IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v138y2015icp346-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative thermochemical routes for aviation biofuels via alcohols synthesis: Process modeling, techno-economic assessment and comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Atsonios, Konstantinos
  • Kougioumtzis, Michael-Alexander
  • D. Panopoulos, Kyriakos
  • Kakaras, Emmanuel

Abstract

This study presents the conceptual process design for the production of branched paraffins with high carbon number, based on the upgrading of alcohols synthesized from biomass-derived syngas and the economic evaluation and comparison with the Fischer–Tropsh (FT) process and biochemical pathways. Two routes, one based on n-butanol and another on isobutanol upgrading, are described and modeled in ASPENPlus™. The flow sheeting results reveal high performance for both process configurations, resulting in an aviation fuel yield 0.172kg/kgfeedstock and a thermal efficiency of 40.5% in the case of employing a modified Methanol catalyst for the mixed alcohols synthesis (MAS). Such alternative pathways offer higher efficiencies compared to FT synthesis because specific products such as C12+ branched paraffins for jet fuel applications are achieved with higher selectivity in the conversion processes. The water balance at the whole process reveals that the annual demands for fresh water from a 190MWth biorefinery plant are 641,000m3, emerging the water management as an important issue with considerable environmental impacts. Simulations of the overall process show a rather high biomass carbon to product utilization ratio (up to 30%) leading to relative low CO2 emissions. The economic evaluation reveals that the Minimum Jet Fuel Selling Price in a FT plant (1.24€/l jet fuel) is lower than the corresponding price in a MAS plant (1.49€/l and 1.28€/l for cases with different catalysts). The biochemical route based on Acetone–Butanol–Ethanol fermentation is considered as the most economically desirable option (0.82€/l). Moreover, the option of selling organic compounds, which are produced intermediately (i.e. light and heavy olefins, C4 alcohol isomers) via the alcohols’ upgrading processes was proved promising enough for the feasibility of such biorefineries plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Atsonios, Konstantinos & Kougioumtzis, Michael-Alexander & D. Panopoulos, Kyriakos & Kakaras, Emmanuel, 2015. "Alternative thermochemical routes for aviation biofuels via alcohols synthesis: Process modeling, techno-economic assessment and comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 346-366.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:138:y:2015:i:c:p:346-366
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914011064
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murphy, J.D. & McCarthy, K., 2005. "Ethanol production from energy crops and wastes for use as a transport fuel in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 148-166, October.
    2. Fortier, Marie-Odile P. & Roberts, Griffin W. & Stagg-Williams, Susan M. & Sturm, Belinda S.M., 2014. "Life cycle assessment of bio-jet fuel from hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 73-82.
    3. Sudiro, Maria & Bertucco, Alberto, 2009. "Production of synthetic gasoline and diesel fuel by alternative processes using natural gas and coal: Process simulation and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2206-2214.
    4. Fierro, Julio & Gómez, Xiomar & Murphy, Jerry D., 2014. "What is the resource of second generation gaseous transport biofuels based on pig slurries in Spain?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 783-789.
    5. Kumar, Manish & Goyal, Yogesh & Sarkar, Abhijit & Gayen, Kalyan, 2012. "Comparative economic assessment of ABE fermentation based on cellulosic and non-cellulosic feedstocks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 193-204.
    6. Jin, Chao & Yao, Mingfa & Liu, Haifeng & Lee, Chia-fon F. & Ji, Jing, 2011. "Progress in the production and application of n-butanol as a biofuel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 4080-4106.
    7. Vaillancourt, Kathleen & Alcocer, Yuri & Bahn, Olivier & Fertel, Camille & Frenette, Erik & Garbouj, Hichem & Kanudia, Amit & Labriet, Maryse & Loulou, Richard & Marcy, Mathilde & Neji, Yosra & Waaub,, 2014. "A Canadian 2050 energy outlook: Analysis with the multi-regional model TIMES-Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 56-65.
    8. Wang, Tiejun & Li, Kai & Liu, Qiying & Zhang, Qing & Qiu, Songbai & Long, Jinxing & Chen, Lungang & Ma, Longlong & Zhang, Qi, 2014. "Aviation fuel synthesis by catalytic conversion of biomass hydrolysate in aqueous phase," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 775-780.
    9. Chuck, Christopher J. & Donnelly, Joseph, 2014. "The compatibility of potential bioderived fuels with Jet A-1 aviation kerosene," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 83-91.
    10. Hammond, Geoffrey P. & Seth, Shashank M., 2013. "Carbon and environmental footprinting of global biofuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 547-559.
    11. Villanueva Perales, A.L. & Reyes Valle, C. & Ollero, P. & Gómez-Barea, A., 2011. "Technoeconomic assessment of ethanol production via thermochemical conversion of biomass by entrained flow gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4097-4108.
    12. Tonini, Davide & Astrup, Thomas, 2012. "LCA of biomass-based energy systems: A case study for Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 234-246.
    13. Sues, Anna & Juraščík, Martin & Ptasinski, Krzysztof, 2010. "Exergetic evaluation of 5 biowastes-to-biofuels routes via gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 996-1007.
    14. Taylor, Benjamin & Xiao, Ning & Sikorski, Janusz & Yong, Minloon & Harris, Tom & Helme, Tim & Smallbone, Andrew & Bhave, Amit & Kraft, Markus, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of carbon-negative algal biodiesel for transport solutions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 262-274.
    15. Kim, Jiyong & Miller, James E. & Maravelias, Christos T. & Stechel, Ellen B., 2013. "Comparative analysis of environmental impact of S2P (Sunshine to Petrol) system for transportation fuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1089-1098.
    16. Haro, P. & Ollero, P. & Villanueva Perales, A.L. & Reyes Valle, C., 2012. "Technoeconomic assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol production via DME (dimethyl ether) hydrocarbonylation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 891-901.
    17. Reyes Valle, C. & Villanueva Perales, A.L. & Vidal-Barrero, F. & Gómez-Barea, A., 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of biomass-to-ethanol by indirect fluidized bed gasification: Impact of reforming technologies and comparison with entrained flow gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 254-266.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cremonez, Paulo André & Feroldi, Michael & de Araújo, Amanda Viana & Negreiros Borges, Maykon & Weiser Meier, Thompson & Feiden, Armin & Gustavo Teleken, Joel, 2015. "Biofuels in Brazilian aviation: Current scenario and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1063-1072.
    2. Gutiérrez, R.E. & Guerra, K. & Haro, P., 2022. "Exploring the techno-economic feasibility of new bioeconomy concepts: Solar-assisted thermochemical biorefineries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    3. Kargbo, Hannah & Harris, Jonathan Stuart & Phan, Anh N., 2021. "“Drop-in” fuel production from biomass: Critical review on techno-economic feasibility and sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    5. Reyes Valle, C. & Villanueva Perales, A.L. & Vidal-Barrero, F. & Ollero, P., 2015. "Integrated economic and life cycle assessment of thermochemical production of bioethanol to reduce production cost by exploiting excess of greenhouse gas savings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 466-475.
    6. Taylor-de-Lima, Reynaldo L.N. & Gerbasi da Silva, Arthur José & Legey, Luiz F.L. & Szklo, Alexandre, 2018. "Evaluation of economic feasibility under uncertainty of a thermochemical route for ethanol production in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 363-376.
    7. Kächele, Rebecca & Nurkowski, Daniel & Martin, Jacob & Akroyd, Jethro & Kraft, Markus, 2019. "An assessment of the viability of alternatives to biodiesel transport fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Azize Ayol & Luciana Peixoto & Tugba Keskin & Haris Nalakath Abubackar, 2021. "Reactor Designs and Configurations for Biological and Bioelectrochemical C1 Gas Conversion: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-36, November.
    9. Haro, P. & Ollero, P. & Villanueva Perales, A.L. & Gómez-Barea, A., 2013. "Thermochemical biorefinery based on dimethyl ether as intermediate: Technoeconomic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 950-961.
    10. Cruce, Jesse R. & Quinn, Jason C., 2019. "Economic viability of multiple algal biorefining pathways and the impact of public policies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 735-746.
    11. Tanmay Chaturvedi & Ana I. Torres & George Stephanopoulos & Mette Hedegaard Thomsen & Jens Ejbye Schmidt, 2020. "Developing Process Designs for Biorefineries—Definitions, Categories, and Unit Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Ahmad, Salman & Ouenniche, Jamal & Kolosz, Ben W. & Greening, Philip & Andresen, John M. & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes & Xu, Bing, 2021. "A stakeholders’ participatory approach to multi-criteria assessment of sustainable aviation fuels production pathways," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    13. Wafiq, A. & Hanafy, M., 2015. "Feasibility assessment of diesel fuel production in Egypt using coal and biomass: Integrated novel methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 522-533.
    14. Yilmaz, Nadir & Atmanli, Alpaslan, 2017. "Sustainable alternative fuels in aviation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P2), pages 1378-1386.
    15. Ajanovic, Amela & Haas, Reinhard, 2014. "On the future prospects and limits of biofuels in Brazil, the US and EU," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 730-737.
    16. Zhang, Xiaolei & Yan, Song & Tyagi, Rajeshwar D. & Surampalli, RaoY. & Valéro, Jose R., 2014. "Wastewater sludge as raw material for microbial oils production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 192-201.
    17. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Zhang, Chi & Hui, Xin & Lin, Yuzhen & Sung, Chih-Jen, 2016. "Recent development in studies of alternative jet fuel combustion: Progress, challenges, and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 120-138.
    19. Rahimpour, M.R. & Mirvakili, A. & Paymooni, K., 2011. "A novel water perm-selective membrane dual-type reactor concept for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis of GTL (gas to liquid) technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 1223-1235.
    20. Chen Zhang & Lei Luo & Wei Chen & Fei Yang & Gang Luo & Junming Xu, 2022. "Experimental Investigation on the Performance of an Aviation Piston Engine Fueled with Bio-Jet Fuel Prepared via Thermochemical Conversion of Triglyceride," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:138:y:2015:i:c:p:346-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.