IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v52y2008i11p5014-5021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A reinvestigation of robust scale estimation in finite samples

Author

Listed:
  • Randal, John A.

Abstract

This paper reworks and expands on the results of existing simulation studies, investigating the performance of various robust estimators of scale for Tukey's three corner distributions. We focus attention on the popular biweight A-estimator, but also propose a new estimator based on the Student's t-distribution, which attains an efficiency close to that of the A-estimator. We investigate the use of more efficient auxiliary location and scale estimators in two-pass estimators such as the A- and t-estimators, and find overall efficiency can be improved. Using much larger simulation sizes than previous studies, significant departures from existing efficiencies are obtained, and these lead to different recommendations for estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Randal, John A., 2008. "A reinvestigation of robust scale estimation in finite samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(11), pages 5014-5021, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:52:y:2008:i:11:p:5014-5021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00227-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Simon, 1976. "Computer Simulation Swindles, with Applications to Estimates of Location and Dispersion," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 25(3), pages 266-274, November.
    2. Tobias Rydén & Timo Teräsvirta & Stefan Åsbrink, 1998. "Stylized facts of daily return series and the hidden Markov model," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 217-244.
    3. Randal, John A. & Thomson, P.J.Peter J., 2004. "Maximum likelihood estimation for Tukey's three corners," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 677-687, July.
    4. R. Cont, 2001. "Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 223-236.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Van Aelst, Stefan & Willems, Gert & Zamar, Ruben H., 2013. "Robust and efficient estimation of the residual scale in linear regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 278-296.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krishnamurthy, Vikram & Leoff, Elisabeth & Sass, Jörn, 2018. "Filterbased stochastic volatility in continuous-time hidden Markov models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 1-21.
    2. Davi Valladão & Thuener Silva & Marcus Poggi, 2019. "Time-consistent risk-constrained dynamic portfolio optimization with transactional costs and time-dependent returns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 379-405, November.
    3. Laurie Davies & Walter Kraemer, 2016. "Stylized Facts and Simulating Long Range Financial Data," CESifo Working Paper Series 5796, CESifo.
    4. Antonio Díaz & Gonzalo García-Donato & Andrés Mora-Valencia, 2017. "Risk quantification in turmoil markets," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 202-224, August.
    5. Emilio Cardona & Andrés Mora-Valencia & Daniel Velásquez-Gaviria, 2019. "Testing expected shortfall: an application to emerging market stock indices," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 153-182, September.
    6. Focardi, Sergio M. & Fabozzi, Frank J. & Mazza, Davide, 2019. "Modeling local trends with regime shifting models with time-varying probabilities," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Wang, Yudong & Wu, Chongfeng & Yang, Li, 2016. "Forecasting crude oil market volatility: A Markov switching multifractal volatility approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 1-9.
    8. Haas, Markus, 2009. "Persistence in volatility, conditional kurtosis, and the Taylor property in absolute value GARCH processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(15), pages 1674-1683, August.
    9. Vikram Krishnamurthy & Elisabeth Leoff & Jorn Sass, 2016. "Filterbased Stochastic Volatility in Continuous-Time Hidden Markov Models," Papers 1602.05323, arXiv.org.
    10. Oscar Espinosa & Fabio Nieto, 2020. "A study on the leverage effect on financial series using a TAR model: a Bayesian approach," Papers 2002.05319, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2020.
    11. Walter Kraemer, 2016. "A Neglected Semi-Stylized Fact of Daily Stock Returns," CESifo Working Paper Series 5806, CESifo.
    12. Liu, Zhenya & Wang, Shixuan, 2017. "Decoding Chinese stock market returns: Three-state hidden semi-Markov model," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 127-149.
    13. Patrick Krieger & Carsten Lausberg & Kristin Wellner, 2018. "Einblicke in die Gründe für nicht-normalverteilte Immobilienrenditen: eine explorative Untersuchung deutscher Wohnimmobilienportfolios [Insights into the reasons for non-normal real estate returns:," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 4(1), pages 49-79, November.
    14. Milan Kumar Das & Anindya Goswami, 2019. "Testing of binary regime switching models using squeeze duration analysis," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(01), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Chen, Ray-Bing & Chen, Ying & Härdle, Wolfgang K., 2014. "TVICA—Time varying independent component analysis and its application to financial data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 95-109.
    16. Abduraimova, Kumushoy, 2022. "Contagion and tail risk in complex financial networks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    17. Josselin Garnier & Knut Sølna, 2018. "Option pricing under fast-varying and rough stochastic volatility," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 489-516, November.
    18. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Julien Kockelkoren & Marc Potters, 2006. "Random walks, liquidity molasses and critical response in financial markets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 115-123.
    19. Juan C. Henao-Londono & Sebastian M. Krause & Thomas Guhr, 2021. "Price response functions and spread impact in correlated financial markets," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(4), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Westerhoff, Frank H. & Dieci, Roberto, 2006. "The effectiveness of Keynes-Tobin transaction taxes when heterogeneous agents can trade in different markets: A behavioral finance approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 293-322, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:52:y:2008:i:11:p:5014-5021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.