IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v239y2020ics0378377419314751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The verification of Jevons’ paradox of agricultural Water conservation in Tianshan District of China based on Water footprint

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yanyun
  • Long, Aihua
  • Xiang, Liyun
  • Deng, Xiaoya
  • Zhang, Pei
  • Hai, Yang
  • Wang, Jie
  • Li, Yang

Abstract

Agriculture is the basic unit that safeguards food security in the world and is also the sector that uses the largest amount of water in economic activities. In agriculture, vigorously promoting high-efficiency water conservation in agriculture is regarded as the most important way to solve the water shortage. However, many examples have shown that increases in irrigation efficiency may increase water consumption in a manner similar to that of the "Jevon’s Paradox" during the energy-saving technology progress. The rebound effect has a substantial impact on the effectiveness of water conservation policies. It is of substantial value to understand the rebound effect of irrigation water to effectively conserve agricultural water consumption and to reveal and solve the water conservation dilemma in the dry areas. An empirical case study is presented based on the largest water conservation irrigation area in the Tianshan region (northwest China), an arid area, to test the rebound effect on the water conservation efforts in terms of its blue water footprint, which is also designated irrigation water consumption. Irrigation technology in this region has increased so that more than 47% of the agricultural area utilizes high-efficiency drip irrigation technology since the adoption of modern water conservation technologies in 1996, while flooding was the only type of irrigation previously used in this area. The results illustrate that since the implementation of high-efficiency water conservation irrigation in 1996, the agricultural blue water footprint has continued to rise, and the increase in the southern foothill (referred to as “the south”) is greater than that in the northern foothill (referred to as “the north”) of the Tianshan Mountains. The rebound effect for agricultural water consumption totaled 115% in the Tianshan region during the last 20 years, showing a "backfire phenomenon". It differs substantially in the southern and northern parts of the Tianshan region, totaling approximately 166% in the southern part and 83% in the northern part. The high-efficiency water-conservation and conservation technologies, characterized by drip irrigation systems since 1996, resulted in a significant improvement in productivity and thus, economic gain, while the water consumption per unit area shows no significant decrease. The differences in agricultural water consumption can be related to four main factors: (i) the scale of high efficiency water saving, (ii) the change of cultivated land area, (iii) variation in planting structure, and (iv) the increase of average yield per ha. This study found negative correlations between high efficiency water conservation and moderate intensity of agricultural water consumption. The expansion of the total cultivated land area, the continuous increase in the proportion planted to economic crops and the average yield per ha undoubtedly increased agricultural water consumption. This study concludes that the primary pathways for achieving the resource-based concept of water conservation are to continue to promote more efficient or “water-conservation” irrigation technologies (engineering aspects), jointly consider with water and land allocation (management aspects), adjust the planting structure (policy guidance aspects), and the appropriate pursuit of yield per unit area (agricultural technology aspects).

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yanyun & Long, Aihua & Xiang, Liyun & Deng, Xiaoya & Zhang, Pei & Hai, Yang & Wang, Jie & Li, Yang, 2020. "The verification of Jevons’ paradox of agricultural Water conservation in Tianshan District of China based on Water footprint," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:239:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419314751
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419314751
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brookes, Len, 1990. "The greenhouse effect: the fallacies in the energy efficiency solution," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 199-201, March.
    2. Pfeiffer, Lisa & Lin, C.-Y. Cynthia, 2014. "Does efficient irrigation technology lead to reduced groundwater extraction? Empirical evidence," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 189-208.
    3. Playan, Enrique & Mateos, Luciano, 2006. "Modernization and optimization of irrigation systems to increase water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(1-3), pages 100-116, February.
    4. Raeisi, Leila Goli & Morid, Saeed & Delavar, Majid & Srinivasan, Raghavan, 2019. "Effect and side-effect assessment of different agricultural water saving measures in an integrated framework," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Haida, Christin & Chapagain, Ashok K. & Rauch, Wolfgang & Riede, Maximilian & Schneider, Katrin, 2019. "From water footprint to climate change adaptation: Capacity development with teenagers to save water," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 456-463.
    6. Li, Haoyang & Zhao, Jinhua, 2016. "Rebound Effect of Irrigation Technologies? The Role of Water Rights," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235966, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Al-Ghobari, Hussein M. & Dewidar, Ahmed Z., 2018. "Integrating deficit irrigation into surface and subsurface drip irrigation as a strategy to save water in arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 55-61.
    8. Macarena Dagnino & Frank Ward, 2012. "Economics of Agricultural Water Conservation: Empirical Analysis and Policy Implications," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 577-600.
    9. Berbel, J. & Mateos, L., 2014. "Does investment in irrigation technology necessarily generate rebound effects? A simulation analysis based on an agro-economic model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 25-34.
    10. Adam Loch & David Adamson, 2015. "Drought and the rebound effect: a Murray–Darling Basin example," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1429-1449, December.
    11. Lecina, S. & Isidoro, D. & Playán, E. & Aragüés, R., 2010. "Irrigation modernization and water conservation in Spain: The case of Riegos del Alto Aragón," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1663-1675, October.
    12. Louis Sears & Joseph Caparelli & Clouse Lee & Devon Pan & Gillian Strandberg & Linh Vuu & C. -Y. Cynthia Lin Lawell, 2018. "Jevons’ Paradox and Efficient Irrigation Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Hang & Song, Jianfeng, 2022. "Drivers of the irrigation water rebound effect: A case study of Hetao irrigation district in Yellow River basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Yali Zhao & Min Li, 2020. "Effect of Water-Saving Society Policy on Water Consumption in the Cities of China: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Xinchun Cao & Jianfeng Xiao & Mengyang Wu & Wen Zeng & Xuan Huang, 2021. "Agricultural Water Use Efficiency and Driving Force Assessment to Improve Regional Productivity and Effectiveness," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(8), pages 2519-2535, June.
    4. Zhai, Yijie & Zhang, Tianzuo & Ma, Xiaotian & Shen, Xiaoxu & Ji, Changxing & Bai, Yueyang & Hong, Jinglan, 2021. "Life cycle water footprint analysis of crop production in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    5. Aijun Guo & Rong Zhang & Xiaoyu Song & Fanglei Zhong & Daiwei Jiang & Yuan Song, 2021. "Predicting the Water Rebound Effect in China under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Qian Chen & Jaume Freire González & Donglan Zha, 2023. "The Gap between Expectations and Reality: Assessing the Water Rebound Effect in Chinese Agriculture," Working Papers 1415, Barcelona School of Economics.
    7. Drew, Mark & Crase, Lin, 2023. "‘More Crop per Drop’ and water use efficiency in the National Water Policy of Pakistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    8. Aihua Long & Pei Zhang & Yang Hai & Xiaoya Deng & Junfeng Li & Jie Wang, 2020. "Spatio-Temporal Variations of Crop Water Footprint and Its Influencing Factors in Xinjiang, China during 1988–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Fei, Rilong & Xie, Mengyuan & Wei, Xin & Ma, Ding, 2021. "Has the water rights system reform restrained the water rebound effect? Empirical analysis from China's agricultural sector," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Jianfeng & Guo, Yanan & Wu, Pute & Sun, SHikun, 2018. "The Agricultural Water Rebound Effect in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 497-506.
    2. Hang Xu & Rui Yang & Jianfeng Song, 2021. "Agricultural Water Use Efficiency and Rebound Effect: A Study for China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Fei, Rilong & Xie, Mengyuan & Wei, Xin & Ma, Ding, 2021. "Has the water rights system reform restrained the water rebound effect? Empirical analysis from China's agricultural sector," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    4. Xu, Hang & Song, Jianfeng, 2022. "Drivers of the irrigation water rebound effect: A case study of Hetao irrigation district in Yellow River basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    5. Julio Berbel & Carlos Gutiérrez-Martín & Juan Rodríguez-Díaz & Emilio Camacho & Pilar Montesinos, 2015. "Literature Review on Rebound Effect of Water Saving Measures and Analysis of a Spanish Case Study," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(3), pages 663-678, February.
    6. Berbel, J. & Mateos, L., 2014. "Does investment in irrigation technology necessarily generate rebound effects? A simulation analysis based on an agro-economic model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 25-34.
    7. David Font Vivanco & Jaume Freire‐González & Ray Galvin & Tilman Santarius & Hans Jakob Walnum & Tamar Makov & Serenella Sala, 2022. "Rebound effect and sustainability science: A review," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1543-1563, August.
    8. Fernández García, I. & Rodríguez Díaz, J.A. & Camacho Poyato, E. & Montesinos, P. & Berbel, J., 2014. "Effects of modernization and medium term perspectives on water and energy use in irrigation districts," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 56-63.
    9. Carlos Gómez & C. Pérez-Blanco, 2014. "Simple Myths and Basic Maths About Greening Irrigation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(12), pages 4035-4044, September.
    10. Qian Chen & Jaume Freire González & Donglan Zha, 2023. "The Gap between Expectations and Reality: Assessing the Water Rebound Effect in Chinese Agriculture," Working Papers 1415, Barcelona School of Economics.
    11. Simons, G.W.H. & Bastiaanssen, W.G.M. & Cheema, M.J.M. & Ahmad, B. & Immerzeel, W.W., 2020. "A novel method to quantify consumed fractions and non-consumptive use of irrigation water: Application to the Indus Basin Irrigation System of Pakistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    12. Berbel, Julio & Gutierrez-Marín, Carlos & Expósito, Alfonso, 2018. "Microeconomic analysis of irrigation efficiency improvement in water use and water consumption," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 423-429.
    13. Carles Sanchis-Ibor & Mar Ortega-Reig & Amanda Guillem-García & Juan M. Carricondo & Juan Manzano-Juárez & Marta García-Mollá & Álvaro Royuela, 2021. "Irrigation Post-Modernization. Farmers Envisioning Irrigation Policy in the Region of Valencia (Spain)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Aldaya, Maite M. & Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos & Espinosa-Tasón, Jaime & Ederra, Idoia & Sánchez, Mercedes, 2023. "The impact of the territorial gradient and the irrigation water price on agricultural production along the first phase of the Navarra Canal in Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    15. Carlos Mario Gómez Gómez & C. D. Pérez-Blanco & David Adamson & Adam Loch, 2018. "Managing Water Scarcity at a River Basin Scale with Economic Instruments," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(01), pages 1-31, January.
    16. Xu, Hang & Yang, Rui, 2022. "Does agricultural water conservation policy necessarily reduce agricultural water extraction? Evidence from China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    17. Adam Loch & David Adamson, 2015. "Drought and the rebound effect: a Murray–Darling Basin example," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1429-1449, December.
    18. Julio Berbel & Alfonso Expósito & Carlos Gutiérrez-Martín & Luciano Mateos, 2019. "Effects of the Irrigation Modernization in Spain 2002–2015," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(5), pages 1835-1849, March.
    19. Zhang, Ling & Ma, Qimin & Zhao, Yanbo & Wu, Xiaobo & Yu, Wenjun, 2019. "Determining the influence of irrigation efficiency improvement on water use and consumption by conceptually considering hydrological pathways," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 674-681.
    20. Sebastian Lieder & Christoph Schröter-Schlaack, 2021. "Smart Farming Technologies in Arable Farming: Towards a Holistic Assessment of Opportunities and Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:239:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419314751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.