IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v203y2017icp442-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated working fluid-thermodynamic cycle design of organic Rankine cycle power systems for waste heat recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Cignitti, Stefano
  • Andreasen, Jesper G.
  • Haglind, Fredrik
  • Woodley, John M.
  • Abildskov, Jens

Abstract

Today, some established working fluids are being phased out due to new international regulations on the use of environmentally harmful substances. With an ever-increasing cost to resources, industry wants to converge on improved sustainability through resource recovery, and in particular waste heat recovery. In this paper, an organic Rankine cycle process and its pure working fluid are designed simultaneously for waste heat recovery of the exhaust gas from a marine diesel engine. This approach can overcome design issues caused by the high sensitivity between the fluid and cycle design variables and otherwise high resource demands, which through conventional methods cannot be addressed. The global optimal design was a 1.2MW cycle with 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-octafluorohexane as the new fluid. The fluid has no ozone depletion potential and a global warming potential under the regulatory limit. By using the simultaneous design approach the optimum solution was found in 5.04s, while a decomposed approach found the same solution in 5.77h. However, the decomposed approach provided insights on the correlation between the fluid and cycle design variables by analyzing all possible solutions. It was shown that the high sensitivity between the fluid and cycle design variables was overcome by using the simultaneous approach. Correlation between net power output and the product of the overall heat transfer coefficient and the heat transfer area could further be addressed by employing a new solution strategy including maximum constraints for this product. The use of such constraints resulted in the design of a new fluid (5-chloro-4,5,5-trifluoro-2,3-dimethylpent-2-ene) with a 1.25MW net power output. Finally, a comparison with conventional fluids was shown where 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-octafluorohexane offered an improvement on net power output and economic and environmental metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Cignitti, Stefano & Andreasen, Jesper G. & Haglind, Fredrik & Woodley, John M. & Abildskov, Jens, 2017. "Integrated working fluid-thermodynamic cycle design of organic Rankine cycle power systems for waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 442-453.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:203:y:2017:i:c:p:442-453
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917307651
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin & Zhang, Hongguang & Yang, Fubin, 2017. "A regenerative supercritical-subcritical dual-loop organic Rankine cycle system for energy recovery from the waste heat of internal combustion engines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 574-590.
    2. Arne Stolbjerg Drud, 1994. "CONOPT—A Large-Scale GRG Code," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 207-216, May.
    3. Tchanche, Bertrand F. & Lambrinos, Gr. & Frangoudakis, A. & Papadakis, G., 2011. "Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3963-3979.
    4. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    5. Di Battista, D. & Mauriello, M. & Cipollone, R., 2015. "Waste heat recovery of an ORC-based power unit in a turbocharged diesel engine propelling a light duty vehicle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 109-120.
    6. Jesper Graa Andreasen & Andrea Meroni & Fredrik Haglind, 2017. "A Comparison of Organic and Steam Rankine Cycle Power Systems for Waste Heat Recovery on Large Ships," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Roskosch, Dennis & Atakan, Burak, 2015. "Reverse engineering of fluid selection for thermodynamic cycles with cubic equations of state, using a compression heat pump as example," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 202-212.
    8. Song, Jian & Gu, Chun-wei, 2015. "Performance analysis of a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system with wet steam expansion for engine waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 280-289.
    9. Andreasen, J.G. & Larsen, U. & Knudsen, T. & Pierobon, L. & Haglind, F., 2014. "Selection and optimization of pure and mixed working fluids for low grade heat utilization using organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 204-213.
    10. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moreira, L.F. & Arrieta, F.R.P., 2019. "Thermal and economic assessment of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery in cement plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Zhang, Jiyuan & Tang, Hailong & Chen, Min, 2019. "Linear substitute model-based uncertainty analysis of complicated non-linear energy system performance (case study of an adaptive cycle engine)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 87-108.
    3. Geertsma, R.D. & Visser, K. & Negenborn, R.R., 2018. "Adaptive pitch control for ships with diesel mechanical and hybrid propulsion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 2490-2509.
    4. White, M.T. & Oyewunmi, O.A. & Chatzopoulou, M.A. & Pantaleo, A.M. & Haslam, A.J. & Markides, C.N., 2018. "Computer-aided working-fluid design, thermodynamic optimisation and thermoeconomic assessment of ORC systems for waste-heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1181-1198.
    5. Jesper Graa Andreasen & Martin Ryhl Kærn & Fredrik Haglind, 2019. "Assessment of Methods for Performance Comparison of Pure and Zeotropic Working Fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Li, Xiaoya & Xu, Bin & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn, 2021. "Towards a novel holistic design of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems operating under heat source fluctuations and intermittency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    7. Wang, Enhua & Mao, Jingwen & Zhang, Bo & Wang, Yongzhen, 2023. "On the CAMD method based on PC-SAFT for working fluid design of a high-temperature organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    8. Fanxiao, Meng & Enhua, Wang & Bo, Zhang, 2021. "Possibility of optimal efficiency prediction of an organic Rankine cycle based on molecular property method for high-temperature exhaust gases," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    9. van Kleef, Luuk M.T. & Oyewunmi, Oyeniyi A. & Markides, Christos N., 2019. "Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power systems in waste-heat recovery applications using computer-aided molecular design techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Martin T. White & Abdulnaser I. Sayma, 2018. "A Generalised Assessment of Working Fluids and Radial Turbines for Non-Recuperated Subcritical Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Zhang, Zhaoli & Alelyani, Sami M. & Zhang, Nan & Zeng, Chao & Yuan, Yanping & Phelan, Patrick E., 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of a novel sodium hydroxide-water solution absorption refrigeration, heating and power system for low-temperature heat sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 1-12.
    12. Zhang, Bo & Wang, Enhua & Meng, Fanxiao & Zhang, Fujun & Zhao, Changlu, 2020. "Prediction accuracy of thermodynamic properties using PC-SAFT for high-temperature organic Rankine cycle with siloxanes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    13. Schilling, J. & Entrup, M. & Hopp, M. & Gross, J. & Bardow, A., 2021. "Towards optimal mixtures of working fluids: Integrated design of processes and mixtures for Organic Rankine Cycles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    14. Siddiqui, Muhammad Ehtisham & Almatrafi, Eydhah & Bamasag, Ahmad & Saeed, Usman, 2022. "Adoption of CO2-based binary mixture to operate transcritical Rankine cycle in warm regions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1372-1380.
    15. Yang, Can & Wang, Weiye & Xie, Hui, 2019. "An efficiency model and optimal control of the vehicular diesel exhaust heat recovery system using an organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 547-555.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    2. Sánchez, Carlos J.N. & da Silva, Alexandre K., 2018. "Technical and environmental analysis of transcritical Rankine cycles operating with numerous CO2 mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 180-190.
    3. Zhu, Sipeng & Zhang, Kun & Deng, Kangyao, 2020. "A review of waste heat recovery from the marine engine with highly efficient bottoming power cycles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Hoang, Anh Tuan, 2018. "Waste heat recovery from diesel engines based on Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 138-166.
    5. Alklaibi, A.M. & Lior, N., 2021. "Waste heat utilization from internal combustion engines for power augmentation and refrigeration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Steven Lecompte & Oyeniyi A. Oyewunmi & Christos N. Markides & Marija Lazova & Alihan Kaya & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2017. "Case Study of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for Waste Heat Recovery from an Electric Arc Furnace (EAF)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Su, Wen & Zhao, Li & Deng, Shuai, 2017. "Group contribution methods in thermodynamic cycles: Physical properties estimation of pure working fluids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 984-1001.
    8. Zhou, Feng & Joshi, Shailesh N. & Rhote-Vaney, Raphael & Dede, Ercan M., 2017. "A review and future application of Rankine Cycle to passenger vehicles for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1008-1021.
    9. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    10. Satanphol, K. & Pridasawas, W. & Suphanit, B., 2017. "A study on optimal composition of zeotropic working fluid in an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for low grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 326-339.
    11. Lecompte, S. & Huisseune, H. & van den Broek, M. & De Paepe, M., 2015. "Methodical thermodynamic analysis and regression models of organic Rankine cycle architectures for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 60-76.
    12. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    13. Eyerer, Sebastian & Dawo, Fabian & Kaindl, Johannes & Wieland, Christoph & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2019. "Experimental investigation of modern ORC working fluids R1224yd(Z) and R1233zd(E) as replacements for R245fa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 946-963.
    14. Kazemi, Shabnam & Nor, Mohamad Iskandr Mohamad & Teoh, Wen Hui, 2020. "Thermodynamic and economic investigation of an ionic liquid as a new proposed geothermal fluid in different organic Rankine cycles for energy production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    16. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    17. Mat Nawi, Z. & Kamarudin, S.K. & Sheikh Abdullah, S.R. & Lam, S.S., 2019. "The potential of exhaust waste heat recovery (WHR) from marine diesel engines via organic rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 17-31.
    18. Barrera, Julian Esteban & Bazzo, Edson & Kami, Eduardo, 2015. "Exergy analysis and energy improvement of a Brazilian floating oil platform using Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 67-79.
    19. Varma, G.V. Pradeep & Srinivas, T., 2017. "Power generation from low temperature heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 402-414.
    20. Sarkar, Jahar & Bhattacharyya, Souvik, 2015. "Potential of organic Rankine cycle technology in India: Working fluid selection and feasibility study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1618-1625.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:203:y:2017:i:c:p:442-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.