IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v218y2018icp104-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who gets my flex? An evolutionary game theory analysis of flexibility market dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Coninx, Kristof
  • Deconinck, Geert
  • Holvoet, Tom

Abstract

Maintaining a real time balance between energy consumption and production is challenging when faced with increasing penetration of Renewable Energy Sources (RES) because of the increased variability in generation output. Demand-Side Management (DSM) techniques address this issue by steering consumers’ energy off-take, thereby enabling further penetration of RES. Present paper addresses the problem of overproduction from distribution grid connected wind generation. We present and analyze two business cases in the Belgian-European energy landscape for using upward consumption flexibility to deal with excessive wind power injection. We focus on the perspective of the flexibility providers and the strategic choice they face in choosing the business partner that maximizes their expected financial compensation. Evolutionary game theory is used to model this strategic choice and to provide a framework for quantifying realistic financial compensation bounds based on real world market and wind production data for multiple locations in Belgium. Results show that in a competitive market setting compensation payments for flexible power consumption are higher when dealing with higher wind forecast error levels. These results validate the economic benefits of having accurate wind production forecasts.

Suggested Citation

  • Coninx, Kristof & Deconinck, Geert & Holvoet, Tom, 2018. "Who gets my flex? An evolutionary game theory analysis of flexibility market dynamics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 104-113.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:218:y:2018:i:c:p:104-113
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626191830223X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hiroux, C. & Saguan, M., 2010. "Large-scale wind power in European electricity markets: Time for revisiting support schemes and market designs?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3135-3145, July.
    2. Daniel Friedman, 1998. "On economic applications of evolutionary game theory," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 15-43.
    3. Timur Kuran & William H. Sandholm, 2008. "Cultural Integration and Its Discontents," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 75(1), pages 201-228.
    4. Ueckerdt, Falko & Brecha, Robert & Luderer, Gunnar, 2015. "Analyzing major challenges of wind and solar variability in power systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-10.
    5. repec:hhs:iuiwop:487 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Brijs, Tom & De Vos, Kristof & De Jonghe, Cedric & Belmans, Ronnie, 2015. "Statistical analysis of negative prices in European balancing markets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 53-60.
    7. Lund, Peter D. & Lindgren, Juuso & Mikkola, Jani & Salpakari, Jyri, 2015. "Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 785-807.
    8. Nachbar, J H, 1990. ""Evolutionary" Selection Dynamics in Games: Convergence and Limit Properties," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 19(1), pages 59-89.
    9. Finn, Paddy & Fitzpatrick, Colin, 2014. "Demand side management of industrial electricity consumption: Promoting the use of renewable energy through real-time pricing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 11-21.
    10. Fred Glover, 1989. "Tabu Search---Part I," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 190-206, August.
    11. Jorgen W. Weibull, 1997. "Evolutionary Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262731215, December.
    12. Denholm, Paul & Hand, Maureen, 2011. "Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1817-1830, March.
    13. Paulus, Moritz & Borggrefe, Frieder, 2011. "The potential of demand-side management in energy-intensive industries for electricity markets in Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 432-441, February.
    14. Agastya, Murali, 2004. "Stochastic stability in a double auction," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 203-222, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Jun & Qin, Yanjun & Zhou, Jingyang, 2021. "Incentive policies for prefabrication implementation of real estate enterprises: An evolutionary game theory-based analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Rossi, Iacopo & Traverso, Alberto & Tucker, David, 2019. "SOFC/Gas Turbine Hybrid System: A simplified framework for dynamic simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1543-1550.
    3. Li-cai Lei & Shang Gao & En-yu Zeng, 2020. "Regulation strategies of ride-hailing market in China: an evolutionary game theoretic perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 535-563, September.
    4. Qiyun Huang & Junwu Wang & Mengwei Ye & Shiman Zhao & Xiang Si, 2022. "A Study on the Incentive Policy of China’s Prefabricated Residential Buildings Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Du, Qiang & Wang, Yalei & Pang, Qiaoyu & Hao, Tingting & Zhou, Yuqing, 2023. "The dynamic analysis on low-carbon building adoption under emission trading scheme," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    6. Carlo Schmitt & Felix Gaumnitz & Andreas Blank & Olivier Rebenaque & Théo Dronne & Arnault Martin & Philippe Vassilopoulos & Albert Moser & Fabien Roques, 2021. "Framework for Deterministic Assessment of Risk-Averse Participation in Local Flexibility Markets †," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-34, May.
    7. Weiwei Liu & Jianing Yang, 2018. "The Evolutionary Game Theoretic Analysis for Sustainable Cooperation Relationship of Collaborative Innovation Network in Strategic Emerging Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Wang, Yadong & Wang, Delu & Shi, Xunpeng, 2021. "Exploring the dilemma of overcapacity governance in China's coal industry: A tripartite evolutionary game model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Leng Yi & Fukuda Hiroatsu, 2022. "Incentives for Innovation in Robotics and Automated Construction: Based on a Tripartite Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Hao, Xinyu & Liu, Guangfu & Zhang, Xiaoling & Dong, Liang, 2022. "The coevolution mechanism of stakeholder strategies in the recycled resources industry innovation ecosystem: the view of evolutionary game theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lund, Peter D. & Lindgren, Juuso & Mikkola, Jani & Salpakari, Jyri, 2015. "Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 785-807.
    2. Andrychowicz, Mateusz & Olek, Blazej & Przybylski, Jakub, 2017. "Review of the methods for evaluation of renewable energy sources penetration and ramping used in the Scenario Outlook and Adequacy Forecast 2015. Case study for Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 703-714.
    3. Gallo, A.B. & Simões-Moreira, J.R. & Costa, H.K.M. & Santos, M.M. & Moutinho dos Santos, E., 2016. "Energy storage in the energy transition context: A technology review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 800-822.
    4. Pechmann, Agnes & Shrouf, Fadi & Chonin, Max & Steenhusen, Nanke, 2017. "Load-shifting potential at SMEs manufacturing sites: A methodology and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 431-438.
    5. Blanco, Herib & Faaij, André, 2018. "A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1049-1086.
    6. Heffron, Raphael & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Wagner, Jonathan & Weibelzahl, Martin & Fridgen, Gilbert, 2020. "Industrial demand-side flexibility: A key element of a just energy transition and industrial development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    7. Staffell, Iain & Pfenninger, Stefan, 2018. "The increasing impact of weather on electricity supply and demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 65-78.
    8. Klaucke, Franziska & Hoffmann, Christian & Hofmann, Mathias & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Impact of the chlorine value chain on the demand response potential of the chloralkali process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    9. Chiara Gruden & Irena Ištoka Otković & Matjaž Šraml, 2020. "Neural Networks Applied to Microsimulation: A Prediction Model for Pedestrian Crossing Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Truong, Dinh-Nhat, 2021. "A novel metaheuristic optimizer inspired by behavior of jellyfish in ocean," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 389(C).
    11. Anurag Agarwal, 2009. "Theoretical insights into the augmented-neural-network approach for combinatorial optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 101-117, April.
    12. Waters, George A., 2009. "Chaos in the cobweb model with a new learning dynamic," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1201-1216, June.
    13. Kruyt, Bert & Lehning, Michael & Kahl, Annelen, 2017. "Potential contributions of wind power to a stable and highly renewable Swiss power supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 1-11.
    14. Jenkins, J.D. & Zhou, Z. & Ponciroli, R. & Vilim, R.B. & Ganda, F. & de Sisternes, F. & Botterud, A., 2018. "The benefits of nuclear flexibility in power system operations with renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 872-884.
    15. Sandholm,W.H., 2003. "Excess payoff dynamics, potential dynamics, and stable games," Working papers 5, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    16. Mohammad Javad Feizollahi & Igor Averbakh, 2014. "The Robust (Minmax Regret) Quadratic Assignment Problem with Interval Flows," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 321-335, May.
    17. Nha Vo‐Thanh & Hans‐Peter Piepho, 2023. "Generating designs for comparative experiments with two blocking factors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3574-3585, December.
    18. Сластников С.А., 2014. "Применение Метаэвристических Алгоритмов Для Задачи Маршрутизации Транспорта," Журнал Экономика и математические методы (ЭММ), Центральный Экономико-Математический Институт (ЦЭМИ), vol. 50(1), pages 117-126, январь.
    19. Weibull, Jörgen & Salomonsson, Marcus, 2005. "Natural selection and social preferences," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 588, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 27 Sep 2005.
    20. Antonio Cabrales & Giovanni Ponti, 2000. "Implementation, Elimination of Weakly Dominated Strategies and Evolutionary Dynamics," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 3(2), pages 247-282, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:218:y:2018:i:c:p:104-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.