yperen, T.A. & Knot-Dickscheit, J. & Jansen, D.E.M.C. & Reijneveld, S.A., 2020. "Elucidating care for families with multiple problems in routine practice: Self-registered practice and program elements of practitioners," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Agans, Jennifer P. & Maley, Mary & Rainone, Nicolette & Cope, Marie & Turner, Andrew & Eckenrode, John & Pillemer, Karl, 2020. "Evaluating the evidence for youth outcomes in 4-H: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Schalock, Robert L. & Verdugo, Miguel Angel & Gomez, Laura E., 2011. "Evidence-based practices in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: An international consensus approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 273-282, August.
    9. Chiu, Yu-Ling & Cross, Theodore P., 2020. "How a training team delivers simulation training of child protection investigators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Nijhof, Karin S. & Veerman, Jan W. & Engels, Rutger C.M.E. & Scholte, Ron H.J., 2011. "Compulsory residential care: An examination of treatment improvement of individual and family functioning," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1779-1785, October.
    11. Kaz de Jong & Cono Ariti & Saskia van der Kam & Trudy Mooren & Leslie Shanks & Giovanni Pintaldi & Rolf Kleber, 2016. "Monitoring and Evaluating Psychosocial Intervention Outcomes in Humanitarian Aid," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Schalock, Robert L. & Lee, Tim & Verdugo, Miguel & Swart, Kees & Claes, Claudia & van Loon, Jos & Lee, Chun-Shin, 2014. "An evidence-based approach to organization evaluation and change in human service organizations evaluation and program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 110-118.
    13. Schalock, Robert L. & Bonham, Gordon S. & Verdugo, Miguel A., 2008. "The conceptualization and measurement of quality of life: Implications for program planning and evaluation in the field of intellectual disabilities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 181-190, May.
    14. Visscher, L. & Jansen, D.E.M.C. & Scholte, R.H.J. & van Yperen, T.A. & Evenboer, K.E. & Reijneveld, S.A., 2022. "Elements of care that matter: Perspectives of families with multiple problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Dauber, Sarah & John, Tiffany & Hogue, Aaron & Nugent, Jessica & Hernandez, Gina, 2017. "Development and implementation of a screen-and-refer approach to addressing maternal depression, substance use, and intimate partner violence in home visiting clients," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 157-167.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:21582440211069387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.