IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v280y2020ics0306261920314240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy and economic assessment of distributed renewable gas and electricity generation in a small disadvantaged urban community

Author

Listed:
  • Silverman, Rochelle E.
  • Flores, Robert J.
  • Brouwer, Jack

Abstract

A methodology for assessing the efficiency and economic viability of renewable gas generation and energy conversion to compliment residential PV is proposed and demonstrated for the 10,000 resident example community of Oak View in Huntington Beach, California. Renewable fuel production processes included in this work are (1) processing of community-produced organic fraction of municipal solid waste in an anaerobic digester, and (2) using solar generation paired with water electrolysis. Six pathways – three ending in natural gas pipeline injection and three ending in solid oxide fuel cell electricity production – were evaluated for each PV capacity scenario. The renewable fuel production potential based only upon waste from the studied community was determined to be 2400 MMBtu per year of renewable natural gas (RNG) from anaerobic digestion, and up to 28,500 MMBtu of hydrogen from electrolysis using only excess solar PV electricity. With current costs the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for renewable fuel production is $40–203/MMBtu, depending upon the energy pathway and scale. The LCOE for renewable electricity production is $0.37–1.28/kWh. A combination of LCFS and tipping fees as low as $20 per ton can yield renewable fuel at $2 per MMBtu. Likewise, a tipping fee of $32 can lead to the production of renewable electricity at $0.18 per kWh. Using future costs, the unsubsidized cost of electricity can drop as low as $0.15 per kWh, and renewable fuel can be produced at $18 per MMBtu. If Low Carbon Fuel Credits exist in 2050, a tipping fee of less than $9 per ton can yield renewable fuel at $2 per MMBtu. On an energy basis, over 80% of the community electrical demand can be met through a combination of local solar PV, anaerobic digestion, and fuel cell operation (80% zero net electricity). In this scenario, solar PV meets 52% of the community electrical load, while excess solar production produces hydrogen that is passed through a fuel cell to meet 26% of the electrical load. The remaining 3% is met using RNG produced through anaerobic digestion using only organic waste from the studied community. This analysis indicates that the production of renewable fuel in the urban environment is currently not economically feasible but will become competitive with conventional energy in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Silverman, Rochelle E. & Flores, Robert J. & Brouwer, Jack, 2020. "Energy and economic assessment of distributed renewable gas and electricity generation in a small disadvantaged urban community," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:280:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920314240
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920314240
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mashayekh, Salman & Stadler, Michael & Cardoso, Gonçalo & Heleno, Miguel, 2017. "A mixed integer linear programming approach for optimal DER portfolio, sizing, and placement in multi-energy microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 154-168.
    2. Obi, Manasseh & Bass, Robert, 2016. "Trends and challenges of grid-connected photovoltaic systems – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1082-1094.
    3. Keirstead, James & Samsatli, Nouri & Shah, Nilay & Weber, Céline, 2012. "The impact of CHP (combined heat and power) planning restrictions on the efficiency of urban energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 93-103.
    4. Geller, Howard & Harrington, Philip & Rosenfeld, Arthur H. & Tanishima, Satoshi & Unander, Fridtjof, 2006. "Polices for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experience in OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 556-573, March.
    5. Parker, Nathan & Williams, Robert & Dominguez-Faus, Rosa & Scheitrum, Daniel, 2017. "Renewable natural gas in California: An assessment of the technical and economic potential," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 235-245.
    6. van der Horst, Dan, 2007. "NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2705-2714, May.
    7. Zoulias, E.I. & Lymberopoulos, N., 2007. "Techno-economic analysis of the integration of hydrogen energy technologies in renewable energy-based stand-alone power systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 680-696.
    8. Keirstead, James & Jennings, Mark & Sivakumar, Aruna, 2012. "A review of urban energy system models: Approaches, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 3847-3866.
    9. Umberto Di Matteo & Benedetto Nastasi & Angelo Albo & Davide Astiaso Garcia, 2017. "Energy Contribution of OFMSW (Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste) to Energy-Environmental Sustainability in Urban Areas at Small Scale," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Papurello, Davide & Lanzini, Andrea & Tognana, Lorenzo & Silvestri, Silvia & Santarelli, Massimo, 2015. "Waste to energy: Exploitation of biogas from organic waste in a 500 Wel solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stack," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 145-158.
    11. Sun, Qie & Li, Hailong & Yan, Jinying & Liu, Longcheng & Yu, Zhixin & Yu, Xinhai, 2015. "Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 521-532.
    12. Tabasová, Andrea & Kropáč, Jiří & Kermes, Vít & Nemet, Andreja & Stehlík, Petr, 2012. "Waste-to-energy technologies: Impact on environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 146-155.
    13. He, Lixia & English, Burton C. & Menard, Robert J. & Lambert, Dayton M., 2016. "Regional woody biomass supply and economic impacts from harvesting in the southern U.S," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 151-161.
    14. Parra, David & Norman, Stuart A. & Walker, Gavin S. & Gillott, Mark, 2017. "Optimum community energy storage for renewable energy and demand load management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 358-369.
    15. Darghouth, Naïm R. & Barbose, Galen & Wiser, Ryan, 2011. "The impact of rate design and net metering on the bill savings from distributed PV for residential customers in California," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5243-5253, September.
    16. Omu, Akomeno & Hsieh, Shanshan & Orehounig, Kristina, 2016. "Mixed integer linear programming for the design of solar thermal energy systems with short-term storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 313-326.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lim, Juin Yau & Safder, Usman & How, Bing Shen & Ifaei, Pouya & Yoo, Chang Kyoo, 2021. "Nationwide sustainable renewable energy and Power-to-X deployment planning in South Korea assisted with forecasting model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    2. Liu, Jia & Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Shan, Kui, 2021. "Hybrid renewable energy applications in zero-energy buildings and communities integrating battery and hydrogen vehicle storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mancarella, Pierluigi, 2014. "MES (multi-energy systems): An overview of concepts and evaluation models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-17.
    2. Flores, Robert J. & Brouwer, Jacob, 2018. "Optimal design of a distributed energy resource system that economically reduces carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 119-138.
    3. Gabrielli, Paolo & Gazzani, Matteo & Mazzotti, Marco, 2018. "Electrochemical conversion technologies for optimal design of decentralized multi-energy systems: Modeling framework and technology assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 557-575.
    4. Lane, Blake & Kinnon, Michael Mac & Shaffer, Brendan & Samuelsen, Scott, 2022. "Deployment planning tool for environmentally sensitive heavy-duty vehicles and fueling infrastructure," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    5. To, Thanh & Heleno, Miguel & Valenzuela, Alan, 2022. "Risk-constrained multi-period investment model for Distributed Energy Resources considering technology costs and regulatory uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    6. Scheller, Fabian & Bruckner, Thomas, 2019. "Energy system optimization at the municipal level: An analysis of modeling approaches and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 444-461.
    7. Gabrielli, Paolo & Gazzani, Matteo & Martelli, Emanuele & Mazzotti, Marco, 2018. "Optimal design of multi-energy systems with seasonal storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 408-424.
    8. Wouters, Carmen & Fraga, Eric S. & James, Adrian M., 2015. "An energy integrated, multi-microgrid, MILP (mixed-integer linear programming) approach for residential distributed energy system planning – A South Australian case-study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 30-44.
    9. Li, Qi & Xiao, Xukang & Pu, Yuchen & Luo, Shuyu & Liu, Hong & Chen, Weirong, 2023. "Hierarchical optimal scheduling method for regional integrated energy systems considering electricity-hydrogen shared energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    10. Omu, Akomeno & Choudhary, Ruchi & Boies, Adam, 2013. "Distributed energy resource system optimisation using mixed integer linear programming," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 249-266.
    11. Yang, Dongfeng & Jiang, Chao & Cai, Guowei & Yang, Deyou & Liu, Xiaojun, 2020. "Interval method based optimal planning of multi-energy microgrid with uncertain renewable generation and demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    12. Rieder, Andreas & Christidis, Andreas & Tsatsaronis, George, 2014. "Multi criteria dynamic design optimization of a small scale distributed energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 230-239.
    13. Heendeniya, Charitha Buddhika & Sumper, Andreas & Eicker, Ursula, 2020. "The multi-energy system co-planning of nearly zero-energy districts – Status-quo and future research potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    14. Scheller, Fabian & Burgenmeister, Balthasar & Kondziella, Hendrik & Kühne, Stefan & Reichelt, David G. & Bruckner, Thomas, 2018. "Towards integrated multi-modal municipal energy systems: An actor-oriented optimization approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 2009-2023.
    15. Oliva H., Sebastian, 2017. "Residential energy efficiency and distributed generation - Natural partners or competition?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 932-940.
    16. Klemm, Christian & Vennemann, Peter, 2021. "Modeling and optimization of multi-energy systems in mixed-use districts: A review of existing methods and approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Di Maria, Francesco & Sisani, Federico & Norouzi, Omid & Mersky, Ronald L., 2019. "The effectiveness of anaerobic digestion of bio-waste in replacing primary energies: An EU28 case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 347-354.
    18. Heleno, Miguel & Sehloff, David & Coelho, Antonio & Valenzuela, Alan, 2020. "Probabilistic impact of electricity tariffs on distribution grids considering adoption of solar and storage technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    19. Theo, Wai Lip & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2017. "Review of distributed generation (DG) system planning and optimisation techniques: Comparison of numerical and mathematical modelling methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 531-573.
    20. Jennings, Mark & Fisk, David & Shah, Nilay, 2014. "Modelling and optimization of retrofitting residential energy systems at the urban scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 220-233.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:280:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920314240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.