IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/anture/v96y2022ics0160738322001098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Turn on instant booking or not? Decisions of rival hosts

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Nan
  • Xu, Nan
  • Feng, Haiyang
  • Li, Minqiang

Abstract

Peer-to-peer accommodation platforms, such as Airbnb, create value by matching hosts and guests. Instant booking services have changed the matching mode and greatly improved the matching efficiency on the accommodation platforms but at the expense of matching quality. This study develops a game-theoretical model to characterize two rival hosts' decisions on turning on instant booking or not and their pricing decisions. We uncover conditions under which the two rival hosts will use instant booking. All hosts turning on instant booking is not always the best market configuration for the platform when the natural matching probability (without instant booking) is relatively high. Management implications are provided to help peer-to-peer accommodation platforms guide hosts in making matching decisions and maximize their profits.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Nan & Xu, Nan & Feng, Haiyang & Li, Minqiang, 2022. "Turn on instant booking or not? Decisions of rival hosts," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:anture:v:96:y:2022:i:c:s0160738322001098
    DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2022.103458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160738322001098
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.annals.2022.103458?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sengupta, Pooja & Biswas, Baidyanath & Kumar, Ajay & Shankar, Ravi & Gupta, Shivam, 2021. "Examining the predictors of successful Airbnb bookings with Hurdle models: Evidence from Europe, Australia, USA and Asia-Pacific cities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 538-554.
    2. Georges Casamatta & Sauveur Giannoni & Daniel Brunstein & Johan Jouve, 2022. "Host type and pricing on Airbnb: Seasonality and perceived market power," Post-Print hal-03250484, HAL.
    3. Ejaz Ghani & William R. Kerr & Christopher Stanton, 2014. "Diasporas and Outsourcing: Evidence from oDesk and India," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1677-1697, July.
    4. Geoffrey G. Parker & Marshall W. Van Alstyne, 2005. "Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(10), pages 1494-1504, October.
    5. Wu, Tian & Zhang, Mengbo & Tian, Xin & Wang, Shouyang & Hua, Guowei, 2020. "Spatial differentiation and network externality in pricing mechanism of online car hailing platform," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 275-283.
    6. Jean-Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2003. "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pages 990-1029, June.
    7. Dmitri Kuksov & J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 2010. "When More Alternatives Lead to Less Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 507-524, 05-06.
    8. Dengpan Liu & Yong Tan & Vijay Mookerjee, 2018. "When Ignorance Can Be Bliss: Organizational Structure and Coordination in Electronic Retailing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 70-83, March.
    9. Liang, Sai & Li, Hui & Liu, Xianwei & Schuckert, Markus, 2019. "Motivators behind information disclosure: Evidence from Airbnb hosts," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 305-319.
    10. Benjamin Edelman & Michael Luca & Dan Svirsky, 2017. "Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Hanna Halaburda & Mikołaj Jan Piskorski & Pınar Yıldırım, 2018. "Competing by Restricting Choice: The Case of Matching Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3574-3594, August.
    12. Jacob, Jagan & Roet-Green, Ricky, 2021. "Ride solo or pool: Designing price-service menus for a ride-sharing platform," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1008-1024.
    13. Davide Proserpio & Wendy Xu & Georgios Zervas, 2018. "You get what you give: theory and evidence of reciprocity in the sharing economy," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 371-407, December.
    14. Bresciani, Stefano & Ferraris, Alberto & Santoro, Gabriele & Premazzi, Katia & Quaglia, Roberto & Yahiaoui, Dorra & Viglia, Giampaolo, 2021. "The seven lives of Airbnb. The role of accommodation types," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Karlsson, Logi & Kemperman, Astrid & Dolnicar, Sara, 2017. "May I sleep in your bed? Getting permission to book," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-12.
    16. Dolnicar, Sara, 2019. "A review of research into paid online peer-to-peer accommodation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 248-264.
    17. Gao, Guang-Xin & Bi, Jian-Wu, 2021. "Hotel booking through online travel agency: Optimal Stackelberg strategies under customer-centric payment service," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Kung, Ling-Chieh & Zhong, Guan-Yu, 2017. "The optimal pricing strategy for two-sided platform delivery in the sharing economy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-12.
    19. Saif Benjaafar & Ming Hu, 2020. "Operations Management in the Age of the Sharing Economy: What Is Old and What Is New?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 93-101, January.
    20. Boysen, Nils & Briskorn, Dirk & Schwerdfeger, Stefan, 2019. "Matching supply and demand in a sharing economy: Classification, computational complexity, and application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 578-595.
    21. Zhu, Hongrui, 2021. "Why a non-discrimination policy upset Airbnb hosts?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Mingyang & Zhao, Daozhi & Gong, Yeming & Rekik, Yacine, 2022. "An on-demand service platform with self-scheduling capacity: Uniform versus multiplier-based pricing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    2. Jun Li & Serguei Netessine, 2020. "Higher Market Thickness Reduces Matching Rate in Online Platforms: Evidence from a Quasiexperiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 271-289, January.
    3. Bruno Jullien & Alessandro Pavan & Marc Rysman, 2021. "Two-sided markets, pricing, and network effects," Post-Print hal-03828345, HAL.
    4. Meijian Yang & Enjun Xia, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review on Pricing Strategies in the Sharing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Sui, Ronghua & Zhang, Xumei & Dan, Bin & Zhang, Haiyue & Liu, Yi, 2023. "Bilateral value-added service investment in platform competition with cross-side network effects under multihoming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 952-963.
    6. De Munck, Thomas & Chevalier, Philippe & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien, 2023. "Managing priorities on on-demand service platforms with waiting time differentiation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    7. Gössling, Stefan & Larson, Mia & Pumputis, Aurimas, 2021. "Mutual surveillance on Airbnb," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Ganfu Wang & Xingzheng Ai & Li Zhong, 2019. "Managing product variety on online platform: Consumer heterogeneity and diseconomies of scope," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Cristiano Codagnone & Fabienne Abadie & Federico Biagi, 2016. "The Future of Work in the ‘Sharing Economy’. Market Efficiency and Equitable Opportunities or Unfair Precarisation?," JRC Research Reports JRC101280, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Lina Wang & Elliot Rabinovich & Timothy J. Richards, 2022. "Scalability in Platforms for Local Groceries: An Examination of Indirect Network Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 318-340, January.
    11. Estelle Malavolti, 2016. "Single Till or Dual Till at airports: a Two-Sided Market Analysis," Post-Print hal-01406372, HAL.
    12. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    13. Esther Gal-Or & Ronen Gal-Or & Nabita Penmetsa, 2018. "The Role of User Privacy Concerns in Shaping Competition Among Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 698-722, September.
    14. Yue Guo & Fu Xin & Xiaotong Li, 2020. "The market impacts of sharing economy entrants: evidence from USA and China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 629-649, September.
    15. Bertin Martens & Frank Mueller-Langer, 2018. "Access to digital car data and competition in aftersales services," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2018-06, Joint Research Centre.
    16. Marco Antonielli & Lapo Filistrucchi, 2011. "Collusion and the political differentiation of newspapers," Working Papers 11-26, NET Institute, revised Nov 2011.
    17. Zhu, Zheng & Xu, Ailing & He, Qiao-Chu & Yang, Hai, 2021. "Competition between the transportation network company and the government with subsidies to public transit riders," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    18. Zhong, Yuanguang & Lan, Yibo & Chen, Zhi & Yang, Jiazi, 2023. "On-demand ride-hailing platforms with heterogeneous quality-sensitive customers: Dedicated system or pooling system?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 247-266.
    19. Wei Zhou & Zidong Wang, 2020. "Competing for Search Traffic in Query Markets: Entry Strategy, Platform Design, and Entrepreneurship," Working Papers 20-12, NET Institute.
    20. Baojun Jiang & Kinshuk Jerath & Kannan Srinivasan, 2011. "Firm Strategies in the "Mid Tail" of Platform-Based Retailing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 757-775, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:anture:v:96:y:2022:i:c:s0160738322001098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of-tourism-research/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.